^^^ At which point Joe says "Yep, I said that. And I still think she'd make a great Vice President - in a Biden Administration."

The wide grins and laughter is simply the newly installed humor module in Hillbot 4.0 kicking in.

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:
The wide grins and laughter is simply the newly installed humor module in Hillbot 4.0 kicking in.

And it already needs a firmware upgrade.....

Damn, Hil. You suck at this.

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:
The wide grins and laughter is simply the newly installed humor module in Hillbot 4.0 kicking in.

On Face The Nation on Sunday, she denied that she is a robot:




Direct Link: https://vine.co/v/ePmlAO9Wttw

BTW, no one believed her.

I heard HC make a joke that Bill Clinton could be her vice president.

As best I understand, Bill Clinton actually could run as her VP.

The 22nd amendment limits being elected to the office of President.

For those who think Hillary is a robot, you may be on to something.


http://www.weeklystandard.com/...n-event_1034043.html

Robot to Be Featured Speaker at Clinton Foundation Event

Among the luminaries appearing this year at the annual meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative, part of the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, are household names such as Bill Gates, actor Ted Danson, Harvard's Lawrence Summers, and ... Pepper?

Pepper, a "social humanoid robot" from Japan, is billed as the "first humanoid robot in the world capable of recognizing universal emotions."

The Clinton Foundation includes Pepper along with his more traditional human counterparts in a list of speakers for the annual gathering that begins later this week.

Run Joe, Run.

It's a slow motion train wreck. The damage is done, and in a month or so when Biden enters the race, that'll be that.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
It's a slow motion train wreck. The damage is done, and in a month or so when Biden enters the race, that'll be that.

If only if only.

Any normal person would be fried by now.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
I heard HC make a joke that Bill Clinton could be her vice president.

As best I understand, Bill Clinton actually could run as her VP.

The 22nd amendment limits being elected to the office of President.

Not as I understand the rules. I.e. the VP must be legally able to assume the presidency.

Since he already served 2 terms, he is ineligible to serve another. Making him ineligible for VP./

quote:

Originally posted by domcintosh:

Any normal person would be fried by now.

Any normal person wouldn't have done what she did, or said what she's said since the story broke.

quote:

Originally posted by domcintosh:

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
It's a slow motion train wreck. The damage is done, and in a month or so when Biden enters the race, that'll be that.

If only if only.

Any normal person would be fried by now.

When Biden enters the race, which Democratic candidate will have the support of the White House? You know the answer, and late last week, Biden's wife told old Joe to run and she will support him.

The handwriting is on the wall.

http://www.breitbart.com/video...e-werent-controlled/

MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” co-host Mika Brzezinski said Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s interview with CBS’ “Face the Nation” was “planned out,”

“she said the State Department authorized it [Hillary’s private server]."

Scarborough then stated, “CBS News knows, if they have any sources at the State Department, CBS News knows, that nobody at the State Department, based on all of our sources at the state department, nobody authorized it. She did it on her own.”

Brzezinski added to this, “It was allowed because she allowed it.”

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:

quote:

Originally posted by domcintosh:

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
It's a slow motion train wreck. The damage is done, and in a month or so when Biden enters the race, that'll be that.

If only if only.

Any normal person would be fried by now.

When Biden enters the race, which Democratic candidate will have the support of the White House? You know the answer, and late last week, Biden's wife told old Joe to run and she will support him.

The handwriting is on the wall.

And the script looks a lot like Obama's... Oh Great - Biden / Patrick 2016, and Patrick / ???? 2020 is the plan.


OBAMA READY TO ENDORSE BIDEN—WITH CONDITIONS

The talk in Democratic Party circles is that Barack Obama has told Joe Biden that he is prepared to endorse him for president if, in return, Biden promises to let Obama have a final say in the choice of his vice presidential running mate.

According to these Democratic sources, Biden is mulling over the president’s conditional offer of support.

In addition, there is speculation among top Democratic sources that Obama has another quid pro quo for his endorsement: he wants Biden to choose an African American as his vice presidential running mate.

In this scenario, which Obama has not yet fully explained to Biden, Biden would promise to serve only one term in the White House, after which he would back his vice president to succeed him.

As Biden’s vice president, Obama is said to favor former Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, a close Obama ally who is the first and only African American to have served as governor of the Bay State.

Obama has already given Biden carte blanche to use Air Force Two, the official vice presidential plane, to crisscross the country and launch an unofficial campaign.

So far, Biden has visited several key primary and general election states and hammered GOP frontrunner Donald Trump, charging that Trump is offering a “sick message” on immigration.

Biden has also courted the Jewish vote, hinting that he will meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

With Obama’s blessing, Biden appeared on “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert,” where he discussed his son Beau’s death from brain cancer and came across as an authentic alternative to the stiff and overly scripted Hillary Clinton.


http://edwardklein.com/obama-r...den-with-conditions/

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
http://www.breitbart.com/video...e-werent-controlled/

MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” co-host Mika Brzezinski said Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s interview with CBS’ “Face the Nation” was “planned out,”

“she said the State Department authorized it [Hillary’s private server]."

Scarborough then stated, “CBS News knows, if they have any sources at the State Department, CBS News knows, that nobody at the State Department, based on all of our sources at the state department, nobody authorized it. She did it on her own.”

Brzezinski added to this, “It was allowed because she allowed it.”

The fact this is now being broadly discussed shows that she's even losing who she considered and counted on to be her complicit allies. What's telling to me is that she rejected the secure State Department Blackberry and then sent her aids to but a Blackberry off the shelf from a retailer. Marry that with the gaps in her email and that in her last month in office she either did not send or receive (IIRC which one) not a single email on her State Dept email account and this is smacks of just trying to hid shit.

She's slowly being unpeeled and I don't think she'll be the nominee with the way it's going. Her trust level is heading in wrong way and she's in trouble unless Little Debbie helps her out. I believe over the weekend Hillary said she was open to more debates but somehow I think she'll come up with excuses to have them.

quote:

OBAMA READY TO ENDORSE BIDEN—WITH CONDITIONS

I'm willing to believe this but, if it's true, the deal will last only so long as it takes to oust Hillary as a candidate. Then Unka Joe's gonna need to cut some deals of his own, and O can either get on the train or find a bench at the station.

I heard this morning that some of the big donors have dropped their sponsorship for the Clinton Global Initiative 2015 Annual Meeting which takes place September 26–29 in NYC.

This is a serious set-back for the Clinton Crime Syndicate because it indicates lack of belief that Hillary will be nominated and elected.

There is no point in buying access to a has been.

Biden and Deval Patrick would be a wonderful combination; if you were a Republican running against them.

Well, this sure clears things up...Not!

http://www.washingtontimes.com...ses-cooperate-serve/

FBI refuses to cooperate in Hillary Clinton email server probe

The FBI refused to cooperate Monday with a court-ordered inquiry into former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s email server, telling the State Department that they won’t even confirm they are investigating the matter themselves, much less willing to tell the rest of the government what’s going on.

Judge Emmet G. Sullivan had ordered the State Department to talk with the FBI and see what sort of information could be recovered from Mrs. Clinton’s email server, which her lawyer has said she turned over to the Justice Department over the summer.

The FBI’s refusal, however, leaves things muddled.

“At this time, consistent with long-standing Department of Justice and FBI policy, we can neither confirm nor deny the existence of any ongoing investigation, nor are we in a position to provide additional information at this time,” FBI General Counsel James A. Baker wrote in a letter dated Monday — a week after the deadline the Justice Department had set for the FBI to reply.

Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest law firm that is pursuing at least 16 open-records cases seeking emails from Mrs. Clinton and her top aides, said at this point it’s not even clear what Mrs. Clinton provided, since all that’s been made public at this point are the former secretary of state’s public comments and some assertions, made through her lawyer, to the State Department.

Judicial Watch is prodding the courts to try to delve more deeply into Mrs. Clinton’s emails, and the group said a number of questions persevere about both Mrs. Clinton and top aides such as Huma Abedin, who did public business on an account tied to the server Mrs. Clinton maintained.

“We still do not know whether the FBI – or any other government agency for that matter – has possession of the email server that was used by Mrs. Clinton and Ms. Abedin to conduct official government business during their four years of employment at the State Department,” Judicial Watch said.

“We also do not know whether the server purportedly in the possession of the FBI – an assumption based on unsworn statements by third parties – is the actual email server that was used by Mrs. Clinton and Ms. Abedin to conduct official government business during their four years of employment at the State Department or whether it is a copy of such an email server. Nor do we know whether any copies of the email server or copies of the records from the email server exist,” the group said in its own court filingMonday afternoon.

Judicial Watch did release more than 50 pages Monday of emails it obtained from Ms. Abedin’s account on Mrs. Clinton’s server, and said it was clear she was talking about “sensitive” topics that shouldn’t have been discussed on an insecure account.

Many of those were details of Mrs. Clinton’s movements overseas, such as hotels she was staying at.

“These emails Judicial Watch forced out through a federal lawsuit show that Huma Abedin used her separate clintonemail.com account to conduct the most sensitive government business, endangering not only her safety but the safety of Hillary Clinton and countless others,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

He questioned what reason Ms. Abedin — who did maintain an account, huma@clintonemail.com, on State.gov servers — would have for using the other account for important business. Mrs. Clinton said she kept only one account, the one on the clintonemail.com server, because it was more convenient, but that reasoning does not appear to apply to Ms. Abedin.

The State Department is making all of Mrs. Clinton’s emails public under order of Judge Rudolph Contreras. But the department has said it won’t make all of the emails public from Ms. Abedin or other top Clinton aides Cheryl Mills or Philippe Reines. Instead the department only plans to release those messages specifically requested in open-records demands.

Mrs. Clinton turned over about 30,000 email messages in December, while her aides turned over more than 100,000 pages between them, with the final set only being returned, by Ms. Abedin, earlier this month, the department said in court filings.

Without those documents in hand, the State Department has been unable to do full and complete searches in response to subpoenas, congressional inquiries or Freedom of Information Act requests.

The State Department has asked for dozens of cases to be put on hold while it tries to get a single judge to coordinate all of its searches in more than two dozen cases. But the people requesting the records have objected, and say the State Department has nobody to blame but itself.

“The State Department acts as if Ms. Abedin’s and Ms. Mills’ documents fell from the sky on the eve of the State Department’s production deadline, but that is not remotely the case,” Citizens United, one of the plaintiffs who’s sued under the FOIA, said in a filing late last week.

Citizens United says the State Department missed its own deadline for producing Ms. Mills’s and Ms. Abedin’s documents.

The Obama administration countered that it went above and beyond its duties under the law by asking Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills to return their records and then to search them in response to open-records requests. The State Department says it’s moving as quickly as possible, but says the sheer number of documents — and the number of requests for them — calls for a stay in most cases.

But of the 26 requests where the State Department has sought to halt proceedings, six have already been denied. Only one has been granted, one was granted in part and denied in part by the same judge, and another is being held in abeyance.

The State Department told one of the federal judges Monday that it’s facing nearly 100 different open-records lawsuits — not all of them related to Mrs. Clinton’s email server — that have stretched officials to their limit.

Monday’s FBI letter underscores the tangled situation Mrs. Clinton’s emails have produced. The letter was addressed to Mary McLeod, a lawyer at the Justice Department, which oversees the FBI — and which means, in effect, that the FBI is refusing to talk to its own parent department about the matter.

Mr. Baker pointedly noted in his letter that he was aware the response would be submitted to the court, which would presumably make it public.

Earlier this month the Justice Department, in another pleading, insisted Mrs. Clinton didn’t do anything wrong in being the one who decided which of her messages were official business records that must be returned to the government, and which were purely personal and able to be expunged.

Judicial Watch said that raises thorny questions for a department that is supposedly investigating Mrs. Clinton.

Last week Sen. John Cornyn, the second-ranking Republican in the Senate, called for Attorney General Loretta Lynch to name a special counsel to oversee the investigation, citing too many potential conflicts of interest.

I hate to say it, but the Fibbers are going to get to claim "national security" on this one, aren't they?

ETA: AAAAannnd you can smell the fear wafting in from the HillCamp!!

An excerpt from "Biden's 'Anita' Problem", published today on Politico's website:

quote:

Nearly 24 years have passed since the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas in which Hill, a respected law professor, was grilled under oath about alleged inappropriate sexual behavior by Thomas, her former boss. The graphic testimony gripped Washington and the country and spurred intense public conversations about sex, harassment and the nominee's charge of being subjected to a "high tech lynching for uppity blacks."

Biden's done a lot over the past 24 years, including authoring the landmark Violence Against Women Act and leading its four reauthorizations. But that hasn't erased the memories of how Biden presided over those hearings as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, blamed for doing little to stop the attacks on Hill and opting not to call three other witnesses who would have echoed Hill's charges of sexual harassment. Biden almost apologetically gave Thomas the benefit of the doubt, critics say, and that stance helped put Thomas on the Supreme Court.

http://www.politico.com/story/...larence-thomas-21864

Now, I know no one here is crazy about Politico as a source, and for good reason. But this is a source that the other side takes as gospel, so all the good little Dems are gonna know Hill's threatening to hit Joe with this. And, for that matter, is effectively hitting him now.

First off, she's obviously convinced that he wants into the race. Second, it's hilarious that the best she can do is cobble this obsolete stuff together and try to put a feminist spin on how he oversaw a committee. Third, if someone did have something on Biden when he was the committee chair, I'd sure love to hear Hillary tell us all about it.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Il Cattivo,