quote:

Originally posted by ensigmatic:

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
Techno Rescue’s Iyad Allis is listed as the company’s regulatory contact in the EPA database. He was charged with selling illegal firearms and bank fraud in a 2008 FBI sting, according to court records. He ultimately pleaded guilty in 2009 to four counts of bank fraud.

Make Money Fast! Set yourself up as a data scrubbing company, lift the data before scrubbing, sell data, scrub drives, charge customer. Win!

Can Hellary really be that dumb?

Between Platte River and Techno Rescue, I don't think you could you come up with softer targets for a foreign intelligence service if you tried.

quote:

The last is to “go on offense” on Clinton’s record as Secretary of State

Knock yourself out Hillary.

I could be a bit more forgiving if Platte River would have at the least used an old time pay toilet to hide the Hildabeast's emails, another level of security if you will.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: recoatlift,

The Clinton camp is getting more desperate as that noose begins to tighten:

quote:

The Clinton camp is getting more desperate as that noose begins to tighten:

Look in a mirror Hillary. You'll see the real problem.

That tweet can suck a full bag of dicks. The 'rules' become rediculous because seom of the establishment like to use the classification system to skirt FOIA. Just dropping classification on all the things so they can be protected from public release.

Given the nature that is being put out about some of the classified materials her server held, they come not from the office of a whiny bureaucrat, but from intelligence agencies.

quote:

Originally posted by domcintosh:
...rediculous...

OK, who is using your account? This doesn't look like it came from you. That's not a typo. That's a spelling mistake, and one I would not expect from you, given all I've seen from you before, nor does the tone of your post seem in line with your usual dispassionate statements.

domcintosh, if you post from a shared computer at work, secure your account.

This link lists the "steps" in the Clinton scandal playbook

http://hotair.com/archives/201...ssification-process/

I didn't do it

You can't prove I did it

Technically, I didn't violate the law

Well, it's a stupid law

Blind assertion she did nothing wrong, no matter what the evidence is saying

quote:

steps

Not to put ideas into her camp but this one has a good chance of working.

Lean on the accomplishments of her administration:

"During my incumbency, the Department of State experienced an unprecedented era of stability in the fulfillment of its duties in world affairs. Never before has the American public felt so secure in their living rooms, not to mention their foyers and back porches."

OPTIONAL: "When compared to DHS...those are the real monsters".

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
This link lists the "steps" in the Clinton scandal playbook

http://hotair.com/archives/201...ssification-process/

I didn't do it

You can't prove I did it

Technically, I didn't violate the law

Well, it's a stupid law

Blind assertion she did nothing wrong, no matter what the evidence is saying

You forgot "eventually accuse everyone else of doing the same thing".

That one will come out soon.

I'm usually not one to rejoice in the suffering of others, but I find myself enjoying every second of this harpies downfall. There's something satisfying about seeing chronic liars get their due.

I hope we see resolution and her in prison, but each day the trap is getting tighter just like JALLEN described and I'm starting to think someone competent is methodically boxing her in.

quote:

I'm usually not one to rejoice in the suffering of others

This royal karma and hopefully the left will bring her down.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:

quote:

Originally posted by domcintosh:
...rediculous...

OK, who is using your account? This doesn't look like it came from you. That's not a typo. That's a spelling mistake, and one I would not expect from you, given all I've seen from you before, nor does the tone of your post seem in line with your usual dispassionate statements.

domcintosh, if you post from a shared computer at work, secure your account.

It was midnight, though I was sober, and I stepped into the posting exhausted after a lengthy argument with people over this issue. Regrettably I associate with flaming liberals that are still supporting Hillary and seem to be mentally allergic to facts.

Anything within 500 miles of Half Moon Bay was infected during tha last LibZombie outbreak...very few Brainz were left intact...

Joe Biden met w Elizabeth Warren today at his VP residence at the Naval Observatory.

Just my guess, but if Hillary doesn't look stronger in a month, Biden will enter the race.

quote:

Joe Biden met w Elizabeth Warren today at his VP residence at the Naval Observatory

at Biden's request:

Washington (CNN)Vice President Joe Biden met privately with Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Saturday in his residence at the Naval Observatory, CNN has learned, another sign he is seriously deciding whether to jump into the Democratic presidential race.

The meeting between Biden and Warren, confirmed by two people familiar with the session, is the biggest indication yet that Biden is feeling out influential Democrats before announcing his intentions.

Beloved by liberal Democrats, Warren decided to sit out a campaign of her own, but she has yet to formally endorse a candidate. In an interview on Friday, she told WBZ in Boston: "I don't think anyone has been anointed."

The vice president arrived in Washington shortly before lunchtime, even though his official schedule said he was planning to spend the weekend at his home in Delaware.

Kendra Barkoff, a Biden spokeswoman, declined to comment on the meeting. But an aide to Biden confirmed a meeting, telling CNN: "The vice president traveled last minute to Washington, D.C. for a private meeting and will be returning to Delaware."

Another source familiar with the meeting told CNN that Warren went to the meeting at Biden's request.

CNN/ORC Poll: Majority of Democrats support Biden run

Biden is increasingly weighing whether to challenge Hillary Clinton and other Democratic candidates for the party's presidential nomination. A small team of advisers has spent weeks quietly putting together a campaign strategy and fundraising plan in case Biden decides to run. He had at least one meeting with them this week in Wilmington, one person familiar with the session told CNN.

He has told his associates he intends to make his decision in the next month, an announcement that could upend the fight for the Democratic presidential nomination.

With the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary six months away, Biden is the leading figure Democrats believe they could turn to if they needed to find an alternative to Clinton, whose favorability ratings have taken a deep hit as her email use while secretary of state is drawing deeper controversy.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/22/...washington-meetings/

quote:

Foxnews.com
<snip>

Clinton has maintained that she has done nothing wrong or illegal and says she will cooperate fully with the non-criminal investigations.

From that statement are we to assume Mrs. Clinton will not cooperate with criminal investigations?

Mrs. Clinton, if you've done nothing illegal, why won't you cooperate with law enforcement efforts to find and prosecute those who have?

Or is it simply a Clinton family modus operandi to obstruct justice whenever possible?

Inquiring minds want to know.

quote:

Originally posted by Sig2340:

quote:

Foxnews.com
<snip>

Clinton has maintained that she has done nothing wrong or illegal and says she will cooperate fully with the non-criminal investigations.

From that statement are we to assume Mrs. Clinton will not cooperate with criminal investigations?

Mrs. Clinton, if you've done nothing illegal, why won't you cooperate with law enforcement efforts to find and prosecute those who have?

Or is it simply a Clinton family modus operandi to obstruct justice whenever possible?

Inquiring minds want to know.

I'm sure the question is rhetorical, but it is merely attempting to maintain the facade that she is not under "criminal" investigation, as if the FBI had any other. She will cooperate but reminds that the investigation is not criminal. Conceding that point would be devastating, irreversible.

She probably heard from Martha Stewart and Scooter Libby that lying to a federal investigator is a crime in and of itself.

quote:

Originally posted by Sig2340:

quote:

Foxnews.com
<snip>

Clinton has maintained that she has done nothing wrong or illegal and says she will cooperate fully with the non-criminal investigations.

From that statement are we to assume Mrs. Clinton will not cooperate with criminal investigations?

Mrs. Clinton, if you've done nothing illegal, why won't you cooperate with law enforcement efforts to find and prosecute those who have?
Or is it simply a Clinton family modus operandi to obstruct justice whenever possible?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Because snitches get stitches, yo.