I see that Judicial Watch got a court order today, and now Clinton will have 30 days to respond under oath, in writing, to their written questions.

If they get the questions right, and get them in quickly, some pretty damning answers could be public before the election.

If she stalls, what's the penalty for disobeying a judicial order?

If the charity does such good work and there was no influence peddling:

1. With Hillary as president, why does the money giving need to stop to the foundation, regardless of source?

2. If it's a bad idea to be accepting money as the president, why is it OK to accept it as the Secretary of State?

quote:

Originally posted by joel9507:

If she stalls, what's the penalty for disobeying a judicial order?

For Hillary, none. For the rest of the population of the continental United States, JAIL!

quote:

Originally posted by joel9507:
I see that Judicial Watch got a court order today, and now Clinton will have 30 days to respond under oath, in writing, to their written questions.

If they get the questions right, and get them in quickly, some pretty damning answers could be public before the election.

If she stalls, what's the penalty for disobeying a judicial order?

Can she take the 5th on every question or simply say it's a matter of national security and refuse to answer? Or do the "I don't recall" ruse

quote:

Originally posted by joel9507:
I see that Judicial Watch got a court order today, and now Clinton will have 30 days to respond under oath, in writing, to their written questions.

If they get the questions right, and get them in quickly, some pretty damning answers could be public before the election.

If she stalls, what's the penalty for disobeying a judicial order?

It depends. She isn't a party. I believe the State Department is. She may have to pay the costs incurred in getting the answers. If she was a party, she might risk having her pleadings struck and a judgment entered against her. If she utterly fails to respond at all, she might face jail for contempt, but I doubt she would want to risk that now.

I expect the lawyers will craft carefully worded responses, like a bikini, revealing only as much as necessary but concealing the best parts. These will say as little as possible and be delivered as late as possible, maybe after some challenges to the form of the questions, delay, delay, delay.

IIRC, JW was hopeful of taking her deposition, so apparently her lawyers were able to convince the court to try this less onerous step.

If she becomes President-elect, the pressure to drop the whole idea will increase exponentially.

REVEALED: Huma Abedin was working as ASSISTANT EDITOR at her mother's radical Muslim journal when it blamed America for 9/11 terror attacks


Human Abedin worked at Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs until 2008

She was the assistant editor under her mother Saleha Mahmood Abedin

In 2002 journal published an article blaming US for the 9/11 attacks

Author wrote America's 'sanctions and injustices' imposed on Muslim countries had created a ticking 'time bomb'

That bomb 'had to explode and explode it did on September 11'

Earlier articles appeared to claim that women who wore revealing clothes were inviting rape


Raises family ties to Institute of Minority Muslim Affairs, a think tank

Suggests link to Muslim Brotherhood but offers no direct evidence

Abedin was born in Kalamazoo, Michigan, and worked for Hillary in the White House, the Senate, and the State Department


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...e.html#ixzz4I0VEcYeZ

quote:

Originally posted by joel9507:
I see that Judicial Watch got a court order today, and now Clinton will have 30 days to respond under oath, in writing, to their written questions.

If they get the questions right, and get them in quickly, some pretty damning answers could be public before the election.

If she stalls, what's the penalty for disobeying a judicial order?

I have to keep wondering if our judicial system is really this screwed up. 30 days? How about NLT 72 hours? Just more tame judges providing cover for the hildabeast and her cronies.

Like all those "testimonies" requested by congressional committees, or some gubbermint agency. Give them months to respond, and when they do it is usually an excuse why they cannot.

Or, why did the idiot judge give the hildabeast MONTHS to turn over the emails?

Is our federal gubbermint so screwed up, or do the klintonistas have so much dirt on all of them.

quote:

Originally posted by Elk Hunter:

quote:

Originally posted by joel9507:
I see that Judicial Watch got a court order today, and now Clinton will have 30 days to respond under oath, in writing, to their written questions.

If they get the questions right, and get them in quickly, some pretty damning answers could be public before the election.

If she stalls, what's the penalty for disobeying a judicial order?

I have to keep wondering if our judicial system is really this screwed up. 30 days? How about NLT 72 hours? Just more tame judges providing cover for the hildabeast and her cronies.

Like all those "testimonies" requested by congressional committees, or some gubbermint agency. Give them months to respond, and when they do it is usually an excuse why they cannot.

Or, why did the idiot judge give the hildabeast MONTHS to turn over the emails?

Is our federal gubbermint so screwed up, or do the klintonistas have so much dirt on all of them.

Nothing particularly different about this. Papers to be prepared and filed ordinarily allow time to do so. Sometimes the time is shorter but 30 days to respond isn't abnormal.

I don't think the questions have been prepared yet. JW was asking for a deposition, but Clinton's team convinced the judge that written questions and answers would be accomplish the purpose.

Very good, Colin. You turned out to be useful for something after all:

Colin Powell sets record straight on involvement in email scandal

quote:

“Her people have been trying to pin it on me.”

When asked why Clinton’s team were attempting to blame him, he responded, “Why do you think?”

EXACTLY!!! When I read Hitlery's claim, I just thought to myself, "there ain't nooooo way Colin Powell is going to take the fall for HER bullspit."

When will the idiots of this country wake up? [SMH]

I wonder why the Clinton team thought Powell would go for the blame.

Well, well, well, 15K more emails just discovered that weren't released by State.

Where will it end? One place it WILL NOT end, Hillary in jail.

RMD

quote:

Originally posted by AzMikeCFD102:
REVEALED: Huma Abedin was working as ASSISTANT EDITOR at her mother's radical Muslim journal when it blamed America for 9/11 terror attacks


Human Abedin worked at Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs until 2008

She was the assistant editor under her mother Saleha Mahmood Abedin

<snip>

Sorry, AzMike. I hadn't seen your post when I started a thread on the same subject. Welcome to the forum!

https://sigforum.com/eve/forums...0601935/m/2230061904

quote:

Originally posted by lbj:
I wonder why the Clinton team thought Powell would go for the blame.

He might want to watch his back.

quote:

Originally posted by rduckwor:
Well, well, well, 15K more emails just discovered that weren't released by State.

Where will it end? One place it WILL NOT end, Hillary in jail.

RMD

I guess I'm crazy after so many disappointments over the decades, but I just can't seem to stop hoping, " Maybe this time."

quote:

I just can't seem to stop hoping

Hope springs eternal . . .

We are all hoping and perpetually disappointed.

RMD

The Hag is like a wad of snot, it just keeps slipping through.

Now you have asked for it- The Lyin Hillary Doll is now available for purchase:



$24.95 with free shipping!
http://lyinhillarydoll.com

What a surprise.

FBI files linking Hillary Clinton to the 'suicide' of White House counsel Vince Foster have vanished from the National Archives


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...tional-Archives.html

So, I've been thinking about the pardon of Nixon by Ford. IIRC, Ford pardoned Nixon after Nixon resigned in the absence of any formal indictment or charges (lawyers step in). I'm certain that a deal was struck.

So, I assume that Obama is ready to pardon Hillary in similar fashion if it comes to that. Regardless of whether it happens before or after the election, it would be unprecedented.

Nixon's pardon carried with it the assumption of guilt. In the case of old Hil, the idiots who vote for her would take a pardon as a statement of innocence.