quote:

Originally posted by Bigboreshooter:
Uh-Oh! Because of heat from Bernie, Hillary "has postponed (but not canceled) two fundraisers with Big Finance, one with the huge investing firm BlackRock and the other with an affiliate of Bain Capital, Mitt Romney’s old outfit."

oooooh noooo, Hil!! teh doll-0rzzzzz$$$$ Not teh doll-0rzzzzz$$$$!!!

ooooh, very bad very bad. Run in circles, Hil!! Panic!!

She has more back doors to launder money than the mafia. They will just send it to to a company in Canada who will donate to the Clinton foundation.

Clinton Foundation Failed to Disclose 1,100 Foreign Donations

http://www.bloomberg.com/polit...00-foreign-donations

As someone else said, my goal is to live long enough to see her in the grave. Not too hard, I hope, I am 42.

My previous 'bucket list' goal was to piss on Obama's grave. But then I decided I didn't want to fly to Kenya.

Sanders supporters have been laying into her pretty relentlessly regarding being in bed with big banks. I don't give a shit, not even half a shit, about Bernie, but the grass rootsy aspect of his campaign is very well organized, and they've zero love for Hillary. sort of like "the enemy of my enemy...", certainly not a friend, but a useful tool in the toolbox.

If Hillary wins steals the nomination, could Bernie run as an independent?

quote:

Originally posted by Bigboreshooter:
If Hillary wins steals the nomination, could Bernie run as an independent?

Good question. I don't know if he had to sign a an agreement that he would not, in order to run in the Democratic primaries.

quote:

She’s not in the bankers’ back pockets. No, siree. Hillary Clinton may have received millions of dollars from Wall Street—in both personal income and campaign contributions—but she can ditch those well-heeled friends at a moment’s notice.

With the Clinton's and big finance, as with the Clintons and certain foreign governments, it's hard to say just who is in which pocket. Suffice it to say that they are joined at the hip pocket.

The payoffs are in hopes of future favors and even more important because it's the Clintons; in recognition of the harm that they cane do you if so inclined. It's the old political protection racket.

It's a really nice bank you have here, it would certainly be a shame if the examiners and the IRS came along and upset things.

quote:

Originally posted by Bigboreshooter:
If Hillary wins steals the nomination, could Bernie run as an independent?

If Bernie Sanders Runs For President, It Won’t Be as an Independent: “I will not be a spoiler”

http://inthesetimes.com/articl...ie_sanders_president

To the dismay some idealists, Sanders rejected the idea of running for president as an independent. “No matter what I do, I will not be a spoiler,” Sanders said. “I will not play that role in helping to elect some right-wing Republican as President of the United States.”

Hillary speeches



Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Mrs. Clinton’s opponent for the Democratic presidential nomination, has accused Mrs. Clinton of being in the pocket of Wall Street and big business by noting that she has received major donations from them and was paid more than $600,000 in speaking fees from Goldman Sachs in one year.

She has struggled to explain why she took that money, saying at a CNN forum on Wednesday night: “Well, I don’t know. That’s what they offered.”

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/g...ook-into-it-n2115489

This is significant because it is coming from MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell

http://www.breitbart.com/video...-and-the-woman-vote/

Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” reporter and commentator for NBC News and host of MSNBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Report,” Andrea Mitchell said it was “stunning” Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton ” has lost the base,” and also that she’s lost women .

Mitchell said, “The party has moved. This is — it reminds me of 1972, actually.

And she has lost the base. And she’s lost the women.

And that is what is so stunning here in New Hampshire. And they are really — they can’t figure out how to combat that.

the frustration of Madeline Albright and of Hillary Clinton, is why don’t these young women realize what we went through and how we haven’t won the battle yet and how all of this can be taken back. And why aren’t they reacting to 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling?”

She added, “There was a young woman just yesterday in Concord who came at Hillary Clinton saying I worked for you in 2008, but I’m troubled by Benghazi. I’m troubled by the server. She is getting blowback from the very people she needs.”

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
Hillary speeches



Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Mrs. Clinton’s opponent for the Democratic presidential nomination, has accused Mrs. Clinton of being in the pocket of Wall Street and big business by noting that she has received major donations from them and was paid more than $600,000 in speaking fees from Goldman Sachs in one year.

She has struggled to explain why she took that money, saying at a CNN forum on Wednesday night: “Well, I don’t know. That’s what they offered.”

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/g...ook-into-it-n2115489

They wiped a pen on a check.

That chart shows almost all payments were $225,000, even from different corporations.
That doesn't look like "that's what they offered," it looks like that's her speaking fee. In other words, she lied again.

quote:

Originally posted by rekstrom:
In other words, she lied again.

!!GNIKCOHS

quote:

Originally posted by mbinky:
As someone else said, my goal is to live long enough to see her in the grave. Not too hard, I hope, I am 42.

My previous 'bucket list' goal was to piss on Obama's grave. But then I decided I didn't want to fly to Kenya.

You may have to stand in line.

41

Washington Post in this article tries to provide cover for Clinton

https://www.washingtonpost.com...1b4289c2f_story.html

WAS HILLARY CLINTON, as secretary of state, careless with classified information that could bring harm to intelligence sources or otherwise benefit U.S. adversaries, or is she being slammed by her partisan opponents over action that was not criminal and may have simply reflected a lapse in judgment?

As we’ve said before, Mrs. Clinton should not have stored her official business on a private computer server based in her home. It was faulty thinking, perhaps borne of her desire to keep control over the communications and long experience in the political trenches.

She has since turned everything over to the State Department for screening and release.

The emails in question — many of them sent to her by others — came from the unclassified systems of the government, and, we are told, did not have any markings on them that identified them as classified.

the Clinton mantra

So it does not seem that she knowingly or willfully mishandled anything classified. The question of intent here is crucial.

more lies. she is supposed to recognize classified

did Clinton ever once ask State security "does this look ok?"


It is also the case that experts in the government may retroactively discover classified information in her inbox. This does not seem surprising — or criminal

now we get into real deceit

quote:

She has since turned everything over to the State Department for screening and release.

She withheld thousands of emails SHE deemed personal. Another lie from the left.

quote:

She has since turned everything over to the State Department for screening and release.

Balderdash! (my Grandfather used to say that and it has a nice ring).

No one probably including Hillary has any idea of how many emails were deleted, she claims 30,000.

Unless the FBI recovers all of the emails on what may well have been multiple servers, no one will ever know.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
This is significant because it is coming from MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell

http://www.breitbart.com/video...-and-the-woman-vote/

Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” reporter and commentator for NBC News and host of MSNBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Report,” Andrea Mitchell said it was “stunning” Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton ” has lost the base,” and also that she’s lost women .

Mitchell said, “The party has moved. This is — it reminds me of 1972, actually.

And she has lost the base. And she’s lost the women.

And that is what is so stunning here in New Hampshire. And they are really — they can’t figure out how to combat that.

the frustration of Madeline Albright and of Hillary Clinton, is why don’t these young women realize what we went through and how we haven’t won the battle yet and how all of this can be taken back. And why aren’t they reacting to 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling?”

She added, “There was a young woman just yesterday in Concord who came at Hillary Clinton saying I worked for you in 2008, but I’m troubled by Benghazi. I’m troubled by the server. She is getting blowback from the very people she needs.”

God, I love to hear this. You know Andrea's just pulling that from out of her butt and what she heard when she was in line at Starbucks, right? For years the one thing I've particularly hated in politics has been when talking heads like Andrea Mitchell just make this stuff up and report it as the "news"!

Well, now they're doing it to a front-running Democrat, and it couldn't happen to a nicer gal.

When Albright said there is a special place in hell for women who don't support each other, was she not aware of what Hiliary did to Bill's victims?

quote:

Originally posted by darthfuster:
When Albright said there is a special place in hell for women who don't support each other, was she not aware of what Hiliary did to Bill's victims?

Albright came out of her hole? With the NorKs detonating hydrogen bombs and lunching long range missile, one would think she would dig her hidey hole deeper.