. . . or perhaps HitLIAR has trouble swallowing the pills with her booze ?





just ask her supporters, she is super intelligent, just like barry






keepin' it classy

My son was prescribed diazepam during his bout with febrile seizures when he was little. The two times we had to give it to him it was a rectal dose (basically a gel) - it stopped the seizure within 15 seconds, but he would crash for nearly an hour after that.

God help the agent if he has to administer the dose for Hildy...shit, now I can't get that image out my head...sorry.

quote:

Originally posted by ersatzknarf:
. . . or perhaps HitLIAR has trouble swallowing the pills with her booze ?

Boy there are a lot of recording devices in that photo.....

quote:

The scuttlebutt is that it's in case of seizures, and is a common treatment for them; otherwise - yes, under what other conditions would she need an instant injection of it...

Seizures (grand, petite, febrile, myoclonic, clinic).
Stop manic episodes
Shut her up

Happy One-Year Anniversary of this thread. And she's still running for president.

quote:

Originally posted by Rightwire:
Boy there are a lot of recording devices in that photo.....

it's for commie posterity.

lookit the expressions on the idiots' faces behind her.

the useful idiots jus' can't get enough of her...

Clinton Body Count or Left-Wing Conspiracy? Three With Ties to DNC Mysteriously Die


Rachel Alexander

Posted: Aug 09, 2016 12:01 AM


Since the Democratic National Committee emails were leaked a few weeks ago, three people associated with the DNC have all been found dead under what could be questionable circumstances. Some — including Bernie Sanders supporters — suspect the Clintons were behind the deaths, just more episodes in the alleged “Clinton body count” dating back to the 1990s. Others dismiss the speculation as left-wing conspiracy nuts. But until the police have completed their investigations and the medical examiners have released autopsy reports, it is premature to make any determinations.

Seth Rich

DNC staffer Seth Rich was mysteriously murdered in the streets of Washington, D.C., on July 10. Although it is being investigated as a robbery, his wallet, credit cards and watch were not taken. The 27-year old was shot in the back on July 10 at 4:15 a.m. near his affluent neighborhood, while he was reportedly walking home from his girlfriend’s apartment. Police still have no suspects, witnesses or motive. His mother told the local NBC station that there were bruises on his face, knees and hands, apparently from trying to fend off his attackers.


Some are speculating that Hillary Clinton is behind the murder, because Rich could have been the DNC staffer responsible for leaking the 20,000 damaging DNC emails to Wikileaks. The allegation is that powerful Sanders allies convinced Rich to leak the data. He had previously worked on the U.S. Senate campaign for Nebraska businessman Scott Kleeb, who lost his election. The Clinton Global Initiative provided funds for a clean energy business started by Kleeb, which had come under investigation after losing $300,000 in 2010 and another $300,000 in 2011 despite the subsidies. Rich was also previously employed at a data firm that had worked with the Clintons. After news of possible corruption emerged between the Clinton Global Initiative and Kleeb, supposedly that led to Sanders’ cronies pressuring Rich to leak what was going on.


Rich was a data analyst, so it is very possible he could have had access to the DNC’s emails. Julian Assange of Wikileaks said recently on TV that it wasn’t Russian hackers who intercepted the emails, as the Hillary Clinton campaign has alleged; instead, any one of a number of staffers within the DNC could have leaked them.

Emily Zanotti of HeatStreet, who is no leftist, has written a skeptical article about the conspiracy theories surrounding his death, analyzing Reddit threads. Reddit has contributors covering the circumstances of his death extensively, but they aren’t professional journalists, are mostly anonymous and can get things wrong, which hurts the credibility of the speculation.

The myth-debunking site Snopes labeled the suspicion over Rich’s death as false. This is strange, since how does Snopes know that it is false? The police haven’t even completed their investigation yet, which Snopes admits. Many murders go unsolved, including several of the strange deaths of people associated with the Clintons. A $25,000 reward is being offered for information about who killed Rich.


There should be no rush to judgment either way. Two people were robbed at gunpoint within the hour before Rich was murdered, a little over a mile away. If Rich was really the victim of a robbery, why didn’t the robbers take his valuables? It is possible that Rich refused to turn his valuables over, so the robbers shot him, and then fled without the valuables due to the noise from the gunshot. Police investigators will likely speak with the victims of the earlier two robberies and ask if they can recall what the gun looked like to see if the ballistics match the two rounds that killed Rich.

Shawn Lucas

Shawn Lucas, along with filmmaker Ricardo Villaba, served the DNC on July 3 with a complaint and summons in a fraud action on behalf of Sanders supporters. In the video, he can be seen grinning, happy to do it.

On August 2, he was found lying on the bathroom floor dead by his girlfriend when she came home that evening. His girlfriend said he was in good health.


John Ashe

The former President of the United Nations General Assembly, John Ashe, mysteriously passed away on June 22, a few days before he was scheduled to begin pretrial meetings involving shady financial dealings regarding a former Clinton crony. Local police officers said he died from dropping a barbell on his throat while working out, but the UN oddly first claimed he died of a heart attack. The 61-year-old was supposed to testify against Chinese real estate developer Ng Lap Seng, who was implicated in the “Chinagate” scandal for funneling money to the DNC for Bill Clinton through Arkansas restaurant owner Charlie Trie. Ashe was arrested last year for allegedly taking over $3 million in bribes from Chinese businessmen, including over half a million from Ng Lap Se, in exchange for building a United Nations conference center in Macau.


Dominican attorney Henry Shillingford questioned his death, “It is strange for Antigua’s most senior diplomat to be implicated and die under such troubling circumstances.” The New York Post’s Page Six ran a skeptical article questioning the circumstances. A source told the paper, “During the trial, the prosecutors would have linked Ashe to the Clinton bagman Ng. It would have been very embarrassing. His death was conveniently timed.”

However, his widow, Dr Anilla Cherian, said it was the third time that her husband had been found collapsed at their home.

More suspicious deaths recently of people with ties to the Clintons

Victor Thorn, who wrote four books exposing the Clintons, reportedly killed himself with a gun on his 54th birthday, August 1, while on top of a mountain near his Pennsylvania home. The books he wrote were Hillary (And Bill): The Sex Volume, Hillary (And Bill): The Drugs Volume, and Hillary (And Bill): The Murder Volume, and his latest which was published in February, Crowning Clinton: Why Hillary Shouldn't Be in the White House.

According to the Inqisitr, Thorn had appeared multiple times on The Russell Scott Show and told the host, “Russell, if I’m ever found dead, it was murder. I would never kill myself.”

Joe Montano, an aide to Hillary’s running mate Tim Kaine, died of a heart attack on July 25. He had worked for the DNC and was only 47.

A man named Larry Nichols claimed on the Pete Santilli Show that he was hired as a hitman for the Clintons, and killed several people years ago.

What is comes down to is this: how many other politicians have you heard of who have had so many mysterious deaths associated with them? You don’t hear of a Bush body count — not even an Obama body count. Snopes, the left-leaning internet myth debunker, labels the Clinton body count as false. However, the main site that hosts a list of the Clinton body count reports that is constantly under attack by hackers of Hillary’s.

Regardless of whether there is any truth to the Clintons being behind these deaths, at a very minimum, the gun laws in DC need to be changed to allow people to protect themselves. After being robbed while housesitting for a friend, former Washington Times columnist Emily Miller wrote a book about how difficult it was to obtain a gun for self-protection in DC, Emily Gets Her Gun. Fortunately, there is now ongoing litigation challenging these draconian laws. Whether Rich was killed by robbers or someone else, a gun likely would have saved his life.

http://www.politico.com/story/...iew-documents-226963

The Obama administration is urgently debating how to respond to congressional demands for the official report on Hillary Clinton's three-and-a-half-hour interview at FBI headquarters, as some inside and outside government raise concerns about giving lawmakers access to politically sensitive records of the FBI's investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email system.

During congressional testimony last month, FBI Director James Comey promised to respond promptly to lawmakers' requests for the interview summaries known as "302s" for Clinton and other witnesses, as well as other information gathered in the course of the year-long FBI probe.


Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) sent Comey a letter the same day requesting the entire "investigative file" on the Clinton email issue. Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) also asked Comey for all 302 reports related to the case, requesting that they be turned over by the end of last month.

Comey and the FBI are pressing to send at least some of the requested information to the Hill soon, but others in government have stepped in to question such a move, officials tracking the debate said.

At the moment, it's unclear what role the Justice Department is playing in the disclosure debate.

"I'm sure this is causing a lot of consternation at main Justice," said Anne Weismann, a former Justice Department official now with the non-profit Campaign for Accountability.

"For example, the 302 of Secretary Clinton, it's classified at the TS/SCI level. We got to sort through all that. But we’ll do it, we’ll do it quickly," Comey said.

*********************

I would like to see Clinton's testimony. It would show how hard the FBI pressed, and also shine light on Comey's statement that Clinton was truthful to the FBI.

"..... the 302 of Secretary Clinton, it's classified at the TS/SCI level. We got to sort through all that. But we’ll do it, we’ll do it quickly," Comey said."


In that case just email the files over to congress, that's OK right?

^^^^
Just what I was thinking. Since when does classification matter with this administration? Oh only when it benefits them. My bad. Yet I am up for another 10 year re-check and they are making sure to let me know that "intent" is not in the letter of the law, mistakes are fully punishable...but only if you are an ordinary American. Some pigs are more equal I guess...

With her recent health issues, we should be looking at what a Kaine presidency will look like.

http://thefederalist.com/2016/...V7MosYnI7T8.facebook

The Federalist

TheFederalist
The Federalist RSS Feed Follow TheFederalist on Twitter Follow TheFederalist on Facebook Follow the Federalist Radio Hour on iTunes
Does WikiLeaks Have Hillary Clinton’s October Surprise?
2016
Does WikiLeaks Have Hillary Clinton’s October Surprise?
Julian Assange, WikiLeaks’s founder and editor-in-chief, may become the nemesis who could scuttle Hillary Clinton’s bid for the White House.
James H. Hyde
By James H. Hyde
AUGUST 15, 2016
Email
Print
The New York Times reports that in the latest release of Clinton documents, billionaire donors to the Clinton Foundation tried to curry favors from a responsive State Department when Hillary Clinton was U.S. secretary of State. That gambit is known as the “pay-to-play” scandal. Give the foundation a big fat donation, and Hillary will open whatever door you need opened. In fact, as secretary, she approved a now-famous deal that granted the Russians control over 20 percent of uranium production here in the United States.

Despite all of this, Hillary, as usual, got off scot-free. But while she may think she’s got smooth sailing ahead, she needs to consider the albatross dangling from her neck. The latest emails handed over to Judicial Watch, which sued over spurned or ignored Freedom of Information Act requests, are very revealing. As in “The Rime of the Mariner,” she may well find no wind in her sails when highly damaging Clinton Foundation information is made public. Julian Assange, true to his promise to release new material about the Clintons, did so most recently on the international classified information-leaking website WikiLeaks on August 8.


Therein lies the real rub for Hillary Clinton and the United States if, as alluded to, Russia is WikiLeaks’ source of what’s being released now. Assange, WikiLeaks’s founder and editor-in-chief, may become the nemesis who could scuttle Hillary’s bid for the White House. Certainly, there’s no love lost between them. Hillary has been pushing hard for Assange’s extradition to the United States on, ironically, espionage charges (which she escaped) and wants WikiLeaks torn off the web.

In response, Assange told CNN on August 1, “We have quite a lot of material (from the DNC, the Clinton campaign and the Clinton Foundation), so I think we will stagger it in different batches when we are ready to publish each batch.” That gives all of us a not-so-subtle clue about his intentions. It’s clear he will publish information in ways that manifest as “data-driven IEDs.” They’ll be set to detonate at pivotal points during the campaign, such as prior to the debates. But his Trump card—pun intended—could more likely play out as an “October Surprise.”

The Plot Thickens with Murder
While many believe the Russians provided Assange the DNC emails, Assange has remained steadfast in refusing to confirm or deny that Russia is his source. However, a hint about the true source can be traced back to July 10 at 4:30 a.m. That’s when Seth Rich, a DNC staffer who managed a database for the committee, was shot in the back and murdered.

He still had his wallet, watch, cell phone, and credit cards on him when he was found, which appears to make his murder more likely a hit than a robbery. It also casts doubt on Russia as the source of the DNC emails, but they cannot be entirely ruled out. Vladimir Putin could be providing a wide range of flammable information.


On August 10, articles appearing above the fold on numerous political websites had the blogosphere blazing. WikiLeaks sent out a tweet that stunned its Twitter followers: “ANNOUNCE: WikiLeaks has decided to issue a US$20k reward for information leading to conviction for the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.”

Was that a game changer, or a head fake? If Rich wasn’t the source of the DNC email data, why would WikiLeaks offer a $20,000 reward? It could be to take the spotlight off the Russians, but during an interview with the Dutch television program Nieuswsuur Assange implied Rich was the source. Assange explained that Rich’s murder exemplified the risks leakers take. “Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks. As a 27-year-old, works for the DNC, was shot in the back, murdered just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington.”

While this suggests more DC skullduggery, Hillary has plenty to be worried about if Assange is preparing to leak more documents in batches. The latest leak is revealing. If Rich leaked the DNC emails, who leaked emails and documents from the Clinton campaign and, more perplexing for the Clintons, emails and documents from their foundation? While the Justice Department may not dispense justice uniformly, WikiLeaks will.

An Adversary with Sights on Our Presidential Election
If Assange is getting his material from Russia and sabotaging Hillary’s campaign, that takes the pending releases up a whole bunch of notches. It means a prickly and powerful adversary is trying to rig our presidential election, and that’s unaccaptable.


In an interview posted on YouTube on July 27, Assange contends the next “batches of postings” will get Hillary Clinton arrested. Some of those emails have been posted on WikiLeaks and it is possible they contain some damning information.

For Hillary, the “fix” appears to be in universally, but freedom of the press gives Assange more power than all other news outlets currently carrying her water. She’s a candidate not without a significant amount of baggage to begin with, and she’s a poor campaigner. She needs all the help she can get, and no trouble. If WikiLeaks posts something in October so devastating that Hillary becomes completely compromised, it may be too late for her to bow out of the race. Instead, she’ll have face a McGovernesque loss.

It can be safely assumed the Russians do have a very large data dump that could ruin both Clintons, and they could have passed it along to Assange.

While we as conservatives should find this a fitting end to Hillary Clinton’s political career, Putin is by no means a friend of the United States. It’s clear that he is cold, calculating, and longs for the halcyon days of the U.S.S.R., as few as they may have been. Putin may be thinking it will be easier to deal with Trump than with Hillary.


He likely envisions a meeting not unlike the one at which Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev ate President John F. Kennedy’s lunch in Vienna. Back then, JFK opined, “It’s going to be a cold winter.” If the Russians give Assange all they have on Hillary, the result could be a career-ending October surprise and a very cold and endless winter for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

I knew it! Excellent news.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/16/...interview-fbi-notes/

The FBI sent to Congress Tuesday a report the bureau provided to the Justice Department last month to explain why it recommended no charges in the Hillary Clinton email server investigation, according to US officials briefed on the matter.

The decision to provide the investigative material on a case in which charges were not brought is exceedingly rare.

The report includes notes from the interviews of Clinton and other witnesses in the investigation.

The notes, called 302s, represent an FBI agent's memos on the interviews and will be provided along with other investigative material.

The material is designated classified so it will need to be reviewed by congressional officials in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, or SCIF. And due to its confidential status, it cannot legally be shared with the public.

The interviews in the Clinton email case were voluntary and the FBI practice is to not have recorded or transcribed, but instead to have them "memorialized" with notes taken by an FBI agent.

Comey said last month that the agency found "thousands" of emails from Clinton's server that were work-related and deleted and had not been turned over to the State Department. State will conduct its own review to determine whether any of the emails are personal, and any that are will not be released. Personal emails are not deemed "agency records" and therefore are not subject to release under the Freedom of Information Act.

Congressional Republicans, meanwhile, are intent on forcing Clinton to pay a political price -- with Reps. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, and Bob Goodlatte, R-Virginia, calling Monday in a letter for the Justice Department to charge Clinton with perjury over her sworn testimony to the House's Benghazi committee.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:

Comey said last month that the agency found "thousands" of emails from Clinton's server that were work-related and deleted and had not been turned over to the State Department.

And that right there is proof of even more perjury, since she swore to a judge, under oath, that she'd turned over all work-related emails. Also a violation of the records-keeping act.

The judge that took that oath from her should be pissed and looking at his options.

quote:

Originally posted by Kadin:

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:

Comey said last month that the agency found "thousands" of emails from Clinton's server that were work-related and deleted and had not been turned over to the State Department.

And that right there is proof of even more perjury, since she swore to a judge, under oath, that she'd turned over all work-related emails. Also a violation of the records-keeping act.

The judge that took that oath from her should be pissed and looking at his options.

I believe she signed the declaration "on information and belief" which is a much looser standard. She is "informed" such and so is true, and "believes" that it is.

quote:

The judge that took that oath from her should be pissed and looking at his options.

That is funny right there.
You think the judge was not aware she was lying through her teeth?

quote:

Originally posted by Black92LX:

quote:

The judge that took that oath from her should be pissed and looking at his options.

That is funny right there.
You think the judge was not aware she was lying through her teeth?

Probably, but there's a difference in suspecting and having proof.