quote:

Originally posted by bigdeal:
I guess the system's guy in me just won't let go of this. The BS fake ballots delivered in the dark of night are not the 'key' issue here. 'If' the Dominion Software functions as Powell claims witnesses have confirmed it does, then the DOJ should confiscate the software and have an independent (assuming that's even possible in today's world) team of programmers/analysts tear the code apart and verify/validate each line of code and each module. No claims of proprietary software rights should be allowed to stand in the way of this verification. Election results are far too important to accept anyone's comments/assertions on the software. If what has been claimed is true, that the software has a built in routine that allows for programmatic vote skewing, that would be game, set, and match, Team Trump.

There is one small problem with that idea. You may or may not be able to determine what software was running on the machines at the time of the election. It would be trivial to “nice, clean, straightforward, honest software source code laying around to provide for perusal by whatever experts. If the folks in question at Dominion haven’t done that, they are blithering idiots. At the same time, it wouldn’t be difficult to have the “rigged” code squirreled away where it is unlikely to be found. Compile a “cheater” image, upload it, run it for the election, then replace it with a “clean” image. Do the machines have logs of when they were last rebooted? Do they have a history log of what images they have been running? If they even have those logs, how secure are the logs? What prevents someone from editing the logs?

As someone who spun many “private” images for customers (an image built off of released software, but with a bug fix or small feature for them to test in their network and a) verify it solves their problem before I roll it into the next software release, and b) get them a fix that they can use quickly instead of waiting for the next release cycle.), I can tell you it is likely impossible to prove anything by examining the machines and software now, unless the perps are morons.

And all that assumes that the actual cheating code was in the image on the machine. It could just as easily be that there is a small vulnerability that allows one to access the machine from outside and fudge the data.

I believe that the dirtbags cheated, I am hopeful that President Trump’s team can prove this well enough to prevent the attempted theft of this election from being successful. In general, I’m a believer in exploring every avenue. I do realize however that time is limited. I am hopeful that President Trump has an ace or three up his sleeve. He has been miles ahead of the GDCs (and me) so far, I’m hopeful that this is still the case.

Like everyone else I’d like to know if Trumps legal team has any evidence besides sworn affidavits. It’s hard to believe that they have a dominion machine or it’s software. I would imagine that it would be a massive legal battle in itself to get that kind of evidence. This is like a murder case where you have everything but the murder weapon.

Flak is getting more intense, so we must be getting closer to the target. I'm as upset as anyone, there are highs and lows, but I've maintained a calm feeling I can't explain that things are going to be alright. I'm not sure how, but we are going to pull through this.

Dominion Voting Systems ‘Lawyers Up,’ Abruptly Backs Out of PA State House Fact-Finding Hearing
By Debra Heine
November 20, 2020

Dominion Voting Systems Thursday night abruptly backed out of attending a fact-finding hearing that was set for Friday morning with the Pennsylvania House State Government Committee.

At a press conference Friday morning, State Govt Committee Chair Seth Grove said the 1.3. million Pennsylvanians who used Dominion’s voting machines have been “hung out to dry and slapped in their faces.”

Pennsylvania lawmakers had scheduled the hearing with the voting machine manufacturer “to help identify and correct any irregularities in the election process,” according to the House Republican Caucus.

“It is vitally important voters have faith in the machines they use to cast their ballots. On the heels of Gov. Tom Wolf unilaterally decertifying every voting machine in the Commonwealth, we need to know whether these new machines met expectations, whether they are reliable and whether they are not subject to interference,” said Rep. Grove (R-York).

Dominion had initially agreed to attend the hearing, before it “abruptly canceled,” Grove said.

“I was impressed at what appeared to be the willingness that Dominion Voting Systems to address accusations and it would have put 1.3. million Pennsylvanians who used their machines at ease—including myself, thinking that Dominion was willing to publicly back up their product which PA taxpayers invested millions to purchase” he noted during the presser.
“Unfortunately, last evening, Dominion Voting Systems lawyered up, and backed out of their commitment to the people of Pennsylvania to provide their input in a public format.”

Grove blasted the company for “retreating into the darkness,” rather than appearing at the hearing with “honesty and integrity.”

The committee chair said he wanted to know why a company with nothing to hide would back out.

“Why would a vender of public goods fear discussing their product sold to the public for the public good? If Dominion’s products were successful and operated as they were supposed to, why wouldn’t Dominion take the opportunity to publicly review its success?” Grove demanded. “How hard is it to say, ‘our ballot machines worked exactly as promised and they’re 100 percent accurate’?”

“After weeks of accusations, why has Dominion Voting Systems not released any analysis of the success of its voting machines to the public in order to stop their accusers in their tracks? If they have nothing to hide, why are they hiding from us?” he asked.

https://amgreatness.com/2020/1...act-finding-hearing/

I would like to see something that definitively defines which election offices across the U.S. used Dominion systems. And which election offices used Smartmatic software.

Good article concerning Dominion Voting Systems in's and out's from the beginning, on heavy dot com. Article raises a ton of questions, concerns and red flags for me.

Dominion says there was no last minute software update. State of Georgia says there was. Looks like a large part of the Dominion software was written in Serbia ... WTF. State of Texas determined the security of Dominion Voting Systems was suspect and passed on implementing the system. Dominion Voting Systems was acquired by a New York-based hedge fund, Staple Street Capital, in 2018. Just the tip of the iceberg.

Good Read Link: https://heavy.com/news/dominio...si-michigan-georgia/

No doubt the prospect of Sidney Powell taking a keen interest in them has something to do with the cut and run.

Our voting hasn’t mattered for years.

They have been flipping votes from one candidate to the other for years.
Flipping votes does not change the ballot count, so this was a very effective vote rigging scheme.

Obama did not win, as Joe stated they did this voter fraud during the Obama administration.
(See video’s on page 443, I believe Joe stated the truth.)

President Trump came along and broke the system in 2016.
Hillary was suppose to win.
To answer Hillary’s question, What went wrong?.

Donald Trump had a deluge of votes in 2016 which swamped their cheating system.

Now in 2020 President Trump doubled down and completely smoked their system with a huge voter turnout for President Trump.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
I would like to see something that definitively defines which election offices across the U.S. used Dominion systems. And which election offices used Smartmatic software.

As I understand it they are not mutually exclusive of each other. A Dominion machine could have Smartmatic software installed on it either all or in part.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
I would like to see something that definitively defines which election offices across the U.S. used Dominion systems. And which election offices used Smartmatic software.

Me too.

A little about dominion.

quote:

Originally posted by TigerDore:

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
And there was some sort of raid in Germany to take control of servers, although we aren't sure by whom it was conducted. We don't know who has possession of the servers where the counting took place.

Based on the continued, confident denial by Scytl, I believe it is likely that the bad guys got the server. And "bad guys" can include the DOJ, CIA, etc.

"..six ways from Sunday" - Chuck Schumer

back to Eric Coomer of Dominion.

this sounds like a big deal

long interview w Joe Oltmann by Michelle Malkin

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rvb31pGqzZQi/

definitely worth a watch

Coomer ranting against Donald Trump

Eric Coomer - top Dominion security official and major Dominion shareholder

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
which election offices across the U.S. used Dominion systems

Dollars to donuts it's Michigan, Georgia, Penn, Arizona, Nevada and Wisconsin.

Sydney Powell, in the presser yesterday, stated a senior Dominion executive went to Detroit Nov 3 to oversee the "election" (fraud...). Does anyone know that specific person's name?

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
back to Eric Coomer of Dominion.

this sounds like a big deal

long interview w Joe Oltmann by Michelle Malkin

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rvb31pGqzZQi/

definitely worth a watch

Coomer ranting against Donald Trump

Eric Coomer - top Dominion security official and major Dominion shareholder

Never heard of this guy or his blog before but there is a lot of those popping up recently. But I like what he has to say.

quote:

I don’t have that evidence, but the fact that Sidney Powell claims she does is enough to convince me. This is a woman who gave up years of income she could have earned in her profitable practice to write, print, and promote a book no publisher would touch. Its charges were too explosive, I imagine.

Its targets, like Andrew Weissman (the protege of FBI director Christopher Wray) wield too much power. Tellingly, none of the people Powell exposed in Licensed to Lie have dared to sue her for defamation or libel. She put herself out there as a target for such a suit by writing the book—with no publishing house’s attorneys on board to defend her. But no one did, I’m sure because her charges were absolutely truthful.

Link

This is an interesting snipped from Sidney Powell on the Glen Beck show.

Sidney Powell on Glenn Beck: Servers from ScytI in Germany were in fact confiscated and "I AM HEARING THAT IS WAS OUR FORCES THAT GOT THE SERVERS."

Sidney Powell: Evidence of voter fraud could be released online 'by this weekend'

From Lin Wood and hour ago on Parler...

Shredding Trucks In ATL

It's amazing to me how the media seems to believe that they have full rights to demand unfettered access to any information that they desire.

They do this regardless of what it will do to people, families, litigation, prosecution, etc. When they don't get what they want they whine like little children.

Tucker is a prime example. No, you cannot have that detail yet. This will not be tried in the court of public opinion after the evidence has been properly censored, twisted, and manipulated.

This is getting interesting. . .

I have never heard of Sidney Powell before, but she is my new best friend.



On a related note, looking back on those two videos kimber1911 posted on page 443 (the first, where buyden stated to his 'supporters' "I don't need you to get elected" and the second, where he stated the dems had the "greatest voter fraud effort ever") makes we wonder if the old fool was actually speaking the truth for a change.

My mother-in-law suffered from dementia (actually , we all 'suffered' from it), and she lost her 'filter.' Meaning, she would tell you whatever she felt like, regardless of whether it was polite or tactful to do so or not.

Here, I wonder if old dementia joe ACTUALLY said what he knew to be the truth. Of course, nobody really pays attention to what he says, anyway, but it makes me curious. . .