Reports of Injuries, Deaths After COVID Vaccines Hit New Highs Just as Biden-Harris Regime Announce Medical Dictatorship

VAERS data released Friday by the CDC showed a total of 675,593 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 14,506 deaths and 88,171 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and Sept. 3, 2021.

https://noqreport.com/2021/09/...edical-dictatorship/

"Based Underground"?

Looks like it doesn't belong here.

Guess who does NOT have to follow the mandate for federal workers?

There’s Someone EXEMPT From Biden’s Wicked Vaccine Mandate!



Ummm, does anybody else have a question about this particular move?

You know, the same people that handle your mail every day, and come to your front door, dropping off stuff every day, at basically every business and house in the entire nation, all of them are somehow exempt?

Oh, and the mandate doesn’t apply to the massive flood of illegal immigrants either, remember?

You can’t mandate on one class of people and not mandate universally. It just doesn’t work that way and we need to fight back and resist all of this. Do not comply until it works its way thru the Courts.

Here is more from the New York Post:

President Biden on Thursday mandated COVID-19 vaccines for almost all federal workers, but the more than 600,000 letter carriers and administrative staff of the US Postal Service won’t have to get a shot.

The exemption was first reported by Washington Post postal reporter Jacob Bogage, who reported that a White House official told him that “we strongly encourage them to comply with these standards” anyhow.

Biden on Thursday also announced a new Labor Department policy requiring workers at private companies with 100 or more employees to get vaccinated or submit to weekly testing. The USPS exemption was initially believed to allow postal workers to duck the private-sector mandate, too.

“USPS is not included in the executive order requiring vaccination of Federal employees. USPS has a separate statutory scheme and is traditionally independent of federal personnel actions like this,” a Biden administration official said.

He added: “That said, USPS is strongly encouraged to comply. Also, [the Labor Department’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration] will cover USPS through the [emergency temporary standards], meaning that postal workers will be subject to the vaccination or testing policy announced today.”

Postal workers serve every community in the United States, often with daily door-to-door deliveries and contact with millions of Americans.

Biden described in stark terms his justification for a package of vaccine mandates.

“We’ve been patient, but our patience is wearing thin, and your refusal has cost all of us,” Biden said in a speech. “This is not about freedom, or personal choice. It’s about protecting yourself and those around you.”

This unconstitutional move has A LOT of legal headwinds and little chance of succeeding, but there is one thing that I can tell.

This move by Biden and his cronies has all the makings of a distraction to me.

We need to keep our eyes on the forensic audits, the California recall election, illegal immigration, Afghanistan, and the upcoming 20th anniversary of 9/11.

https://dailyheadlines.net/the...n=DH.net%209-10%206p

Just when you thought the Aussies couldn’t get more stupid with their useless, draconian and never-ending Covid lockdowns.

The government in NSW is literally rationing beer now, limiting people to one 6 pack per day:

Residents in apartment blocks locked-down by NSW Health are having their alcohol deliveries policed as part of a policy to limit the number of drinks being consumed each day.

It’s almost like they’re running an experiment to see where people’s breaking point is.

Guess who else is exempt from the mandatory poison jab? Congress as well as their staffers. Yes, they are not part of the executive branch as included in the unconstitutional decree, but shouldn't they step up and volunteer if it's so important, effective, and safe? Hypocrites and tyrants.

https://www.newsweek.com/membe...cine-mandate-1627859

President Joe Biden's new vaccine mandates for federal employees don't apply to members of Congress or those who work for Congress or the federal court system.

Biden issued two executive orders on Thursday requiring vaccination against COVID for federal workers and contractors who work for the federal government. He also asked the Department of Labor to issue an emergency order requiring businesses with more than 100 employees to ensure their workers are vaccinated or tested on a weekly basis.

However, Biden's order on federal workers applies to employees of the executive branch. The House of Representatives and the Senate belong to the separate legislative branch, and the courts to the judicial branch of the federal government.

Biden's COVID action plan - "Path Out of the Pandemic" - published on the White House website makes the effect of the vaccine mandate clear.

The plan says: "Building on the President's announcement in July to strengthen safety requirements for unvaccinated federal workers, the President has signed an Executive Order to take those actions a step further and require all federal executive branch workers to be vaccinated."

"The President also signed an Executive Order directing that this standard be extended to employees of contractors that do business with the federal government," the plan goes on.

"As part of this effort, the Department of Defense, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Indian Health Service, and the National Institute of Health will complete implementation of their previously announced vaccination requirements that cover 2.5 million people."

Study Finds Teenage Boys Six Times More Likely To Suffer Heart Problems From Vaccine Than Be Hospitalized by COVID

https://www.zerohedge.com/covi...-problems-vaccine-be

Research conducted by the University of California has found that teenage boys are six times more likely to suffer from heart problems caused by the COVID-19 vaccine than to be hospitalized as a result of COVID-19 itself.

“A team led by Dr Tracy Hoeg at the University of California investigated the rate of cardiac myocarditis – heart inflammation – and chest pain in children aged 12-17 following their second dose of the vaccine,” reports the Telegraph.

“They then compared this with the likelihood of children needing hospital treatment owing to Covid-19, at times of low, moderate and high rates of hospitalisation.”

Researchers found that the risk of heart complications for boys aged 12-15 following the vaccine was 162.2 per million, which was the highest out of all the groups they looked at.





Even during high risk rates of COVID, such as in January this year, the threat posed by the vaccine is 4.3 times higher, while during low risk rates, the risk of teenage boys suffering a “cardiac adverse event” from the vaccine is a whopping 22.8 times higher.

The research data was based on a study of adverse reactions suffered by teens between January and June this year.

In a sane world, such data should represent the nail in the coffin for the argument that teenagers and children should be mandated to take the coronavirus vaccine, but it obviously won’t.

In the UK, the government is pushing to vaccinate 12-15-year-olds, even without parental consent, despite the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advising against it.

Meanwhile, in America, Los Angeles County school officials voted unanimously to mandate COVID shots for all children over 12 despite angry objections from parents.

quote:

In a sane world, such data should represent the nail in the coffin for the argument that teenagers and children should be mandated to take the coronavirus vaccine, but it obviously won’t.

In the UK, the government is pushing to vaccinate 12-15-year-olds, even without parental consent, despite the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advising against it.

Meanwhile, in America, Los Angeles County school officials voted unanimously to mandate COVID shots for all children over 12 despite angry objections from parents.

Have we lost our flippin minds?
Well, not all of us. At least there is some push back, but our government, and all "western democracies" are responding as the CCP did in Wuhan.

"Lockdowns,” the mass quarantine of both sick and healthy people, have never before been used for disease mitigation in the modern Western world. Previously, the strategy had been systematically ruled out by the pandemic plans of the World Health Organization (WHO) and by health experts of every developed nation. So how did we get here?

Mass lockdowns of entire countries as a technique for fighting disease sprung into the world’s consciousness on the order of Xi Jinping, general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), who fomented a global propaganda offensive targeting Western governments and media. Within weeks, the WHO, an organization that once devoted itself to fighting disease and which has sadly become a tool of Chinese foreign policy, promulgated lockdowns into global policy through a series of press conferences that showed a complete absence of analysis or logic.

The world has been fighting a virus from China with a public health policy from China that transforms the world into China. But if the national security community has noticed this bizarre development, they haven’t said so. Instead, their preoccupation has remained largely unchanged since February 2020. Insiders have confirmed that by spring 2020 the national security community was convinced that SARS-CoV-2 was a supervirus leaked from the Wuhan lab, explaining why many supported lockdowns.

https://www.tabletmag.com/sect...asked-ball-cowardice

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:
The government in NSW is literally rationing beer now, limiting people to one 6 pack per day:

It’s almost like they’re running an experiment to see where people’s breaking point is.

I can see a new reality show coming out of this.

Death Zone: Australia

If the ratings are good (what else can they do but sit and watch TV?) the series can be expanded.

Death Zone: New York

Death Zone: L.A.

We can have a Death Zone: CDC Christmas special.

I questioned on day one why our public health response was the same as a communist shithole. We literally couldn't come up with anything better than the Chinese game plan. Our politicians and public health 'experts' should be ashamed and apologetic...instead we have the Big Guy telling us he's plain run out of patience.

Maybe the only way this ends is when enough people break and begin to adopt a “fuck it, I’d rather die than live like this any longer” mentality and then begin to totally disregarded all government mandates, all fear propaganda broadcasts and just begin to live their lives again.

That’s the only way I see this ending any time soon.

Putting any faith in our government to fix this, handle this or even be honest with us is a lost cause. They don’t care about anything but power, control and money. Just look how our benevolent leaders exempted themselves from the vax mandate.

I don't think people will accept this vaccine mandate...I think it was a critical political mistake created by desperation and sinking polling. If it stands, the country is fundamentally altered and any pretensions about 'freedom' are just silly propaganda. You can basically be forced to do whatever a majority decides you must do...they just have to pretend it's for the 'public health'. The gun confiscations will be for 'public health' reasons as well.

They demand a 100% vaccination rate. That's never going to happen, so they've already failed.

When they try to force the holdouts, they're in for a big surprise.

September 11, 2021
Ivermectin, 'Noble Lies,' and Whom Do We Trust?
By Keith Jackson, MD

The controversy around the use of ivermectin and, previously, hydroxychloroquine joins a long list of things where the left's pursuit of the "Noble Lie" is judged more important than honest debate. This particular piece of dishonesty claims that vaccinations, masking, and social distancing alone will eradicate COVID-19, and all other "side hustles" like these inexpensive medications are mockable, "snake oil" obfuscations. Whom we choose to align with in these debates is unjustifiably and destructively polarizing, especially when facts may not line up with the pursued plans of those we trust to lead. Why we trust and how we justify lying come into question.

By now, most of us know that there are studies, many of them from our own CDC, that show the effectiveness of ivermectin when given early in the course of COVID-19. There is real-life proof that countries like Japan have already had success with the medication. The medicine is cheap and safe when used properly. Like hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin is nevertheless demonized by the political left, its mainstream media, and the medical establishment, the last despite published studies by reputable investigators.

For some unexplained reason, we can't be allowed to have alternate treatments, apparently because the narrative of the left may get undermined in the eyes of the voters, the "Noble Lie" being more important than our health. Alternatives to any of the Left's "Noble Lie" agendas are always panned by the media as non-scientific and undermining our communal good. Healthy skepticism is akin to flat-Earthism, with no room in between, contradictory facts and unexpected consequences be damned.

Regular Americans are all too aware that they are being lied to practically every minute of every day, with roughly half of voting Americans hoping it is in our best interest to accept the lying. All of us are put into the uncomfortable situation of having to choose political sides while not really knowing the truth. And the choice of whom to believe is not as black and white as one would assume, especially when reminded of the axiom that we don't really know what we don't know.

Do we Americans join the team of our sports and movie icons, the "cool" people living dream lives, who ridicule the use of the "horse medicine" ivermectin for COVID-19? They tell us that the rubes voicing alternative treatments for COVID-19 also want a polluted, scorching-hot planet, endless wars against non-whites, and Jim Crow racism, throwing black Americans back into chains. We are just as evil and stupid in their eyes if we question why we shouldn't be looking for all possible means to survive.
Biden's Vaccine Mandate: Unconstitutional, Unscientific, Underhanded

But we knew we couldn't trust the left and its complicit, apparatchik media when they told us at the onset of this viral plague that if we would all just wear a mask for a week, this would all go away. Then "our betters" told us that you can't trust a vaccine that is a product of President Trump's efforts in the battle against COVID-19, apparently because "Orange Man bad" — dishonestly politicizing the virus to defeat the political opposition. Now they want us all to trust the vaccine manufactured to fight last year's virus (not the delta variant), use masks (even outside!) that don't really work, and not seek alternative therapies.

Those of us on the political right label people who "mindlessly" repeat the obvious falsehoods of the left "crazy." But we should consider a sad truth. It is crazier not to believe people, at least in our formative years.

From the time we are born, we must trust those who raise us, educate us, and work with us. It is an untenable proposition when growing up not to believe in a parent's love and society's positive role in your general welfare. We can survive only if we trust, learning to mistrust as a survival tool when we mature and discover the true nature of man.

Because trust is important for the creation of a healthy psyche, the molding of a country full of "Greta Thunbergs" is more easily understood. Just as Greta was educated by those she trusted, who told her that the world is going to burn up if we continue to use fossil fuels, lots of Americans trust those in power when it comes to COVID-19. While we might consider it nuts to believe the president, the news, and the Journal of the American Medical Association, it is just as easy to wonder why one wouldn't.

America was founded by those who lost trust in their mother country. Our Constitution was unique in that it mistrusted the very institutions of governing, with checks and balances codified for the citizens' protection. It would be wonderful if we could trust the people we charge with our care, but experience reminds us that we can't. The Bible reminds us that we are all sinners, all of us fallen, the only trust being through Christ.
Read More

History reminds us that peace and the complacency it breeds foment self-destructive behavior in a society. The politicians currently in power seek to dismantle the Constitution for America's own good. They ask us to trust them while most things they do smack of dishonesty. Their "Noble Lies" are justifiable as a means of achieving their endgame, but their lust for power is the only truth we recognize as true.

https://www.americanthinker.co...hom_do_we_trust.html

More Lancet letter signatories found to have links to Wuhan
Link

Around 1:15 it gets EXTREMELY interesting. A study found that at the local level in multiple nations and even in the same nation the higher the prevalence of infectious diseases the higher the probability of totalitarian attitudes. Well isn’t that fascinating.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
September 11, 2021
Ivermectin, 'Noble Lies,' and Whom Do We Trust?
By Keith Jackson, MD

https://www.americanthinker.co...hom_do_we_trust.html

There's NOTHING 'Noble' about ANY of these Lies...Period

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:

It’s almost like they’re running an experiment to see where people’s breaking point is.

I honestly think you are onto something with this statement.

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:

The government in NSW is literally rationing beer now, limiting people to one 6 pack per day:

It is mind boggling to think some folks drink a 6 pack or more per day.
I rarely drink anything alcoholic but I do support someone's right to get shit-faced.

Fauci: No ‘Firm Answer’ on Why Americans Who Recovered From COVID-19 Should Get Vaccinated

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...tetxlYS8mJiqFDH8AfJE

Dr. Anthony Fauci, a top U.S. public health official, said that a new study regarding so-called natural immunity following COVID-19 infection is provoking discussion among government experts.

The real-world study, conducted by Israeli researchers, found that previous COVID-19 infection confers better protection against infection and hospitalization than COVID-19 vaccines.

COVID-19 is the disease caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.

Fauci, the longtime director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, was asked Friday about the research in the context of convincing people who have natural immunity, or recovered from COVID-19, to get vaccinated.

“I get calls all the time people say, ‘I’ve already had COVID, I’m protected.’ And now the study says maybe even more protected than the vaccine alone. Should they also get the vaccine? How do you make the case to them?” Dr. Sanjay Gupta asked Fauci during an appearance on CNN.

“I don’t have a really firm answer for you on that,” Fauci responded.

“That’s something that we’re going to have to discuss regarding the durability of the response. The one thing that paper from Israel didn’t tell you is whether or not—as high as the protection is with natural infection—what’s the durability compared to the durability of a vaccine? So it is conceivable that you got infected, you’re protected, but you may not be protected for an indefinite period of time,” he continued.

“So I think that is something that we need to sit down and discuss seriously because you very appropriately pointed out, it is an issue, and there could be an argument for saying what you said.”

Some experts who have studied the matter have expressed confusion as to why vaccination efforts are not focused on those who have not gotten a shot and have not recovered from COVID-19.

“We’re trying to update policy such that people who have recovered have the same privileges and access as people who are vaccinated,” Dr. Jeffrey Klausner, clinical professor of preventive medicine and medicine at the University of Southern California’s Keck School of Medicine, told The Epoch Times previously.

The Israel findings, because they’re based on real-world data, even led Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb, commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, to call for natural immunity to be part of policy discussions.

“The balance of the evidence demonstrates that natural immunity confers a durable protection,” Gottlieb said during a recent television appearance.

Official guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) acknowledges people have some level of immunity after COVID-19 recovery. But the agency still recommends the vast majority of Americans get a COVID-19 vaccine, asserting the protection is even better when combining natural immunity and a jab.

Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the CDC’s director, last month pointed to a study conducted by CDC and Kentucky researchers that suggested vaccines actually provide better protection than previous infection.

“These data further indicate that COVID-19 vaccines offer better protection than natural immunity alone and that vaccines, even after prior infection, help prevent reinfections,” the agency said in a statement.

quote:

Dr. Anthony Fauci, a top U.S. public health official, said that a new study regarding so-called natural immunity following COVID-19 infection is provoking discussion among government experts.

That's a lie, just like everything else he says. There is only one point of view allowed.