Here's an excellent interview about the criminal migrants (well worth the watch), but go to 1:02:00 to see Bret Weinstein's take on the jab. It will make your hair stand up. This guy is/was a liberal biologist who started saying things that got him cancelled by the leftists.

(I watched this yesterday on YT, but now it's gone from my watch history and is not searchable, guess YT doesn't like it.)

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarl.../1753190238502170900

quote:

Here's an excellent interview about the criminal migrants (well worth the watch), but go to 1:02:00 to see Bret Weinstein's take on the jab.

Yeah, I was kind of wondering why this was posted in the COVID thread, but now I get it.

Who knows what the Chinese are up to? ... but they are up to something and pouring across our open border.

Just a review of the acres of horse shit we had to deal with from self-righteous, smack-talking imbeciles who were COMPLETELY WRONG.

https://twitter.com/tomselliot.../1657021799652024324

Everyone one of those assholes make my blood boil!

mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Caused More Deaths Than Saved: Peer-Reviewed Study

https://www.zerohedge.com/medi...e-deaths-saved-study

https://www.cureus.com/article...cination-campaign#!/

With considerably lower efficacy rates, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines cause more deaths than save lives, according to a new study whose researchers called for a “global moratorium” on the shots and “immediate removal” from childhood immunization schedule.

The peer-reviewed study, published in the Cureus journal on Jan. 24, analyzed reports from the initial phase 3 trials of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. These trials led to the shots being approved under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the United States. The study also looked into several other research and reviews of the trials. It found that the vaccines had “dramatically lower” efficacy rates than the vaccine companies claimed.

Moreover, based on “conservative assumptions, the estimated harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines greatly outweigh the rewards: for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA injections.”

“Given the well-documented SAEs (serious adverse events) and unacceptable harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse and enforce a global moratorium on these modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.”

The authors also recommended an “immediate removal” of the COVID-19 vaccines from the childhood immunization schedule. They pointed out that children were at very low risk from the infection.

“It is unethical and unconscionable to administer an experimental vaccine to a child who has a near-zero risk of dying from COVID-19 but a well-established 2.2 percent risk of permanent heart damage based on the best prospective data available.”

“An absolute risk reduction of approximately 1 percent for the COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations meant that a substantial number of individuals would need to be injected in order to prevent a single mild-to-moderate case of COVID-19.”

To prevent one case of COVID-19 infection, 142 individuals would need to be vaccinated with Pfizer’s shot, the study said. When it came to Moderna, 88 people had to be injected.

Taking into account these numbers as well as the infection fatality rates of COVID-19, the researchers concluded that roughly 52,000 people would need to be vaccinated to prevent one COVID-19-related death.

This would mean two lives saved for roughly 100,000 injections of the Pfizer vaccine. However, there is a risk of 27 deaths per 100,000 doses of Pfizer shot, the researchers calculated. As such, for every life saved by the jab, almost 14 lives would be lost due to the mRNA vaccine, the study stated.

Much more at links

quote:

Originally posted by 6guns:
Everyone one of those assholes make my blood boil!

Me too. Being treated with open contempt and sometimes hostility in public by people who were swayed by this propaganda is no small part in why my family left Washington state the first opportunity we got.

I'll never forget how I was treated. Best to just stop there.

^^^^
Could NOT agree more, Smudge!

Please review the documents filed against my company (Motion to Certify...about an hour read) to see the premeditated pure evil that was going on behind closed doors...

https://sigforum.com/eve/forum...0601935/m/8100080605

https://rumble.com/v4c5fti-yea...n=frankploegman&ep=2

Reported on Jan 26, 2024 bij German mainstream media channel ARD.

SOURCE: https://www.tagesschau.de/wirt...d-rezession-100.html

EPOCH TV | Dr. Pierre Kory Explains COVID-19 Vaccine Shedding

COVID Vaccine Mandate At Rutgers Survives Landmark Court Ruling
Did students at Rutgers have the "fundamental right" to refuse a vaccine? Nope, a federal appellate court ruled.

NEW JERSEY — When Rutgers University rolled out a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for students in the heart of the pandemic, it ignited a firestorm of controversy around a thorny question: Do students at Rutgers have the “fundamental right” to refuse a vaccine?

They do not, a federal appeals court ruled in a landmark decision this week.

On Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a decision to dismiss claims brought by a group of students and Children’s Health Defense Inc. against Rutgers University. Read the full court opinion here.

During the pandemic, Rutgers added the COVID-19 vaccine to its list of required shots for students who wanted to return to in-person classes, including the campuses in Newark, New Brunswick and Camden.

Students were given exemptions if they had a documented medical contraindication to the vaccine, or if they had a “bona fide” religious belief – but they were then subject to other requirements, such as being excluded from university housing and being required to take weekly COVID-19 tests.

https://patch.com/new-jersey/b...l&utm_campaign=alert

^^^Let me guess, Rutgers is STILL requiring students to be 'vaccinated' IN TWENTY TWENTY FOUR if they want to attend classes 'in-person' or live in on-campus housing. Surprise me and Tell me I'm wrong. Just checked, and nope, I'm NOT surprised...It's 'New Jermany'!

Have you noticed how their efforts for a new push of this phony bullshit has failed?

Here we are, on the backside of winter. No one is wearing a mask who wasn't already wearing one, no new or renewed access restrictions, nothing.

Their shit failed because no sane person believes it anymore.

On top of that, it seems that being vaccinated is gaining the stigma the con artists once placed upon the unvaccinated.

To wit:

https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/.../1759988876301516913

^^^ Our blood may help fund our retirement!

Seriously, the tide is turning, although some will never admit it. I remember an article posted in this thread long ago talking about how one has difficulty admitting they're wrong when they already made the decision to take the shot.

quote:

Originally posted by 6guns:
^^^ Our blood may help fund our retirement! .

You mean more than the $20 Amazon gift card and a cheap T-shirt me wife and I each received Saturday?

I’m tempted to call the Red Cross and ask why this is necessary. I can’t wait to see the leftist media spin for this one…

This may be anecdotal but I spent a couple hours in the local ER Sunday, I had what thought was just a bad cold the week prior and got over it but then started feeling awful and my heart rate went to like 105-115 resting and wouldn’t come down. Was going to just stop at the local urgent care but figured they’d kick me up to the ER anyway if I mentioned “heart”.

Well they checked me out and I had Flu A and during a wait after triage for some additional tests and observation: 4 STROKE victims were brought in, I knew only because there was an audible alert I suppose for a stroke response team?

In just over 1 hour, they had 4 people with strokes coming in. This cannot be normal, can it?

Crazy. 4 right in a row

^^^
Well, it sure can’t be the vaccines; they’ve told us they are safe and effective so many times it MUST be true.

The truth keeps getting out a little bit at a time. Of course they had to throw the blanket bullshit in that Covid infection ALSO causes the same conditions in and of itself but it’s clear that the truth is unavoidable- the “vaccines” caused elevated injury when compared to traditional, time tested, TRIALED vaccines.

https://thehill.com/policy/hea...adverse-effects/amp/

Largest multicountry COVID study links vaccines to potential adverse effects

A new study on COVID-19 vaccines that looked at nearly 100 million vaccinated individuals affirmed the vaccines’ previously observed links to increased risks for certain adverse effects including myocarditis and Guillain-Barré syndrome.

The researchers noted in their analysis that COVID-19 infections have consistently been found to be more likely to cause the conditions observed in this study than vaccinations, adding that factor should be considered when weight the risk-to-benefit ratio of immunization.

The study was conducted by the Global COVID Vaccine Safety project and took into account 99,068,901 vaccinated individuals across eight countries: Argentina, Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, New Zealand and Scotland.

The report specifically looked at adverse events following administration of the Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca vaccines.

The researchers looked for 13 adverse events of special interest that occurred in vaccine recipients for up to 42 days after shots were administered. These conditions included Guillain-Barré syndrome, Bell’s palsy, convulsions, myocarditis and pericarditis.

Researchers observed a “significant increase” in cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome among those who received the AstraZeneca vaccine with 42 days of administration.


They also noted higher-than-expected instances of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), inflammation of the brain and spinal cord, among those who received their first dose of Moderna’s vaccine.

However, the study noted that when it came to ADEM there was “no consistent pattern in terms of vaccine or timing following vaccination, and larger epidemiological studies have not confirmed any potential association.”

Both mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna were associated with instances of myocarditis, inflammation of the heart muscle, which occurred more than was expected in the study, with the condition having a significant observed-to-expected ratio consistently after the first, second and third doses.

Significantly higher than expected cases of pericarditis, inflammation of the sac-like structure that surrounds the heart, were also observed following first and fourth doses of Moderna’s vaccine.

“The safety signals identified in this study should be evaluated in the context of their rarity, severity, and clinical relevance,” the researchers wrote.

“Moreover, overall risk–benefit evaluations of vaccination should take the risk associated with infection into account, as multiple studies demonstrated higher risk of developing the events under study, such as GBS, myocarditis, or ADEM, following SARS-CoV-2 infection than vaccination.”