Now they tell us! The New York Post ran a story yesterday headlined, “COVID ‘6-feet’ social distancing ‘sort of just appeared,’ likely lacked scientific basis, Fauci admits.”
https://nypost.com/2024/01/10/...rt-of-just-appeared/

On Monday and Tuesday, Fauci, a very-well-preserved 83, testified for two full days before closed Coronavirus Committee meetings. Details are oozing out, similar to how Fauci oozed out of government right when things were heating up. I’m sorry to report that the former bureaucrat may be experiencing dementia, since the former NIAID head often — more than 100 times — “could not recall” important details about his words and actions during the most important and recent period of his life.

Maybe he needs vitamins or something.

Between Fauci’s not-remembering and his default instinct of shirking responsibility, very little progress was made over the two sessions. The good doctor continued insisting that he never closed a single school or business and only made itsy-bitsy suggestions — suggestions which people were free to take or leave, at their option. Nobody was forcing them.

Fauci can’t remember why all the schools did every single thing he “recommended.” Who knows.

On other topics, Fauci obstinately refused to admit he was wrong. Fauci simply doesn’t believe any students experienced learning loss from school lockdowns. Or at least it’s debatable. “It’s open for discussion,” he reportedly allowed, after the point was pressed. He also generously allowed there was room for debate about where covid came from, but suggested it was one of those mysteries that would probably remain unsolved forever. If he can help it.

Fauci struggled to defend some of his recommendations. When pushed, Fauci apparently admitted that the six-foot social distancing rule was completely made up; in other words, “likely not based on scientific data.” Likely not.

Please never ever forget how, when you questioned the six-foot-rule, they screamed at you to follow the science! and mocked you as a science denier. Remember when Fauci, in his scratchy Brooklyn accent, bragged “I am the science?” He was right. That’s all there was to most of it. Just a human cockroach in a lab coat.

More interesting was Stat News’ story about Fauci’s testimony headlined “After grilling Fauci on Covid origins, House Republicans want to consider new rules for foreign research.” Now we’re getting somewhere.

Not one to mince words, Representative Greene (R-Ga) said that, after his performance at the hearings, Fauci should go straight to jail...

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...-thursday-january-11

Wasn't the whole 6-foot distancing thing traced back to some CIA tactic from years before? I thought I had read that somewhere that someone stumbled upon that, that it was developed originally as a psychological thing by them.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
Fauci should go straight to jail...

I wonder if Jeff is making an attempt to channel a fantastic climactic courtroom scene from “And Justice for All” so famously orated by Al Pacino?? It’s the first thing that popped into my head…

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:
Wasn't the whole 6-foot distancing thing traced back to some CIA tactic from years before? I thought I had read that somewhere that someone stumbled upon that, that it was developed originally as a psychological thing by them.

Well if so, PASig, the sheep sure fell for it hook, line, and sinker. Freaking CRIMINAL!!!

The 6ft distancing idea was so proven and grounded in science that every store had distance markers on the floor, so that you would know precisely where to stand. To little this way or that way could expose you or grandma to instant death.
No questions asked, no wondering about its effectiveness. Just mindless obedience. That's what science requires.

quote:

Originally posted by erj_pilot:

quote:

Fauci should go straight to jail...

I wonder if Jeff is making an attempt to channel a fantastic climactic courtroom scene from “And Justice for All” so famously orated by Al Pacino?? It’s the first thing that popped into my head…

These finding should be compulsively and visibly posted on any Facebook page and MSM websites, YT channels, etc around the world that prominently espoused the mandates / recommendations / whatever the fuck Fauxi calls them for at least 1 year. Anytime someone looks up anything related to wuflu, these findings get enumerated.

Force them to acknowledge and spread the word publicly and prominently that it was all a lie.

For those interested Marjorie Taylor Greene is having a hearing today on injuries caused by the Covid-19 vaccine. You can register here to get your access link sent to you when the hearing starts at noon eastern time today. Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Ryan Cole, and Dr. Kirk Milhoan will be giving testimony.

Safe and effective

Prenatal Exposure to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 Induces Autism-Like Behaviors in Male Neonatal Rats: Insights into WNT and BDNF Signaling Perturbations

https://link.springer.com/arti...ack&utm_medium=email

On January 5th, in Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice v. Centers for Disease Control, et al, a Texas federal court gave the CDC a twelve-month rolling deadline to cough up all the “free-text” entries from its V-SAFE vaccine side-effect tracking database.
https://icandecide.org/wp-cont...inion-2024-01-08.pdf

It was surely the most important decision of this year (so far). It may ultimately be ranked among the most important of the pandemic’s court decisions. To start, the Court declined to believe the giga-funded health agency’s sworn affidavit that redacting those side-effect documents would take 59 years.

V-safe is similar to but different from VAERS; it is a smartphone-based app allowing vaccine recipients to enroll and report their (or their child’s) health status after vaccination. Users get a confidential registrant number to protect their privacy, and for 12-months after each shot the system regularly sends texts prompting folks to sign in and report how they’re doing. Each check-in collects two types of data: a series of generic check boxes asking high-level questions about pain at the injection site, chills, headaches, et cetera, and a 250-character free-text field where users can type out any other feedback.

Any other feedback like myocarditis, rashes, blood clots, strokes, heart attacks, or death. The CDC ensured serious adverse events would be limited to the difficult-to-search free text field and not show up in an easy-to-check box.

By the time the CDC suddenly and unexpectedly pulled the plug on the V-safe program last May, it had collected 7.8 million text entries.

Despite initially promising to promptly make the V-safe data public, the CDC has instead been guarding the V-safe data like it is made out of gold. CDC stubbornly refused to release any V-safe data — privacy! — except on a limited basis to a couple friendly teams of CDC-affiliated scientists. It released the ‘check the box’ part of the data in September 2022 to ICAN — but only after a lawsuit and a court order. In January of last year, the Plaintiff in this case asked the CDC for the free-text entries.

It’s taken a full year.

One of the most remarkable things about last week’s order was how skeptical the judge seemed about nearly everything the CDC said. The public’s loss of trust in the health agency apparently extends to the judicial branch. Judges are part of the public, after all. The order even referenced the disgraceful loss of trust, ironically noting that “While 'Trust the Science’ became something of a national slogan, the American public’s trust in science and scientists are at an all-time low.”

Ouch!

The Plaintiff is a non-profit formed specifically to get the V-safe data and make it available to the public on its website, www.drsforchoice.org. Now that they have an order, the first batch of V-safe entries should be released to the public on February 15th.

Warning signs for the CDC started appearing early in the order. In addition to snarking about the CDC’s loss of public trust, by page 12 (out of 30), the court had also footnoted Francis Collin’s recent mea culpa, where the NIH director loonily admitted that public health people shouldn’t be in charge of important decisions. The Court wrote:

In 2024, American citizens may be more interested in COVID data following Dr. Francis Collins’s statements on the “public-health mindset”: “If you’re a public-health person and you’re trying to make a decision, you have this very narrow view of what the right decision is, and that is something that will save a life. It doesn’t matter what else happens. So you attach infinite value to stopping the disease and saving a life. You attach a zero value to whether this actually totally disrupts people’s lives, ruins the economy, and has many kids kept out of school in a way that they never quite recovered from … This is a public-health mindset. And I think a lot of us involved in trying to make those recommendations had that mindset, and that was really unfortunate. It’s another mistake we made. Okay.”

Stop for a second. Those of you who were annoyed when Collins said that but nothing happened to him — this happened. Collins thought his silly statement would make him look good somehow (our fault was we just cared too much!). But his half-baked, half-hearted, half-witted admission is now showing up in crucial court orders.

This high-stakes game we are playing is a game of inches. Be patient.

Next, the Court began using skeptical language suggesting it thinks the CDC lies like a rug, or a dog, or a Pelosi. The Court considered the CDC’s sworn claim that it would take one of its analysts fifty-nine years to review all the 7.8 million text entries for private information, which came to 650,000 pages, and said, yeah, that’s your own fault:

To this lawyer’s eyes, that last comment about overestimating — wholly unnecessary to the order — stuck out like a sore injection site. The Court didn’t just say the CDC overestimated the number of pages; it said the CDC excessively overestimated the number of pages.

That’s how the judge calls you a liar without calling you a liar.

Then the Court began analyzing whether forcing the CDC to cough up the V-safe data was in the public interest, and here is where the order really began to soar. Enjoy these remarkable comments, and contrast this calm, collected judicial reasoning to the media’s position on the vaccines:

Plaintiff argues that release of the data is essential for myriad reasons. Some groups contend they were injured by the vaccine, and without access to the underlying data they cannot meaningfully seek coverage or treatment. Some parents are hesitant to consent — or even believe they are incapable of consenting — for their minor children to receive the vaccine. Production of the source material is essential for independent researchers to evaluate the vaccines and for medical professionals to provide meaningful treatment to their patients.
Rapid vaccination of a huge percentage of the American population is nothing short of astounding, and the endeavor continues. As of May 11, 2023, the CDC reports that more than 81% of Americans have received at least one dose, including nearly 32 million children. Understandably, there is substantial public interest in the data that supported, and continues to support, the government’s promotion of the COVID-19 vaccines and boosters.

After describing how important the data was to the public interest, the judge moved on to the CDC’s V-safe “studies,” of which he seemed to take an exceptionally dim view:

Notably, Plaintiff points to several studies published and presented by CDC that rely upon on the V-safe data. All but one of those studies considered only the first seven days after receiving a vaccine, and the only study that looked beyond the first week considered just two weeks. Defendants do not contest this. Rather, Defendants dismiss the limited scope of the published studies as just “the time period that some scientists have chosen to use in their research studies.”
Because Defendants structured V-safe to collect health and symptomatic responses for a full year after a vaccine or booster, reviewing that data is of great importance to the public. If “some scientists” — sponsored or platformed by Defendants — “have chosen to use” only the first week or two of data to report the vaccine is safe and effective, then other scientists should be permitted to access the data to “pierce the veil of administrative secrecy,” “open agency action to the light of public scrutiny,” and “promote the disclosure of information.”
Many of the policies previously addressed were enacted because of guidance from Defendants. With billions of taxpayer dollars expended to develop, distribute, administer, and fund messaging campaigns, Plaintiff assumes a hefty and viable public interest in examining the raw clinical data. Production of the free-text data will permit independent researchers to put the government agencies to their proof by considering all of the available data.
Plaintiff has shown an urgent need to inform the public about “actual or alleged Federal Government activity” — namely, related to the health and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines and policies.

The judge continued, suggesting that some of the CDC’s published V-safe studies might actually be misleading:

Plaintiff marshalled evidence that some vaccine studies may be misleading or based upon cherry-picked data. One study reported that only 0.8% to 1.1% of users reported needing medical care according to the check-the-box data. However, when the raw data was released pursuant to separate FOIA litigation, it showed some 7.7% of V-safe users reported needing medical care and an additional 25% missing school or work or unable to perform normal activities. Similarly, Plaintiff alleges the check-the-box data captures only the “symptoms CDC says are normal to occur after vaccination and are actually a sign the vaccine is working.” Thus, collecting that data and then profiling the vaccine as safe and effective was a “pointless” exercise. Any concerning symptoms would necessarily be restricted to only the free-text responses, to date unexamined by independent researchers not sponsored by Defendants.
Plaintiff (has) presented evidence that calls into question the claim that the vaccines are safe and effective — or at least the scope of research supporting that claim.

The Court concluded by ordering the CDC to produce all 7.8 million entries over the next 12 months, starting with 390,000 a month and expanding to 780,000 per month.

Now let’s consider some of the order’s implications.

First of all, we know this must be bad news for the jabs because, had the V-safe data shown the vaccines were safe and effective, the CDC would have already released the data. (We can ignore the CDC’s bogus claims about its alleged 59-year effort to review the data, since the court already dealt with that.) It is vexing that a publicly-funded health bureaucracy used taxpayer money to protect big pharma from the reality of its defective products by dragging out the release of this information for two years.

But the data is finally coming out. Add this order to the list of other eye-popping disclosures last week. It’s starting to look like 2024 could be a lot more productive — and a lot less apocalyptic — than we thought.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...7n3&utm_medium=email

The Chinese are at it again, and have developed a new strain of coronavirus that kills 100% of the humanized mice infected:

https://www.biorxiv.org/conten....01.03.574008v1.full



https://rumble.com/v46w8jh-dr....TheLibertyDaily&ep=2

This message has been edited. Last edited by: wcb6092,

This post from A Midwestern Doctor discusses what is probably the most central problem we face which is convincing the masses that the "scientific experts" should not be trusted especially since none of them will allow open challenge.
- Steve Kirsch

The Deadly Rise of Scientism
We All Suffer Once You Can No Longer Debate "The Science"
A Midwestern Doctor

One of the greatest challenges each society faces is deciding what constitutes “truth.” Whoever holds that power wields enormous influence and steers the direction of the society for better or for worse.

For centuries, “truth” was delegated to the ruling institutions of the time, and hence truth was simply the narrative which conformed to their interests. Then, during the enlightenment period a new idea emerged—that truth could be determined empirically through experimentation and data.

This in turn gave birth to the scientific revolution, and while not perfect (as vested interests would still try to make their “narrative” be truth irrespective of what the scientific data showed), scientific inquiry began shaping the direction of Western Culture, and in a rocky fashion gradually moved society forward, giving us many of the benefits we take for granted today.

Sadly however, the tendency of ruling interests to want to monopolize the truth never went away and we’ve watched a curious phenomenon emerge where science, riding on the social credit earned by the success of its revolutionary discoveries, has gradually transformed into something not that different from a state religion. Given that science was originally meant to be a way to move beyond truth being monopolized by the dogmatic institutions which ran society, it is quite tragic that science has become one as well.

As a result, science has more and more become the practice of “trusting scientific experts” and not being allowed to question their interpretations of the data—or even see it. This is very different from what science was originally intended to be—the collective endeavor of scientists around the world to put forth ideas and have the ones that stand up to scrutiny become the generally accepted standard.

(please read more...) here:
https://www.midwesterndoctor.c...7n3&utm_medium=email

Newly released emails show what a fraud Fauci is.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQK9i-prv3M

And the hits just keep coming; another one of the beautiful people dropped from Covid, despite full and boosted “vaccination”. How very(not) odd. When oh when will our hero’s in Hollywood finally step up and speak out against the plandemic? I kid, I kid; the phonies are committed at this point… if they want to keep working in this town… or until they die from a disease they were “vaccinated” against. Seriously though- I wonder what would happen if the estate of some really rich/famous person with the financial resources sued despite “vaccine” producers immunity granted by the criminal fed?

https://www.foxnews.com/entert...ovid-contributed.amp

'All My Children' actor Alec Musser dead at 50, fiancée suspects COVID contributed

Actor Alec Musser, famous for his roles in "All My Children" and "Grown Ups," passed away on Saturday, Fox News Digital can confirm. He was 50 years old.

His fiancée, Paige Press, says Musser was suffering from "a severe case of Covid," and believes he died from the illness. He was both vaccinated and boosted. She says he died at their home in Del Mar, California.

Musser confirmed that an autopsy would be conducted.

"He was a very healthy person. I mean he took exceptional care of his body and what went into it. …He'd eat some cookies and that was the worst thing I ever saw him do."

"Alec was a wonderful man. He was the best fiancé. The best dog dad. Very kind hearted person," Press said of Musser, whom she got engaged to a little over a year ago. "Seeing how many messages and people have reached out to me from his childhood…In the last couple of days, people I’ve never even met, sending me photos from him from high school and when he was in there wedding…He was so loved and touched by so many people."

Press says the couple had not chosen a wedding date, but that planning was on the horizon.

Actor Adam Sandler, whom Musser worked with on the 2010 film "Grown Ups," shared his condolences with the family. "I loved this guy," Sandler wrote alongside a frame of Musser in the flick to his Instagram. "Cannot believe he is gone. Such a wonderful, funny good man. Thinking of Alec Musser and his family and sending all my love. A true great sweetheart of a person."

Press added that some kind of service, perhaps on the beach, would take place in the future.

In addition to acting, Musser was also a model. Born on the East Coast, he eventually moved to California and attended the University of San Diego.

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
The Chinese are at it again, and have developed a new strain of coronavirus that kills 100% of the humanized mice infected:

https://www.biorxiv.org/conten....01.03.574008v1.full



https://rumble.com/v46w8jh-dr....TheLibertyDaily&ep=2

Anyone care to make a guess at what race/ethnicity those mice were “humanized” to simulate? It has long been assumed that China (and probably everyone else) is working on bio-weapons aimed at specific groups.
Who is their biggest threat? White/euro? Pakistani?

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds:
https://www.foxnews.com/entert...ovid-contributed.amp

'All My Children' actor Alec Musser dead at 50, fiancée suspects COVID contributed

Actor Alec Musser, famous for his roles in "All My Children" and "Grown Ups," passed away on Saturday, Fox News Digital can confirm. He was 50 years old.

His fiancée, Paige Press, says Musser was suffering from "a severe case of Covid," and believes he died from the illness. He was both vaccinated and boosted. She says he died at their home in Del Mar, California.

.....that an autopsy would be conducted.

Updated 1/16/24: And that autopsy shows that he died by suicide from a self-inflicted GSW to the chest.

quote:

...there were no contributing conditions to Musser's death.

The release from the medical examiner's office says Press last saw Musser on the evening of Jan. 12 when she went to sleep. In the morning, she found Musser "seated and slumped forward on the bathroom floor" and a firearm was near his body.

A bullet hole in your fiancée, with a gun near his body, and you "believe he died from covid"? Your story has a huge whole in it that an 18-wheeler can go through, lady.

What a bizarre story. I don't get it.

quote:

A bullet hole in your fiancée, with a gun near his body, and you "believe he died from covid"?

That's how the hospitals were doing it a few years ago.....

quote:

Originally posted by konata88:
What a bizarre story. I don't get it.

According to the link, the case is "not officially closed". I'm betting that investigators are building a case against the fiancée, looking for more holes in her story.

Not jail

That means we have to pay to support his miserable life.

He should be tried for crimes against humanity

Worth the watch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ej5Se4gMRA