Military officers speak out about being forced to take "the vaccine" (Bret Weinstein interview)

Bret Weinstein
@BretWeinstein
This is an emergency.

We are compromising our military readiness, surrendering basic constitutional principles and erasing the hard won moral clarity established at Nuremberg.

Watch the episode on Odysee:
https://odysee.com/$/embed/@Br...nd-defend-military:7

A doc who isn't afraid to admit he was wrong.

https://justthenews.com/politi...-went-booster-critic

Social media platforms target cardiologist who went from booster to critic of COVID vaccines

By Greg Piper
Updated: October 18, 2022 - 11:12pm

As a CDC committee votes this week to potentially add COVID-19 vaccines to the routine schedule of immunizations for all ages — making them mandatory for public school students — a British cardiologist who once promoted COVID vaccination on TV will go before Parliament to argue the opposite.

Aseem Malhotra, who recently wrote an unusual first-person medical paper calling for a "pause and reappraisal of global vaccination policies for COVID-19," has become increasingly vocal in his skepticism of the jabs since his healthy father's inexplicable cardiac death six months after vaccination.

In a phone interview with Just the News, he called COVID vaccines "one of the worst pharmaceutical interventions in the history of medicine" whose harm is so thoroughly documented that "it shouldn't even be worthy of debate" to pause vaccination campaigns.

The only explanation in his mind is "the increasing unchecked power of Big Pharma over the last two decades" and "willful blindness" of policymakers and regulators.

That's one reason he published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance — it doesn't take money from corporate interests. "I want a good rebuttal" to the paper, but most criticism has consisted of "character assassinations," Malhotra said.

He's testifying on COVID vaccine damage before the All-Party Parliamentary Group in the House of Commons Thursday. "The British government must announce an immediate halt to the UK's Covid-19 vaccine programme and launch a public inquiry to fully assess the risks and benefits associated with new mRNA vaccine technology," Malhotra wrote.

The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) will undertake "recommendation votes" for the adult and child/adolescent immunization schedules and COVID vaccines, according to the Federal Register notice for the meetings Thursday and Friday.

This is despite the fact that vaccines for younger children are still under emergency use authorization. The FDA itself warns healthcare professionals not to use Pfizer's fully approved Comirnaty vaccine "interchangeably" with its EUA vaccine for children 5-11.

Malhotra, who previously campaigned to tax sugary drinks and against overprescription of statins, told Just the News he never faced censorship before COVID.

Facebook locked him out of his account for 24 hours after he shared Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo's controversial assessment of post-vaccination cardiac deaths in young men, Malhotra told GB News. Twitter briefly censored Ladapo's tweet thread as well.

Facebook extended the lockout another few days, Malhotra said, after finding a two-week-old video where he called for a pause on COVID vaccination until "all the raw data" on trials "has been released for independent analysis." He accused Facebook of "trawling through" his account "looking for misinformation."

It's not Malhotra's first tiff with social media, he told Just the News. Facebook censored him last year for sharing a Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics study, later retracted, that found dangerously high carbon-dioxide intake in masked schoolchildren. Facebook threatened to penalize users for sharing the paper even before its retraction.

LinkedIn permanently suspended him last year for sharing his appearance on GB News discussing a possible link between mRNA vaccination and heart attacks, Malhotra said.

While LinkedIn said he could appeal the decision, it didn't respond to multiple appeals he filed. "I suspect this is [due to] Bill Gates," a major funder of vaccine research and former chairman of LinkedIn parent Microsoft, he said.

His deplatforming by LinkedIn made Malhotra "a little bit more careful" about what he said, given the anonymous complaints filed against him with the General Medical Council and "trolls" claiming he's spreading misinformation.

But Malhotra is pleased that he has not otherwise been canceled. He remains visiting professor of evidence-based medicine at Brazil's Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, president of the Scientific Advisory Committee of the U.K. Public Health Collaboration charity and a trustee of The King's Fund, which advises the U.K. government and just invited him to its annual conference.

Other medical professionals who challenge COVID conventional wisdom have faced puzzling apparent restrictions on their social media usage.

Indiana University immunologist Steve Templeton, who writes the "Fear of a Microbial Planet" newsletter and forthcoming book, told a listserv recently it has been "impossible for me to gain followers" consistently on Twitter for several months, speculating he's been "shadowbanned."

He told Just the News "there were a lot of people that are seeing weird things happening to their follower numbers lately" and wondered if "COVID militants" were also losing followers.

Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn didn't respond to queries.

The latest wave of social media censorship comes as mainstream scientific discourse is taking heart inflammation following COVID vaccination more seriously.

This week, the journal Science said "several new studies suggest" these heart injuries can take "months to heal," with unknown long-term consequences, and that doctors are divided on the risk-benefit calculus for boosting young people. FDA advisor Paul Offit is well-known for his skepticism of boosting young people and voting against so-called bivalent vaccines that include Omicron subvariants.

A joint CDC-Kaiser Permanente Northern California study in the Annals of Internal Medicine this month found the risk of two-dose myocarditis or pericarditis to be one in 6,700 for boys 12-15 years old, and one in 8,000 for 16-17 year-old boys. The risk for the two age groups went opposite directions for boosters: one in 16,000 and one in 6,000.

Men 18-29 were just behind them in risk, around one in 11,000 after the second dose and one in 19,000 after boosting.

Several doctors remain unimpressed by the quality of evidence made public for the authorization of bivalent boosters.

Pfizer's human data showing "an increase in circulating antibodies seven days after the dose" say little about protection against severe disease or the duration of elevated antibodies, Nicole Saphier, assistant professor at Weill Cornell Medical College, wrote for Fox News.

"To put this plainly, there are no data on the bivalent booster shot in kids," safety data for their age group or effect of the new boosters on previously infected or boosted children, she said.

"I'd love to see the data on the Omicron vaccine in children but the Biden admin will not release it," Johns Hopkins medical professor and National Academy of Medicine member Marty Makary tweeted. "Why can't it be made public?"

The CDC’s mostly-ineffective vaccine advisory committee will meet today starting at 8:30AM (EST) to decide whether to recommend making the experimental mRNA covid vaccine part of the childhood vaccine schedule. Then the CDC will ignore the committee and do whatever the government wanted to do anyway. If you’re a glutton for punishment, you can watch the all-day hearing here:

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/index.html

Actually, if you’ve time and interest, you’ll probably hear a lot of public comment that you agree with, including solid scientific information. So it might be worth a watch. Some of us have to work, though.

Public comments are still open and are due before the end of the day tomorrow. It might not do any good, but it can’t hurt to throw your $0.02 in. Hey, THEY asked. There were only 422 approved comments as of this morning, which blew my mind. Surely we can do better than that. Here’s the link where you can submit your comment, but read the rest of this section first.

https://www.regulations.gov/do...t/CDC-2022-0111-0001

If (when) the CDC approves the drugs for the childhood vaccine schedule, Pfizer and Moderna will immediately enjoy permanent liability protection. Their current liability protection under the PREP and CARES Acts ends when emergency use authorization expires. Thus, childhood vaccination scheduling is IMPERATIVE for the drugmakers, and thus, also imperative for their captured government regulators.

Regardless of whether the CDC approves scheduling the mRNA shots, remember — we’re in a war, not a battle. If the covid shots are scheduled, we’ll shift the battle lines to de-scheduling them.

We will never, ever quit.
_________________

A new pre-print study published on medRxIV last week titled, “Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly informed from pre-vaccination national seroprevalence studies.” In the study, researchers calculated the current worldwide ‘infection fatality rate’ for covid. You remember the IFR — it’s the ratio of number of deaths to number of confirmed infections.

Back in the day, you could get canceled for comparing covid’s IFR to the flu’s IFR.

The researchers found, for unvaccinated and for previously uninfected, the median covid infection fatality rates were:

0.0003% at 0-19 yrs

0.003% at 20-29 yrs

0.011% at 30-39 yrs

0.035% at 40-49 yrs

0.129% at 50-59 yrs

0.501% at 60-69 yrs

I probably don’t need to say this, but for all cohorts under 50, these IFR’s are far below the flu. For 50-59, the covid IFR is comparable to flu. And, flu IFR’s are also higher for older people, I just don’t have those figures handy this morning.

So.

Another new study was published this month in medRxIV titled, “Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against infection and COVID-19 hospitalization with SARS-coV-2 Omicron sub variants: BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5.”

The researchers looked at the effectiveness of three doses of mRNA jabs to prevent infection and hospitalization from each of the five primary Omicron variants. Although the study authors scrupulously avoid discussing this awkward fact, their table shows that, for all variants except BA.1, the vaccine efficacy (VE) ends up NEGATIVE. Meaning, a thrice-vaccinated person is MORE LIKELY to get a subsequent Omicron infection than unvaccinated people:

You know what you DON’T want in a vaccine? Negative efficacy. It sort of defeats the purpose. And remember, this study included hospitalization, so it addresses the argument that the drugs reduce severity. In other words, if you have to stay at the hospital, I think we can all agree you have a ‘bad’ case.

What’s most ironic about this data is that a lot of people who refused to take the jabs got fired. But it turns out they actually protected their coworkers better than the vaccinated employees did.

Funny old world, isn’t it?

https://open.substack.com/pub/...ost&utm_medium=email

This is the problem for the layman. Mountains of data, but it's impossible for the common man to get a true grasp of what's going on.

They want the “vaccine” as a mandatory part of childhood vaccination? I’m glad my kids are old enough where this forced poisoning won’t be an issue for them. Said poisoning will be enough for people to go to war over. This should be a huge red flag for all but the most rabid “vaccine” sycophants. This is planned genocide, nothing less. For a virus that has become no more dangerous than the flu.

This will backfire. Parents are waking up. This will lead to less acceptance of ALL vaccines.

The most important words parents will have to use are: "I will not comply".

CDC Set To Add COVID-19 Vaccines To Childhood Immunization Schedule

A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advisory committee is set to vote on Thursday over whether to add the Covid-19 vaccine to the recommended schedule of vaccines for children.

And while left-wing fact checkers were quick to point out that this doesn't automatically mean schools will require students to take the jab - a decision made at the local level - even ABC News admits; "If the CDC does update its list of suggested vaccinations to include the COVID vaccine, which is available to anyone 6 months or older, that will open the door for states to begin making those calls, too."

The CDC also pushed back, stating that it's Thursday meting is an annual gathering to simply update which vaccines doctors should recommend to their patients - with no acknowledgement that most doctors are going to follow it.

"Thursday, CDC's independent advisory committee (ACIP) will vote on an updated childhood immunization schedule. States establish vaccine requirements for school children, not [the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] or CDC," the agency wrote in response to a segment by Fox News' Tucker Carlson, who reported that the updated childhood vaccine schedule would soon mean that kids "will not be able to attend school without taking the COVID shot."

"State laws establish vaccination requirements for school children. These laws often apply not only to children attending public schools but also to those attending private schools and day care facilities," the CDC writes on its website, adding "All states provide medical exemptions, and some state laws also offer exemptions for religious and/or philosophical reasons."

Tucker responds:

On Wednesday, a CDC advisory committee separately decided to add the COVID vaccine to the Vaccines for Children program, which provides government-funded jabs to children who aren't insured or can't afford to pay.

"Equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines for all ages and populations remains critically important," said the CDCs Dr. Sara Oliver at the meeting, ABC News reports. "This includes now, while the vaccines are being supplied by the federal government, and in the future, when we one day move to a commercial program."

Sen Rand Paul (R-KY) slammed the decision, calling it "Appalling!"

Paul had more to say on the topic:

And as Summit News notes, Paul responded recent revelations from Boston University, which recently made headlines for genetically engineering a strain of Covid with an 80% mortality rate in mice.

Others noted that there's little to no data on how the Omicron strain of Covid-19 affects children.

So - while adding the Covid-19 vaccine to the list of recommended childhood immunizations does not automatically mean kids will be forced to get it if they want to attend school - it's nothing more than a game of semantics when it's clear that most schools will follow the guidance.

As Alex Berenson writes in The Burning Platform;

If I were a Republican candidate in a blue state, I would have ads about school Covid vaccine mandates ready to go today, assuming the the CDC vaccine committee is foolish enough to throw this chum in the water. At a time when countries all over the world are now rejecting mRNA shots for kids, can our public health “experts” really be this stupid? Or this beholden to the mRNA companies?

Experience suggests the answer is yes.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covi...mmunization-schedule

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:


CDC Set To Add COVID-19 Vaccines To Childhood Immunization Schedule

Over my dead body.

quote:

Originally posted by erj_pilot:

quote:

Originally posted by arabiancowboy:
I want to see people fired and thrown in jail.

You are much more compassionate and gentler and kinder than I. I want to see people swinging gently in the breeze at the end of a rope. But that’s just the Italian in me coming out…

I was thinking fired and the ashes swept up afterwards, but I guess swinging in the breeze could be okay too. Whatever it takes to give folks pause when they consider trying something like this again. Somehow, I don’t see congressional inquiries providing enough deterrent effect.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
This is the problem for the layman. Mountains of data, but it's impossible for the common man to get a true grasp of what's going on.

At the closing for my 1st & only house, I said to the banker, title person & RE person: "You know, if you want to make money at something, make it complicated enough that a normal person can't or won't do it, then get the gov't to make it required.

I've torn apart enough data to know you usually can't conclude anything with certainty, so you average, throw out what you don't like, regress linearly (prof liked that twist of words), etc.

CDC says kids get the jab

How is Pfizer stock this afternoon?

Went to the pharmacy today, almost saw two 70s aged men get into it oved social distancing.

It's been almost three years! Fuck.

Most pediatricians won't accept or keep your child as a patient if you reject any vaccinations. Our pediatrician mentioned she could make $100,000+ yearly if she pushed vaccines like other doctors in the area.

Some states allow for religion exemptions for school and sports if you're willing to jump through some paperwork hoops, but many don't know that's even an option.

Most parents will likely just do what the doctor wants.

quote:

Originally posted by sse:
CDC says kids get the jab

Link?

quote:

Originally posted by sse:
CDC says kids get the jab

CDC recommends the poison but is not in a position to mandate anything. That will be up to states, jurisdictions, etc. 21 states have made it illegal to require vaccines to attend schools in them. As for doctors requiring the snake oil to keep seeing them, I would tell them to read up on the Hippocratic oath and begin looking for a rational practice.

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds:

CDC recommends the poison but is not in a position to mandate anything. That will be up to states, jurisdictions, etc.

Yes, but the CDC knows that at least a dozen states have laws or regulations that will mandate whatever schedule the CDC recommends. So in effect, they are mandating the covid shot for those children in at least those states who attend public school.

Not happening in FL.

DeSantis: “As Long as I am Governor, in Florida There Will Not be a Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate For Children in Our Schools” (VIDEO)


By Cristina Laila
Published October 20, 2022 at 4:46pm

Governor Ron DeSantis responded to the Biden Regime and CDC’s latest attempt to force Covid vaccines on children.

On Thursday, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted to recommend COVID-19 to be included in the 2023 childhood immunization schedule in 15 unanimous votes.

ACIP recommends the use of COVID-19 vaccines for everyone ages 6 months and older. COVID-19 vaccine and other vaccines may be administered on the same day.

DeSantis said as long as he is governor, the Covid-19 vaccine will not be mandated for school children in Florida.

“As long as I am Governor, in Florida there will not be a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for children in our schools,” DeSantis said.

He continued, “That is your decision to make as a parent. These are new shots. I get a kick out of it when people compare to MMR – things that have been around for decades and decades.”

quote:

Originally posted by Skins2881:
Went to the pharmacy today, almost saw two 70s aged men get into it over social distancing.

It's been almost three years! Fuck.

I was thinking about this while lying in bed half awake this AM, and angers me what we've been through and more importantly, put our children though during the previous 'almost three years'! We NEVER EVER should have done and/or accepted ANY of this shit in the first place!

If you're that afraid to be out in public, then maybe you shouldn't!

Pfizer laughing all the way to the bank

Raises price of their children's kill shot to $110/dose hours after ACIP votes to include it in the children's schedule.
Meryl Dorey

As I reported earlier, Pfizer, the corporation which has paid the highest fines for fraud of any company worldwide, and who our governments are saying we should trust with the health of our children and ourselves, has had their COVID jab added to the US Childhood Vaccination Schedule today by the US CDC’s Advisory Committee On Immunization Practices (ACIP).

The schedule is:

3 X doses for all children over 6 months
4 X doses for immunocompromised/other sick children.

One has to wonder how many of these kids will survive this assault on their bodies? And for those who don’t die straight away, how many will be left disabled or infertile or both? And how many will have their lives shortened by heart issues, autoimmunity or other vaccine-associated conditions?

But this approval was necessary in order for Pfizer and Moderna - the two suppliers of COVID jabs for children in the US and Australia - to maintain their indemnity protection from lawsuits. So despite the fact that no research has been conducted into safety, efficacy or necessity of these jabs in this age group, all US (and soon all Australian) kids will be the target.

Never a company to let an opportunity for profit go, Pfizer increased the cost of their COVID jabs within a matter of hours of the ACIP vote.

Evil doesn’t even begin to describe these companies and the authorities who have placed our children and adults in the way of harm and death for their own profit.

https://open.substack.com/pub/...ost&utm_medium=email