quote:

Originally posted by 6guns:
This morning I woke up with cold symptoms, but overall feel okay for now. I'm not going to get a "test" because of the unreliability and BS of it all, but I'm here to ask about Ivermectin.

Good for you, not worrying about "testing".

Regarding Ivermectin:
There is no question that it has been suppressed by the CDC and the FDA for "off label" use for Covid.

However, as much as I have read that was positive for Ivermectin, there is this recent study that shows little effect. Certainly it's not dangerous, but possibly little effect. In the study it was only used for 3 days; I've heard 5 days, so who knows?

Effect of Ivermectin vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With Mild to Moderate COVID-19
A Randomized Clinical Trial
https://jamanetwork.com/journa.../fullarticle/2797483

Biden puts U.S. children at grave medical risk
By Deane Waldman, M.D.

As a pediatrician (and cardiologist) for nearly fifty years, I cannot remain silent while President Biden – an unlicensed, untrained, wanna-be physician – practices bad medicine on our nation’s children. Following the CDC’s unwarranted revision of the vaccination schedule for children, Biden urged all Americans to get their children vaccinated and boosted against CoViD; mRNA injections – the “jab” – are neither safe, nor effective, and certainly unnecessary in healthy babies, children, and young adults.

To most physicians, the CDC’s recommended routine vaccination schedule has been the gold standard. After all, CDC has access to reams of medical data and employs tens of thousands of analysts to review outcomes data. Clinical physicians do not have the time to review all this information themselves. We must rely on the CDC to provide a vaccination schedule for children (and adults) that is proven by hard evidence to be safe and effective against deadly infectious diseases. CDC is, purportedly, an apolitical agency driven solely by medical considerations, with no political agenda. Or so we thought!

Most clinicians believed this, at least until CoViD. The evidence slowly came out that CDC withheld, manipulated, distorted, and outright lied about medical data. They gaslighted the public in order to support the official Washington narrative. The CDC changed definitions in order to justify mandates to mask, lockdown, and take the jab. They banned, canceled, and censored any reports that question the medical necessity of their pseudo-martial law in the name of public health.

As just exposed by Joseph Mercola, neither Pfizer nor Moderna did the testing necessary to confirm the jab would prevent the spread of CoViD. The CDC and FDA knew this. Even as they told Americans it was their civic duty to protect others from contagion by getting the jab, Biden and the CDC knew the mRNA vaccine was a fraud: it did not stop viral spread!

A purely medical advisory agency has been corrupted into a political tool of the Biden administration.

Recently, a 15-person CDC panel called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted unanimously, without public comment or dissenting medical opinions, to add mRNA jabs to the recommended routine vaccination schedule for children, beginning when they are 6 months old.

Apparently, the ACIP members never read or chose to ignore reports by Drs. Paul Alexander, Kristie Clarke, Charles Kim, Jennifer Margulis, Joseph Mercola, Jack Phillips, Zachary Stieber, US Politics and News, Deane Waldman, and Allen Zhong to name but a few. These and other reports prove the jab has frequent, serious, even life-threatening adverse effects; masks don’t work; lockdowns cause more harm than good; and natural immunity (which CDC said doesn’t exist!) is more protective than mRNA injections.

Trust in the CDC, crumbling before now, was totally shattered by the latest move: to impose mRNA vaccination – the “jab” – on children. That was a final straw, sweeping away any remaining faith clinical doctors or average Americans have in the CDC.

Children are in no danger from CoViD. The vast majority – 99.97 percent – have inherent defenses, natural immunity, against CoViD. No CoViD vaccine, or any other, standard vaccine, comes close to this level of protection. Given the dangers associated with mRNA vaccines, and absence of medical risk from CoViD infection in children (and healthy adults), there is no medical justification for the CDC to add CoViD to the routine vaccination schedule. Furthermore, there is another compelling reason not to do so: lack of outcomes data.

For the standard vaccinations, viz., against polio, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus (DPT), and measles, mumps and rubella (MMR), there were literally decades of outcomes research before vaccines were given to the general population. For CoViD, based on Fauci’s and CDC advice, the FDA approved mRNA vaccination with no long-term data! The short-term data that showed safety concerns were hidden by the CDC and censored by academia. Recently, the FDA recently approved a booster with no clinical trials at all.

In an attempt to avoid accountability for unpopular mandates based on the revised vaccination schedule, a CDC spokesperson lamely declared the ACIP decision “does not alter official policy.” No one was fooled.

The hidden but very real peril related to the new CDC schedule is that school districts might require a vaccine card before allowing in-person education. Noting the danger to Florida’s school age and younger population, Governor DeSantis immediately responded saying, "As long as I’m kicking and screaming, there will be no COVID shot mandates for your kids.”

Based on purely medical criteria, children do not need and should not be given mRNA vaccination against CoViD. When the CDC advises and the president mandates administration of the jab, they go against sound medical practice and put our children at unnecessary medical risk.

https://www.americanthinker.co...ve_medical_risk.html

The studies on Ivermectin may be limited or somehow otherwise in question, but the studies done on HCQ were run by the NIH, the first one back when SARS-1 reared it’s ugly head. They demonstrated that it prevented the virus from entering cells.

HCQ & Ivermectin have both been used by hundreds of millions from all ages sexes and ethnic groups, and the side effects are well known and minor. They should have been the first defense against Covid, not a highly experimental shot with virtually no real testing.

Wasn't Ivermectin tested widely, as in country-wide, in India since they couldn't get their hands on any of the Experimental Use Authorized "vaccines"?? I believe it's been reported that MILLIONS of lives were saved due to the use of Ivermectin, yes??

Shoot, I just bought a tube of Ivermectin at our local Tractor Supply store. It was eleven bucks. Lots of info out there on how to reduce the dosage for a human.

quote:

Originally posted by erj_pilot:
Wasn't Ivermectin tested widely, as in country-wide, in India since they couldn't get their hands on any of the Experimental Use Authorized "vaccines"?? I believe it's been reported that MILLIONS of lives were saved due to the use of Ivermectin, yes??

I think there were also studies in Japan that showed Ivermectin to be effective.

quote:

Originally posted by erj_pilot:
Wasn't Ivermectin tested widely, as in country-wide, in India since they couldn't get their hands on any of the Experimental Use Authorized "vaccines"?? I believe it's been reported that MILLIONS of lives were saved due to the use of Ivermectin, yes??

Every country below the Sahara desert uses ivermectin to prevent river blindness, you didn’t hear about huge numbers of people dying from C19 there, did you? Ivermectin works-they knew it from the start and pushed the mRNA shit anyway.

Yes there were deaths in those countries as not all of the population uses ivermectin, it only is needed around Rivers where the flies live that cause the blindness. But nothing like the die off elsewhere.

October 28, 2022
Disaster: CDC Calls for COVID-19 Vaccines on the Child Immunization Schedule

By C.J. Baker, M.D.

The CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) met on October 20, 2022. Despite the protestations of child advocates and physicians (including your humble correspondent), the committee voted unanimously to add the COVID-19 vaccines to the Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule.

Put bluntly, the committee blew it. Scientifically, ethically, and as public policy, this was a terrible decision — and one that, if allowed to stand, will cause irreparable harm to countless American children.

Here are the top ten reasons that COVID-19 vaccines should not be on the Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule:

The risk/benefit ratio of the COVID-19 vaccines is UNFAVORABLE for children. It is now known beyond debate that the risk of serious illness and death from COVID-19 a) is strongly correlated with advancing age, b) is declining over time as the virus continues to mutate, and c) is and always has been vanishingly small in children. Comparison to VAERS and EudraVigilance data shows much greater risk to children from COVID-19 vaccine-adverse events than from COVID-19 infection itself.
The COVID-19 vaccines do NOT stop a recipient from either contracting the disease or transmitting it to others. Exhibit A for this would be the recent COVID-19 diagnosis of the reportedly quintuple-vaxxed CDC director, Rochelle Walensky. These vaccines are ineffective in efforts to create herd immunity — unlike many of the established vaccines for other diseases that are already on the schedule.
The CDC decision ignores natural immunity. The CDC itself has released recent data showing that 86% of school-aged American children already have had prior COVID-19 infection. With the committee's decision, the CDC yet again dismisses natural immunity as a protective factor against COVID-19 disease — a position so unscientific and intellectually dishonest that other factors (political, monetary) seem the only plausible explanation for it.
The COVID-19 vaccines have NO long-term safety data. How could they? They have been in use less than two years. Young children receiving these vaccines will live for up to a century having to deal with the unforeseen risks of these injections, the magnitude of which we have zero knowledge of at present.
The COVID-19 vaccines have much more worrisome safety data than vaccines already on the schedule. COVID-19 vaccines have well known, well demonstrated, significant toxicities in children and young persons (e.g., myocarditis) that occur in significant excess relative to other vaccines currently on the Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule. Reports of vaccine-related deaths from COVID-19 vaccines far outnumber reports related to other time-tested vaccines already on the CDC schedule.
The CDC's decision completely contradicts those of multiple nations who have made appropriate risk/benefit analyses and ended pediatric COVID-19 vaccine programs. Sweden, the rare nation that remained mostly sane in its COVID-19 policies since the onset of the pandemic, never recommended COVID-19 vaccines for children under 12 and has now ceased to recommend them in older children as well. Denmark no longer offers COVID-19 vaccines to any healthy children under 18. The CDC, to my knowledge, has never publicly addressed the decisions of these nations or why they were made.
Adding COVID-19 vaccines to the CDC schedule will absolutely result in their being required for school attendance in many states. The CDC has, rather disingenuously, stated that their schedules are not mandates. However, the COVID-19 era has taught us that most health commissioners and school officials, especially in Democrat-run states, treat CDC recommendations as gospel. Gavin Newsom in California has already stated he will mandate COVID-19 vaccines for schools in California. Kathy Hochul in New York and Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan will no doubt do the same if re-elected. These recommendations are effectively mandates for millions of American children — approximately 13 million in California and New York alone.
The decision is completely out of step with most American parents. The CDC's own data show that most parents have chosen not to have their children vaccinated against COVID-19. Furthermore, the younger the age group, the lower the percentage of children vaccinated. And somehow, these children have survived COVID-19! In essence, parents have collectively shown a degree of logic, common sense, and ability to perform basic risk-benefit analyses that seems completely beyond the capacity of the CDC. The only remaining question for many thinking, concerned parents seems to be whether the CDC a) doesn't give a damn about children, b) is completely incompetent, c) is completely corrupt, or d) all of the above.
Mandating these new and minimally tested therapies on millions of American schoolchildren will further undermine trust in the immunization schedule for years to come. In short, it will backfire. Population-wide confidence in the current vaccine schedules has already been seriously undermined by the COVID-19 vaccine policies that have caused countless Americans (including thousands of health care workers) to lose their jobs. In my practice, I now find a number of patients refusing some or even all vaccines, despite my recommendations otherwise, as a result of the coercion they felt regarding COVID-19. This will happen at the pediatric level, as well, if COVID-19 vaccines are imposed on schoolchildren. The horrible irony is that children will suffer and die for lack of beneficial vaccines as a result of the CDC's attempts to force unnecessary COVID-19 vaccines on them. This is public health malfeasance of the worst kind.
The prime directive of medicine is primum non nocere — first, do no harm. At present, the risk/benefit ratio for the COVID-19 vaccines in children is not even close. The CDC committee's decision gives the middle finger to all four pillars of medical ethics: autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. For this reason alone, it should have never been made.

The CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' recent unanimous decision to add COVID-19 vaccination to the Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule is shameful. It is unscientific, unethical, bad policy. It is further evidence — if we need any more at this stage in the COVID-19 saga — that the public health bureaucracy in the United States is corrupt and broken, perhaps beyond repair.

The potential electoral defeat of gubernatorial COVID-19 tyrants like Kathy Hochul or Gretchen Whitmer would provide respite to millions of families and children, and would be most welcome to the vulnerable in those states. However, the dismantling of the medical-industrial complex in Washington, D.C. is the only ultimate solution to the seemingly endless governmental assault on medical autonomy that the COVID-19 pandemic has made so obvious.

https://www.americanthinker.co...zation_schedule.html

For your Halloween enjoyment, the Monster Vax:

Both my physicians have eliminated the mask requirement, some employees wear them but my Doctors are not and patients are no longer required.

Funny sitting in my Pulmonary docs waiting room of the 5-6 people that came in all had masks on but me and one other patient.

Pool store has had the laminate up at the register and pool testing area, I said something a week or so ago about getting the message that the panic is over, maybe join in the rest of the world...

They are gone now... last two hold outs in my world...

The masks are part of the hoax, and some people won't be giving them up any time soon.

Yet another sighting today of a woman in her car, alone, mask on.

In the part of central Florida I live in it is so few people wearing masks you hardly notice it anymore.
The ones locally I do see are usually the elderly.

We were at Disney for our friends anniversary dinner this weekend and noticed some tourist still wearing them.

I was on a flight form MCO to RDU this AM and over 50% of the people were wearing masks getting on the plane...I thought "WTF is going on...did I miss the memo?!"

quote:

Originally posted by GrumpyMCO:
I was on a flight form MCO to RDU this AM and over 50% of the people were wearing masks getting on the plane...I thought "WTF is going on...did I miss the memo?!"

LOL

You should see where I work.


They eliminated masking a while back but some people still do…every single one of them like age 22-25, none older than that.

Brainwashed, compliant little sheep

COVID-19: A Universe Of Questions In A Time Of Universal Deceit

Authored by Michael Bryant via Off-Guardian.org,

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act"

-George Orwell

As we approach the third year of the ‘Covid Crisis’, the once unassailable Covid Story – reported and repeated by politicians, public health mandarins and all mainstream media – has been replaced by contradictions and inconsistencies.

The original Covid Story narrated by health ‘experts’ and government officials told of a particularly virulent pathogen which besieged the planet in 2020 and spread like wildfire– terrorizing, infecting, and killing people en masse.

It was the story of a “pandemic level event” in which people were told to stay indoors, entire sectors of society were forced to shut down and humans were told to do everything possible to avoid contact with one another.

It was a story of closed down schools, closed down businesses, closed down churches and soon-to-be overwhelmed hospitals.

In later chapters the Covid Story morphed from ironclad truths, “Follow the science”, to ever changing definitions, “The science evolves.” Countless aspects of the “official” narrative changed overnight. Gradually the tale became fraught with pages of questionable statistics and ever shifting storylines.

What was one to make of all of these contradictions and ministerial mutations?

Did today’s story make sense with yesterday’s? Will tomorrow’s make sense with today’s?

Soon the only certainty within the Covid narrative became its uncertainty– the moment the Covid story “you thought you knew” was on solid footing the sands shifted yet again.

Attempting to make sense of the Covid conundrum soon required navigating a complex labyrinth of deceits, manipulations, obfuscations and concealments. Separating fact from fiction became more challenging each day.

While most persisted with the media storyline and government edicts, some began to take notice of the numerous anomalies and started asking questions.

The most glaring question was simply: “Why was no one allowed to ask questions?” Once this Pandora’s Box opened, a stream of questions came tumbling out.

Why wasn’t the media asking any questions? How were they all operating in lockstep?

Were we alerted to this “pandemic-level event” by our direct observations and experiences?

Were we surrounded by sick people, in our homes, neighborhoods and workplaces who were succumbing to a quick-spreading and dangerous virus?

If we were truly in a pandemic of biblical proportions would there be so much discussion of the epidemiological minutiae?

Bit by bit as most of the accepted narrative began to unravel, questioning the “official story” became more than a revolutionary act it became an obligation.

If you have to be persuaded, reminded, pressured, lied to, incentivized, coerced, bullied, socially shamed, guilt-tripped, threatened, punished and criminalized. If all of this is considered necessary to gain your compliance — you can be absolutely certain that what is being promoted is not in your best interest. Ian Watson

To sell the Covid Story a mass marketing campaign rife with its own nomenclature was launched. The constant drumbeat of the Covid battle cry became inescapable resembling military grade propaganda rather than public health messaging.

Were these Covid watch words and rallying cries intended to serve public health or were they designed merely to be obeyed? Where did these ideas and phrases come from?

Why did the media and government relentlessly stoke public fear and anxiety?

Why were millions spent on behavioral management teams?

How did the phrase “the new normal” emerge within the first weeks of the pandemic?

Was sustained psychological manipulation utilized to create fear and coerce the public?

Were Covid symptoms genuinely unique or were we being conditioned to believe there was a new disease?

Were statistics about Covid deaths being manipulated to create the perception of a crisis?

Were lockdowns about protection or social control?

Did lockdowns reduce deaths or cause increased mortality?

Was there ever any evidence for ”asymptomatic spread” or was this overstated to frighten the public?

How did we go from “two weeks to flatten the curve” to permanent emergency “laws?

"Hospitals and doctors are getting rich off a sickened mass population."

- Steven Magee, Hypoxia, Mental Illness & Chronic Fatigue

One of the earliest Covid Campaign methods used to alert the public to the coming storm of dire illness centered on the belief that hospitals were going to be overwhelmed by a cascade of the Covid infected.

“Two weeks to flatten the curve” became a national rallying cry.

The public was flooded with stories of overflowing hospital corridors and swamped ICU’s. Makeshift hospitals were swiftly constructed to take in the excess casualties. The unquestioning media amplified these stories creating a climate of widespread panic and hysteria.

Was any of this true?

Were US hospitals really overwhelmed? What does the data say?

Were NYC hospitals overwhelmed in Spring 2020?

Was Elmhurst hospital, the ‘epicenter of the epicenter’, overflowing in Spring 2020?

Were ICUs flooded with patients?

Were US hospitals busier in 2020 than they were in 2019?

Are hospitals regularly overrun during cold and flu season?

"Fear is a market. To instill fear in people also has advantages. Not only in terms of drug use. Anxiety-driven people are easier to rule."

- Gerd Gogerenzer, Director Emeritus, Max Planck Institute for Educational Research

As the pandemic picked up speed, the “Covid death toll” became a daily marker hammered home by media bullhorns and mortality scoreboards.

Ghastly tales of the “first wave” of Covid fatalities were plastered all over media channels in lockstep. Harrowing tales of overflowing morgues and refrigerated trucks filled with Covid cadavers saturated the evening news. While a simpler explanation for these trucks was readily available, a compliant and complicit media plugged its ears and continued to manufacture mass hysteria.

Again all questions that might sow seeds of skepticism were kept away from public discussion.

But was this advertised death march verifiable or was this yet another feature of the Covid fear campaign?

Were Covid death counts and death certificates accurate or were Covid deaths artificially inflated?

What was the average age of Covid deaths and how did that compare with normal life expectancy?

What percentage of Covid deaths were from people who already had multiple comorbidities?

Were the photos of coffins from Bergamo, Italy, in March 2020, used to terrify the world, authentic?

Why did CNN report that a 7-year-old Georgia boy died from Covid when he drowned in a bathtub after a seizure.

How many Covid deaths due to “intentional and unintentional injury, poisoning and other adverse events” were placed in the CDC COVID death count?

Why were 14,369 injury deaths, 1,265 deaths due to falls, drowning deaths and suicides listed in the Covid-19 death count?

Why did the CDC change recording methods exclusively for Covid deaths and did this inflate Covid fatality numbers?

"One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth."

- Carl Sagan

As the purported wreckage of the “first wave” subsided and the body count failed to add up to the predicted totals, the narrative abruptly shifted.

“The Covid Death” was replaced by “The Covid Case” as the main vector of fear. What defined a “Covid Case” generally seemed up for grabs. “Case” definitions ranged from anyone “suspected of having Covid” to those who were ‘positive’ as established through PCR testing.

Nowhere in the media could one find an inquiring reporter who would question what it meant to be a “probable case.” Even as the PCR became a regular feature of daily life never was the soundness of its usage as a diagnostic tool examined by any mainstream source.

Were these case counts and the methods used situated on solid scientific ground?

Was Covid-19 a novel virus?

How did the peer-review process of the critical publication about the Covid PCR tests only take one day?

Were Covid PCR test results accurate?

Were Covid case counts and diagnoses accurate?

Were PCR tests used deceptively to invent Covid “cases?”

Why was the definition of a Covid “case” altered?

"Big Pharma needs sick people to prosper. Patients, not healthy people, are their customers. If everybody was cured of a particular illness or disease, pharmaceutical companies would lose 100% of their profits on the products they sell for that ailment. What all this means is because modern medicine is so heavily intertwined with the financial profits culture, it’s a sickness industry more than it is a health industry."

- James Morcan

Once it was firmly established in the public’s mind that a pathogenic menace was lurking just outside their door a non-stop barrage of messaging, gaslighting and coercion kicked in from all angles.

The entire world was repeatedly informed that the only salvation for the human species was a genetically engineered experimental medical product concocted at “Warp Speed” by giant Pharmaceutical companies. This and only this medication could save humanity from catastrophe.

Like many other facets of the Covid Story, the tale of Big Pharma and their magical potions unraveled upon further scrutiny. Multiple questions arose:

If Big Pharma is truly in the business of public health what is their historical record towards safeguarding public health?

What is Pfizer’s previous track record of fraud and corruption?

Has Big Pharma captured the FDA and the political and regulatory processes?

Does Big Pharma control the CDC?

Does Big Pharma influence clinical trials?

Were Pfizer’s clinical trials for Covid vaccines properly run trials?

Why did the FDA try to conceal Covid vaccine trial data for 75 years? What did the trial data reveal?

Why has the FDA refused to make its vaccine safety monitoring public?

How did the CDC decide the Pfizer clinical trials proved a ‘safe and effective’ vaccine?

"I’m for truth, no matter who tells it. I’m for justice, no matter who it is for or against. I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole."

- Malcolm X

When the mass rollout of the experimental Covid vaccines was launched, a compulsory campaign silencing all voices who dare question the vaccine imperative was set in motion. Even so, some voices of apprehension slipped through the cracks. Many of these voices were some of the most renowned medical practitioners in their field.

Why were their voices not allowed into the mainstream conversations?

Why were thousands of dissenting physicians censored and silenced?

Why were doctors who spoke out about early treatment vilified and censored?

Were the Covid vaccines necessary, effective or safe?

Would the Covid Vaccines stop hospitalizations or deaths?

Was evidence of harm and serious adverse events from the clinical trials covered up?

Why did the media maintain silence about potential dangers of the Covid vaccine?

Were people given proper informed consent for the Covid vaccines?

What did multiple studies as early as 2020 say about the Covid vaccines and microvascular injury?

Why weren’t independent scientists allowed to examine the mRNA vaccine vials?

Was there a connection between heart inflammation and the Covid vaccines?

Why were kids targeted for vaccination when it was known they were at zero risk from the disease in question?

Were there doctors calling for a halt to the Covid vaccine program?

Ultimately a comprehensive and complete reckoning with the ‘Covid Story’ is not possible without a thorough examination of the policies which unfolded in hospitals and nursing homes and the catastrophic consequences.

While hospital workers were feted as heroes, reports began to leak out hinting that what actually occurred inside these medical institutions was contrary to the sustained media narrative. As more stories surfaced, suspicions escalated that this too was part of the Covid mythology.

Questions concerning treatments in hospitals and nursing homes emerged and allegations about monied interests materialized.

Were hospitals incentivized to manufacture Covid patients?

What were the Covid hospital treatment protocols?

Were hospitals incentivized to put Covid patients on ventilators and to use Remdesivir?

Did these incentives and protocols endanger people?

"Silence in the face of evil is itself evil."

- Dietrich Bonhoeffer

In the early chapters of the Covid Story, perhaps no other storyline trapped our imaginations and pulled on our heartstrings quite like the “Saving Grandma” shibboleth. We were told that “Covid-19” targeted the old and the sick and multiple reports from across the globe revealed a consistent pattern of how ghastly situations in long-term care facilities unfolded.

As more information on this piece of the sordid Covid puzzle surfaced more questions came to light.

Did thousands of elderly die because of Covid or was the management of their end-of-life treatment withdrawn actively putting them in a situation that ensured their death?

What did they mean when they said “taking care of the elderly?”

How did they “take care of the elderly in Canada?” In the UK? In France? In Maryland?In Massachusetts?In Washington DC? In Mississippi? In NewYork? In New Jersey? In Minnesota? In Indiana? In Louisiana? In Michigan? In Rhode Island?

Were conditions for high death rates at Care Homes created on purpose?

"I live in the Managerial Age, in a world of “Admin.” The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid “dens of crime” that Dickens loved to paint. It is not done even in concentration camps and labour camps. In those we see its final result. But it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voices."

- C.S. Lewis

All intricate stories require a cast of characters and the Covid Chronicle was no different. Neil Ferguson and Christian Drosten played significant supporting roles behind the scenes while others, like Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates, took center stage. As we moved through the Covid narrative we “came to know” these personalities through the portraits painted by a uniformly deferential media.

Were these images of our Covid cast of characters accurate depictions? How much about them did we really know?

What did Neil Ferguson’s original computer models predict about Covid deaths and what was his well documented track record?

How did his calamitous and inaccurate predictions play such a central role in determining government policy?

Who is Christian Drosten and how did he develop the now famous Covid PCR test?

Who is The Real Anthony Fauci?

What role did Anthony Fauci play in the HIV/AIDS crisis?

Given that Bill Gates has no medical training, why did he play such a central role in determining government policy?

How did Bill Gates know in 2019 that vaccines would be “one of the best buys” in 2020?

How did Bill Gates use medical investments to turn $10 billion into $200 billion?

Why did the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation invest $55 million in the shares of BioNTech in August of 2019?

"They failed to see that globalisation was merely a tactic to prise power from nation states towards international conglomerates. Once the power was siphoned from the people and democratic control was circumvented, the ability to assert global governance without any democratic restraint was available."

-James Tunney

Finally, to understand the totality of the Covid Story it’s necessary to understand how the public health industry is inextricably linked to global financial markets and operates based on the demands of those financial conglomerates. Manufactured pandemics are now considered one of the biggest investment opportunities to increase the wealth of billionaires and consolidate their power.

The medical industry is no longer a system whose primary focus is to serve the health and well-being of the public. It is a system whose primary function is as a financial instrument for investors. The present-day policies that define the medical industry are designed to serve socioeconomic and political agendas which benefit these same financial elites.

Was the entire ‘Covid Crisis’ a genuine health emergency or was it an agenda rooted in fear to enrich the pockets of Big Pharma and their monied investors.

Here again the mainstream media remain dutifully silent, refusing to ask the most basic of questions:

Who owns Big Pharma?

Is it a coincidence that the Covid Public Health Emergency created over 500 new billionaires and coincided with one of the largest upwards transfers of wealth in human history?

Why were Big Banks being bailed out during the Covid era while small businesses were being pushed out?

How did workers around the world lose $3.7 trillion in the pandemic while billionaires around the world gained $3.9 trillion in the pandemic?

Is it possible to “follow the science” if the science is controlled by money?

What did the Head of the IMF say about the fate of the world’s economy and vaccines?

What is the “Great Reset?”

What is the Great Reset?

What are Central Bank Digital Currencies?

After a deeper dive into the Covid Hall of Mirrors one wonders if even a single strand of the story withstands scrutiny. Three years on and the wreckage from the fusillade of Covid policies continue to pile up. With every passing day more holes appear in the official narrative and more admissions come to light as officials scurry to avoid accountability.

As the dust settles in the aftermath of the Covid carnage we are left asking one final question:

“Was the entirety of the Covid Story a lie?”

https://www.zerohedge.com/covi...ime-universal-deceit

The intelligent people asked questions, didn’t believe the lies, and avoided poisoning themselves with a “vaccine” that was by no measure a true vaccine. The disinformation machine even went as far to redefine what the very word “vaccine” meant. Even now, with the admission by the various snake oils creators, the “vaccines” do not inhibit the transmission and spread of Covid. It in fact facilitates the continuous reinfection of the poor gullible people that took it into their bodies. Those of us that said “no” to the poison were demonized and Covid was attributed to the “pandemic of the unvaccinated. You almost never hear that nonsense anymore, and for good reason. It is an obvious lie.

NOBODY I know that avoided this poison has gotten Covid more than once. Nearly everyone I personally know that got it has had Covid more than once. Some have had it several times. One of them, in his 30’s and in good shape was put on a ventilator. The last time I spoke with him, he suffered from “tingling and numbness in his legs.

Sadly, we still see the results of what amounts to terrorism inflicted on us by our own government. A significant portion of the country that almost exclusively leans left hates those that didn’t allow the poison into their bodies. Is it true belief in the lies? Or is it embarrassment because they know we are not tainted like them by the false cure? Or is it purely political gerrymandering to further divide the nation, if not the world?

Google Covid and most hits are what is going on in China. Almost NOTHING about what is going on in the US except for fear mongering about “Frankenstein” variants just in time for the midterm elections. How ironic. I am sick and tired of the traitors, the money hungry liars, and the small minded simpletons that scream “follow the science!” when the actual science points out the clear discrepancies in their logic. I fear for friends and loved ones that fell for the rhetoric- we still have no idea of the long term damage done by the fake cure; if the ridiculous number of adverse affects are any indicator (including the deaths of thousands of people in the physical prime of their lives from sudden cardiac events alone) I’m afraid this is just the top of the iceberg.

My employer (a hospital system) still requires employees who are "patient-facing" and all patients/guests/etc. to wear a mask. This means all the big execs who stay in their offices all day and move in the upper tier circles are mask-free.

They have also required that all staff be fitted for an N95 mask. the question they cannot/won't answer is this: If these kleenex-like masks we've been wearing for the last 2.5 years are so effective, why does everyone need to be fitted for an N95?

It's obvious - the masks are for show only. Always have been. It says to the public sheep, "see, we're doing something. We're concerned for your safety." (BTW, the masks everyone is provided are literally kleenex-like; pull on it even slightly and it tears.

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds:
A significant portion of the country that almost exclusively leans left hates those that didn’t allow the poison into their bodies. Is it true belief in the lies? Or is it embarrassment because they know we are not tainted like them by the false cure? Or is it purely political gerrymandering to further divide the nation, if not the world?

.

For the most part it is true belief, at least with the people I know personally. It was fostered by blind allegiance to "their team", in large part due to TDS. They so despised President Trump, and they believe in general that conservatives are hateful (racist, classist, homophobe, patriarchal, etc), so they were programmed to believe it when the opposition to Trump said something. They trust their team implicitly, meaning the media and the D party, and they are incapable of believing anything Trump or his team said.

A lot of them are followers who prefer a strong top down authority. They are comforted by an expert directing them.

Sadly, I believe Trump's opponents intentionally whipped up the divide for their own benefit.