^^^There's NO evidence they aren't either, and as long as 'Big Tech' and the legacy 'State Media' continue to run cover we'll NEVER know! Feel free to hold your breath!

Lest we not forget, there's the 40% increase in 'All Cause Mortality' that coincides precisely with the introduction of the 'vaccine'...It's a real puzzler!

quote:

There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Covid vaccines are the cause of various cancers. None.

This is long, I'll only post the introduction:

Houston, We Have a Problem (Part 1 of 3)
Posted on August 20, 2022 by The Ethical Skeptic

Seven of the major eleven International Classification of Diseases codes tracked by the US National Center for Health Statistics exhibit stark increase trends beginning in the first week of April 2021 – featuring exceptional growth more robust than during even the Covid-19 pandemic time frame. This date of inception is no coincidence, in that it also happens to coincide with a key inflection point regarding a specific body-system intervention in most of the US population. These seven pronounced increases in mortality alarmingly persist even now.

The following work is the result of thousands of hours of dynamic data tracking and research on the part of its author. The reader should anticipate herein, a journey which will take them through the methods and metrics which serve to identify this problem, along with a deductive assessment of the candidate causal mechanisms behind it. Alternatives as to cause which include one mechanism in particular, that is embargoed from being allowed as an explanation, nor even mere mention in some forums.

At the end of this process, we will be left with one inescapable conclusion. One which threatens the very fabric and future of health policy in the US for decades to come.

https://theethicalskeptic.com/...problem-part-1-of-3/

COVID vaccination and turbo cancer: pathological evidence

In this video (26 min, Swedish with English subtitles), MD/pathologistv Ute Krueger describes her findings on breast cancer and other cancers in the era of gene-based COVID vaccines. She finds increased numbers of cancers, in younger patients, which are larger in size and growing more rapidly and aggressively already at the time of the initial diagnosis. Her findings agree with reports by other pathologists, e.g. Dr. Ryan Cole

While the exact mechanism of the apparent increase in cancers remains to be established, both immunosuppression (evident e.g. from increased case numbers of shingles) and insertion of DNA copies of the mRNA vaccines into the chromosomal DNA of the host cell are plausible candidates. DNA insertion has been demonstrated in vitro in a human cell line:

https://doctors4covidethics.or...thological-evidence/

There's also this Atlantic piece about a doctor who believes it made his cancer worse:

Did a Famous Doctor’s COVID Shot Make His Cancer Worse?

Michel found other clues suggesting that the link was real, and that the mRNA vaccines might be risky for a specific subset of the population. He learned that body scans of some of those who get vaccines, including cancer patients, have shown heightened activity in the lymph nodes near the armpit on the side where the shot was received. He also came across another, very important clue. In 2018, a team of researchers based at Columbia University’s Institute for Cancer Genetics had published an intriguing study using mice with a pair of gene mutations that, when they co-occur, predispose T cells to go rogue. (Michel’s tumor, which had been sequenced by this point, showed the same two mutations.) When these mice were injected with sheep red-blood cells—as an experimental stand-in for invading microbes—the animals developed the subtype of lymphoma that was diagnosed in Michel.

https://www.theatlantic.com/sc...phoma-cancer/671308/

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

I'm not taking sides, just looking for information. I have a question about the graph that was posted and discussed - the discussion seems to refer to new cancer diagnoses, but this chart appears to refer to cancer mortality. Big difference. Where did this chart actually come from? The source down on the bottom left is not legible (at least to my eyes). If there is such a significant increase in new cancers, that's far more alarming to me than if this chart/data just reflects an increase in cancer deaths right now.

quote:

I have a question about the graph that was posted and discussed - the discussion seems to refer to new cancer diagnoses, but this chart appears to refer to cancer mortality. Big difference. Where did this chart actually come from?

I think you're right about that, and I think there has been some confusion between the two.

You can read the article here:
How Cancer Deaths From the Covid Jabs Are Being Hidden
By Dr. Joseph Mercola
https://www.lewrockwell.com/20...bs-are-being-hidden/

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

quote:

I have a question about the graph that was posted and discussed - the discussion seems to refer to new cancer diagnoses, but this chart appears to refer to cancer mortality. Big difference. Where did this chart actually come from?

I think you're right about that, and I think there has been some confusion between the two.

You can read the article here:
How Cancer Deaths From the Covid Jabs Are Being Hidden
By Dr. Joseph Mercola
https://www.lewrockwell.com/20...bs-are-being-hidden/

Apparently the source is footnoted on that website, although the article is clearly mistaken or misleading, at least about that particular chart, because it refers to new cancers and not mortality. Anyway - thanks for clarifying that I'm not crazy. I might follow the link and go down that rabbit hole when I have more time.

https://thepostmillennial.com/...e?utm_campaign=64487


Boston University makes new Covid strain with 80 percent kill rate

Researchers extracted Omicron’s spike protein, which binds to and invades human cells, and attached those to the original virus that emerged in Wuhan.

Researchers at Boston University’s National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories have created a new strain of the Covid virus, echoing experiments which many believe led to the Covid-19 pandemic.

The variant is a hybrid of the Omicron variant which spread over the winter and the original virus that was discovered in Wuhan, with this hybrid killing 80 percent of the mice researchers infected, according to the Daily Mail.

Researchers found that when infected with the Omicron variant, a similar group of mice all survived and experienced "mild" symptoms.

The new research, which has not been peer reviewed, centers around the role of spike proteins in the pathogenic and antigenic behaviors of the virus.

Researchers extracted Omicron’s spike protein, which binds to and invades human cells, and attached those to the original virus that emerged in Wuhan.

Looking at how mice fared against the new hybrid strain, researchers wrote, "In…mice, while Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80 percent."

Researchers said that while the spike protein is responsible for rates of infectivity, other changes to the virus’ structure determine its deadliness.

In addition to looking at mice, researchers also looked at how different strains affect human lung cells that were grown in the lab.

Researchers found that the new strain produced five times more infectious virus particles than the Omicron variant.

Researchers noted that the hybrid virus is likely to be less deadly in humans due to differences in the immune systems of mice and humans.

Boston University’s lab is one of 13 biosafety level 4 labs in the US. These labs are authorized to handle the most dangerous pathogens, and conduct experiments that often involve working with animal viruses to advance treatments and vaccines.

The research echoes similar research that was being done by the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China at the onset of the pandemic. The lab, which lies 8 miles from a wet market where the original strain was located, was working with bat coronaviruses.

According to the Daily Mail, Chinese scientists were found to have stifled independent investigations into the facility’s ties to the pandemic, and wiped crucial databases.

I’ve been trying to follow these CoVid dis-cussings from the beginning. It’s my understanding that there have been 3 different versions of these vaccines: Pfizer; Moderna; and Janssen (J&J) used in the USA, with another version used in Europe.

The wife and I held off for taking any of them for over 6 months, waiting to see what side-effects would develop. As we didn’t want to have a second dose requirement from Pfizer & Moderna, we opted for the Janssen (one-shot).

So far (after 2 years; knock on my wooden head), we have not experienced any adverse effects; and no, we have not taken any “booster” versions either.

So my question is: those of you who have experienced adverse effects, which version(s) & boosters did you receive? Is it possible that the double-dose versions are causing long-term illnesses, but the single-dose which I believe had a different formulation, is more benign?

quote:

Originally posted by Gustofer:

There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Covid vaccines are the cause of various cancers. None.

Show it to me and I'll buy it. I'll wait...

Proximal cause. While it is just a correlation at this point in time (possibly because nobody is looking into it with any seriousness), there is a very real phenomenon happening, and the only thing temporally related is mRNA vaccines.

A bit longer timeline would be the virus itself, so there is a possibility that all of these excess deaths and illnesses, including cancer, are actually a long term result of infection rather than jabs. Or possibly even a combination, whereby someone who was both infected and jabbed has higher death, but those not both are not subject to higher death rates.

Occam's Razor, and the general scientific method, would strongly favor the jabs as the most likely cause, either alone or, maybe, in combination with those who also were infected.

Remember, the jabs turn the body into a spike protein factory. The spike is what is so harmful in the virus in the first place, and there is a lot of direct proof of damage from spike.

Anyone claiming the jabs are not the cause of these illnesses and deaths has a big hill to climb.

quote:

Originally posted by nhtagmember:
https://thepostmillennial.com/...e?utm_campaign=64487


Boston University makes new Covid strain with 80 percent kill rate

Researchers extracted Omicron’s spike protein, which binds to and invades human cells, and attached those to the original virus that emerged in Wuhan.

Researchers at Boston University’s National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories have created a new strain of the Covid virus, echoing experiments which many believe led to the Covid-19 pandemic.

If the original strain was natural, from bats in the wet market, then we need more of this kind of research.

If the original strain was from the Wuhan lab, which is seemingly very much most likely, then we need to shut this kind of thing the fuck down.

It is insanity that they are doing these kinds of experiments!

quote:

Originally posted by Fly-Sig:
Remember, the jabs turn the body into a spike protein factory. The spike is what is so harmful in the virus in the first place, and there is a lot of direct proof of damage from spike.

Early on this was identified as one of the key factors lacking in the typically required long term research. It did get limited press, and was promptly censored.

quote:

Originally posted by sse:
Yup, "investigations" are a sham.

The fall guys are always (as in, always) underlings. The real perpetrators always escape consequences.

Why are people fucking around trying to make it more lethal?

The Chinese took a virus not transmissible to humans and turned it into a global pandemic. Actually I believe it was a deliberate act.

Haven’t they learned? But hey, it’s Massachusetts. The state that hates America as much as California does. If not more. The communist capital.

This has Faucci written all over it.

I think China is just going to point to this and say "See. It wasn't us."
Seems like a weaponization competition.

It’s almost as if there’s some evil 007 style plot.

On Charlie Kirk’s show late last week, Dr. McCullough reported on a new Thai study concluding that pediatric myocarditis cases have jumped from a baseline of 4 cases per million before the shots, up to TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND cases per million after the shots.

Covid jabs, 4 in a million Myocarditis cases, afterwards, 25,000 in a million....Myocarditis at this point in time is due to the Covid jabs until proven otherwise."
https://twitter.com/Xx17965797...vR4iXDnWCo-aqEpq2dDw

4 / million - 25,000 / million. Seems like a big jump.

https://open.substack.com/pub/...ost&utm_medium=email

I know... no evidence this has anything to do with the shots.

quote:

Originally posted by darthfuster:
It’s almost as if there’s some evil 007 style plot.

Reminded me of the very same thing.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
On Charlie Kirk’s show late last week, Dr. McCullough reported on a new Thai study concluding that pediatric myocarditis cases have jumped from a baseline of 4 cases per million before the shots, up to TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND cases per million after the shots.

Covid jabs, 4 in a million Myocarditis cases, afterwards, 25,000 in a million....Myocarditis at this point in time is due to the Covid jabs until proven otherwise."
https://twitter.com/Xx17965797...vR4iXDnWCo-aqEpq2dDw

4 / million - 25,000 / million. Seems like a big jump.

I know... no evidence this has anything to do with the shots.

Yeah, that's a BIG Jump alright...A nearly 625,000% increase!

Actually it's a 624,900% increase, but who's really counting, it's just numbers, REALLY Big ones! Anyway, what 'really' matters to those pushing the narrative, and those willingly going along with it, is that there's NO 'evidence'...And as long as the legacy 'State Media' and Big Tech continue to run cover there won't be any either, so it must be something else.

Once again, Nothing to See here...

quote:

Boston University makes new Covid strain with 80 percent kill rate

But it’s only deadly to the mice it was developed for and they have a BSL-4 research facility just like Wuhan; what could possibly go wrong?

Oh yeah…humans are in the loop.

quote:

Originally posted by darthfuster:
It’s almost as if there’s some evil 007 style plot.

I remember unsettlingly recalling Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six when the calls for mandatory jabs were at their height.

Can anyone say election time, mail in ballots, harvesting ballots and drop boxes, hmmm, anyone, Bueller? Bueller?


Link of Doom

Most vaccine-resistant COVID strain ever' - dubbed 'XBB' - is detected in the US with three confirmed cases: Mutant strain has causes case to double in a fortnight in Singapore

A new Covid variant that is feared to be the 'most vaccine-resistant yet' has sent case numbers soaring in Singapore — and it is already in the US.

The mutant strain — dubbed XBB — is another spin-off of the Omicron variant and has been blamed for Singapore's infection numbers doubling in the past fortnight.

It has accumulated mutations in its receptor binding domain, a key part of the spike protein where virus-fighting antibodies dock and block infections.


+6
View gallery
Changes to this spot make the virus less recognizable to the immune systems of people who are vaccinated or have been infected with Covid previously.

Sounding the alarm over the new variant, Johns Hopkins University's Dr Amesh Adalja said: 'It is likely the most immune-evasive [to date].'

But there is no evidence that it is more likely to cause severe disease or death compared to its parent or sister strains — which have all proven to be mild for most.

Just two people are dying in Singapore per day from Covid, figures show.

While in the past there have been just one or two dominant global variants, the virus now appears to have splintered into a swarm of closely-related sub-variants.

They all derive from the Omicron strain which sent worldwide case numbers to record highs and they all contain similar mutations.

Just last month, scientists were worried about BA.275, which took off in South Asia. In the US, the BA.4.6 and BF.7 sub-strains have been slowly growing.

And in recent weeks, BQ1.1 started to take off in Europe, and looks like the frontrunner to become the continent's dominant strain this fall.