ABC did their best to prop her up with the softball interview that aired in the 5:30 news. Didn't work. She looks more vile and sinister than ever.

quote:

"That was a mistake. I’m sorry about that. I take responsibility,”

And what is the result of her taking responsibility?

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:
When you have libs in the NYT cracking jokes about how Hillary 4.0 will compare to Hillary 3.0 or 2.0, you know she's in deep trouble.

https://twitter.com/redsteeze/...s/641325709659668484


"Must.... Be... More....Friendly...Show....Humor...Must...Keep....Smiling...."

quote:

Originally posted by Himiko:

quote:

"That was a mistake. I’m sorry about that. I take responsibility,”

And what is the result of her taking responsibility?

Usually, the person responsible for a gross breach of security like this is perp walked into court and out the back door to depend 10-20 years in a federal penitentiary.

On the picture, holy crap. There is nothing natural about her; that is forced in its entirety.

She is not her husband, to be sure. For all the fail about him, at least he was an honest approachable person.

http://www.breitbart.com/video...ved-classified-info/

interview on ABC’s “World News Tonight.”

Hillary was asked, “The intelligence community’s inspector general telling ABC today, that after reviewing those emails, that two of them carry the classification of top secret, that both emails were classified when they were created, and remain classified now.

One was about drones. One was about North Korea’s nuclear program. And I’m curious, does this mean classified information passed through your private server?”

She responded, “Well, there is still, as you know, a dispute. The State Department disputes that. I understand why different agencies have different views, and I respect that. It does not change the fact that I did not send, or receive, any information that was marked classified at the time.”

************************

MSM won't destroy her for this repetitive and nonsensical answer. I wonder how long before B Sanders and M OMalley start going after it.

I hope the Republican candidates all start pointing it out, in every interview they do.

State Dept security people should be fired in droves if they choose to enable HC's lies.

quote:

Originally posted by domcintosh:
On the picture, holy crap. There is nothing natural about her; that is forced in its entirety.

HilBot has begun generation

quote:

Originally posted by domcintosh:
She is not her husband, to be sure. For all the fail about him, at least he was an honest approachable person.

Approachable? Monica thought so.

Honest?? "I did not have sex with that woman." That's honest?????

Clinton campaign announced that it will plan spontaneity.




Direct Link: https://vine.co/v/etX9inPWAgM

Alternate caption to the photo I posted of her maniacal smile...

*Guy Behind her* "Power cell reserves at max power. Diagnostics holding steady. She should be good for another 12:00"

quote:

Originally posted by BamaJeepster:
Clinton campaign announced that it will plan spontaneity.

Fargin' brilliant

quote:

Originally posted by domcintosh:
On the picture, holy crap. There is nothing natural about her; that is forced in its entirety.

That guy behind her looks like is concentrating on a remote control joystick...I wonder if HilBot is controlled via radio or a hardwire cable coming out of her ass?

quote:

Originally posted by Bisleyblackhawk:
I wonder if HilBot is controlled via radio or a hardwire cable coming out of her ass?

Is that a rhetorical question?

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
http://www.breitbart.com/video...ved-classified-info/

interview on ABC’s “World News Tonight.”

Hillary was asked, “The intelligence community’s inspector general telling ABC today, that after reviewing those emails, that two of them carry the classification of top secret, that both emails were classified when they were created, and remain classified now.

One was about drones. One was about North Korea’s nuclear program. And I’m curious, does this mean classified information passed through your private server?”

She responded, “Well, there is still, as you know, a dispute. The State Department disputes that. I understand why different agencies have different views, and I respect that. It does not change the fact that I did not send, or receive, any information that was marked classified at the time.”

This sounds like she was secretary at the State Department, not Secretary OF State.

There is nothing authentic (that was the word I was looking for earlier) about her. She is the result of poll-testing every word, which is why she seems to be about a week behind every issue.

quote:

Originally posted by domcintosh:
There is nothing authentic (that was the word I was looking for earlier) about her. She is the result of poll-testing every word, which is why she seems to be about a week behind every issue.

We have recalibrated her jocularity settings and upgraded her authenticity chip

quote:

Originally posted by domcintosh:
On the picture, holy crap. There is nothing natural about her; that is forced in its entirety.

She is not her husband, to be sure.

It looks like she should be shilling for ShamWow - "Holds 12 times its weight in Bullshit and Lies!"

This could actually be an interesting development. Is 'Bryan from IT' really concerned about criminal liability or is he just a true believer protecting the HilBot 4.0?

http://www.washingtontimes.com...-offer-immunity-bry/

Senators propose immunity for Hillary Clinton staffer to testify on email server

Two top Senate investigators offered potential immunity Tuesday to Bryan Pagliano, the staffer who set up the email server in former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s home, in exchange for testimony about her activities.

Mr. Pagliano last week said he would assert his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in refusing to answer questions about the matter, but Sens. Charles E. Grassley and Ron Johnson, the chairmen of two key committees investigating the situation, said they have authority to extend immunity if Mr. Pagliano is willing to talk.

They proposed a proffer session, where Mr. Pagliano would let them know what he knows in an off-the-record setting, and all sides could then decide what steps to take.

“The Committees have the authority to obtain an immunity order, to acquire the information they need, while also protecting your right against self-incrimination,” the two senators wrote in a letter to Mr. Pagliano’s lawyer.

Their offer raises the stakes for Mr. Pagliano and could create more peril for Mrs. Clinton, who has insisted she complied with all laws when operating the server.

But after days of refusing to apologize for setting up her own server, Mrs. Clinton finally reversed course Tuesday, in an interview with ABC News.

“That was a mistake. I’m sorry about that. I take responsibility,” she said.

Last week she had said she was sorry that the situation was confusing, but declined to apologize for her own behavior.

Security experts have disputed Mrs. Clinton’s claim that she followed the law, saying that she handled hundreds of classified messages on the server.

Mrs. Clinton has maintained that none of the messages were secret at the time she sent or received them, and were only upgraded now that they are being released to the public. The New York Times reported Tuesday, however, that a new review by the inspector general for the intelligence community has concluded two messages did contain information that was top secret at the time.

The State Department contested that review, saying it was “premature.”

John Kirby, a department spokesman, said they are doing their own analysis and “it’s not uncommon or atypical for there to be this kind of given and take between agencies on something like this.”

Mr. Pagliano was paid by Mrs. Clinton’s political operation through early 2009, then shifted over to the State Department, where he was an information technology specialist. At the same time, however, Mrs. Clinton’s campaign has said she paid him to maintain the server she kept at her New York home.

Mr. Kirby, the State Department spokesman, refused to say whether Mr. Pagliano was required by department rules to report outside income paid to him by Mrs. Clinton.

Other developments I haven't seen mentioned (hope I didn't overlook them):

Kerry names State Department email and transparency czar

State Department Official Appointed To Oversee Clinton Email Requests Donated To Hillary’s Campaign In June

quote:

Originally posted by Test1968:


Honest?? "I did not have sex with that woman." That's honest?????

Actually, in the context as used, he's right. The exact quote was "I did not have sexual relations with that womam, Ms Lewinsky". He only received a blow job. Sexual relations would have included him fucking that pig. Even old Slick wasn't that low. We can debate his honesty because the entire context was false and misleading, but the statement you selected can be said to be "not false".