Another interesting item from ZH. Tinfoil not withstanding, I do believe we are watching "something big" unfold. What exactly it is? Guess we will have to wait and see.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/...eaked-clinton-emails

quote:

Originally posted by 6guns:
They must have paid him well....or threatened him bad!

It's the eternal liberal need to not look like a bad guy. If she wins, then she owes him, if she loses, then Trump was a bad guy and she was a loser and none of that is Bernie's fault. Either way, Bern's done what a good guy in the Democratic party is supposed to do. Besides, Hill's campaign doesn't seem to be getting that much of his time and effort.

If half of this crap was exposed around anyone OTHER than Clinton, law enforcement couldn't get the charges filed fast enough.

The FBI investigation was discussed on the Fox Kelly File tonight. Like in the earlier Fox show this evening, it was mentioned that Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson may lose their immunity.

Not any detail specifically why.

But one thing that does tie them together is that Samuelson ran word search on the original batch over 60,000 Clinton emails to find those that were "work related" and separate them from those that were "personal".

Mills then came in to oversee what Samuelson had done.

So, just guessing here, if the FBI found a lot of important work related emails on Weiner's lap top, ones that were not turned over to State Dept, that could put both of them in hot water.

That would be awesome. This could take down Abedin, Mills and Samuelson. Maybe Clinton

***************************

Hannity just confirmed that the info to Fox is that there is a 99% chance that up to 5 foreign govts may have hacked Clinton's server.

Remember Guccifer? I seem to recall that Guccifer said when he was reading Clinton's email he saw signs that 5 foreign govts had been in there previously. But then the FBI said Guccifer never got in Clinton's server.

Some heavy stuff going down.

This is nuts. I can't believe this woman is on the ballot to be President of the United States, and the election is now less than six days away!

As American as baseball:

This evening I had the pleasure of working in a young and upwardly mobile young Indian family with their parents visiting from India. We talked about WS tonight, he was a big Phillies fan, but was routing for Cubbies. His father was as well. They were both spitting off stats and historical players names. It was great! This is what America is about.

Know what was better? Clinton corruption update came on the news. They ALL were anti Hiliary. Not just a little, but just destroying her. I didn't expect the convo to go that way at all. They all been following WikiLeaks and PV.

I wanted to high five them, but I figured that might be over the top.

Bitch, you can't keep 30 years of lies, corruption, and destruction secret forever. The house of cards is falling all around you and it's so fucking fun to watch.

quote:

Not any detail specifically why.

Because immunity deals come with a price tag. And that tag includes telling only the truth, and the whole truth.

If law enforcement has proof - such as discovered e-mails - that prove a witness/suspect did not participate in good faith with the immunity deal, the immunity can and will be revoked.

Once one or two crack...the floodgates will open.

There are probably hundreds of peripheral folks that have acid reflux tonight...

God Bless The United States of America.

Meanwhile the anti-trump ads are going full bore during the MLB-WS.

quote:

Originally posted by radioman:
Meanwhile the anti-trump ads are going full bore during the MLB-WS.

So are the Trump ads.

I have no problem with that.

quote:

Originally posted by radioman:
Meanwhile the anti-trump ads are going full bore during the MLB-WS.

Noticed that too eh?

The media is the true villain in this whole mess we now find ourselves in. If they had simply done their jobs, this country wouldn't now be in a position where one of the candidates for President faces the very real possibility of federal indictment for numerous crimes. Shameful.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
The media is the true villain in this whole mess we now find ourselves in. If they had simply done their jobs, this country wouldn't now be in a position where one of the candidates for President faces the very real possibility of federal indictment for numerous crimes. Shameful.

Huh? i hate the media, and I hate HRC, but I can't make the connection that the media is responsible for her crimes.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
The media is the true villain in this whole mess we now find ourselves in. If they had simply done their jobs, this country wouldn't now be in a position where one of the candidates for President faces the very real possibility of federal indictment for numerous crimes. Shameful.

Second that!

quote:

Originally posted by radioman:

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
The media is the true villain in this whole mess we now find ourselves in. If they had simply done their jobs, this country wouldn't now be in a position where one of the candidates for President faces the very real possibility of federal indictment for numerous crimes. Shameful.

Huh? i hate the media, and I hate HRC, but I can't make the connection that the media is responsible for her crimes.

I'm saying that she would've been exposed long before now and never would've gotten the nomination to begin with.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

quote:

Originally posted by radioman:

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
The media is the true villain in this whole mess we now find ourselves in. If they had simply done their jobs, this country wouldn't now be in a position where one of the candidates for President faces the very real possibility of federal indictment for numerous crimes. Shameful.

Huh? i hate the media, and I hate HRC, but I can't make the connection that the media is responsible for her crimes.

I'm saying that she would've been exposed long before now and never would've gotten the nomination to begin with.

yup, they coulda played the bernie rigged game over and over. but hell its helping trump to have her in there so I thank the writers of the election 2016 script.

I am ready to wake up to a "FBI to make statement at 10a.m. and indict her. *Fingers crossed*

quote:

Originally posted by radioman:

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
The media is the true villain in this whole mess we now find ourselves in. If they had simply done their jobs, this country wouldn't now be in a position where one of the candidates for President faces the very real possibility of federal indictment for numerous crimes. Shameful.

Huh? i hate the media, and I hate HRC, but I can't make the connection that the media is responsible for her crimes.

Responsible for her crimes, they are not. Concealing them from the American people they are...

quote:

Originally posted by Bigboreshooter:
No matter who wins, I'd like to see Bernie file a lawsuit against Donna Brazile and Danky. They deserve to be punished.

I would like to see the Chicago cops who were injured in the Trump protest out side his rally file a lawsuit as well.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

quote:

Originally posted by radioman:

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
The media is the true villain in this whole mess we now find ourselves in. If they had simply done their jobs, this country wouldn't now be in a position where one of the candidates for President faces the very real possibility of federal indictment for numerous crimes. Shameful.

Huh? i hate the media, and I hate HRC, but I can't make the connection that the media is responsible for her crimes.

I'm saying that she would've been exposed long before now and never would've gotten the nomination to begin with.

Got it. The media SUCKS the big one. Could CNN have any less ethics? No wonder they were saying that it's legal for only them to look at the leaked e-mails. Assholes.

Secret Recordings Fueled FBI Feud in Clinton Probe

http://www.wsj.com/articles/se...ton-probe-1478135518

Secret recordings of a suspect talking about the Clinton Foundation fueled an internal battle between FBI agents who wanted to pursue the case and corruption prosecutors who viewed the statements as worthless hearsay, people familiar with the matter said.

Agents, using informants and recordings from unrelated corruption investigations, thought they had found enough material to merit aggressively pursuing the investigation into the foundation that started in summer 2015 based on claims made in a book by a conservative author called “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,” these people said.

The account of the case and resulting dispute comes from interviews with officials at multiple agencies.

Starting in February and continuing today, investigators from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and public-corruption prosecutors became increasingly frustrated with each other, as often happens within and between departments. At the center of the tension stood the U.S. attorney for Brooklyn, Robert Capers, who some at the FBI came to view as exacerbating the problems by telling each side what it wanted to hear, these people said. Through a spokeswoman, Mr. Capers declined to comment.

The roots of the dispute lie in a disagreement over the strength of the case, these people said, which broadly centered on whether Clinton Foundation contributors received favorable treatment from the State Department under Hillary Clinton.
Senior officials in the Justice Department and the FBI didn’t think much of the evidence, while investigators believed they had promising leads their bosses wouldn’t let them pursue, they said.


These details on the probe are emerging amid the continuing furor surrounding FBI Director James Comey’s disclosure to Congress that new emails had emerged that could be relevant to a separate, previously closed FBI investigation of Mrs. Clinton’s email arrangement while she was secretary of state.

On Wednesday, President Barack Obama took the unusual step of criticizing the FBI when asked about Mr. Comey’s disclosure of the emails.

Amid the internal finger-pointing on the Clinton Foundation matter, some have blamed the FBI’s No. 2 official, deputy director Andrew McCabe, claiming he sought to stop agents from pursuing the case this summer. His defenders deny that, and say it was the Justice Department that kept pushing back on the investigation.

At times, people on both sides of the dispute thought Mr. Capers agreed with them. Defenders of Mr. Capers said he was straightforward and always told people he thought the case wasn’t strong.

Much of the skepticism toward the case came from how it started—with the publication of a book suggesting possible financial misconduct and self-dealing surrounding the Clinton charity. The author of that book, Peter Schweizer—a former speechwriting consultant for President George W. Bush—was interviewed multiple times by FBI agents, people familiar with the matter said.

The Clinton campaign has long derided the book as a poorly researched collection of false claims and unsubstantiated assertions. The Clinton Foundation has denied any wrongdoing, saying it does immense good throughout the world.

Mr. Schweizer said in an interview that the book was never meant to be a legal document, but set out to describe “patterns of financial transactions that circled around decisions Hillary Clinton was making as secretary of state.”

As 2015 came to a close, the FBI and Justice Department had a general understanding that neither side would take major action on Clinton Foundation matters without meeting and discussing it first. In February, a meeting was held in Washington among FBI officials, public-integrity prosecutors and Leslie Caldwell, the head of the Justice Department’s criminal division. Prosecutors from the Eastern District of New York—Mr. Capers’ office—didn’t attend, these people said.

The public-integrity prosecutors weren’t impressed with the FBI presentation, people familiar with the discussion said. “The message was, ‘We’re done here,’ ” a person familiar with the matter said.

Justice Department officials became increasingly frustrated that the agents seemed to be disregarding or disobeying their instructions.

Following the February meeting, officials at Justice Department headquarters sent a message to all the offices involved to “stand down,’’ a person familiar with the matter said.

Within the FBI, some felt they had moved well beyond the allegations made in the anti-Clinton book. At least two confidential informants from other public-corruption investigations had provided details about the Clinton Foundation to the FBI, these people said.

The FBI had secretly recorded conversations of a suspect in a public-corruption case talking about alleged deals the Clintons made, these people said. The agents listening to the recordings couldn’t tell from the conversations if what the suspect was describing was accurate, but it was, they thought, worth checking out.

Prosecutors thought the talk was hearsay and a weak basis to warrant aggressive tactics, like presenting evidence to a grand jury, because the person who was secretly recorded wasn’t inside the Clinton Foundation.

FBI investigators grew increasingly frustrated with resistance from the corruption prosecutors, and some executives at the bureau itself, to keep pursuing the case.

As prosecutors rebuffed their requests to proceed more overtly, those Justice Department officials became more annoyed that the investigators didn’t seem to understand or care about the instructions issued by their own bosses and prosecutors to act discreetly.

In subsequent conversations with the Justice Department, Mr. Capers told officials in Washington that the FBI agents on the case “won’t let it go,” these people said.

As a result of those complaints, these people said, a senior Justice Department official called the FBI deputy director, Mr. McCabe, on Aug. 12 to say the agents in New York seemed to be disregarding or disobeying their instructions, these people said. The conversation was a tense one, they said, and at one point Mr. McCabe asked, “Are you telling me that I need to shut down a validly predicated investigation?’’ The senior Justice Department official replied: ”Of course not.”