quote:

Originally posted by Kadin:
And what about the speech she gave on that trip behind a podium with the presidential seal? Isn't that misuse of the seal, which is also a felony?

quote:

Originally posted by mbinky:
I don't watch Hillary's speeches but I bet standing behind that seal gave her a hard on.

quote:

Originally posted by Kadin:
What about her flying on Air Force One the other day to campaign? Doesn't that violate campaign finance rules, using taxpayer money?

And what about the speech she gave on that trip behind a podium with the presidential seal? Isn't that misuse of the seal, which is also a felony?

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:

quote:

Originally posted by mbinky:
I don't watch Hillary's speeches but I bet standing behind that seal gave her a hard on.

I'll be she went home and banged Huma like a screen door in a hurricane.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
I'll be she went home and banged Huma like a screen door in a hurricane.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:

quote:

Originally posted by mbinky:
I don't watch Hillary's speeches but I bet standing behind that seal gave her a hard on.

I'll be she went home and banged Huma like a screen door in a hurricane.

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/...me-treatment-hillary





A Marine Corps officer who has been locked in a legal battle with his service after self-reporting that he improperly disseminated classified information now intends to demand the same treatment that Hillary received.

Maj. Jason Brezler sent a classified message using an unclassified Yahoo email account to warn fellow Marines in southern Afghanistan about a potentially corrupt Afghan police chief. A servant of that police chief killed three Marines and severely wounded a fourth 17 days later, on August 10, 2012, opening fire with a Kalashnikov rifle in an insider attack WaPo reports.

Brezler, who is still in the reserves and who works full time for the New York City Fire Department, was not charged criminally in the case, but he was issued a potentially career ending fitness (fit to continue serving) report after self-reporting that he sent the classified email to Afghanistan. Rep. Peter King (R-NY) even wrote then-Commandant Gen. James F. Amos about the case in August 2013 and asked whether it was necessary to be so harsh on someone who had warned fellow Marines of a potential threat in combat. Furthermore, the Naval Criminal Investigation Service reviewed electronics voluntarily turned over by Brezler and determined that there were more than 100 classified documents on his personal, unclassified hard drive and thumb drive. The board of inquiry recommended removing Brezler from the service in December 2013 after prosecutors argued that he knowingly kept classified information in order to help him write a book about his experiences in Afghanistan.

The case has been tied up in federal court since Brezler sued the service in December 2014, and Brezler's attorney, Michael J. Bowe, intends to cite the treatment of Clinton as an example of how severely Brezler was punished.

An attorney for Brezler, Michael J. Bowe, said that he intends to cite the treatment of Clinton “as one of the many, and most egregious examples” of how severely Brezler was punished. FBI Director James B. Comey announced Tuesday that he would not recommend the U.S. government pursue federal charges against Clinton, but he rebuked her “extremely careless” use of a private, unclassified email server while serving as secretary of state. The FBI found that 110 of her emails contained classified information.

Bowe said it is impossible to reconcile President Obama’s statement that Clinton’s intentional act of setting up a secret, unsecured email server did not detract “from her excellent ability to carry out her duties” while Brezler received a “completely opposite finding… involving infinitely less sensitive and limited information.”

The FBI's decision on Clinton will lend itself perfectly (and will very good reason) to those those such as Brezler who are being punished for similar or less severe incidents, to reference as they fight cases in court. Sadly, we must admit that unless your name is Clinton, there will be consequences to storing and sending classified information using an unsecured network - even if it is to warn fellow Marines of imminent danger.

The good news is that people, however few, are starting to catch on.

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/...me-treatment-hillary



A Marine Corps officer who has been locked in a legal battle with his service after self-reporting that he improperly disseminated classified information now intends to demand the same treatment that Hillary received.

Maj. Jason Brezler sent a classified message using an unclassified Yahoo email account to warn fellow Marines in southern Afghanistan about a potentially corrupt Afghan police chief. A servant of that police chief killed three Marines and severely wounded a fourth 17 days later, on August 10, 2012, opening fire with a Kalashnikov rifle in an insider attack WaPo reports.

Brezler, who is still in the reserves and who works full time for the New York City Fire Department, was not charged criminally in the case, but he was issued a potentially career ending fitness (fit to continue serving) report after self-reporting that he sent the classified email to Afghanistan. Rep. Peter King (R-NY) even wrote then-Commandant Gen. James F. Amos about the case in August 2013 and asked whether it was necessary to be so harsh on someone who had warned fellow Marines of a potential threat in combat. Furthermore, the Naval Criminal Investigation Service reviewed electronics voluntarily turned over by Brezler and determined that there were more than 100 classified documents on his personal, unclassified hard drive and thumb drive. The board of inquiry recommended removing Brezler from the service in December 2013 after prosecutors argued that he knowingly kept classified information in order to help him write a book about his experiences in Afghanistan.

The case has been tied up in federal court since Brezler sued the service in December 2014, and Brezler's attorney, Michael J. Bowe, intends to cite the treatment of Clinton as an example of how severely Brezler was punished.

An attorney for Brezler, Michael J. Bowe, said that he intends to cite the treatment of Clinton “as one of the many, and most egregious examples” of how severely Brezler was punished. FBI Director James B. Comey announced Tuesday that he would not recommend the U.S. government pursue federal charges against Clinton, but he rebuked her “extremely careless” use of a private, unclassified email server while serving as secretary of state. The FBI found that 110 of her emails contained classified information.

Bowe said it is impossible to reconcile President Obama’s statement that Clinton’s intentional act of setting up a secret, unsecured email server did not detract “from her excellent ability to carry out her duties” while Brezler received a “completely opposite finding… involving infinitely less sensitive and limited information.”

The FBI's decision on Clinton will lend itself perfectly (and will very good reason) to those those such as Brezler who are being punished for similar or less severe incidents, to reference as they fight cases in court. Sadly, we must admit that unless your name is Clinton, there will be consequences to storing and sending classified information using an unsecured network - even if it is to warn fellow Marines of imminent danger.

The good news is that people, however few, are starting to catch on.

quote:

Originally posted by Kadin:
So it must be political theater saying that they're reopening the investigation at state.

quote:

Originally posted by Shaql:
The point Comey is making is that there is no law that can be used to punish a gov't (current or past) employee for what Hilary did.

quote:

Director Comey said that persons employed in government posts (including the military) are susceptible to penalties other than criminal prosecution for actions of gross negligence, but persons not employed by the government do not have alternate penalties that can be imposed--it's all or nothing, prosecute or not. His contention is that a government employee being that careless would be reprimanded, disciplined, had clearance revoked, or even fired, but that none of those penalties are applicable to someone not government employed. He maintained that the history of cases involving gross negligence have almost never resulted in criminal charges, but were handled by use of the other penalties available, and that those penalties are not available in Hillary's case.