Damn, I had such hopes for Bernie.

with 80% reporting, Hildebeast kicked Bernie's ass in SC, nearly 3/4 to 1/4.

And with 100% reporting, Trump took all 50 delegates with 32.5%, 10% ahead of both Cruz and Rubio (22.5% each).

The whole Democratic 'Superdelegate' thing is what is going to cool The Bern.

Poor thing, the cards were just so stacked against him...kinda like living in a Socialist society...where my votes are my votes and your votes are my votes...

Zero surprise. I read where hilLIARy is now turning her guns on Trump. She better be careful what she asks for.

Lol Hill's guns are Red Ryder caliber...the Donald has Iowa class weapons

quote:

Originally posted by mbinky:
Lol Hill's guns are Red Ryder caliber...the Donald has Iowa class weapons

The beauty of Trump is that he will force Hillz to answer or dodge a laundry list of questions no one else in the GOP has the rocks to go near. It won't be 20 minutes after the first Trump attack that the media will be screaming sexism at the top of their lungs. They still don't seem to get it that we hold them in the same contempt we do politicians in Washington. I can't wait.

2 Georgia State students kicked out of Hillary Clinton rally for 'Black Lives Matter' sign...



http://www.al.com/news/index.s...ml#incart_river_home

Two Georgia State University freshmen claim they were kicked out of a Hillary Clinton rally on Friday for writing "Black Lives Matter" on the back of a Clinton sign.

"The ironic thing is that the staffer gave me the sign in the first place. If they hadn't given it to us, I would not have written it down," Ashona Husbands told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Her friend, Meagan Mwanda, who was also ejected, said: "Why are these three words such a threat to her and her campaign?"

The Clinton campaign told the newspaper the Secret Service nor the campaign kicked anyone out of the rally at Atlanta City Hall. Atlanta police did escort two people out of the rally for having signs, according to the report.

Husbands and Mwanda said they didn't want to hold the sign because they don't know who they are supporting yet. They said the men, wearing military-style uniforms, escorted them out and told them the signs weren't appropriate.

Besides "Black Lives Matter," Husbands also wrote the names of three black people whose deaths have been protested by the movement: #Sandrabland, #trayvonmartin, #Ericgarner.

Mwanda wrote "I am not a super predator" on another sheet of paper.

Clinton used the phrase to describe youth with "no conscience and no empathy" in a speech in advance of her husband President Bill Clinton's controversial 1996 crime bill.

With all of HRC's cronies in congress, as well as the state, and justice department, does anyone truly believe that anything of consequence will ever be done to bring real justice to HRC for the laws she has broken?

My guess is that her lawyers will play "rope a dope" with any and all threats to prosecute her until the country either just loses interest in the whole thing, or Obama will eventually get his way and fill the Supreme Court vacancy with a liberal justice that will ensure any legal action will die by at least a 5-4 decision.

I think an honored four star general was indicted quickly. For, mostly pillow talk and contributing to a writer.
Quickly for some, "Not ever" for a member of the ruling class.
I don't care who she is. She should answer for exposing anything classified and especially secret.
But, she dodged White Water without a scratch.
What's really troubling is the millions that support her.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/dn...rses-bernie-sanders/

DNC vice chair resigns, endorses Bernie Sanders

Democratic National Committee vice chair and Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is stepping down from her post at the DNC and throwing her weight behind Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign.

"First of all, I am resigning from the DNC so I can support Bernie Sanders for president," Gabbard said early Sunday during NBC's "Meet the Press" panel.

Gabbard, one of the first two female combat veterans to ever serve in Congress, stressed the importance of a leader with a "military mindset," which she described as a candidate who knows "importantly, when we don't use [U.S.] military power."

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:

Gabbard, one of the first two female combat veterans to ever serve in Congress, stressed the importance of a leader with a "military mindset," which she described as a candidate who knows "importantly, when we don't use [U.S.] military power."

So Bernie is the military genius with a military mindset, eh, sweetheart?

You know, for a combat veteran, you sure are a dumbass...

Jesus, what an embarrassment.

Farrakhan: Don’t Fall For ‘Satan’ Hillary Clinton’s ‘Crap’

http://www.breitbart.com/video...llary-clintons-crap/

Sunday at the Nation of Islam, Louis Farrakhan said don’t “fall” for Democartic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s “crap” on African-American issues because she and her husband, former President Bill Clinton are responsible for mass incarceration of black people.

Farrakhan said, “How many of you are going to vote for Hillary Clinton? You don’t have to raise your hands. I do not blame you for wanting a female president, but that is a wicked woman. She can be sweet but so can you. And you know when you are sweet but playing a game. All of a sudden she knows about Trayvon Martin. All of a sudden—the boy’s been dead two years now—she talking about him like she met the mother and oh… White people this is Satan. And you fall for that crap? Most of you went to jail for having a little blunt. They arranged that—the Clintons. Mass incarceration came about under the Clintons, Don’t forget that. They call my young gang bangers super predators. And Black Lives Matter put it to her—she didn’t know how to handle that. Call you a super predator, that has no conscience, no sense of dignity like you are a dog, an animal. She gotta bring you to heal you my young brothers. This is what she said about you and she didn’t just say it—it became law and policy of the U.S. government under Bill Clinton and his wife, and now she is apologizing, but apologizing can’t bring back the broken families. Apologizing cant bring back those that been destroyed in prison life.”

Well. it looks like she brought them to heel in Georgia.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
Clinton wiping Sanders out in South Carolina

50 points ahead with half the vote in.

Exit polls showed 6 in 10 voters in the South Carolina primary were black. About 7 in 10 said they wanted the next president to continue Obama's policies

And how many of those 60% are on the free shit train?

quote:

Originally posted by ac130nav:
With all of HRC's cronies in congress, as well as the state, and justice department, does anyone truly believe that anything of consequence will ever be done to bring real justice to HRC for the laws she has broken?

My guess is that her lawyers will play "rope a dope" with any and all threats to prosecute her until the country either just loses interest in the whole thing, or Obama will eventually get his way and fill the Supreme Court vacancy with a liberal justice that will ensure any legal action will die by at least a 5-4 decision.

You mean like the Benghazi thing? How many years has it been now, and they still have not done one fucking thing on it.

I just noticed that when I read anything from Louie, my brain starts thinking like he talks. Its bizarre. My brain doesnt go into "Hillary Schrill Mode" or "Trump Mode" when I read quotes from them.

Ok...back to your regularly scheduled bickering.

This is one of those articles that deserve a full print out.

Hillary's Victories Mean Painful Legal Choices for DOJ, WH

By Charles Lipson
February 29, 2016

RCP contributor Charles Lipson is the Peter B. Ritzma Professor of Political Science and the founder and director of the Program on International Politicis, Economics and Security at the University of Chicago.



http://www.realclearpolitics.c...ices_for_doj_wh.html

Few jobs are as demanding as the U.S. attorney general’s. The AG’s popularity peaks at the swearing-in ceremony and goes downhill from there. It’s not just the hard cases on the docket. It’s that attorneys general have two mandates that sometimes conflict. Do they follow their responsibilities as the nation’s chief law enforcement officer, wherever those responsibilities lead? Or do they act as the president’s top appointee in law enforcement and do his bidding?

AGs do not keep their jobs unless they know which mandate takes priority. They serve at the president’s pleasure.

This bedrock choice between blind justice and political calculation is almost certain to confront Loretta Lynch once the FBI concludes its investigation into Hillary Clinton, her top aides, and the Clinton Foundation.

Her choice just got tougher now that the former secretary of state is sure to win the Democratic nomination. She effectively clinched that prize with an unheard-of 50-point victory over Bernie Sanders in Saturday’s South Carolina primary, on the heels of a solid victory in Nevada last Tuesday. Clinton's victory in the Palmetto State portends big wins all across the South, leaving Sanders with no realistic path to the nomination. After months of enthusiastic “Feel the Bern” rallies, the Democrats are now back where they started. As one prankster, who managed to photo-bomb a Clinton campaign rally, put it on his tee-shirt: “Settle for Hillary.”

Before Democrats officially settle, though, Clinton, Lynch, and Barack Obama have a treacherous bridge to cross.

Standing athwart it is FBI Director James Comey, an experienced prosecutor and consummate professional with some 100-150 agents investigating the Democratic front-runner, the Clinton Foundation, and (presumably) several of Hillary’s closest aides: Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, and Jake Sullivan.

Clinton voters are oblivious to the dangers. Polls show they no longer consider her “honest and trustworthy,” but they still don’t think she has committed any crimes. Countless Clinton supporters have told me, “These investigations won’t find anything. The Benghazi hearings proved it. This is simply a partisan witch hunt.”

They are half right. The Benghazi hearings proved, once again, that Congress has the investigative prowess of Homer Simpson. They are right that Republicans hate her. Divided as the GOP is, it is united in thinking Bill and Hillary are corrupt, self-serving liars.

But the GOP is not leading the criminal investigation. The FBI is. The bureau is not partisan, and it is not on a witch hunt. Despite the obvious risks of investigating the presumptive Democratic nominee during a Democratic administration, its agents are sorting through mountains of evidence pointing to serious, deliberate crimes.

What are the key legal dangers facing Clinton and her aides? Here are just a few.

* Hillary Clinton deliberately set up a private email server for herself and her top State Department aides. She used it to store over 1,800 documents now deemed classified, some highly classified. The sheer bulk of the security violations is extraordinary. Intelligence professionals agree the server was almost certainly hacked by foreign agencies—probably by several.

* Secretary Clinton specifically instructed aides to send her classified materials on that insecure network. We know of at least one such instruction. We don’t know how many others were redacted by the State Department.

* Because her server was private, the State Department’s records did not include its contents when responding to Freedom of Information Act requests. The department wrongly told FOIA applicants that no such materials existed. Not only did the materials exist (on Clinton’s server), senior officials knew it and allowed false denials to be made.

* Some documents on the Clinton server contained the intelligence-gathering methods, the names of undercover agents, and real-time disclosures of top officials’ movements. Aside from the nuclear launch codes, these are the most closely guarded secrets in the U.S. government. That material is “classified at birth,” as Clinton, Mills, Abedin, and Sullivan certainly knew. To avoid any misunderstanding, they had all taken mandatory training in the proper treatment of sensitive and classified materials.

* Some of the classified materials on Clinton’s server originated in intelligence agencies outside the State Department and came into the department on a secure, classified network. They were marked as such. They could only be transferred to Clinton’s unsecured network by hand. Each occurrence was a felony. Since the server has now been recovered, the FBI and intelligence agencies know who sent those messages and who received them at the State Department.

* The Clinton Foundation and some private businesses were deeply involved in the State Department’s business. The lines were blurred between Hillary Clinton’s official role as secretary of state and her unofficial role at a major foundation, headed by her husband, that was showered with money from people and companies working with the State Department. At best, the arrangements were sleazy. At worst, they were criminal “pay to play.”

* Hillary’s closest aide, Huma Abedin, had blurred roles, too. While working at State, she was also employed by a private company whose clients did business with her department and the government.

One major feature of FBI investigations has been completely ignored. The bureau normally interviews all the key participants, and it knows the answers before it asks the questions. That should mean closed-door sessions with Abedin, Mills, Sullivan, and, ultimately, Hillary Clinton and perhaps Bill Clinton (if the foundation’s activities are at issue). Failing to interview them would replicate the botched Benghazi investigation by Adm. Mike Mullin and Ambassador Thomas Pickering. The FBI won’t repeat that mistake or subject itself to the withering criticism.

These interviews are deadly serious. Former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert learned that the hard way. When the FBI asked why he had withdrawn cash from his bank account, he lied. He was caught and, last October, plead guilty to a felony.

So, will Abedin, Mills, or Sullivan answer fully and truthfully or invoke their Fifth Amendment rights? If they did, would it become known and hurt Hillary politically? If she refuses to testify herself, her political career is over. She won’t do that unless she fears indictment is certain, and she would have to drop out of the presidential race anyway.

If FBI Director Comey does recommend criminal charges, he will put DOJ and the White House in a very tight box. First, as a seasoned prosecutor, he will present only strong, winnable cases. Second, he won’t present one or two charges. He will present evidence of dozens and dozens of felonies. AG Lynch and her career attorneys won’t be able to say, “On the whole, there’s just not enough here to convict.” They will have to say that over and over, on each charge. Indictment on even a few felonies is a torpedo beneath the waterline for Clinton. Third, it is clear that CIA and FBI investigators already fear an administration whitewash and have leaked damaging information to the press.

If insiders think the administration is engaged in a full-fledged cover-up, they will resign, led by Comey. They won’t go quietly. They will spill the beans. And two hours later, it won’t smell good.

Knowing that, Lynch and her political bosses, Barack Obama and his closest adviser, Valerie Jarrett, will have to decide which is worse, indicting their party’s presumptive nominee or risking their own Watergate?

Whichever they choose, the White House will not want its fingerprints on the decision. They will want White House spokesman Josh Ernest to say, with a straight face, “This decision was made entirely by respected, career professionals at the Department of Justice.”

If the FBI recommends felony charges, as is likely, the DOJ’s choices are damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don’t. For Loretta Lynch, it will make for a painful final year. For her party, the stakes are the presidency. For her country, they are the impartial rule of law.

^^^^^^^ it won't cost her my vote, either way.

I disagree that Benghazi has not gone anywhere. Sifting through the rubble led to the server.

It is likely true that Judicial Watch has done most of the heavy lifting, but they are not hampered by having majority and minority staffs, self important windba,... Errr, Congressmen, to ego stroke and similar baggage.

I'm hoping the FBI gets to it sooner rather than later in recommending criminal charges.