quote:

Blasey Ford scrubbed her social media accounts before coming forward publically with her accusations.

She didn't scrub them. The leftists had professionals scrubbing them since July.

quote:

Originally posted by ScreamingCockatoo:
When this is over and she's proved to by a bought and pied for liar, can she be sued for defamation if character?
Does he have a tort?

This whole thing is kind of in a new territory in some ways. If you'll notice the established print media is making it clear that they can't verify it so they give the disclaimer. The electronic media, aka Twitter, is letting it roll. They (Twitter) obviously have taken a stand as to the content distributed using their services as we know they ability to stop things from being published on their site. I think this could be a case for libel for the outlets that have let this be published and republished with no disclaimer.

I don't see how the senate could be so what seems to be criminal in their intent to smear this man.
SOMONE is paying for this.
Can we censure Feinstein already?

quote:

Originally posted by jljones:
So, how did she get to Maryland if she refuses to fly? That was the location of the supposed polygraph.

Coincidentally, that’s a BWI airport hotel, too - about a mile from the terminal.

Just one more lie.

-Rob

It is documented that she flew to and from Hawaii on several occasions to surf.

flashguy

quote:

Originally posted by ScreamingCockatoo:
I don't see how the senate could be so what seems to be criminal in their intent to smear this man.
SOMONE is paying for this.
Can we censure Feinstein already?

The Senate isn’t criminal. The God Damned Commies are.

They know they must beat this or see decades of court decisions they won’t like.

Feinstein could be censured, but don’t look for that happening over this. Not enough outrage at this point.

These 2 new women were brought out because Ford is proving to be a liar.
A fucking liar.

Swetnick works for the IRS, but




that's a $40,000 IRS lien Oct 2017.

Looks like it was released in Jan 2018

The zip code is correct for her address. She lives in DC

quote:

Originally posted by JALLEN:
Feinstein could be censured, but don’t look for that happening over this. Not enough outrage at this point.

Something tells me that after November, Feinstein may not even be around to censure.

Grassley and McConnell just need to keep pushing forward as this could all be over by the weekend. Let's hope that happens.

quote:

Originally posted by bigdeal:

Grassley and McConnell just need to keep pushing forward as this could all be over by the weekend. Let's hope that happens.

I'm praying it happens. This whole ordeal is exhausting. I can only imagine how emotionally draining this is for the Kavanaugh’s.

Grassley Staffers Receive Horrific Death, Rape Threats Over Kavanaugh Hearing

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...r-kavanaugh-n2522932

Staffers for Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley have received a number of serious and horrific threats in recent days as the battle over Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh rages on.

Here are a few examples of phone calls the office has received, which were provided by staff.

-“I hope you get raped so you can understand what that woman is going through.”

-“You’re a disgusting excuse for a human being, and I don’t know how you can live with yourself. I hope you never have children because they’ll be just as worthless as you are.”

-“You’re racist trash.”

-“Senator Grassley doesn’t have a spine and neither do you bitch.”

-“I just wanted to call and tell you that you are a piece of shit and Senator Grassley is a fucking piece of shit and he can’t die from a heart attack soon enough.”

-“I feel really sorry for women like you – outside of your office you’re probably disturbed by this but apparently you have a job to do.”

Grassley and his office have been working tirelessly since last week to ensure Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Kavanaugh of sexual assault during a party in high school nearly 40 years ago, has a safe and fair venue to tell her story. That venue is being provided on Thursday morning in front of the Committee. Ford and Kavanaugh will be questioned separately by long time sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell before Senators ask their own questions.

“As I have said, I’m committed to providing a forum to both Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh on Thursday that is safe, comfortable and dignified. The majority members have followed the bipartisan recommendation to hire as staff counsel for the committee an experienced career sex-crimes prosecutor to question the witnesses at Thursday’s hearing. The goal is to de-politicize the process and get to the truth, instead of grandstanding and giving senators an opportunity to launch their presidential campaigns. I’m very appreciative that Rachel Mitchell has stepped forward to serve in this important and serious role. Ms. Mitchell has been recognized in the legal community for her experience and objectivity,” Grassley said in a statement.

“I’ve worked to give Dr. Ford an opportunity to share serious allegations with committee members in any format she’d like after learning of the allegations. I promised Dr. Ford that I would do everything in my power to avoid a repeat of the ‘circus’ atmosphere in the hearing room that we saw the week of September 4," he continued. "I’ve taken this additional step to have questions asked by expert staff counsel to establish the most fair and respectful treatment of the witnesses possible.”

here is Ford's opening statement

https://www.scribd.com/documen...Testimony#from_embed

The Circus Continues...

The democrats and their lapdog media counterparts are beyond embarrassing. I hope every American is watching right now.

NBC Reporting a 4th Accuser (full length article at the link, shortened here for clarity)

WASHINGTON — The Senate Judiciary Committee is inquiring about at least one additional allegation of misconduct against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, according to a letter obtained by NBC News and multiple people familiar with the process.

Republican Senate investigators asked Kavanaugh about the new complaint, NBC News has learned, during a phone call on Tuesday between Kavanaugh and committee staff. Sources told NBC News that Kavanaugh denied the allegation in the letter during the call and a spokesman for the committee declined to comment.

A Republican aide on the committee said the conversation took place shortly after noon. While Republican staff posed questions to Kavanaugh, their Democratic counterparts were also on the call but did not ask any questions.

According to an anonymous complaint sent to Republican Sen. Cory Gardner of Colorado, Kavanaugh physically assaulted a woman he socialized with in the Washington, D.C., area in 1998 while he was inebriated.

The sender of the complaint described an evening involving her own daughter, Kavanaugh and several friends in 1998.

“When they left the bar (under the influence of alcohol) they were all shocked when Brett Kavanaugh, shoved her friend up against the wall very aggressively and sexually.”

“There were at least four witnesses including my daughter.” The writer of the letter provided no names but said the alleged victim was still traumatized and had decided to remain anonymous herself.

A Democratic source said the minority wasn’t satisfied by the Republicans’ questions about the incident during the call, calling them cursory, and believed it should be investigated more deeply.

NBC News reached out to the White House for comment.

Well, it certainly looks now that this thing is going full steam ahead tomorrow.

And I don't believe a word of that lying bitch's statement.

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
Ford's polygraph was 2 questions

This is complete BS then. Real ones are long and can take hours.

All polygraph exams are BS. The polygraph is pseudo science. Read about Aldrich Ames and how he passed his polygraph. No American citizen should ever be subject to a polygraph ever for any reason.

Swetnik's statement is curiously similar to the lurid and over-the-top Adventures of O. C & Stiggs series printed in National Lampoon back then.

The Utterly Monstrous, Mind Roasting Summer of OC & Stiggs: October, 1982. A classic and some of the funniest shit you'll ever read in your life. I wish that I still had it.

Also, here is a link to a review of Ford's high school yearbooks. Those girls needed no help to be drunk and raunchy.

http://cultofthe1st.blogspot.c...h-school_19.html?m=1

quote:

Originally posted by ScreamingCockatoo:
When this is over and she's proved to by a bought and paid for liar, can she be sued for defamation of character?
Does he have a tort?

YES! I posted, a few pages back, a link to a recent case in Virginia where an Army Colonel up for promotion to General was defamed by a woman who claimed he raped her at West Point with no evidence at all. He won an $8 million dollar judgement against her.

Women who seek to destroy the character of men with false accusations MUST be held accountable.

https://www.stripes.com/news/u...e-raped-her-1.482514

By the way, he wasn't retired when she defamed him. He was forced to retire by the Army after being denied the promotion.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
I don't believe a word of that lying bitch's statement.

Without a date, time, location, witness or contemporaneous exchange- I'm not sure what we're supposed to do with it.

Has any whackjob dimwit said- As long as they believe Judge Kavenaugh wronged them it doesn't matter if it happened or not. Like Gender Identity.

Brett Kavanaugh groped my buttocks in an opium den during the Yuan dynasty in 1336.

The latest allegations by the Porn Lawyer is laughable.

1. Female college student
2. Attended High school house parties
3. Observed girls being drugged and gang raped at these parties.
4. Repeatedly attended these parties at least 10 times

Sounds more like an orgy party to me.

How old were the high school boys at the party.
Does she need to be investigated for statutory rape?