SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Who Killed JFK, 61 years ago, today...
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Who Killed JFK, 61 years ago, today... Login/Join 
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
Actually, the reports will be filled with soft spots and outright vacancies so that the arguments will be renewed. So this will never end until the Comet.


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11294 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Raptorman
Picture of Mars_Attacks
posted Hide Post
I gots a Ruby Cobra too.



____________________________

Eeewwww, don't touch it!
Here, poke at it with this stick.
 
Posts: 34582 | Location: North, GA | Registered: October 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
That is an outright, handsome six shooter right there. Cool


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11294 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Keystoner
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by selogic:
Serious question . IF Oswald did it . AND he acted alone without any collusion from ANYONE . Why is there any national security concerns , foreign affair considerations , or anything else that could be harmful to anyone this long after ?

By the way you're asking this seems to me you assume the reason for the hold on the information is to conceal a collusion. That's narrow-minded if true. That's not necessarily the reason. It could be completely unrelated to that. I can speculate other reasons. Maybe there's something very unflattering about JFK. I'm not even guessing that. I'm just pointing out that with the facts so overwhelmingly pointing to Oswald acting alone, it's tinfoil hat irrationality to assume the reason for the hold on the file has something to with a conspiracy.



Year V
 
Posts: 2694 | Registered: November 05, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
thin skin can't win
Picture of Georgeair
posted Hide Post
It’s always remarkable how bonkers some of these conspiracy arguments are, sometimes even coming from otherwise sane people.



You only have integrity once. - imprezaguy02

 
Posts: 12890 | Location: Madison, MS | Registered: December 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
quote:
posted November 25, 2024 02:22 PM Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by selogic:
Serious question . IF Oswald did it . AND he acted alone without any collusion from ANYONE . Why is there any national security concerns , foreign affair considerations , or anything else that could be harmful to anyone this long after ?

By the way you're asking this seems to me you assume the reason for the hold on the information is to conceal a collusion. That's narrow-minded if true. That's not necessarily the reason. It could be completely unrelated to that. I can speculate other reasons. Maybe there's something very unflattering about JFK. I'm not even guessing that. I'm just pointing out that with the facts so overwhelmingly pointing to Oswald acting alone, it's tinfoil hat irrationality to assume the reason for the hold on the file has something to with a conspiracy.



It is equally narrow minded to assume that there's no possibility whatsoever that it could be to conceal a collusion. The simple fact of the matter is we don't know why there has been a hold on information.

I believe Oswald acted alone. But selogic made an interesting observation.


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11294 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Bookers Bourbon
and a good cigar
Picture of Johnny 3eagles
posted Hide Post
Wouldn't we be better served if we could see Epstein s Client list and P Diddys party list.





If you're goin' through hell, keep on going.
Don't slow down. If you're scared don't show it.
You might get out before the devil even knows you're there.


NRA ENDOWMENT LIFE MEMBER
 
Posts: 7376 | Location: Arkansas  | Registered: November 06, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
I’m reminded of the supposed comment by a mathematical illiterate that he has a 50 percent chance of winning a lottery: “I’ll either win or lose; that’s 50-50.”

What would we think of someone who believes that it’s less likely to win a Ford F150 being offered in a raffle that has tens of thousands of entries than it is to win a year’s gun club membership that has a couple of hundred? Is that person being “narrow minded”?

The answer is no: It’s basic mathematics. The possibility that an event like the JFK murder was the result of an active conspiracy can’t of course be expressed in such simple mathematical terms, but that doesn’t mean there’s no way to judge its likelihood as compared with the alternatives, and that’s what many of us have tried to explain. Some things are simply much less likely than others, and recognizing (and admitting) the reasons for the difference is hardly being narrow-minded. As the skeptics like to point out, we shouldn’t be so open-minded that our brains fall out.




“I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.”
— The Wizard of Oz

This life is a drill. It is only a drill. If it had been a real life, you would have been given instructions about where to go and what to do.
 
Posts: 47959 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
There is less likely, and there is absolutely no chance. When you talk as if there is absolutely no chance, that is narrow minded.

I've looked around on the floor and I don't see my brains. But thank you for your concern.


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11294 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
I was trying to be nice in my previous post by ignoring the “absolutely no chance” comment, but now that you’ve made it again, whose post are you quoting?

This is a long thread and perhaps I missed it, so please enlighten us.




“I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.”
— The Wizard of Oz

This life is a drill. It is only a drill. If it had been a real life, you would have been given instructions about where to go and what to do.
 
Posts: 47959 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
quote:
it's tinfoil hat irrationality to assume the reason for the hold on the file has something to with a conspiracy.


That sounds to me like absolutely no chance.

Try harder to be nice. You can do it.

Actually, I'm tired of you Sigfreund. You are very impressed by your own intelligence. But I'm not.


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11294 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by justjoe:
Actually, I'm tired of you Sigfreund.

Alas, we all have our crosses to bear. Wink




“I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.”
— The Wizard of Oz

This life is a drill. It is only a drill. If it had been a real life, you would have been given instructions about where to go and what to do.
 
Posts: 47959 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Keystoner
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by justjoe:
quote:
it's tinfoil hat irrationality to assume the reason for the hold on the file has something to with a conspiracy.


That sounds to me like absolutely no chance.

Try harder to be nice. You can do it.

Actually, I'm tired of you Sigfreund. You are very impressed by your own intelligence. But I'm not.

Let me rephrase then, "it's tinfoil asshattery to assume anything and state anything open to opinion as absolute," and if you thought I was making an absolute, there are none so blind as those who refuse to see.



Year V
 
Posts: 2694 | Registered: November 05, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
fugitive from reality
Picture of SgtGold
posted Hide Post
Oswald's first shot hit a traffic light. The audio of the shooting recorded one more shot that was accounted for. It wasn't until recently that the specific traffic device was being inspected for maintenance, and the bullet hole was discovered.

quote:
Originally posted by parabellum:
A man by the name of Lee Harvey Oswald, a perpetual malcontent, did it. He used a surplus Carcano rifle with a cheap scope.

His first shot missed his target so badly, it hit a curb. Spalling from the shot hit a man standing nearby and cut his cheek.

The second shot hit Kennedy in his upper back, passed out through his throat, passed through the jump seat Texas Governor Connally was sitting in, passed through Connally's torso, breaking a rib, fractured his wrist and embedded itself in his leg.

The third and final shot struck Kennedy in the back of the head.

In March, 1963, Oswald used the same rifle to attempt to kill General Edwin Walker, with testimony from Oswald's wife Marina supporting the evidence.

After the assassination, Oswald also murdered Dallas Police Officer J.D. Tippit with a war surplus S&W revolver, which had been converted from .38/200 to .38 Special, before being captured by authorities in a Dallas movie theater.

Two days later, Oswald was murdered by Dallas night club owner Jack Ruby.

Any other questions?


_____________________________
'I'm pretty fly for a white guy'.

 
Posts: 7168 | Location: Newyorkistan | Registered: March 28, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
quote:
"it's tinfoil asshattery to assume anything and state anything open to opinion as absolute,"


That doesn't make any sense. Not a lick. That's worthy of Kamala. But I'm not gonna waste anymore time arguing with nincompoops who think they are brilliant.


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11294 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SgtGold:
Oswald's first shot hit a traffic light. The audio of the shooting recorded one more shot that was accounted for. It wasn't until recently that the specific traffic device was being inspected for maintenance, and the bullet hole was discovered.
This makes it sound as if the bullet hit the traffic light mechanism proper and was stopped by it.

This is not what happened. The bullet passed through the metal facia of the light- essentially about as thick as a traffic sign- then continued on and finally hit a curb, spalling fragments of the concrete upon impact. A fragment of concrete flew up and struck a spectator in one of the cheeks on his face, cutting him.

By the way, if I recall correctly, the hole was discovered via photographs which were take in Dealy Plaza shortly after the assassination.
 
Posts: 110088 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
Yes, here it is:

JFK: The Lost Bullet Part Three: Reproducing the Kennedy Signal

and:

A Technical Investigation Pertaining to the First Shot Fired in the JFK Assassination

Page 11 of the linked PDF shows a photograph of the curb. James Tague is the name of the man who was struck by the spalled fragment.
quote:
Several minutes after the presidential
motorcade left Dealey Plaza in disarray, James
T. Tague, an eyewitness to the motorcade,
reported to a deputy sheriff that he was stung
by something during the shooting. The officer
observed that there was blood from a scratch on
Tague’s lower left cheek. Tague took the deputy
sheriff to where he had been standing, south of
Main Street, close to the triple underpass and
152.9 feet (46.6 meters) downrange from the
concrete skirt in Figure 2. A search of the area
revealed that a nearby concrete curb, located
23.3 ft (7.1 m) east of the triple underpass,
had been freshly struck by a projectile (Fig. 3),
presumably accounting in some way for Tague’s
superficial wound [15]. The relative positions
of the concrete skirt, concrete curb, and James
Tague can be seen in Figure 4

After the Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI) removed the curb for examination,
the Bureau’s Laboratory determined that the
projectile mark had metal that contained lead/
antimony, and concluded it was from the core
of a mutilated metal-jacketed bullet, such as the
type loaded into Oswald’s 6.5-mm cartridges.
Because there was no copper present in
the metal residue, the FBI Laboratory also
concluded that the curb metal “could not
have been made by the first impact of a high
velocity rifle bullet,” meaning the bullet had
encountered an obstruction that stripped off
its copper jacket before it struck the curb [16].
Although eyewitness recollections can be
misleading or mistaken, any findings regarding
the first shot must explain not only why the
shot missed the presidential limousine, but
should reasonably account for all the heretofore
unresolved but documented phenomena just
described.
The photograph of the curb on page 11 of this document is captioned:
quote:
Figure 3:
The concrete curb near where James Tague
was standing when he sustained a minor
injury, and the projectile strike mark on the
curb. Subsequent FBI analysis determined that
metallic residue in the mark was consistent with
the lead core of ammunition used by Lee Harvey
Oswald. (Photo from the Tom Dillard Collection,
The Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza.)


____________________________________________________

"I am your retribution." - Donald Trump, speech at CPAC, March 4, 2023
 
Posts: 110088 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Little ray
of sunshine
Picture of jhe888
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by pulicords:
As one who's actually gotten paid (as a LEO) to investigate conspiracies for years, I can definitively say this: Those involved talk. They talk to spouses, family members, lovers, friends, people they work with, and those they've been acquainted with for many years or just a few weeks. Those spoken to talk to others and they in turn spread the word until it gets back to investigators.

Sometimes the promise of reward money or special consideration for a pending prosecution elicits these people to talk to investigators, but most of the time (on serious matters) those "in the know", just want to let it out and all they need is a bit of probing by someone that's shown an interest in them and what they've got to say, and they'll spill their guts. Someone that'll listen.

When the President of the United States was murdered, it was literally the most horrific act of wrongdoing committed against the citizens of the nation, not to mention the victim, his family, friends, and other loved ones in decades. If there was truly a conspiracy to commit this act, word among those involved would have gotten out by someone over the last sixty plus years. There's far too much incentive to talk and (at this point) far too little reason not to. Those "dark recesses" of government involve far too many people that would have been directly involved and innumerable others that would have learned about those responsible who would have passed what they had learned on. That lack of credible/corroborative information after all this time speaks volumes.


That is way too boring for conspiracy theorists.




The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything.
 
Posts: 53414 | Location: Texas | Registered: February 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Little ray
of sunshine
Picture of jhe888
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Keystoner:
quote:
Originally posted by selogic:
Serious question . IF Oswald did it . AND he acted alone without any collusion from ANYONE . Why is there any national security concerns , foreign affair considerations , or anything else that could be harmful to anyone this long after ?

By the way you're asking this seems to me you assume the reason for the hold on the information is to conceal a collusion. That's narrow-minded if true. That's not necessarily the reason. It could be completely unrelated to that. I can speculate other reasons. Maybe there's something very unflattering about JFK. I'm not even guessing that. I'm just pointing out that with the facts so overwhelmingly pointing to Oswald acting alone, it's tinfoil hat irrationality to assume the reason for the hold on the file has something to with a conspiracy.


Governmental inertia. Once secret, always secret. And it may be to protect methods of investigation that are still used even if this particular investigation is old and moldy. Still, there are living people still around who were around then, so maybe it protects some of them.




The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything.
 
Posts: 53414 | Location: Texas | Registered: February 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Savor the limelight
posted Hide Post
If everybody talks, then who killed Hoffa and where is his body?

But, I do think LHO was/would have been a talker.
 
Posts: 12014 | Location: SWFL | Registered: October 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Who Killed JFK, 61 years ago, today...

© SIGforum 2024