quote:

Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:
Interesting that the female cop did not come in uniform. I love her answer about ARs. I own them, I have fired them and have trained with them.

If they are weapons of war, why do so many PD's issue them?

^^^^^^^^^^^
I am sure j jones will be along shortly to answer that question.

I suspect Drew Hernandez picked up a few followers of his videos today.

quote:

Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:
Interesting that the female cop did not come in uniform.

I think I'd like to see her testimony again... perhaps several times

quote:

Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:
I love her answer about ARs. I own them, I have fired them and have trained with them.

Yeah, that was pretty kick-ass.

quote:

I think I'd like to see her testimony again... perhaps several times

^^^^^^^^^^^
ahahaha

quote:

Originally posted by ensigmatic:
I think I'd like to see her testimony again... perhaps several times

Now we know your wife doesn't read this forum.

Fascinating argument on defense's part: Re: Admissibility of digitally-enlarged digital photos.

quote:

Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:
Interesting that the female cop did not come in uniform. I love her answer about ARs. I own them, I have fired them and have trained with them.

Seen that happen before. If you are testifying for Prosecution they want you in uniform. If you are called back on another day to testify for the defense, some departments/prosecutors want you in regular clothing.

Do you know the enhanced version is accurate? Yes it is.
Did you compare it to the original? No.

I'm not sure this whole subject didn't put most jurors to sleep, or will end up being all that important, but that was a really big blunder after all the effort to argue the admissibility of this enlarged photo.
Keystone cops and Sargent Shultz comes to mind here.

I'd almost enjoy being arrested and charged in Kenosha just to squabble with that piece of shit prosecutor and to embarrass him publicly and on the record.

Re photographs, strictly speaking, no original photograph can be enlarged digitally without changing it some, however small.

Photos aren't scalable vector images.

quote:

Originally posted by 220-9er:
Do you know the enhanced version is accurate? Yes it is.
Did you compare it to the original? No.

Who was speaking, please?

quote:

Originally posted by RichardC:

quote:

Originally posted by 220-9er:
Do you know the enhanced version is accurate? Yes it is.
Did you compare it to the original? No.

Who was speaking, please?

The defense, questioning the prosecution's witness. That was a pretty astonishing screw-up on their part

So what's the importance of whether the AR jammed or not?

quote:

Originally posted by saigonsmuggler:
So what's the importance of whether the AR jammed or not?

Lefty said Kyle charged the weapon so he feared for his life and lunged at Kyle. Kyle said he didn't charge the rifle. The video doesn't really show him charging the rifle.

If reasonable people agree he didn't charge the weapon, then Lefty didn't need to charge Kyle and Lefty is caught in another lie.

^^ You'll have to ask the prosecutor. Everyone else would just be speculating.

quote:

Originally posted by saigonsmuggler:
So what's the importance of whether the AR jammed or not?

If you pulled the trigger ”It would go click, it wouldn’t go bang.” - Officer Bray
2:43:35

quote:

Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:

quote:

I think I'd like to see her testimony again... perhaps several times

^^^^^^^^^^^
ahahaha

Could you pervs help a brother out with a time stamp reference?

https://youtu.be/RRmG3YUX0Ko

quote:

Originally posted by RichardC:


Could you pervs help a brother out with a time stamp reference?

https://youtu.be/RRmG3YUX0Ko

Sworn in at 2 hours 34 minutes.

quote:

Originally posted by RichardC:
Could you pervs help a brother out