Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
I wouldn't call labeling everyone who dies as dying from the Corona virus "data gathering" at all. It's like ballot harvesting only using real people instead of ballots. "Fixed fortifications are monuments to mans stupidity" - George S. Patton | |||
|
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie |
"Sooner rather later." Tomorrow! ~Alan Acta Non Verba NRA Life Member (Patron) God, Family, Guns, Country Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan | |||
|
Ammoholic |
We don't have enough people to preform autopsies for them all. I'm also not sure if it's been discussed if the dead bodies can spread infection. Jesse Sic Semper Tyrannis | |||
|
10mm is The Boom of Doom |
Since all of these are correlated with age, I'm not sure how significant this is. *** BREAKING NEWS *** Gray hair, baldness, wrinkles and a need for reading glasses identified as risk factors for Wuhan Bat Soup Virus. God Bless and Protect the Once and Future President, Donald John Trump. | |||
|
Member |
I appreciate Trump's enthusiasm. And I agree, it must be open sooner rather than later. Come May 1st, the gears 100% have to start turning towards economic motion again. But it will not boom before his re-election. Not a chance in hell. Too much damage has been done and getting this economy moving again will be a HUGE effort and take lots of time. | |||
|
10mm is The Boom of Doom |
So if an asymptomatic person is in a car crash, decapitated and shot in the head that is scored as a Wuhan kill? God Bless and Protect the Once and Future President, Donald John Trump. | |||
|
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie |
That does appear to be the metrics they are using, yes. ~Alan Acta Non Verba NRA Life Member (Patron) God, Family, Guns, Country Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan | |||
|
On the wrong side of the Mobius strip |
These will be marked as underlying illnesses. It is the Wuhan-rona that did 'em in. | |||
|
Still finding my way |
More reported cases equal more relief funding. Gee, I don't know why anyone would ever fudge the numbers to make it look worse than it is. | |||
|
Member |
The estimations made by a model are based on conditions and trends at the time it is made. They are going to change over time. The unfortunate thing is that people will fall into two camps: those that believe the model was that far off and that's all there is to it and those that believe that all of the distancing and isolation is the sole reason for the change in numbers. The truth is probably somewhere in between. | |||
|
Unflappable Enginerd |
When you base your actions on statistics, everyone's a winner!! __________________________________ NRA Benefactor I lost all my weapons in a boating, umm, accident. http://www.aufamily.com/forums/ | |||
|
Ammoholic |
That is pretty silly. Why would they waste a test on a dead person? Especially one who cause of death was apparent? What they are not doing is trying to determine someone who was infected and under treatment for COVID19 and had a heart attack if the heart attack was caused by COVID or if they would have had a heart attack absent CV19. Either way it would be impossible to tell that. Best they could do was say heart attack with contributing factor of Wu Flu. Jesse Sic Semper Tyrannis | |||
|
Member |
| |||
|
wishing we were congress |
Guess what CNN is accusing President Trump of now ? CNN’s Maggie Haberman: I do think, John, just based on other reporting we have, that [Trump’s] interest in [hydroxychloroquine] is primarily about the fact that it has been suggested to him by people who he knows, including Larry Ellison at Oracle, Dr. Oz on television suggested this, and the president has gotten more interested in what TV doctors have to say than some of the people in his own administration. But mostly, John, I think he’s looking for a quick fix out of this . And I really do believe that that is his main focus. I have no way of knowing if that’s the only one. But I do think that’s the main one. | |||
|
Baroque Bloke |
I see the possibility of a boom before the 2020 election, given the huge federal spending programs recently enacted. But those, and much lower tax revenues, portend major inflation at some point in the future. Just a question of when, not if. Serious about crackers | |||
|
Partial dichotomy |
| |||
|
Gracie Allen is my personal savior! |
Er, the election's in November and all Trump needs to get a good tailwind is the beginning of a boom. The only mistake he can make is letting Pelosi and Schumer slow down the appearance of the beginning of a boom by letting the federal government spend money wildly in every which direction. | |||
|
Non-Miscreant |
Now the arguing in this thread has stumbled upon a useful tidbit. I've been thinking about this for a while now and wonder what a good strategy will be to protect against it. We learned back in the '80s that it will literally kill your savings if you're locked into a low interest rate. I stumbled into Treasury I bonds 20 years ago. They did a decent job when interest rates dropped to the cellar. They were designed to insulate against surging rates but did well with the opposite. Of course the Obama administration radically lowered the amount you could buy per year, kind of killing the attractiveness of them. Its not really an investment as much as a hedge. There's got to be another hedge we could use against inflation. Anyone know? Unhappy ammo seeker | |||
|
Member |
For sure...the only way the Dems get what they want (make Trump look bad, more govt control over American's way of life) is if it drags on.....
--------------------------------------- It's like my brain's a tree and you're those little cookie elves. | |||
|
Internet Guru |
Politically, leftist need this to drag on through the election. That's the narrative right now, but folks seem to think it's all about our safety. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 ... 1216 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |