quote:

Originally posted by olfuzzy:
The only thing our liberal rag has had in it concerning this latest investigation is articles blasting Comey.

Comey is the only target they have right now

quote:

THE CAKE IS BAKED

...is melting in the dark
All the sweet, green icing flowing down
Someone left the cake out in the rain
I don't think that I can take it
'Cause it took so long to bake it
And I'll never have that recipe again
Oh, no!
Oh, no
No, no
Oh no!!

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
[IMG]

Her "accomplishments" in office will make Nixon's legacy of corruption look minor. Congrats Hillary. You've made your place in history after all!

This message has been edited. Last edited by: parabellum,

quote:

Originally posted by pulicords:

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
[IMG]

Her "accomplishments" in office will make Nixon's legacy of corruption look minor. Congrats Hillary. You've made your place in history after all!

Saw a sticker like this in DC a few weeks ago...

quote:

Originally posted by pulicords:

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
[IMG]

Her "accomplishments" in office will make Nixon's legacy of corruption look minor. Congrats Hillary. You've made your place in history after all!

It's no wonder. Nixon, after all, got caught acting like a Democrat, after watching LBJ et al for ~20 years and knowing that's how he got cheated in 1960. He figured that is how hardball is played in the big time.

Moreover, they had more than 40 years to "improve their lie" as golfers put it.

I wonder if HRC appreciates irony?

Why are the DEMs so upset ?

It's just a security review.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
Why are the DEMs so upset ?

It's just a security review.

Because the last time a Dem was involved with security, an Ambassador and three other Americans were killed by Islamic terrorists?

quote:

Originally posted by IrishWind:

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
Why are the DEMs so upset ?

It's just a security review.

Because the last time a Dem was involved with security, an Ambassador and three other Americans were killed by Islamic terrorists?

You think dems would be upset about that? Their history proves otherwise.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

quote:

Originally posted by IrishWind:

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
Why are the DEMs so upset ?

It's just a security review.

Because the last time a Dem was involved with security, an Ambassador and three other Americans were killed by Islamic terrorists?

You think dems would be upset about that? Their history proves otherwise.

This security review is to protect their anointed queen. The people below her, well, we know what happened to the Ambassador (RIP).

RMD

FBI Unexpectedly Releases Documents Related To 2001 Probe Into Clinton Foundation

Update: According to NBC's Tom Winter, the FBI Vault twitter account "released all files pertaining to Donald Trump's father, Fred Trump, a few weeks ago. That was response to FOIA" and adds that "the release of WJC FBI files was sent by the FOIA office under normal guidelines. A proper requested was made -Pete Williams rpts.... The account, @FBIRecordsVault started tweeting several days ago after not tweeting for a year. The first tweet.... about Fred Trump's files." And now, it is tweeting about the Clinton Foundation.

And then, the following choice piece: "the young federal prosecutor who ultimately decided not to charge Clinton or anyone else in "pardongate"... James Comey." Is it time for Comey to come clean?

In what appears to be an unexpected, and very surprising, disclosure, moments ago the FBI released 129 pages of heavily redacted records from its 15-year-old investigation into the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton's 11th hour pardon of financier Marc Rich (less than a week before the election).

According to the FBI, "this initial release consists of material from the FBI's files related to the William J. Clinton Foundation, a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization. The bulk of these records come from a 2001 FBI investigation into the pardon of Marc Rich (1934-2013), aka Marcell David Reich, by President Clinton in 2001; it was closed in 2005. The material is heavily redacted due to personal privacy protections and grand jury secrecy rules."

The commentariat is, in a word, shocked by what this symbolic, and impromptu release means, with some wondering if it is payback for Clinton’s blasting of the FBI.

As the Washington Examiner notes, it was not immediately clear what prompted the FBI to publish the files Tuesday. However, the bureau posted the documents on the section of its website dedicated to records released through the Freedom of Information Act.

Is this the FBI engaging in a covert mutiny against the Clintons and the political affiliated Department of Justice? We hope to find out soon.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/...oundation-marc-rich-

I hope sunshine on these types is sufficient disinfectant.


Can’t make this up: DOJ official ‘running’ Clinton email probe tried to get son a job with the Clinton campaign

Great work by Sarah Westwood over at the Washington Examiner with this bombshell of a report (thanks to WikiLeaks) on how the DOJ official “running” the ongoing Hillary Clinton email investigation not only has close ties to John Podesta but also even tried to get his son a job on the Clinton campaign:



http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2606152

quote:

Originally posted by AzMikeCFD102:

quote:

Read the article. Kadzik is head of legislative affairs at DOJ, not investigations

"Kadzik was not in the direct chain of command on the Clinton investigation but he was able to deny a request from Republican lawmakers to appoint a special counsel to lead the investigation."

I was in charge of "legislative affairs" both in Chicago and Illinois government, for major entities. I know first hand what power that position holds. Do not kid yourself for one moment that the corruption at HRC's level is ultimately far reaching and extremely powerful.

Hillary’s Watergate?
By Patrick J. Buchanan

After posting Friday’s column, “A Presidency from Hell,” about the investigations a President Hillary Clinton would face, by afternoon it was clear I had understated the gravity of the situation.

Networks exploded with news that FBI Director James Comey had informed Congress he was reopening the investigation into Clinton’s email scandal, which he had said in July had been concluded.

“Bombshell” declared Carl Bernstein. The stock market tumbled. “October surprise!” came the cry.

The only explanation, it seemed, was that the FBI had uncovered new information that could lead to a possible indictment of the former secretary of state, who by then could be the president of the United States.

By Sunday, we knew the source of the eruption.

Huma Abedin, Clinton’s top aide, sent thousands of emails to the private laptop she shared with husband Anthony Weiner, a.k.a. Carlos Danger, who is under FBI investigation for allegedly sexting with a 15-year-old girl.

The Weiner-Abedin laptop contains 650,000 emails.

The FBI has not yet reviewed Abedin’s emails, and they could turn out to be duplicates of those the FBI has already seen, benign, or not relevant to the investigation of Clinton.

But it does appear that Abedin misled the FBI when she told them all communications devices containing State Department work product were turned over to State when she departed in 2013.

Clinton, understandably, was stunned and outraged by Comey’s letter. For it casts a cloud of suspicion over her candidacy by raising the possibility that the FBI director could reverse his decision of July, and recommend her prosecution.

By Monday, Oct. 31, new problems had arisen, some potentially crippling or possibly lethal to a Clinton presidency.

Reporters have unearthed a near-mutiny inside the FBI over the decision to shut down the investigation of the Clinton email scandal and Comey’s recommendation of no prosecution.
Andrew McCabe, No. 2 at the FBI, has come under anonymous fire from inside the bureau as one of those most reluctant to pursue aggressively any investigations of the Clintons.

McCabe’s wife, in a 2015 state senate race in Virginia, received $475,000 in PAC contributions from Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a longtime friend and major fundraiser for Bill and Hillary Clinton.

After the Senate race that McCabe’s wife lost, he was promoted from No. 3 at the FBI to No. 2, where he has far more influence over decisions to investigate and recommend prosecution.

Justice Department higher-ups under Attorney General Loretta Lynch apparently disagreed with Comey notifying Congress, and the nation, to new developments in the email scandal. Yet Comey had given his word to Congress that he would do so.

In the Southern District of New York, which has jurisdiction over the Weiner sexting investigation, FBI agents have reportedly been blocked from opening an investigation into charges of corruption in the Clinton Foundation.

This follows revelations that corporate chiefs and foreign rulers and regimes, hit up for contributions to the Clinton Foundation, were then urged by an ex-Clinton aide to provide six-figure speaking fees for Bill Clinton.

This follows reports the Clinton Foundation took contributions for victims of natural disasters, and awarded multimillion-dollar contracts to contributors to do the work.

Still unanswered is what Bill Clinton and Attorney General Lynch discussed during that 30-minute meeting on the Phoenix tarmac, prior to the FBI and Justice Department decision not to indict Hillary Clinton.

The stench of corruption is reaching Bhopal dimensions.

What appears about to happen seems inevitable and predictable.

If Hillary Clinton is elected, the email scandal, the pay-for-play scandal involving the Clinton Foundation, “Bill Clinton, Inc.,” the truthfulness of her testimony, and reports of Clinton-paid dirty tricksters engaging in brownshirt tactics at Trump rallies, are all going to be investigated more thoroughly by the FBI.

And if Clinton is president, there is no way her Justice Department can investigate the Clinton scandals, any more than this city in the early 1970s would entrust an investigation into Watergate to the Nixon Justice Department.

If Clinton wins this election, and Republicans hold onto one or both houses of Congress, investigations of the Clinton scandals will start soon after her inaugural and will go on for years. And the clamor for a special prosecutor, who will, as Archibald Cox did with Nixon, build a huge staff and spend years investigating, will become irresistible.

Realizing that this is the near-certain fate and future of any Hillary Clinton presidency, and would be disastrous for the country, Sunday night, Doug Schoen, who worked for President Clinton for six years, said he has changed his mind and will not be voting for Hillary.

Donald Trump says this is worse than Watergate. As of now, it is only potentially so.

But if Hillary Clinton, this distrusted and disbelieved woman, does take the oath of office on Jan. 20, there is a real possibility that, like Nixon, down the road a year or two, she could be forced from office.

Do we really want to go through this again?

I think an easy way out for dealing with Kadzik would be for the FBI to declare him a person of interest in the corruption investigation.

Absolutely classic!

I think the timing of this FOIA release is not a coincidence. I doubt that anyone believes it's a coincidence.
I think this bodes ill for Hillary Clinton because it seems to be an indication that the FBI- not James Comey or any other high level FBI administrator- is pissed off. I think it means they really do have the goods on her and they are fed up with her shit ten ways from Sunday.

I think Huma Abedin's stupidity is the ultimate undoing of Hillary Clinton.

But hey, that's what you get, Hil- the little head thinking for the big head, well, it'll get you every time.

So much corruption from the Clinton era that I have a hard time remembering it all.

The one thing that vividly stands out, is the Clinton Administration giving China the technology to launch satellites into space. This same technology can be used to aim ballistic missiles at the U.S.

Later it was learned a Chinese businessman gave millions to the DNC.

I always thought that cigar holding son of a bitch should have been tried for treason over that.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
I think the timing of this FOIA release is not a coincidence. I doubt that anyone believes it's a coincidence.

quote:

Prior to Sunday, the account hadn't tweeted since October 2015. A law enforcement official told CNN that the Twitter account is an automatic feed and the tweets are not done manually. The official said the feed was down for a year until Sunday, when it was fixed and then began tweeting automatically.