SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    FNC reporting the Hilary's Email contained a "Top Secret" labeled message
Page 1 ... 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 ... 315

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
FNC reporting the Hilary's Email contained a "Top Secret" labeled message Login/Join 
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
Guccifer, who hacked into Hillary's emails, has made a plea deal for a reduced sentence in return for his cooperation. This is not good for Hillary. Actually, it is very very bad for Hillary.

In his little basement room in the White House, meanwhile, Uncle Joe has popped the top of another Bud Lite and tossed his slinky into the air with a whoop.

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...-deal-with-feds.html


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11253 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Report This Post
Knows too little
about too much
Picture of rduckwor
posted Hide Post
We all know she is guilty, but in case you wanted to hear from some experts: ZDNet's take -

http://www.zdnet.com/article/c...e589&ftag=TREc64629f

RMD




TL Davis: “The Second Amendment is special, not because it protects guns, but because its violation signals a government with the intention to oppress its people…”
Remember: After the first one, the rest are free.
 
Posts: 20407 | Location: L.A. - Lower Alabama | Registered: April 06, 2008Report This Post
Mired in the
Fog of Lucidity
posted Hide Post
Napolitano: Audit faulting Clinton on emails is 'huge'


http://video.foxnews.com/v/491...hpvid1#sp=show-clips
 
Posts: 4850 | Registered: February 10, 2007Report This Post
Banned
posted Hide Post
http://www.oann.com/clinton-di...litico-cites-report/


quote:
NEW YORK (Reuters) – Hillary Clinton broke government rules by using a private email server without approval while U.S. secretary of state, an internal government watchdog said on Wednesday.

The long-awaited report by the State Department inspector general was the first official audit of the controversial arrangement to be made public so far, and was also critical of department record-keeping practices before Clinton’s tenure.

It concluded that Clinton, now the front-runner in the race to become the Democratic presidential nominee, would not have been allowed to use the server in her home had she asked the department officials in charge of information security.

The report undermined Clinton’s defense of her private server. She said it was allowed and that no permission was needed, although she has since apologized for the arrangement.

The report’s highly critical findings included an account of State Department technology staff trying to internally raise concerns about the arrangement in 2010 only to be told to keep quiet by an official in Clinton’s office.

It immediately fueled Republican criticism of Clinton in an already acrimonious race. The report will also add to Democratic anxieties about voter perceptions of Clinton as untrustworthy and secretive.

Several other inquiries are continuing, including a U.S. Justice Department investigation into whether the arrangement broke laws.

The inspector general’s report cited “longstanding, systemic weaknesses” with State Department records that predated Clinton’s tenure, and found problems with the email record-keeping of some of her predecessors that failed to comply with the Federal Records Act.

But it singled out Clinton for her decision to use a private server in her home in Chappaqua, New York, for government business, apparently without seeking authorization.

“OIG found no evidence that the Secretary requested or obtained guidance or approval to conduct official business via a personal email account on her private server,” the report said, using an abbreviation for the office of inspector general.

The report said she should have discussed the arrangement with the department’s security and technology officials. Officials told the inspector general’s office that they “did not – and would not – approve her exclusive reliance on a personal email account to conduct Department business.” The reason, those officials said, is because it breached department rules and presented “security risks.”

When two lower-level information technology officials tried to raise concerns about Clinton’s email arrangement in late 2010, their supervisor in Clinton’s office instructed them “never to speak of the Secretary’s personal email system again,” the report said. Their supervisor told them that department lawyers had approved of the system, but the inspector general’s office said it found no evidence this was true.

Brian Fallon, a Clinton spokesman, said the report rebutted criticisms of Clinton made by her political opponents.

“Contrary to the false theories advanced for some time now, the report notes that her use of personal email was known to officials within the Department during her tenure, and that there is no evidence of any successful breach of the Secretary’s server,” he said in a statement.

He did not address the report’s criticism of her use of a private server, something no other secretary of state has done.

Emails sent by Colin Powell, who was secretary of state from 2001 to 2005 and the first in that role to use email, were not properly archived, the report said, noting that the rules for email in place at the time were less comprehensive than those during Clinton’s tenure.

Powell failed to keep any of his work emails, in breach of the Federal Records Act, while Clinton returned some of hers to the department two years after she left, about 30,000, though the report notes that some are missing.

Officials in the inspector general’s office interviewed John Kerry, the current secretary of state, and predecessors Powell, Condoleezza Rice and Madeleine Albright for the report, which was released to the media by lawmakers on Wednesday. Kerry asked the inspector general to investigate after Clinton’s email arrangement came to light last year. Representatives for Powell and Rice did not respond to requests or comment.

Clinton, who served as the nation’s top diplomat from 2009 to 2013, and her deputies, including Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan and Huma Abedin, declined to be interviewed for the inspector general’s investigation, the report said.

Republicans have used Clinton’s email practice to suggest she was trying to hide government records from scrutiny under public-access laws.

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said in a statement that the findings “are just the latest chapter in the long saga of Hillary Clinton’s bad judgment that broke federal rules and endangered our national security.”

Mark Toner, a State Department spokesman, said the report’s key recommendations have already been acted upon.

“As this report underscores, agencies across the Federal Government are working to adapt decades-old recordkeeping practices to the email-dominated modern era,” he said in a statement.
 
Posts: 1562 | Location: Chester County, PA | Registered: February 12, 2016Report This Post
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
Also: Hillary failed to report hacking attempts. She knew her private server-- with its classified info-- was being hacked and did nothing.

I'm not a lawyer, don't know what laws, exactly, might pertain. But this can only be bad.

http://www.washingtontimes.com...everal-hacking-atte/


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11253 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Report This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
John Kerry, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, and Madeleine Albright cooperated with the State Dept IG probe.

H Clinton, her chief of staff, deputy chiefs of staff, and her technology gurus all refused to cooperate.

Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan, and Huma Abedin are among those who did not cooperate with the investigation.

The 83 page report says it can find no record of her getting approval from either security or legal staffers for her unique arrangement.

The Clinton email system had several hacking attempts that she failed to report.

the inspector general was unable to discover who gave the final approval for Mrs. Clinton to use the odd arrangement. The department’s legal office said it was not asked to review or approve the setup, and was unaware of anyone else approving it — though some of them did email Mrs. Clinton on her secret account.

During her tenure, the department specifically warned employees not to send information deemed “sensitive but unclassified” outside of the internal network, and said if they needed to do so, they should speak with tech staffers to work out a solution

“OIG found no evidence that Secretary Clinton ever contacted IRM to request such a solution, despite the fact that emails exchanged on her personal account regularly contained information marked as SBU,” the investigators said.

http://www.washingtontimes.com...hacking-atte/?page=2


adding: I read dozens of Clinton's emails posted on the State Dept Virtual Reading Room. Many had SBU markings. Sensitive but unclassified
 
Posts: 19759 | Registered: July 21, 2002Report This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
It's not looking good for this disgusting criminal witch.

Bad for Clinton = Good for America

There's you're new Goddamned slogan, ya harpy.
 
Posts: 109659 | Registered: January 20, 2000Report This Post
Chip away the stone
Picture of rusbro
posted Hide Post
quote:

the inspector general was unable to discover who gave the final approval for Mrs. Clinton to use the odd arrangement.


You don't have to be the IG to figure that one out.

 
Posts: 11597 | Registered: August 22, 2008Report This Post
Edge seeking
Sharp blade!
posted Hide Post
Replacing her old slogan? Hillary Clinton - where charisma goes to die
 
Posts: 7689 | Location: Over the hills and far away | Registered: January 20, 2009Report This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
Here is the 83 page OIG report.

http://static.politico.com/f3/...f1e6c/oig-report.pdf

4.5 MB download


OIG Dept of State

Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements

(haven't read it yet)


From the OIG report:



I think the bean count is Clinton and 8 of her team who refused the OIG interview.

This actually could be pretty bad; just for the fact that her team refused to talk.

On 8 May 2016:
Hillary Clinton affirmed again that no one at the FBI has reached out to her yet about the investigation into her emails, but

“I’m more than ready to talk to anybody any time.”
 
Posts: 19759 | Registered: July 21, 2002Report This Post
Rule #1: Use enough gun
Picture of Bigboreshooter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by parabellum:
It's not looking good for this disgusting criminal witch.

Bad for Clinton = Good for America

There's you're new Goddamned slogan, ya harpy.





When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are undisturbed. Luke 11:21


"Every nation in every region now has a decision to make.
Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." -- George W. Bush

 
Posts: 14826 | Location: Birmingham, Alabama | Registered: February 25, 2009Report This Post
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
She is one of the most arrogant people ever to have polluted the planet. Really, it takes your breath away. Few leaders ever believe they can do just whatever the hell they want to do-- Henry VIII comes to mind-- but when you look just at Benghazi, and the email scandal-- to say nothing of the long wake of corruption and scandal-- this is a woman who truly thinks that she is above the law, imperial, no mere mortal.


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11253 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Report This Post
Member
Picture of Kadin
posted Hide Post
I don't understand how people employed by us, the taxpayers, can refuse to cooperate with an investigation. It should not be allowed. I understand they have the right not to self-incriminate, that's fine, but that doesn't mean they should be permitted to avoid cooperating entirely. That should be a felony all by itself IMO.
 
Posts: 1848 | Location: Carrollton, TX | Registered: June 05, 2015Report This Post
Too old to run,
too mean to quit!
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Kadin:
I don't understand how people employed by us, the taxpayers, can refuse to cooperate with an investigation. It should not be allowed. I understand they have the right not to self-incriminate, that's fine, but that doesn't mean they should be permitted to avoid cooperating entirely. That should be a felony all by itself IMO.


Seems to me that this crap only happens because the elected politicraps let it happen. If they refuse to appear have the US marshals haul them in. If they take the 5th, that is another story.

But it seems to me that all some really hard nosed prosecutor could tell all of them, that the first one to talk gets reduced sentence or immunity. The rest go to jail. Pretty sure it would be a fist fight to see who was first to spill the beans.

Isn't treason eligible for life in the big house?


Elk

There has never been an occasion where a people gave up their weapons in the interest of peace that didn't end in their massacre. (Louis L'Amour)

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical. "
-Thomas Jefferson

"America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great." Alexis de Tocqueville

FBHO!!!



The Idaho Elk Hunter
 
Posts: 25656 | Location: Virginia | Registered: December 16, 2001Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
There's a lot of people and a lot of lies to keep straight. Probably the easiest approach would be to throw out what she's accused of doing and focus on the conspiracy to cover up and hide information on what she's accused of.

A couple of simple focused charges that can use their own words against them= conviction.


____________________________________________________

The butcher with the sharpest knife has the warmest heart.
 
Posts: 13510 | Location: Bottom of Lake Washington | Registered: March 06, 2007Report This Post
Mired in the
Fog of Lucidity
posted Hide Post
quote:
She is one of the most arrogant people ever to have polluted the planet. Really, it takes your breath away.




Yes, big time! This, in part, is why my hatred for this woman runs so deep! She deserves every rotten thing that I HOPE is coming to her. She and Slick Willy have skated too many times in the past. If she somehow makes it to the presidency, what faith I have left in this country will be gone.
 
Posts: 4850 | Registered: February 10, 2007Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Older article but it just shows what a nasty, condescending, miserable being that she is:

The bane
 
Posts: 1814 | Location: Austin TX | Registered: October 30, 2003Report This Post
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
From the article cited by saigonsmuggler,above: “Hillary was very rude to agents, and she didn’t appear to like law enforcement or the military,” former Secret Service agent Lloyd Bulman recalls. “She wouldn’t go over and meet military people or police officers, as most protectees do. She was just really rude to almost everybody. She’d act like she didn’t want you around, like you were beneath her.”

We have a political class in America, and this kind of arrogance is almost an inevitability for them. Think about her life for the past many decades: Everybody she is dealing with on a daily basis is "beneath her." A similar thing happens with celebrities. They are surrounded by staff of all sorts--assistants, aides, secretaries-- and a gaggle of assorted sycophants. Everybody is heaping praise, saying "Yes, Ma'am!", elbowing each other out to nuzzle into her ass crack. Human psychology being what it is, you know that is going to turn out badly....

Hillary Clinton has not made a bed, gone grocery shopping, cooked a meal, driven a car, flown aboard a commercial airliner, made a restaurant dinner reservation-- you get the idea. She does nothing that ordinary people do, and in time this breeds contempt for ordinary people. These people in the political class come to think of themselves as royalty. Again, from that same article, a Secret Service agent greets her with "Good morning, Ma'am." To which she replies, "Fuck off."

Henry VIII had a "Groom of the toilet" who wiped Henry's ass.


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11253 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Now would be the perfect time for the FBI to tag-team on top of the OIG report to finish off the turgid POS and her criminal dynasty with a 'Jake The Snake' DDT match ending move!!


__________
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal labotomy."
 
Posts: 3617 | Location: Lehigh Valley, PA | Registered: March 27, 2007Report This Post
Coin Sniper
Picture of Rightwire
posted Hide Post
I think it is time the investigators stop focusing on whether she had classified emails or not, and figure out exactly what she was doing with email that required a personal server to prevent anyone from knowing what was going on.

I would think that ALL emails related to any level of business generated by the S.O.S. are property of the United States Government. If Clinton had .gov for business and .com for family and friends, they are separate. If she used .com for all of it, well.... that is all property of the government until someone can sort through it.

How many back door deals were completed to line her pockets that cost this country in the end? That is what she is hiding.




Pronoun: His Royal Highness and benevolent Majesty of all he surveys

343 - Never Forget

Its better to be Pavlov's dog than Schrodinger's cat

There are three types of mistakes; Those you learn from, those you suffer from, and those you don't survive.
 
Posts: 38417 | Location: Above the snow line in Michigan | Registered: May 21, 2004Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 ... 315 

Closed Topic Closed

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    FNC reporting the Hilary's Email contained a "Top Secret" labeled message

© SIGforum 2024