Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
Top. Men. From the website of WDSU (and elsewhere) - FBI agent arrested for multiple sexual charges involving juveniles __________ "I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal labotomy." | |||
|
Jack of All Trades, Master of Nothing |
That moron has never been elected with a majority of the vote. My daughter can deflate your daughter's soccer ball. | |||
|
Member |
Stupid is already baked in given what's already occurred. If these morons had any character at all (which they don't), they'd align with the rest of the Repub Senators and oppose all of this Biden BS....but they won't which is why they need to go. Regardless, she's sitting in Washington today 'representing' Alaska. That needs to change. And having been to Utah many times, you can't tell me they can't do better than Romney too. ----------------------------- Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter | |||
|
Gracie Allen is my personal savior! |
Understood, but if the Dems want to beat them into rebellion then who are the Republicans to argue? Let Biden and Schumer do the Lord's work for once. | |||
|
wishing we were congress |
https://www.breitbart.com/poli...under-2nd-amendment/ CLAIM: During his June 23, 2021, gun control speech President Joe Biden claimed the Second Amendment prohibited Americans from purchasing a cannon at the time it was ratified. VERDICT: False. Biden said, “The Second Amendment, from the day it was passed, limited the type of the people who could own a gun [and] what type of weapon you could own. You couldn’t buy a cannon.” Biden’s claim about not being allowed to purchase cannons is not new. He made it on May 21, 2020, and it was, at that time, shown to be false by PolitiFact. PolitiFact noted Biden comparing “assault weapons” to cannons, saying: “They have no rationale for being owned by individuals on the street. They should be outlawed… From the very beginning you weren’t allowed to have certain weapons. You weren’t allowed to own a cannon during the Revolutionary War as an individual.” Julie Anne Sweet, director of military studies at Baylor University, told PolitiFact: “It seems highly unlikely that there were restrictions on the private ownership [of cannons].” Independent Institute’s Dave Kopel told PolitiFact, “I am not aware of a ban on any arm in colonial America.” The Second Amendment did not forbid the purchase of a cannon. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx many people have pointed out that privateers fought in the revolutionary war on ships with cannons privately owned So what is the basis for Biden's comment ? | |||
|
Member |
Five minutes until Wapner... ----------------------------- Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter | |||
|
Ubique |
I am curious when social media will begin censoring his comments. They are certainly misleading. Calgary Shooting Centre | |||
|
wishing we were congress |
| |||
|
Member |
Ok, at the risk of repeating myself again, I just love this woman. While the Repub men in congress cower under their desks praying for everything to just blow over, Mrs. Bobert is going to war. Please give me more women like this to vote for in the future. ----------------------------- Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter | |||
|
wishing we were congress |
Biden knows he messed up. Now he says: "At a press conference after announcing the bipartisan agreement, I indicated that I would refuse to sign the infrastructure bill if it was sent to me without my Families Plan and other priorities, including clean energy. That statement understandably upset some Republicans, who do not see the two plans as linked; they are hoping to defeat my Families Plan—and do not want their support for the infrastructure plan to be seen as aiding passage of the Families Plan. attacking the people he just "negotiated" with My comments also created the impression that I was issuing a veto threat on the very plan I had just agreed to, which was certainly not my intent." not his intent ? Biden said “If this is the only thing that comes to me, I’m not signing it.” "Some Republicans now say that they might oppose the infrastructure plan because I am also trying to pass the American Families Plan: that is also a mistake, in my view. I intend to work hard to get both of them passed, because our country needs both—and I ran a winning campaign for President" that promised to deliver on both" https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...-the-intent-n2591635 This kind of double talk mixed with lies and pretending to be "bipartisan" makes me so angry at the idiots who voted for him. And angry at the wuss antiTrump Republicans who were too stupid or self righteous not to see that Trump was doing exactly what our country needed to bring prosperity to everyone. | |||
|
Gracie Allen is my personal savior! |
You're angry. How do you think those poor RINOs who stood up with him for that photo op feel? And what do you think that means for his "massive free shit" legislation? Come to think of it, what do you think this means for the elections in 2022 and Biden's preferred legislation all the way through to 2024? Rejoice. Good things can still happen. They just aren't going to happen on Joe's terms. | |||
|
Member |
_____________________________________________ I may be a bad person, but at least I use my turn signal. | |||
|
wishing we were congress |
Merrick Garland continues to prove why it was so important to keep him off the Supreme Court. He is a DEM political hack. https://redstate.com/bonchie/2...g-red-states-n402765 Garland is suing Georgia over the new Georgia voting law. Garland: the Department of Justice is suing the state of Georgia for changing election laws “with the purpose of denying or abridging the right of Black Georgians to vote on account of their race or color.” video at https://twitter.com/therecount...g-red-states-n402765 | |||
|
Uppity Helot |
[QUOTE]Originally posted by sdy: Garland: the Department of Justice is suing the state of Georgia for changing election laws “with the purpose of denying or abridging the right Black Georgians to perpetuate voter fraud. “ is how it should read. | |||
|
Member |
Seems to me that the Dems are really trying to seriously abridge states' rights, with ascendant Red states being attacked (DOJ vs GA; feds pushing back on MO anti fed gun rights infringement) or all states (HR1/SR1). As the US armed forces go increasingly woke/marxist, could it be time for Red states to start shoring up their NG ranks?
--------------------------------------- It's like my brain's a tree and you're those little cookie elves. | |||
|
Uppity Helot |
Assuming the states NG ranks aren’t corrupted with blue falcon officers like milley. Big assumption. | |||
|
Gracie Allen is my personal savior! |
If the US military must be combed through for ideological purity, doesn't it simply make sense for red states to do the same with their National Guard units? As Joe pointed out, extremists from the political left to the political right are a major threat. | |||
|
Member |
_____________________________________________ I may be a bad person, but at least I use my turn signal. | |||
|
Member |
Mitt Romney was just on my news feed saying how he "trusts the President" after the infrastructure deal. He is the modern day Republican Benedict Arnold. End of Earth: 2 Miles Upper Peninsula: 4 Miles | |||
|
Member |
When is this quisling up for rejection? 2024?
--------------------------------------- It's like my brain's a tree and you're those little cookie elves. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 ... 712 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |