Flake has been crawfishing the whole time.

I fully expect him to find a reason to vote No.

The most credible woman in the world caught lying under oath? Say it isn't so.

And since the left was cheerleading all of the criminal charges brought upon those on the right for lying to the FBI, they should have no problem when criminal charges are brought against those on the left when they do it.

Monica McLean at a Rehoboth Beach wine taster
April 2016

https://www.capegazette.com/ar...po-taste-town/102030



McLean's address is 106 Hickman st, Rehoboth Beach, DE

Ford's father has a house at 27 Bedford Ave, Rehoboth Beach, DE

The houses are 2 miles apart

Ford: "I traveled, I think, the 26th of July to Rehoboth, Delaware. So that makes sense, because I wrote it from there"

"it" being the letter to Feinstein

quote:

Flake is going with the Dems on this especially if he's the deciding vote.

He won't be the deciding vote. Manchin WILL vote YES.

quote:

Originally posted by bigdeal:
After all that we've seen and heard over the past two weeks, how could any Republican senator vote 'no' on this confirmation? To do so would mean destroying Judge Kavanuagh's life, destroying any remaining credibility of the US Senate, likely causing a GOP loss of the House (and maybe the Senate) this fall, and virtually guaranteeing no Republican candidate for the SCOTUS would ever be confirmed to the court again.

With all that hanging in the balance, how could 'any' Republican vote 'No', even a POS RINO?

Because, as someone mentioned a few posts above yours, this kabuki theater is nothing more than a stick in the eye to President Donald J. Trump. Plain and simple. The RINO's that are the "Never Trumpers" don't give one popcorn fart about "the will of the people" nor their constituents. Envision that sunuvabitch McCain with his thumb down and sour look on his face...THIS is how these RINO assholes want to go down in history; sticking it to the MAN and putting the screw to their party.

Once you realize that, all this starts to make sense. The Demoshits gave "Dr." Ford a sword and she willingly and gladly fell right on it.

It's getting difficult to follow what's going on. Too many players, and too much confusion.

Maybe that's the plan.

quote:

It's getting difficult to follow what's going on. Too many players, and too much confusion.

Maybe that's the plan.

It's really quite simple when you focus on the bottom line. Collusion.

quote:

Originally posted by radioman:
It's getting difficult to follow what's going on. Too many players, and too much confusion.

Maybe that's the plan.

Its always part of their playbook - when the narrative slides away from them they muddy the waters and make nothing be crystal clear - even facts that should be. We all know facts and logical deduction and reasoning are not part of their skill sets, but obfuscation is.

quote:

this kabuki theater is nothing more than a stick in the eye to President Donald J. Trump. Plain and simple. The RINO's that are the "Never Trumpers" don't give one popcorn fart about "the will of the people" nor their constituents. Envision that sunuvabitch McCain with his thumb down and sour look on his face...THIS is how these RINO assholes want to go down in history; sticking it to the MAN and putting the screw to their party.

quote:

Originally posted by grumpy1:
The most credible woman in the world caught lying under oath? Say it isn't so.

This thread isn't about Hillary.

quote:

Originally posted by fpuhan:

quote:

Originally posted by grumpy1:
The most credible woman in the world caught lying under oath? Say it isn't so.

This thread isn't about Hillary.

Six of one... Besides, they made sure she(Hilz) never said a damn thing "under oath".

Actress mocks Ford's voice.

She pretty much nails it. She's trying to walk it back now. Too late.



https://www.huffingtonpost.com...28ffe4b0425e3c21ae64

There won't be any charges brought against Dr. Ford or anyone else. They could discover a video of her sitting around planning the whole thing with her friends and lawyers and making up her story line by line and nothing would happen.

Kavanaugh being confirmed is the win and it better be enough because it is the only good that will come out of this.

McLean has disputed the account that she was helped or coached by Ford..

"Ford’s team did, however, release a response from the friend cited in her ex-boyfriend’s statement that flatly denies his claims. “I have NEVER had Christine Blasey Ford, or anybody else, prepare me, or provide any other type of assistance whatsoever in connection with any polygraph exam I have taken at any time,” Monica McLean said in her response."

Politico

What Cory Booker doesn't mention is that it is the Democrats who have politicized the confirmation process.... with Bork, Clarence Thomas, and now with Kavanaugh.

Cory Booker: It Doesn't Matter If Kavanaugh Is Innocent Or Guilty

Democratic Senator Cory Booker admitted in a press conference on Tuesday that his belief that Brett Kavanaugh should not be confirmed to the Supreme Court has nothing to do with whether he is "innocent or guilty." The very fact that his name has been sullied by uncorroborated allegations and that he displayed anger at being accused without evidence and pushed back against the politically-motivated handling of the allegations by Democrat senators, Booker argued, "ultimately" disqualifies Kavanaugh from a lifetime appointment to the "sacred institution."

With the FBI investigation close to wrapping up and most expecting that it will confirm what has already been publicly revealed in sworn statements to the Senate — that the named witnesses by Ford all either deny any knowledge of the alleged incident or directly refute it — the New Jersey senator said that, in the end, it doesn't matter if Kavanaugh is innocent or guilty, just that his "credibility has been challenged" enough by supposed "intimates" of Kavanaugh from high school — despite the dozens of Kavanaugh's female friends from that period who have publicly vouched for his good character. The other disqualifier, according to Booker, is that in the highly emotional and politicized hearing, Kavanaugh displayed a "temperament" and used "language" that "shocked" Democrats.

"[U]ltimately, not whether he's innocent or guilty, this is not a trial," said Booker, "but ultimately have enough questions been raised that we should not move on to another candidate ... [T]he people who are on the Supreme Court should preserve the integrity of the court and be beyond the reproach of these difficult partisan times."

In other words, allegations, regardless of the absence of evidence, and strongly defending one's name are enough to disqualify a Supreme Court candidate in Booker's view. Full transcript and video below:



My hope is beyond the vicious partisan rancor that is going on, beyond the accusations, we don't lose sight of what this moral moment is about in this country, and ultimately ask ourselves the question: Is this the right person to sit on the highest court in the land for a lifetime appointment — when their credibility has been challenged by intimates, people that knew the candidate well as a classmate, when his temperament has been revealed in an emotional moment where he used language that frankly shocked a lot of us? And then ultimately, not whether he's innocent or guilty, this is not a trial, but ultimately have enough questions been raised that we should not move on to another candidate in that long list put together by the Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society? Move on to another candidate because ultimately the Supreme Court is not an entitlement. Just because you went to Yale or were president of your class doesn't entitle you to the Supreme Court. This is a sacred institution, and the people who should be on it — whether you agree with their political or judicial philosophy at all — the people who are on the Supreme Court should preserve the integrity of the court and be beyond the reproach of these difficult partisan times.

https://www.dailywire.com/news...nocent-james-barrett

He's a fine one to talk, isn't he? I cannot say what I think about him (Booker) because I'd be labeled as a racist.

flashguy

If my recallation is correct didn’t Corey Booker have a sex crime process against him from the 1990s or early 2000s. My memory may be not correct on this but....someone help me out here.

quote:

My memory may be not correct on this but....someone help me out here.

I was going to do such, but google turned up SO MANY stories on the myth & legend & charges of various lawlessness I became trapped in 'too much information' and really know little about him other than the drivel he spouts and a couple of hostile articles on same.

The ultimate way to make our voices heard: