The Real-World Data Show the Covid Vaccines Are Ineffective

By Vasko Kohlmayer

“Pfizer and BioNTech’s Covid-19 vaccine is just 39% effective in Israel where the delta variant is the dominant strain according to a new report from the country’s Health Ministry” we read in a CNBC report. Astonishment is one’s first reaction when coming across this piece of information, since it was not so long ago the vaccine manufacturers claimed their products were 92 to 98 percent effective.

The manufacturers’ initial claims, however, have been steadily revised down as real-world data has been coming in. In March of this year news came from South Africa that “AstraZeneca vaccine doesn’t prevent B1351 Covid.” A couple of months later, the Hill ran a piece by a Baylor School of Medicine virologist who observed:

“A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine provides only 51 percent protection against B.1.351 of South Africa.”

Just a couple of weeks ago, we learned that recipients of the Sinovac Biotech’s vaccine have no antibodies after six months. This effectually means that merely half a year after being injected into people’s bodies the vaccine has zero percent efficacy in protecting against Covid-19.

Even factoring for the variants, the hard data makes it quite clear that the initial claims of vaccine effectiveness were greatly exaggerated. This, of course, comes as no surprise to anyone familiar with the dynamic of the pharma industry. Drug manufacturers tend to wildly overstate the efficacy of their products, while doing their very best to understate their side effects. It is for this purpose they conduct trials that are manipulated to obtain the results they wish for. Sadly, they too often get away with it because of the corruption of the system by what is called regulatory capture. This is why the outcomes of manufacturers’ trials are almost never replicated by independent trials or real-world data.

This is what has apparently happened with the Covid vaccines. The manufacturers used the sense of emergency brought on by the pandemic to conduct rushed and incomplete trials which were designed to yield the results they wanted to see. There is every reason to believe that the effectiveness of their injections was nowhere close to the 92-98% range they initially claimed even for the variants that were in circulation at that time.

Needless to say, one has a strong suspicion that even the meagre 39 percent figure is still overstated. This would only be natural, since everyone involved in the vaccination enterprise – the manufacturers, politicians, regulators, the medical establishment and corporate scientists – is trying their best to save face and reputation in the face of this fiasco. Bad though the data is, we can be quite sure that it has been massaged to soften the blow.

You can clearly observe this tendency at work in the CNBC piece which claims that even though Pfizer is only 39 percent effective, it still protects against serious disease. But this is simply not true, which you can easily see if you take the trouble to look into the data put out by the Israeli government. At roughly the same time that CNBC filed its report, the Israeli Ministry of Health published a bulletin which reported on Covid cases in the country. According to their data, there were 137 serious cases in Israel of which 95 were fully vaccinated and 42 unvaccinated or partially vaccinated (see here and here). In other words, the bulk of the serious cases was comprised of those who had received their shots. If the vaccine was as effective in protecting against heavy illness as the article claims, the numbers would look completely different. The figures published by the Israeli Ministry of Health shows that the claims of Pfizer’s efficacy of protecting against serious Covid are simply untrue.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/20...nes-are-ineffective/

This is the ethanol scam all over again: The producers, government, and dominant "news" media all presenting a narrative that is clearly not even remotely close to the truth.

Because: real life is not a movie

In the movie, the virus would emerge as a global threat and Fauci- misunderstood by all- would be the lone voice of reason. He'd suffer hardship and harsh treatment at every turn, scorned by the entire world. At the end of the film, though, Fauci would be vindicated- yes, you need two masks AND three vaccinations WITH booster shots (TBA) and if he told us shit tasted like strawberry ice cream, we'd all queue up for a taste.

But...

This is real life, and we're little more than sophisticated primates who've managed to avoid that comet long enough to come down out of the trees and create Instagram.

So...

There's still no vaccine to prevent infection/transmission of this virus.

quote:

In the movie, the virus would emerge as a global threat and Fauci- misunderstood by all- would be the lone voice of reason. He'd suffer hardship and harsh treatment at every turn, scorned by the entire world. At the end of the film, though, Fauci would be vindicated

This is Fauci's second movie. In the first film, titled AIDS, his performance was no better. He was apparently hoping the writers would give COVID a different ending.

Moderna, BioNTech tumble 19% amid report the EU is looking into COVID vaccine side effects

https://markets.businessinside...-side-effects-2021-8


Shares of biotech firms Moderna and BioNTech fell sharply on Wednesday following a report that European Union's drug regulator is investigating potential new side effects from the companies' respective COVID-19 vaccines.
The European Medicines Agency said Wednesday it has started assessing reports about conditions related to the skin and kidneys following vaccinations using Comirnaty, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, and Spikevax, the product from Moderna. The notifications from the agency were reported by Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/busine...=twitterurce=twitter

he EMA said "a small number of cases" about potential side effects were reported but it didn't specify how many.
The agency's Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee is trying to establish if Erythema multiforme, an allergic reaction characterized by round skin lesions; glomerulonephritis, or inflammation of tiny filters in the kidneys; and nephrotic syndrome are side effects in each vaccine. Nephrotic syndrome is a disorder that causes the kidneys to leak too much protein in the urine.

More at link.

We are barely at the ground floor of public rumblings about adverse effects due to the vaccination. It seems to be growing almost daily now with more videos of professionals in the field coming out and not just rumbling but clanging the alarm bell as loud as they possibly can. Videos of citizens who are asking real questions and pushing back. It’s just getting to the point where big tech can’t censor fast enough.

Imagine where this is going to be in a year from now. What else are we going to learn about this vaccine that was never told or never known but administered to millions anyway. Five years from now, ten years? We are in uncharted waters for sure and I plan to stay on high dry ground.

We know now it does not do what they claimed it would do and that was to make you safe and resume your normal activities. So now we know what it won’t do but what it may do is still left to be seen.

Has anyone noticed that every drug commercial on TV spends about 1/2-2/3 of the air time talking about side effects or negative reactions that may be possible.

Yet, not a word about any possible negative effect from a vaccine in any TV or radio ads.

I guess I'm supposed to believe this one drug, in the entire history of medicine has zero risk or any side effect?

^^^^

Good point, Rightwire. Once negative effects are acknowledged, they'll be thrown at Trump.

Yup, if this all goes sideways, and I expect it very well may, there is little doubt that it will be President Trump's fault.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Rightwire:
Has anyone noticed that every drug commercial on TV spends about 1/2-2/3 of the air time talking about side effects or negative reactions that may be possible. Yet, not a word about any possible negative effect from a vaccine in any TV or radio ads.



They can't advertise these vaccines because they have never been approved by the FDA except for Emergency Authorized Use. Meanwhile:


Fauci Confirms "Likely, Inevitable" Everyone Will Need COVID Vaccine Booster Shot

https://www.zerohedge.com/covi...vaccine-booster-shot

Within the space of a few days, the narrative has shifted from "if" booster shots are even necessary, to "only for immunocompromised", to "only for those who got vaccinations early on, due to fading efficacy", and now today, His Omniscience Anthony Fauci told 'CBS This Morning' that while it is imminent that immune compromised people will get Covid-19 vaccine booster shots, it is likely that at some point in the future everyone will need one.

“It’s likely that that will happen at some time in the future,” Fauci said, when asked if everyone will need a booster shot at some point.

That's "science" folks!

Fauci noted that this is data is being followed in real time, “literally on a weekly and monthly basis,” with cohorts of all different populations to determine if the level of protection is starting to attenuate.

“When it does get to a certain level, we will be prepared to give boosters to those people, but from what you just said a moment ago, it is imminent that we will be giving it to immune compromised,” he said.

As a reminder, the FDA is reportedly expected to announce soon that it will authorize COVID-19 vaccine booster shots for immunocompromised Americans.

Fauci also said during an interview on NBC News' "Today" show Thursday, that:

"Inevitably, there will be a time when we'll have to give boosts to the general population."

As far as furiously moving goalposts goes, Fauci admittred earlier in the week that the Delta variant presents the additional problem that vaccinated people can also transmit the virus to someone else. That has led to the CDC revising its mask guidelines recently. But, he stressed:

“The vaccines are still doing what you originally want them to do -- to keep you out of the hospital to prevent you from getting seriously ill.”

Actually, what the CDC "originally" wanted the vaccines to do, was to prevent those who were jabbed from infecting others. Only later did we learn that too was a fabrication.

Perhaps the most 'new' science is the following...

"No vaccine, at least not within this category, is going to have an indefinite amount of protection."

Fauci comments come as debate grows over “breakthrough” infections among fully vaccinated people and whether approval should be given for booster shots. On Sunday, Israel, the first nation to roll out booster shots widely, said it had given more than 420,000 third shots to people 60 and over. At least 14 Israelis have already caught Covid-19 after having been injected with a booster shot, suggesting that the booster shot will be the first of many, and will likely last all the way through the mid-term elections because, well, mail-in ballots next November.

they are under emergency use. and they are also protected from liability. every other drug commercial you see is not. hence most of it warning you "dont sue us cause reasons"

these vaccines are immune from liability and no commercial needed, you cant escape there constant "free" advertising. its worldwide...

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
Fauci Confirms "Likely, Inevitable" Everyone Will Need COVID Vaccine Booster Shot

Nope. I'm part of "everyone"

Me neither as a part of everyone, sorry Doc.

What is Graphene Oxide (GO)?
Is it dangerous? If so, how dangerous?

Stew Peters Show
https://rumble.com/embed/vhu7kx/?pub=4

quote:

Graphene Oxide

Oh, yes. Graphene nanoparticles

I did a quick search and it looks like crackpot stuff, which, normally, I would oppose with every fiber of my being. But, for this global clusterfuck? Well, let's just say I have some fibers which are idle.

DONT TAKE THE VACCINE ITS GOT GRAPHENE OXINONOPARTICULES IN IT!!!!!!!!!1111

It's got graphene and chlorine and benzine and gasoline. Hell, it's even got Visine in it.

Let's get some guys in labcoats in here to influence public opinion. Ask any of 'em- graphene nanoparticulate molecules have no business in our ineffective vaccines.

Given our present circumstances, I say more power to these people: https://www.reddit.com/r/consp...isoning_is_covid_19/

Plus...

quote:

Let's get some guys in labcoats in here to influence public opinion. Ask any of 'em- graphene nanoparticulate molecules have no business in our ineffective vaccines.

J.P. Sears, izzat you?

I just read the definition of a vaccination

what do you call a vaccine that doesn't protect you from the disease?

A cash cow riding the gravy train?