quote:

Originally posted by sigmonkey:
And before anyone thinks that broad-brushing the entire muslim/islamic/arabic world is "racist" or whatever. Look back at the bast 50 years at least, and see to whom the bloody fingerprints belong.

Wahhabism funded by radical money from Saudi Arabia.

It's always a good idea to keep our rifles clean, but we now have President Trump. We fought very hard for him so that neither of us will likely need to use our rifles. Still, my rifles are clean.

I said it in an earlier thread.

Kill them. Kill them all.

People became obtuse about it. Claimed that I wanted to wipe out an entire religion. That there were eleventy billion muslims and it couldn't be done. Well, I must say we need to give it the old college try. Loosen up the rules of war on our warfighters. Quit sniveling over "well, if we do this, they are going to hate us more". Horseshit. They already want you and your children dead. How much more can they hate you? They already want to behead you in front of your children. They want to light your children on fire in front of you. How much more can they hate us?

And it is coming to America. Your town is chock full of soft targets. If Aloha snackbar ever gets their shit together in America, its going to be bad. They have perfected the type stuff like Mumbia and London for a while now. A coordinated attack like Mumbia here at a mall or school will bring calls for a police state like you have never witnessed. A large death toll will cripple our way of living. And its coming. Mark my words. The days of flying jets into buildings are over. The next major attack with be a Mumbia style attack that is coordinated in multiple cities at once. There will be little or no chatter before hand.

You can be obtuse about killing them all if you wish. You either kill them over there, or you kill them here. Your choice. The more you kill over there, the less you kill here. It is just this simple. The more that you kill, the more they stay on the run. The more intel you gather about how they operate, who associates are.

We are at war. We need to fight wars with soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines. Not hashtags. Let Special Operations do their thing. Love and change of facespace status is cute and whatnot. But, we need to be in the business of killing. And business is good.

Kill them. Kill them all.

The response to this does not need to be in London. And it needs to be massive, and it needs to be immediate.

quote:

Originally posted by jljones:
I said it in an earlier thread.

Kill them. Kill them all.

Ultimately, it will come to that. They will NEVER stop.

I think it will take a nuke detonation in Europe or the U.S. to wake up enough people to face that reality and finally begin taking action.

quote:

Originally posted by jljones:
Kill them. Kill them all.

Ya'll know that in WW II we used that strategy and won it. We didn't care about collateral damage. Why the fuck don't we use it now?

He needs to be dragged out of office, literally.

quote:

Originally posted by BamaJeepster:

quote:

Originally posted by TigerDore:

quote:

Originally posted by BamaJeepster:
...The London mayor said get used to it - that this is the new normal.

Mayor SADIQ KHAN said that, huh?

Well how about that...
.

Yeah, he also said this:



Eating those words now.

quote:

Originally posted by Bytes:
We didn't care about collateral damage.

Not that it matters to the here and now either way, but in the interest of historical accuracy we (or the U.S., anyway) did in fact worry about collateral damage during World War II. In his series of books about the war in the European Theater Rick Atkinson discusses that issue in more detail than most historians, and points out how it affected our operations and the numbers of our casualties. And we certainly did not have a policy of “kill them [the enemy populace] all”—not least, of course, because such a policy would have been impossible to implement in practice.

quote:

Originally posted by sigfreund:

quote:

Originally posted by Bytes:
We didn't care about collateral damage.

Not that it matters to the here and now either way, but in the interest of historical accuracy we (or the U.S., anyway) did in fact worry about collateral damage during World War II. In his series of books about the war in the European Theater Rick Atkinson discusses that issue in more detail than most historians, and points out how it affected our operations and the numbers of our casualties. And we certainly did not have a policy of “kill them [the enemy populace] all”—not least, of course, because such a policy would have been impossible to implement in practice.

You are correct. My father was a WWII vet and he wasn't a terrorist. We did care (no one liked what we did) but could not avoid it because we HAD to win... we sent a very strong message.

quote:

Originally posted by BamaJeepster:

quote:

Originally posted by HuskySig:
The London mayor

The London mayor said get used to it - that this is the new normal.

Sent by London police during attack:

It's hard to run when you have a truck mowing you down. The London mayor is an asshole.

quote:

Originally posted by BamaJeepster:
Bette Midler chimes in with some deep analysis

She should specify which religion. But who really cares what she thinks?

quote:

Originally posted by Floyd D. Barber:

Did it look like an episode of Benny Hill?

Western civilization is NOT compatible with that cult. It's just not. And I dislike the term "radical islam". That implies there is a non-radical islam, and there is not. That entire filthy cult is radical. Are there good muslims? Absolutely. Dead ones.

Many on the left want to use Islamic terrorism as a tool to smear all religions. There is a method to their madness.

quote:

Originally posted by jdmb03:
She should specify which religion. But who really cares what she thinks?

quote:

Originally posted by mbinky:
Western civilization is NOT compatible with that cult. It's just not. And I dislike the term "radical islam". That implies there is a non-radical islam, and there is not. That entire filthy cult is radical. Are there good muslims? Absolutely. Dead ones.

You are absolutely right. The term "radical," as you said, implies a departure from the norm. Islam was founded by a murderous thug, and if he could see what his followers do in his made up "god's" name, would be thrilled.

The mayor of London's tweet is a subtle, disguised threat, isn't it? Don't alienate moderate Muslims-- that roiling sea of millions of Muslims. You don't want to piss them off. You think this is bad? Wait and see what millions of us can do to you.

The propaganda machine of the progressives, utilizing the main stream "media" and the entire entertainment industry, convinced huge swaths of the populations of Europe and America that only bigots and racists worried about the Muslim incursion. And for a long time they managed to keep that narrative in place, despite terrorist attacks.

But the attacks keep coming and coming. After a while, the narrative of "bigotry" and "racism" wears thin. That's where we are now. I think we are approaching a point where it all pivots. Where even the sheeple shake their heads and say "Waaaait a minute! These people are killing us! Maybe it's NOT bigotry to say so...."

How many nations are currently under a state of emergency due to islamic terrorism?

I think France, England, Egypt and the Philippines? Any others?

quote:

Originally posted by jljones:
You can be obtuse about killing them all if you wish. You either kill them over there, or you kill them here. Your choice. The more you kill over there, the less you kill here. It is just this simple.

I would like to print your statement, JLJ, and hang it on the bulletin board in my office.

Mbinky, jones and the Monkey get it....

I'd much rather be killing them there than here, and kill them we must.

They'll do it to us, and it is their stated goal...submit or die. (read their book-it's all it talks about)

And words have power, using the right word is key. Calling them "radical" is a lie. They are neither radical nor are they alone-all of them believe in it. (either they are good followers of the death cult or they are not)

And the post of Golda is spot on.

quote:

Originally posted by vthoky:

quote:

Originally posted by jljones:
You can be obtuse about killing them all if you wish. You either kill them over there, or you kill them here. Your choice. The more you kill over there, the less you kill here. It is just this simple.

I would like to print your statement, JLJ, and hang it on the bulletin board in my office.

Certainly, sir.