SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Sig Sauer releases statement on the P320
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Sig Sauer releases statement on the P320 Login/Join 
Down the Rabbit Hole
Picture of Jupiter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by P220 Smudge:
I actually sat all the way through this one a few weeks back. Like many of you, I thought this was all a bunch of nonsense and careless gun handling. I'm not convinced of that anymore. The video also addresses some of the reasons why this isn't really an issue with the P365, as multiple people in this thread have mused about.



I watched it a couple of weeks ago. I thought the comments were also very interesting.


Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell

 
Posts: 5070 | Location: North Mississippi | Registered: August 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lost
Picture of kkina
posted Hide Post
^I just finished the video, and it has me thinking as well. I'm wondering if these things are in fact having spontaneous discharges in the field, and it's due to both poor design and deficient quality control.

That said, I don't it detracts at all from the assertion that these platforms need safeties. Problems can have multiple causes, and the 320 seems to be the poster child for this.



ACCU-STRUT FOR MINI-14
"Pen & Sword as one."
 
Posts: 17378 | Location: SF Bay Area | Registered: December 11, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt 127:
A few points. The P320 versions, with a manual safety. The safety only blocks the trigger movement. If other parts are failing, it won’t stop the gun from firing.

The manual safety on the P365, designed after the P320, actually blocks the sear from moving. I can’t help but think an engineer caught that.

The fact that the sear and striker have very precise engagement surfaces lets it have a good trigger. The problem is, they are in separate parts of the gun. Slides have vertical and horizontal movement. Is it enough to lift the striker off the sear? Don’t know. Does it get worse as the gun wears? Possibly. On, for example, a 1911, both the striker (hammer) and sear are held rigidly in place by an inflexible metal housing. The frame.

Another point. On the street, one doesn’t always have time to visually and physically feel around inside the holster and then carefully look down while gently guiding the gun back in.

So, in practical terms, that’s not an optimal design for a duty gun. A manual safety, would alleviate that concern. A longer heavier trigger, would help mitigate it.


You have a good grasp of it.

I am an Sig certified armorer on the 320 as well as the 365. I’ve been involved with a SF guy who had a 320 discharge in a Bladetech holster while seated in his truck. I inspected his copy and found several issues related to sear engagement, sear springs crossed, etc.

I routinely carry 365s. I won’t carry my 320.
 
Posts: 53 | Registered: September 05, 2021Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Lt CHEG
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by monoblok:
I suspect that SIG's statement may have been in response to this:

WA police academy bans Sig Sauer after reports it could fire by itself


That was my thought as well. I’m currently issued a P320 and carry it or my personally purchased and approved for on or off duty carry P365. Currently working on the west coast, I’ve been hearing a lot about these academies (this academy isn’t the only one) that prohibit the use of the P320. Personally, I’m not sure what the issue is, but I will say that if I were the chief of police for an agency I would not even consider issuing the P320, even if they were free. I would not allow personally owned P320 pistols to be carried on duty either. If I was the decision maker in my current agency, I would move to replace the P320. I don’t particularly love my issued gun, primarily because I don’t love the way it feels in my hands, but have not had any issues with it and I do shoot it pretty well. I just think there are enough documented instances of guns firing in their holsters with no hands present on or near the guns that I think there are better options for police issue. The way that SIG has handled this also does not leave me with a lot of warm and fuzzies either. I just think that right now there are too many alternatives that don’t carry the potential liability.




“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”
 
Posts: 5735 | Location: Upstate NY | Registered: February 28, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I swear I had
something for this
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Lt CHEG:
I don’t particularly love my issued gun, primarily because I don’t love the way it feels in my hands, but have not had any issues with it and I do shoot it pretty well.


Are you allowed to try aftermarket frames or just the Sig OEMs?
 
Posts: 4764 | Location: Kansas City, MO | Registered: May 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Nullus Anxietas
Picture of ensigmatic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jljones:
I think some of the claims that the 320 “just goes off” are specious at best. Notice it only happens to cops? The special needs children of the gun community?
It does seem odd.

SIG has three markets for this pistol and its variations, yes? LEO, military, and consumer. Yet it seems it's only LEOs that ever have these problems.

(I got a chuckle out of the "special needs" line, btw Smile)

I have an OG P320 full-size in .45 ACP. Un-"upgraded." Why un-"upgraded?" Because I sent my Walther PPS M2 in for a similar fix. Like my P320, it had had an excellent trigger for a striker-fired pistol before I sent it in.

After it came back: Not so much.

I wonder if I can send my P320 into GG and have them do what's needful? At least then I'll have some confidence they won't ruin the trigger in the process.

Btw: My P320 has been back-and-forth between safe in the basement and nightstand next to the bed multiple times in its life. It's also once-or-twice been in a holster. And, of course, it's had range time.

It hasn't self-discharged yet.



"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe
"If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher
 
Posts: 26137 | Location: S.E. Michigan | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Frangas non Flectes
Picture of P220 Smudge
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
Yet it seems it's only LEOs that ever have these problems.


Except it’s not. The video I embedded on the previous page is long, but it covers a surprising number of incidents and it’s not all cops.


______________________________________________
Endeavoring to master the subtle art of the grapefruit spoon.
 
Posts: 18045 | Location: Sonoran Desert | Registered: February 10, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Lt CHEG
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DanH:
quote:
Originally posted by Lt CHEG:
I don’t particularly love my issued gun, primarily because I don’t love the way it feels in my hands, but have not had any issues with it and I do shoot it pretty well.


Are you allowed to try aftermarket frames or just the Sig OEMs?


I know the SIG aluminum frame is allowed and if I stay, I will likely try it. I like the feel with the aluminum frame much better. I’ve said all along that the plastic that sig uses on these feel cheap to me. If it was the same plastic that was used on the SIGPro frames I’d probably like the feel much better. As we go deeper down the rabbit hole though with respect to unexpected discharges, I’m less inclined to want to invest money into this system.




“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”
 
Posts: 5735 | Location: Upstate NY | Registered: February 28, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I swear I had
something for this
posted Hide Post
The Wilson Combat frames are excellent and lower in price if you can try them. They might look like they started as Sig OEM frames, but it's far from the truth.
 
Posts: 4764 | Location: Kansas City, MO | Registered: May 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Domari Nolo
Picture of Chris17404
posted Hide Post
Good one, Ian.




 
Posts: 2363 | Location: York, PA | Registered: May 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
This just in from Bruce Gray and Grayguns:

quote:

A Personal Message from Bruce Gray and the Entire Grayguns Team

March 10, 2025 - Reedsport, OR

Our Responsibility to You

Every firearm that leaves our shop is one we stand behind—not just in craftsmanship, but in purpose. Lately, we’ve seen renewed discussion surrounding the SIG Sauer P320 platform, and we understand why. When questions arise about a defensive or competitive firearm, the people who rely on it deserve answers—not accusations and dismissals.

At Grayguns, we operate with the full understanding that the quality of our work could be the difference between a routine day and a tragedy—between a casual goodbye in the morning and a family left waiting for someone who never comes home.

It could be the difference between a child growing up with bedtime stories from their parent or only memories. The difference between a police officer finishing their shift and walking through their front door, or a department notifying a family that their loved one is gone. The difference between a protector standing strong in the face of danger or being let down by their equipment in the moment they need it most. The difference between a fun day at the range filled with laughter and competition, or a moment no one ever forgets for all the wrong reasons.

What we do makes a difference. We do not take this responsibility lightly.

Every cut we make, every part we produce, every firearm we work on carries the weight of real lives, real families, and real people who trust us to get it right. That is what drives us. That is why we do what we do—not just to make firearms better, but to make sure that no matter the context, the people who rely on them make it home.

What We’ve Found, and What We’re Still Testing

At Grayguns, we don’t take anything for granted. We test, we push, and we go beyond normal use conditions to find out what a firearm is truly capable of. Over the years, in controlled environments, we have deliberately attempted to compromise the mechanical safeties of the P320, looking for ways an unintended discharge could occur. Despite those efforts, we have never been able to induce a discharge without the trigger being actuated. That does not mean people are wrong to be asking questions.

The fact that we have not been able to make it happen does not change the reality that people believe it’s happening. We understand that too, and because of that, we are going to continue to explore every scenario, no matter how implausible it may seem. If there is a way for a failure to occur, we want to find it, understand it, and make sure the people who depend on this firearm have the information they need.

Please know that at this moment, every single person at Grayguns still has faith that a SIG P320 cannot fire without the trigger being acted on by something. That confidence is built on years of testing, evaluation, and our own firsthand experience with the platform.

A New Standard of Transparency

No matter how small the job, every firearm that enters our shop undergoes an exhaustive mechanical inspection before it makes it back into a customer’s hands. We’ve always done this, but moving forward, we will be making that process more visible.

We know that a simple “inspection performed” line item on a work order doesn’t tell you enough. That’s why we are developing clearer documentation that details exactly what has been inspected before a firearm leaves our shop. Our customers deserve to know their firearm has been carefully evaluated by someone who cares and knows what’s at stake.

This isn’t a response to pressure. It’s a commitment to what we already believe: that peace of mind isn’t something you should have to ask for—it should be built into the work we do.

A Message to Those Who Serve and Protect

To every law enforcement officer, military professional, and armed citizen who carries a firearm in defense of others: we see you, we respect you, and we recognize the weight of responsibility you bear. Thank you.

And to everyone who has placed their trust in us, no matter which group you belong to. Just know that we do not take you, or your trust, for granted.

With gratitude and humility,

Bruce Gray
Founder, Grayguns, Inc.
On behalf of the entire Grayguns team



Personally, I'm more willing to trust the engineers and expert gunsmiths rather than the lawyers and social media influencers.
 
Posts: 33847 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
I received that welcome email from Bruce as well. Some things benefit by being stated clearly.




6.0/94.0

“To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.”
— Thomas Paine
 
Posts: 48199 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
quote:
Personally, I'm more willing to trust the engineers and expert gunsmiths rather than the lawyers and social media influencers


I agree. Knowing that Bruce and company are actively testing the guns looking for problems and still have the confidence to make that statement is encouraging. I definitely put more stock in their opinion than some social media marketer at Sig.



I finally got through the whole video that P220 Smudge posted. There are some interesting technical theories in there buried within a lot of snark and defamatory stuff about the company that's not necessarily related to the gun itself. Maybe they are truly scumbags, I don't know, but I never really trust marketing people anyway, so that hour's worth of info wasn't particularly helpful. I thought the most useful takeaway was that he did a pretty good job of compiling a list of incidents involving the P320.


quote:
I am an Sig certified armorer on the 320 as well as the 365. I’ve been involved with a SF guy who had a 320 discharge in a Bladetech holster while seated in his truck. I inspected his copy and found several issues related to sear engagement, sear springs crossed, etc.


I'd be interested in knowing exactly what you found in the gun after that incident. I'd like to know what things I should be looking for during inspections to help make sure we don't have a gun that's about to become a problem. It sounds like crossed sear springs are a recurring theme, and obviously verifying the function of the striker safety and spring is important, but if there are other things we should be paying attention to as well that would be really helpful to know.
 
Posts: 9983 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
More details and photos from lwt16 here:
https://pistol-forum.com/showt...P320-Concerns/page12

I'm not a P320 Armorer, but perhaps you'll know: Is it possible to assemble the sear springs in that improper crossed configuration on the newer version of the sear with the two "nipples", as it apparently was with the older 2017-era P320's sear with the two depressions shown in lwt16's photos at the link?

 
Posts: 33847 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
Thanks Rogue, that's good info at that link. I would think that you probably could still cross the springs with the new sear, but it would definitely be harder.

I can affirm what LWT said about the striker safety lever spring, too. I'm not sure when they got rid of that, but when I went through the armorer course in 2020 the guns we worked on didn't have it. When I got home I tore my duty gun apart (that one was 2018 issue, IIRC...it was one of the replacements we got to replace our pre-upgrade guns, so it came from the factory with the upgrade) and found that spring in there. They'd told us in class to toss them because they weren't necessary, so I did. IIRC the spring puts downward pressure on the lever, so if it's working properly it keeps the lever down, but I can see how if it broke or got mangled it might jam the lever up.
 
Posts: 9983 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Lt CHEG
posted Hide Post
I think there’s a good chance that a big part of why Grayguns hasn’t duplicated any potential issues is that they use machined, tool steel components when they put them into these guns. I really think that tolerance stacking may be a major part of the problem, and frankly MIM just doesn’t give me the same confidence of strength as tool steel does. The components that Grayguns is using likely far exceed the capabilities, strength and quality of the SIG factory components. That’s why they can output a safe pistol, with absolute reliability and much improved trigger feel. I think that the design of the 320 is likely not problematic itself, but some of the components that SIG uses in the manufacture just might not be able to withstand situations that exceed their anticipated design conditions. Of something doesn’t go right then it can allow a catastrophic failure.




“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”
 
Posts: 5735 | Location: Upstate NY | Registered: February 28, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
Perhaps Bruce himself could chime in to clarify, but I didn't take their statement to mean that they've rigorously tested only those P320s that are outfitted with Grayguns parts.

Rather, they've rigorously tested the P320 system itself (including stock factory guns) and come up with nothing yet.
 
Posts: 33847 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of steve495
posted Hide Post
quote:
I think there’s a good chance that a big part of why Grayguns hasn’t duplicated any potential issues is that they use machined, tool steel components when they put them into these guns.


quote:
but I didn't take their statement to mean that they've rigorously tested only those P320s that are outfitted with Grayguns parts.


Bruce and the Oregon team have tested many P320s, including straight-up OEM pistols in all variations. His letter was not specific to guns with their premium aftermarket parts.

Of course, he also has the feedback from the 30-plus of us on the grassroots SIG team who all had P320s—eventually both pre- and post-voluntary upgrades—and who put hundreds of thousands of rounds down range with those guns. There were also thousands of holster draw and reholstering cycles, most with level 1 retention holsters used in competition. More recently, he's gotten continued feedback from Mason, Kaylee, Isaac, Joe, and other competitors. (Almost all of these guns made it back to Bruce at least once or twice for detailed inspections and testing over many years.)

When it comes to the trigger* upgrades available for the P320, Grayguns has three triggers (hybrid, straight and curved) that are adjustable for over-travel and are "American-made from precision machined tool steel, heat-treated, hand-finished, and gauged for perfect appearance, fit, and function."

For the competition/range-only trigger system, the sear starts its life as an OEM SIG sear. It is a "precision-ground custom sear, polished and finished in hard nickel PTFE." The other components of the competition system are springs and the extended safety lever pin.

* I mentioned the trigger components here as they seem most related to the thread, but much effort has also gone into the custom slides and complete top ends during the past two years to make the P320 even more accurate and shootable.


Steve


Small Business Website Design & Maintenance - https://spidercreations.net | OpSpec Training - https://opspectraining.com | Grayguns - https://grayguns.com

Evil exists. You can not negotiate with, bribe or placate evil. You're not going to be able to have it sit down with Dr. Phil for an anger management session either.
 
Posts: 5056 | Location: Windsor Locks, Conn. | Registered: July 18, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of ACClauhs
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by FrankMoses:
Back in 2014, and maybe into 2015, wasn’t it also available with a trigger safety à la Glock?
Fair to assume not many of them sold? At least it would’ve prevented the drop safety issues that followed soon after.

It was. We asked for them after the issues my department had with them prior to the drop safe issue. They said it wasn’t in production. They never issued them to LE or the public to my knowledge.
 
Posts: 405 | Location: PA | Registered: February 21, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
steve945, please check your email.
 
Posts: 111133 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Sig Sauer releases statement on the P320

© SIGforum 2025