Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | |
| Staring back from the abyss |
I was a medic, not infantry or scout or armor, so forgive me a bit...and correct me if I'm wrong. Here's what worked in WWII. Armor and infantry. Marching through the country and taking everything in the way. IMO, that's what we need to do in Iran. Yes, it is going to cost lives, but this is a war that has been brewing for nearly fifty years and it is time to end it. Insert them through the Bandar Abbas (or further south) area and head north killing everything in sight. Take this country with no prisoners. That is where we have failed in the past conflicts. We inserted teams and played whack-a mole (God I had that term), and failed to gain any ground. Roll them MFers. Armor and infantry and be done with it once and for all. ________________________________________________________ It is long past time for a Convention of States. The Founding Fathers gave us this tool to fix an out of control government and we need to use it. | |||
|
Member![]() |
Eliminating Iran’s ability to make money - the MOU granted them the time to make $6bn USD in oil sales - is critical. I’m aligned with bombing every bit of infrastructure that they can utilize to extract and ship oil; Kharg island, ports, depots etc. @Gustofer, war has changed immeasurably just in the last couple of years. Boots on the ground will lead to tens of thousands of US casualties, courtesy of cheap, Chinese made drones that they will gladly give/donate/sell to Iran. Armor and infantry are no longer king, but targets. | |||
|
| Member |
^ Problem with that plan is the islamist fanatics will extract an enormous price in dead American. Remember in the Iraq - Iran war Iran marched children through the minefields to clear them for the infantry. It's modern warfare today use intelligence from our friend Israel and target their oil export infrastructure and financial operations in addition to any remaining military targets left. Break Iran financially would be a good start. The silly MOU took US for a ride. Doesn't cover the real issues with Iran who has been murdering Americans for half a century. US needs to wake up and start being smart in dealing with the relidgious dictarorship. U.S. Army 11F4P Vietnam 69-70 NRA Life Member | |||
|
Ammoholic![]() |
I still don't think this MOU is a good agreement. Maybe you guys can further tell me that I don't know what I'm talking about. Maybe toss an insult or two for good measure. Jesse Sic Semper Tyrannis | |||
|
| Member |
Didn’t the Iranians say yesterday that they’re done with the MOU and they won’t be doing any more talking with the US - no way, no how, never again? (No insults, BTW). | |||
|
| Member |
The Iranians are obfuscating everything. We don't even know if the people we are negotiating with actually control anything. They are masters at buying time and that's all the MOU did. And you can end this by an air war only. You just need to drop the right kind of bombs. "Fixed fortifications are monuments to mans stupidity" - George S. Patton | |||
|
| Political Cynic |
The MOU was only an agreement to talk in the future if certain conditions were met. It wasn’t the document to end the war. And the IRGC was already violating those conditions before the ink was dry. I see it as the U.S. giving them the opportunity to show the world who they really were. Yes it gave them a bit of time to resupply butbitvgavevus that opportunity as well. | |||
|
| No More Mr. Nice Guy |
We need to kill their leadership. All of it. Civilian, military, secret police. Go deep enough that those remaining lose interest in stepping into leadership positions. Breaking infrastructure brings hardship to the populace but it doesn't change the beliefs of the leaders. These are religious zealots who won't be swayed by having to get future votes or who logically conclude that their victory is not possible. They believe eventual Islamic domination is promised by their deity. Getting the citizens to rise up might be a positive side effect of breaking infrastructure, but I have doubts about what portion of the population would be genuinely supportive of a free western style society. The best we can hope for is that the general population loses all will to have an Islamist government, and then over time the future generations learn to embrace a western society. | |||
|
| Something wild is loose ![]() |
As a counterargument, philosophically when in history (admittedly a short one) has an air campaign exclusively gained or kept ground permanently, destroyed an enemy completely, or resulted in victory with aims achieved for any countries at war. Again admittedly a short history (beginning in the early 19th century), so there's always the chance it might work. But it appears not to be now. And as observed, the alternatives are not good, so here we are. "And gentlemen in England now abed, shall think themselves accursed they were not here, and hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks that fought with us upon Saint Crispin's Day" | |||
|
| Lawyers, Guns and Money |
Doc H., sigfreund asks the same question, on the previous page:
"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." -- Justice Janice Rogers Brown "The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth." -rduckwor | |||
|
Member![]() |
The aims of war are different now, as warfare has evolved. Unconditional surrender, WW2 style, is not really possible in almost any conflict; and when it occurs, the victor faces ruinous costs to rebuild and defend. Air power can absolutely achieve the following aims: 1. Complete degradation of Iran’s ability to refine and process oil. 2. Substantial degradation of Iran’s ability to make and import conventional weapons. 3. Substantial degradation of Iran’s ability to make and launch nuclear weapons. As for the MOU, it was absolute ridiculous; you can have a short MOU, but the carrots that were offered (oil sales) were too generous. Also, it should have been positioned as “We are giving Iran the rope to save them, or they can choose to hang themselves - their call”. Vance should never have done a blitz to say there is a new regime and we can negotiate with them. Trust, but verify… we’ve forgotten what that meant. The messaging should have been much more cautious, including from Trump. | |||
|
| Shall Not Be Infringed |
It didn't 'need' to be positioned that way...It should've been assumed/understood by EVERYONE once the details were finalized and officially announced for all the world to see. It is mind-boggling how people don't understand this. Iran has a VERY Well known history, and Donald Trump is NOT at all naive on this subject! ____________________________________________________________ If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !! Trump 47....Making America Great Again! "May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20 Live Free or Die! | |||
|
| Internet Guru |
This is becoming somewhat disastrous, but we still have a little time. Hopefully, we aren't still perceived to be playing footsie with the Iranians this fall. We should probably declare the Iranian nuclear facilities sufficiently degraded and the mission complete. We can always hit them again next year or every six months forever until they learn. This timeline isn't going to work for us. At this rate, we are going to blow the midterms. Our focus should probably be on replacing the straight as a conduit for energy. No point in a deal with these people who can't really control their various factions. | |||
|
| Lawyers, Guns and Money |
We were told that #3 was accomplished. I thought that was the goal? Do we now have new goals? If so, what are they? We've already spent trillions on Middle East wars... See:
Does any of this really benefit the US? We have more "wounded warriors" now than we did after World War II, which was the last war actually declared as a war by Congress. "Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." -- Justice Janice Rogers Brown "The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth." -rduckwor | |||
|
| Partial dichotomy |
| |||
|
Member![]() |
100% agreed Chellim. What is the point of this conflict, and how do we seek to achieve that? If it’s nuclear elimination, hit those repeatedly, and exit. If it’s removing Iran’s ability to make money, bomb the oil refineries, extraction, and export facilities, and exit. But communicate to America exactly what we are seeking to achieve, and how it differs from 60+ years of disaster in the ME. And don’t mention that the Strait is a complication; that has to have been anticipated, and if it wasn’t, is an absolute indictment of intelligence.This message has been edited. Last edited by: reloader-1, | |||
|
| Optimistic Cynic |
With their track record of lies after lies after lies, why the hell would anyone take them at their word? An MoU only works if both parties are honest and have a common Understanding of what the Memorandum intends to accomplish. Why anyone would believe that the mullahs had any intent to honor the MoU in the first place is beyond me. Thank goodness we have a leader that is not afraid to punish these liars and weasels instead of making excuses for them as has happened too many times in the past! The legacy of the Iraq war, especially the lives and limbs lost to IEDs would suggest using great caution in pursuing a ground war. As far as minimizing injury to civilians goes, that is not our responsibility. If Iranian citizens feel they are more at threat from their own Government than the US, it is beholden upon them to change things. | |||
|
| Back, and to the left ![]() |
He tells you in this video which was posted on the previous page. Clearly at least a few here didn't watch it. The whole thing is only 9 minutes long, but if you must skip ahead, start at 4:09. | |||
|
| Like a party in your pants |
We should hand the keys over to the Arab states that Iran has attacked, let them know we will help with air support but they should invade and take control of Iran, we don't want it or need it. | |||
|
Member![]() |
Here’s the transcript, the major issue is we did NOT have to be proportionate prior to negotiations, and our weakness there lead to today:
| |||
|
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 ... 111 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

