Trump's sentencing has been moved to September 18. The second debate is September 10.

https://x.com/gatewaypundit/st.../1808225249084805412

Gangster.

https://x.com/vigilantfox/stat...179617397719127?s=42



Congressman Wesley Hunt Reveals Jaw-Dropping Trump Story

This is amazing.

In a tense meeting with Taliban leaders, Trump declared, “I want to leave Afghanistan, but it’s going to be a conditions-based withdrawal,” before issuing a stark warning.

“If you harm a hair on a single American, I’m going to kill you,” Trump said. The translator conveyed this exact message.

Trump then “reached in his pocket, pulled out a satellite photo of the leader of the Taliban’s home, handed it to him, got up and walked out the room.”

^^^^^ doesn't get any better than that

quote:

...Sotomayor wrote. "Order the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune.

I guess someone should remind Sotomayor and other idiot Dems that, were it not for "presidential immunity," Barrack Obama could have been prosecuted for murder for illegally ordering the drone deaths of Anwar Al-Awlaki, a U.S. CITIZEN, and 2 other US citizens in the Middle East (one of them a 16 yr old child). None of them were convicted of a crime, nor were they afforded the "due process" which is guaranteed to all citizens. Two of the most liberal organizations there are, the ACLU and Amnesty International, thought what Obama did was illegal.

Since there is no statute of limitations on murder, I guess Merrick Garland should bring charges against Obama for murder now, since he doesn't agree with the Supreme Court decision either.

Don is The Don...

He works in Waste Management.

This says at all. No matter what people say publicly, when they step into the voting booth, they vote for themselves. This election is about many things, but mainly and in the day to day, it's about the economy:

https://x.com/TheStevenCheung/.../1807407385335500943

quote:

Since there is no statute of limitations on murder, I guess Merrick Garland should bring charges against Obama for murder now, since he doesn't agree with the Supreme Court decision either.

To the best of my understanding, it is legal to waive your rights so long as you understand what your doing.

As such, anybody who doesn't feel they need to be protected by that immunity can voluntarily give it up. Who's willing to sign some waivers?

“It’s the economy, stupid”

quote:

Originally posted by darthfuster:
“It’s the economy, stupid”

More like “It’s the stupid, stupid.”

AFAIK, this is the first time in history we have two presidential candidates each with experience in the White House, and consecutive terms at that. So the voter can directly compare the two presidents. And the question is "was your quality of life better off with one over the other?"

^^^ and everyone knows the answer. They can change the candidate, but they can't ditch the record. Nor do they want to change the stupid policies.
Which is why the Dems are grasping at straws.

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:
AFAIK, this is the first time in history we have two presidential candidates each with experience in the White House, and consecutive terms at that. So the voter can directly compare the two presidents. And the question is "was your quality of life better off with one over the other?"

It happened once before, in the election of 1892, when former President Grover Cleveland defeated incumbent Benjamin Harrison. That, like now with Kennedy, featured a somewhat popular third candidate (Weaver), but unlike Kennedy, Weaver had a party's backing and he actually won a few states in the electoral college. Similar to this time, the economic condition was one of the most important factors and the result wasn't really close.

This is an awesome story about President Trump threatening the Taliban leader with death if he hurt an American during our withdrawal that I’ve heard before and likely others have, but it’s worth hearing from Congressman Wesley Hunt who was on Sage Steele’s show.

https://redstate.com/brandon_m...-their-face-n2176275

^^^Yup, we all heard it on the previous page of this thread.

^^^Gangster.

Damn, should have gone back a page.

Slightly scary scenario - dump Joe, get Kamala in office for a few months of media suckuppery. I'd hope that a necessary debate would sink her but the dems can exploit her victim credentials during and after a debate.

Thanks for the history lesson StarTraveler, didn't think of Grover Cleveland.

quote:

Originally posted by Ripley:
Slightly scary scenario - dump Joe, get Kamala in office for a few months of media suckuppery. I'd hope that a necessary debate would sink her but the dems can exploit her victim credentials during and after a debate.

You MIGHT get Joe to resign, but not likely. There is no way the democrats will throw him out because the bad vibes that would cause would definitely sink their presidential candidate.

quote:

Originally posted by Southern Rebel:


You MIGHT get Joe to resign, but not likely.

Jill isn't resigning, period.