Man, are you blind?

What have I said about this type of thing, repeatedly? What have I said?

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
Man, are you blind?

What have I said about this type of thing, repeatedly? What have I said?

Wow, yeah. That was pretty bad. Deleted

Tell me what I have said about this, please.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
The opinion is linked above. Nothing fiery or outlandish... you don't usually get that in a 9-0 opinion.

quote:

In a sign of the high court’s awareness of the election calendar, the justices took the unusual step of announcing the opinion on the Supreme Court’s website on a day when the court is not in session, instead of issuing it from the bench later this month.

Ref: Supreme Court keeps Trump on ballot, rejects Colorado voter challenge

I imagine the expectation is they may have more to say at a later date?

Read the thread or recent posts before posting.

It must burn Potatohead and other Dems that his DEI commie choice for the bench, Ketanji Jackson, voted with Thomas and others.

Great news to start the day with. I've been smiling about it for several hours now. It's frustrating that something this stupid had to go before the Supreme Court, but edifying that they ruled unanimously.

quote:

It must be dissolved.

Fuck you, Keith. We need them, we don't need you. If we're gonna go around dissolving stuff, it's the compromised, complicit, corrupt, illegitimate "news media" that ought to go first, and we can start with guys like you.

The people "fighting to save our democracy" want to dissolve a co-equal branch of the government, mkay, sure.

To the left, "democracy" is a euphemism for tyranny.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

quote:

Originally posted by Pipe Smoker:
^^^^^^
The written opinions of the Justices will be interesting. Perhaps beyond the bounds of the usual judicial restraint.

The opinion is linked above. Nothing fiery or outlandish... you don't usually get that in a 9-0 opinion.

I said Justices (plural). Their individual opinions.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
King Douche is upset. That's a shame. Oh, look. He says we should get rid of the Supreme Court. Sure, that makes sense.

It's bad, man. It's really, really bad.

https://twitter.com/ThePacific.../1764706254440849673

If They Win The House, They Will Refuse To Certify Trump As POTUS



How Democrats Could Disqualify Trump If the Supreme Court Doesn’t

Without clear guidance from the Court, House Democrats suggest that they might not certify a Trump win on January 6.

https://www.theatlantic.com/po...mp-january-6/677545/

Let's cross that bridge when we come to it.

How many times have I said that we should savor a victory without trying to diminish it?

chellim, that goes for you and everyone else in this forum. I do not want to see one speck of shit dropped onto this victory.

Everyone here needs to read me loud and clear.

“ How Democrats Could Disqualify Trump If the Supreme Court Doesn’t

Without clear guidance from the Court, House Democrats suggest that they might not certify a Trump win on January 6.“

Gee, wasn’t this that the demonrats called “ insurrection” one January 6th?

This is not the first time that maggot Olbermann calls for dissolution of SCOTUS. He did the same tantrum, after Bruen.

That boy ain't right.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
That boy ain't right.

In the good old days his relatives would have had him shut away to avoid shaming his family.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...-ballot-ban-n2636057

Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellow has reversed course in her effort to keep former President Trump off the primary ballot after the Supreme Court on Monday unanimously overturned a similar ruling in Colorado.

“I have reviewed the Anderson decision carefully. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that individual states lack authority to enforce Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment with respect to federal offices,” wrote Bellows, a Democrat. “Consistent with my oath and obligation to follow the law and the Constitution, and pursuant to the Anderson decision, I hereby withdraw my determination that Mr. Trump’s primary petition is invalid.”

She added: “As a result of the modified ruling, votes cast for Mr. Trump in the March 5, 2024 Presidential Primary Election will be counted.”

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled 9-0 that "responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates rests with Congress and not the States.”