Did anyone see this? Biden falls again during Air Force graduation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ctthyYjglw

JP

Here is Trump's reply to Hannity's question about "name calling" from last night's interview.

quote:

Originally posted by Gustofer:
This is why people can't stand Trump.

https://mediarightnews.com/don...numbers-on-fox-news/



This woman took slings and arrows for you and has supported you through the worst of it, and you attack her?

So how many votes will he gain from the tweet to Kayleigh McEnany? By my count: ZERO.

Here's what I would have suggested:

I love ya Kayleigh, but you got the numbers wrong. I am up over DeSantis by xx points (insert
citation). You're doing a great job at Fox, and you can have your job back in 2025.

Trump needs to spend more time attacking Demokrats, not Republicans. He's gonna need all
the help he can get; alienating supporters is unwise.

quote:

Originally posted by Sigmund:

Here's what I would have suggested:

I love ya Kayleigh, but you got the numbers wrong. I am up over DeSantis by xx points (insert
citation). You're doing a great job at Fox, and you can have your job back in 2025.

Did it occur to you that it is likely that McEnany burned her bridge to Trump before this tweet? That he does not want her back to work for him? Loyalty is paramount to Trump, and he does not shy away from expressing his feelings on those who betray him.

As far as "attacking' other Republicans, this has been going on since U.S. primary elections have been around. Reagan, Bush, and Connally were not playing kiss and make up in the 1980 election cycle. Lee Atwater was working for Reagan, using smear tactics even back then. And Trump hasn't changed since 2016, and we shouldn't expect him to.

Do you actually believe that anyone will say, this far into the game, that they were going to vote for Donald Trump until they saw this tweet?

It doesn't matter, because the man has been consistent in his behavior in this respect for years.

Donald Trump is going to do and say what Donald Trump has been doing and saying for years. Either you can look past his perceived faults because you care about this country, or you can claim that everything hinges on silly shit like this and let the leftists keep it.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...j9BvnOEZZgVrK5Xbo%3D

YouTube Reverses Policy on Censoring Claims of Stolen 2020 Election

YouTube has announced it’s doing a U-turn on censoring content about U.S. elections, with the platform saying it will no longer delete posts questioning the results of the 2020 presidential election, including claims of widespread voter fraud.

The company made the announcement in a blog post on Friday, which comes about two months after it reinstated former President Donald Trump’s YouTube account.

Trump’s account on YouTube was suspended in the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol breach, which came as the former president alleged that the 2020 election had been stolen.

cont...

quote:

YouTube Reverses Policy on Censoring Claims of Stolen 2020 Election

Translated: We believe that there will be massive amounts of people posting and viewing videos on utoob, from both sides Pro and Con regarding Donald J Trump, in turn we anticipate increased ad revenue and stock prices by allowing the exploitation of Mr. Trump.

quote:

Originally posted by HRK:

quote:

YouTube Reverses Policy on Censoring Claims of Stolen 2020 Election

Translated: We believe that there will be massive amounts of people posting and viewing videos on utoob, from both sides Pro and Con regarding Donald J Trump, in turn we anticipate increased ad revenue and stock prices by allowing the exploitation of Mr. Trump.

Not sure I believe YouTube's intentions are benevolent.

^^^

Would you believe...altruistic?

Financial

flashguy

Interesting interview with one of President Trumps lawyers, Timothy Parlatore. The empty classified folder is a nothing burger.

Donald Trump Breaks CNN — CEO Chris Licht Is Out
https://www.breitbart.com/the-...-chris-licht-is-out/

Trump broke CNN.

Chris Licht is out

The walls really started closing in (if you’ll pardon the expression) on Licht after former President Trump’s CNN town hall triumph last month. Because Trump was allowed to state his beliefs and come off as charming and in command, the Woke Nazis in the media, including at CNNLOL, freaked out. Licht tried to trip Trump up. Of course, he did. He’s a leftist. His mistake was having a lightweight like Kaitlan “Nurse Ratched” Collins moderate. She tried her worst, Trump did his best, and the Woke Gestapo never forgives.

CNN might have a chance if it fired its disgraced on-air staff responsible for all of this:

Russia Collusion Hoax
Hands Up, Don’t Shoot Hoax
Jussie Smollett Hoax
Covington KKKids Hoax
Very Fine People Hoax
Seven-Hour Gap Hoax
Global Warming Hoax
Russian Bounties Hoax
Trump Trashes Troops Hoax
Policemen Killed at Mostly Peaceful January 6 Protest Hoax
Rittenhouse Hoax
Eating While Black Hoax
Border Agents Whipping Illegals Hoax
NASCAR Noose Hoax
The Georgia Jim Crow 2.0 Hoax
Trump Assaulted Secret Service Agents and Grabbed Steering Wheel of Beast Hoax
Frame MAGA for Alleged Paul Pelosi Assault Narrative
The COVID lab leak theory is racist
Hunter Biden’s laptop is Russian disinformation
Joe Biden will never ban gas stoves

Joey D
6/5/23

Feds inform Trump he is target likely to be indicted as DOJ rebuffs prosecutorial misconduct claim

Trump defense has submitted secret evidence alleging a prosecutor tried to sway witness testimony by discussing federal judgeship

https://justthenews.com/politi..._campaign=newsletter

Federal prosecutors have notified Donald Trump that he is a criminal target and likely to be indicted imminently in a probe into alleged classified documents – even as the Justice Department declined to delay charges to give time to investigate allegations of witness tampering submitted by the former president’s legal team, according to multiple people on Wednesday familiar with the case.

The sources directly familiar with the case told Just the News that DOJ declined to delay the planned indictment of Trump to investigate allegations that a senior prosecutor working on the case tried to influence a key witness by discussing a federal judgeship with the witness’ lawyer.

That allegation is still pending in a secret case before Chief U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg, the jurist who oversees the federal court in Washington, D.C., and the grand juries that convene in that courthouse, the sources said.

An historic federal indictment crafted by Special Counsel Jack Smith could be handed up by a federal grand jury against the 45th president as early as this week, the sources said.

Trump has already been indicted in a Manhattan court on charges he falsified business expenses to hide hush money payments to a porn star and has pleaded innocent.

Trump has portrayed both cases as part of a broader “witch hunt” and dual system of justice designed to derail his 2024 presidential candidacy.

This week, Trump argued Smith is a partisan and the federal case against him is being treated differently than one against President Joe Biden, who also was found with classified documents in his possession from his time as vice president.

“HOW CAN DOJ POSSIBLY CHARGE ME, WHO DID NOTHING WRONG, WHEN NO OTHER PRESIDENT’S WERE CHARGED, WHEN JOE BIDEN WON’T BE CHARGED FOR ANYTHING,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform in a post in which he also railed against the failure of DOJ to charge Hillary Clinton in 2016 over classified emails kept on her private email server.

“ONLY TRUMP - THE GREATEST WITCH HUNT OF ALL TIME!” he added.

Federal prosecutors deny politics have been involved in their pursuit of Trump.

Smith’s prosecutorial team informed Trump’s legal team in recent days that the charges against the former president could include a violation of 18 U.S. Code Chapter 37 Section 793 that outlaws the “gathering, transmitting or losing” of national defense information. Other charges being considered involve alleged false statements and obstruction of justice, all claims the president and his team have robustly contested in public and in private.

No prior or sitting American president has ever been indicted in federal court, and if the grand jury accepts the prosecutors’ case it will touch off an unprecedented legal battle certain to work its way to the Supreme Court while lingering over the 2024 election in which Trump handily leads the GOP field by as many as 50 points in some polls.

According to multiple sources familiar with the ongoing probe, all of whom talked to Just the News on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media:

Trump’s lawyers have prepared a robust defense based on months of legal research, anticipating Smith might pursue charges. Trump’s lawyers are prepared to argue that a president had broad powers under the Constitution to keep documents or declassify without any fanfare documents from his presidency and take them with him upon leaving office.

They will rely heavily on a U.S. District Court case in Washington more than a decade ago involving former President Bill Clinton that concluded a president had broad and mostly unchallengeable power to determine which documents from his presidency can be kept personally and that any documents moved to Trump’s homes in Mar-a-Lago, Fla., and Bedminster, N.J., fall under that category.

An American Bar Association report in 2022 seemed to agree with Trump’s assertion that “guidelines support his contention that presidents have broad authority to formally declassify most documents that are not statutorily protected, while they are in office.”

Prosecutors plan to counter that authority does not extend to documents containing National Defense Information whose retention or release could jeopardize national security.

They have purportedly introduced to grand jury witnesses a recording Trump’s office made in 2021 during an interview with former chief of staff Mark Meadows’ biographers in which the former president allegedly talked about a document he described as classified and in his possession allegedly written by former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley that outlined a war plan against Iran.

While prosecutors have not located an exact document matching Trump’s description, they found one with classified markings written by others laying out an Iranian battle plan that Trump returned to the National Archives more than a year ago.

Trump lawyers have developed evidence showing that information from that plan was leaked to a major magazine by a senior military officer and plan to use that as evidence that it no longer can be considered National Defense Information, according to people familiar with both sides of the case.

But one of the first disputes likely to be addressed is evidence the Trump defense team submitted to Boasberg in a secret court proceeding recently and to Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco’s office Monday alleging a senior federal prosecutor working on the case discussed a federal judgeship with a defense lawyer for a key witness.

Monaco’s office informed the Trump team in the last 24 hours that it was rejecting a request to delay the indictment so the allegation could be investigated.

The lawyer was already in line for consideration by the Biden White House for a judgeship when the prosecutor allegedly raised the nomination while trying to get additional testimony from the lawyer’s client, according to sources familiar with the allegation.

The discussion raised concerns among defense lawyers that it was an effort to influence the witness, who has declined to change his testimony because he claims to have no other information about the movement of boxes and artifacts at Mar-a-Lago since he left the White House, the sources said.

https://truthsocial.com/@realD...s/110504575984441774

<script async="async" src="https://truthsocial.com/embed.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

Jun 07, 2023, 3:26 PM

Truth social link doesn't work. Thinks I'm from a foreign country. Maybe my VPN?

quote:

Originally posted by Bytes:
Truth social link doesn't work. Thinks I'm from a foreign country. Maybe my VPN?

Note that in wcb6092’s post, just above, you can scroll the Truth Social insert to see all of President Trump’s comments.

Here is another article that provides more detail. If true then someone in DOJ is leaking a lot of information.

https://news.yahoo.com/prosecu...tment-193915222.html

The Department of Justice is preparing to ask a Washington, DC grand jury to indict former president Donald Trump for violating the Espionage Act and for obstruction of justice as soon as Thursday, adding further weight to the legal baggage facing Mr Trump as he campaigns for his party’s nomination in next year’s presidential election.

The Independent has learned that prosecutors are ready to ask grand jurors to approve an indictment against Mr Trump for violating a portion of the US criminal code known as Section 793, which prohibits “gathering, transmitting or losing” any “information respecting the national defence”.

The use of Section 793, which does not make reference to classified information, is understood to be a strategic decision by prosecutors that has been made to short-circuit Mr Trump’s ability to claim that he used his authority as president to declassify documents he removed from the White House and kept at his Palm Beach, Florida property long after his term expired on 20 January 2021.

That section of US criminal law is written in a way that could encompass Mr Trump’s conduct even if he was authorised to possess the information as president because it states that anyone who “lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document ...relating to the national defence,” and “willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it” can be punished by as many as ten years in prison.

It is understood that prosecutors intend to ask grand jurors to vote on the indictment on Thursday, but that vote could be delayed as much as a week until the next meeting of the grand jury to allow for a complete presentation of evidence, or to allow investigators to gather more evidence for presentation of necessary.

A separate grand jury that is meeting in Florida has also been hearing evidence in the documents investigation. That grand jury was empaneled in part to overcome legal issues posed by the fact that some of the crimes allegedly committed by Mr Trump took place in that jurisdiction, not in Washington. Under federal law, prosecutors must bring charges against federal defendants in the jurisdiction where the crimes took place.

Another source familiar with the matter has said Mr Trump was recently informed that he is a “target” of the Justice Department probe, which began in early 2022 after National Archives and Records Administration officials discovered more than 100 documents bearing classification markings in a set of 15 boxes of Trump administration records retrieved from Mar-a-Lago, the century-old mansion turned private beach club where Mr Trump maintains his primary residence and post-presidential office.

Over the course of the last year, grand jurors have heard testimony from numerous associates of the ex-president, including nearly every employee of Mar-a-Lago, former administration officials who worked in Mr Trump’s post-presidential office and for his political operation, and former high-ranking administration officials such as his final White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows.

Mr Meadows has already given evidence before the grand jury and is said to be cooperating with the investigation into his former boss. It is understood that the former North Carolina congressman will plead guilty to several federal charges as part of a deal for which he has already received limited immunity in exchange for his testimony.

Prosecutors are also prepared to ask grand jurors to indict Mr Trump on charges that he obstructed justice during the year-long investigation and caused false statements to be made to investigators by persons working for him.

It is possible that such charges could stem from a declaration submitted to federal investigators roughly a year ago, when FBI agents and prosecutors visited his home to retrieve a sealed folder filled with 38 classified documents which Mr Trump’s attorneys turned over in response to a grand jury subpoena.

According to court documents, the government subsequently developed evidence indicating that documents had been removed from a storage room where his attorneys had stated that all such documents were being stored in the days following the receipt of the grand jury subpoena.

Using that evidence, which reportedly includes surveillance footage taken by cameras placed in the interior of Mar-a-Lago, prosecutors obtained a search warrant for the property that was carried out by FBI agents on 8 August last year.

During that search, special agents discovered 103 documents bearing classification markings, including 18 marked “top secret,” 54 marked “secret,” and 31 marked as “confidential,” including a number of documents that were stored in Mr Trump’s personal office.

Newsmax is saying Trump has been indicted.
Trump to appear at a federal courthouse in FL next Tuesday.

Trump on Truth Social:
https://truthsocial.com/@realD...p/110511177469281373

<script async="async" src="https://truthsocial.com/embed.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

<script async="async" src="https://truthsocial.com/embed.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

<script async="async" src="https://truthsocial.com/embed.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

This message has been edited. Last edited by: stoic-one,