Remember, you "one man, one vote" types; this is a leftie argument to get rid of the Senate and the Electoral College.

The senate is not one man one vote in practice because Wyoming has two senators, and California has two senators, and therefore Wyoming's senators represent more than "one vote" worth of power in Washington.

Similarly, the electoral college per state is equal to it's representatives, added to it's senators. Again, Wyoming packs more power in the electoral college per state voter than does California.

"One man, one vote" is a trap; don't fall into it. "Count the legal votes" is a slogan to get behind.

The phrase "one man one vote" is not mentioned once in the Constitution, just like Democracy is not mentioned. The Senate and Electoral College were set up for a reason. The change to popular election of Senators instead of by the State Legislatures was a grave mistake and is the cause of most of the inroads made by the marxists in the past 100 years.

I said nothing about tossing out the Electoral College.
Sheeezzz, I think we all know what happened.
The ballot boxes were stuffed, figured everyone would realize that is what my reference was to.

One man one vote at the polls.

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
I said nothing about tossing out the Electoral College.
Sheeezzz, I think we all know what happened.
The ballot boxes were stuffed, figured everyone would realize that is what my reference was to.

One man one vote at the polls.

Exactly right.

When I posted that phrase, I meant the voter gets one. As in one each. Not 2, not 20, 200, or 200,000. As some of our opposition would seem to believe is their right. I had no intent to dissolve the electoral college or pare down our republic to a pure democracy.
Para is right, take a fukkin breath will ya?

{shark cruises through the thread}

[sound effects] ba-dum

ba-dum, ba-dum, ba-dum... [/sound effects]

Rand Paul destroys Stephanopoulos...

https://youtu.be/Vub26OEWyV8

Unfortunately, Rand Paul did not destroy Stephanopoulos but I'm glad he fought back. In most interviews everyone holds back and plays nice. Just once though, I'd like someone to rip through a smart ass pretend journalist like a wild ass tornado, no holding back, just go ape shit crazy on them.

quote:

Originally posted by ersatzknarf:
[sound effects] ba-dum

ba-dum, ba-dum, ba-dum... [/sound effects]

Sharks patrol these waters
Sharks patrol these waters
Don't let your fingers dangle in the water
And don't you worry about the dayglow orange life preserver…

quote:

Originally posted by sigspecops:
Unfortunately, Rand Paul did not destroy Stephanopoulos but I'm glad he fought back. In most interviews everyone holds back and plays nice. Just once though, I'd like someone to rip through a smart ass pretend journalist like a wild ass tornado, no holding back, just go ape shit crazy on them.

I thought Paul calmly explained to Stephanopolous that he basically wasn’t doing his job as a journalist. He was falling on one side of the argument without even allowing a counterpoint. More of these ridiculous biased and one-sided “journalists” need to get called out in the same manner.

quote:

Originally posted by aparoche:
Rand Paul destroys Stephanopoulos...

https://youtu.be/Vub26OEWyV8

Yes he sure did. What a hack Stephanopoulos is.

Stuffingenvelopes has been a hack since his days on This Week with David Brinkley.

I didn’t expect George Will to become such a coward.

George is not remotely a journalist. He's a political hack. Not that there's anything wrong with that. But if anyone, including George, considers him to be a journalist, that's a sad commentary on what passes for journalist these days. And that's a very low bar.

quote:

Originally posted by nhtagmember:
I didn’t expect George Will to become such a coward.

He wants party invites.

quote:

Originally posted by aparoche:
I thought Paul calmly explained to Stephanopolous that he basically wasn’t doing his job as a journalist. He was falling on one side of the argument without even allowing a counterpoint. More of these ridiculous biased and one-sided “journalists” need to get called out in the same manner.

Yes. Exactly.
Stephanopolous has always been a Clintonista-commie who now is held up as a "respected journalist". He's so biased he doesn't even see his own bias. I'm glad Rand Paul called him out on it. We need more of that.

Trump Has Political Plans For 2022, Abandons Idea Of Creating Third Political Party: Report

President Donald Trump has reportedly dropped an idea to start a third political party, which was briefly floated last week, and is now focused on helping the Republican Party win back the House and the Senate in 2022.

cont....

https://www.dailywire.com/news...utm_source=housefile

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

quote:

Originally posted by aparoche:
I thought Paul calmly explained to Stephanopolous that he basically wasn’t doing his job as a journalist. He was falling on one side of the argument without even allowing a counterpoint. More of these ridiculous biased and one-sided “journalists” need to get called out in the same manner.

Yes. Exactly.
Stephanopolous has always been a Clintonista-commie who now is held up as a "respected journalist". He's so biased he doesn't even see his own bias. I'm glad Rand Paul called him out on it. We need more of that.

Well that definitely got the aging boy wonder, Steponallofus, pissed off. He had Rand Paul on there for one reason, to extract a public statement, that no one will be allowed to publicly disagree with the left.
The phrasing is different, yet not:

'Do you confess?'
'Just say it, and this will be over.'
'The prisoner wishes to say a word.'

That was like a combination of the end of Braveheart and the Sam Kinison part of Back to School.





How very Maoist cultural revolution of him.

Exactly 83V45. Rand went mum every time.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
{shark cruises through the thread}

Daddy shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo
Daddy shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo
Daddy shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo
Daddy shark

Some reference material for your review - to combat the lie.

“BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Accurate List of 2020 Election Fraud Cases Shows 81 Cases Total, 30 Still Active – And NOT ONE SINGLE COURT Has Allowed Evidence to be Argued.” Link [emphasis added]

It seems the Michigan case is making significant findings as I’ve previously said.