https://www.breitbart.com/poli...y-elected-president/

Hillary Clinton:

“Here’s how elected Republicans and conservative media can begin the healing and unifying process: Accurately state that Joe Biden was duly elected president in a free and fair election,”

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To hell w "healing and unifying". We are at eternal political and cultural war w the far left (aka Democrats). No compromise.

xxxxxxxxxxx

sean davis:

It's long past time for GOP lawmakers in every state in the country to accept that Big Tech is at war with them, and to respond by making it impossible for Big Tech to do business in their states.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
https://www.breitbart.com/poli...y-elected-president/

Hillary Clinton:

“Here’s how elected Republicans and conservative media can begin the healing and unifying process: Accurately state that Joe Biden was duly elected president in a free and fair election,”

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To hell w "healing and unifying". We are at eternal political and cultural war w the far left (aka Democrats). No compromise.

"Conservative media"? The fuck is that?
Oh, and she can get stuffed. This is all coming from the woman who still blames Russia for her loss.

quote:

Originally posted by Largefarva:

This says otherwise. Plenty of other sources out there stating the same thing.

https://www.foxnews.com/politi...hment-efforts-report

quote:

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell supports Democrats' move to initiate impeachment proceedings against President Trump and is "done" and "furious" with him, sources familiar told Fox News.

Well, I ain't believing that bullshit for a second. Screw the media and their damned anonymous sources. I'm sick of it. I called McConnell a coward and will stand by that, but I want to hear it come out of his mouth directly. Freaking fake media, always trying to stir up crap.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy::

It's long past time for GOP lawmakers in every state in the country to accept that Big Tech is at war with them, and to respond by making it impossible for Big Tech to do business in their states.

You will enjoy reading this:

Internet provider blocks facebook and twitter

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
https://www.breitbart.com/poli...y-elected-president/

Hillary Clinton:

“Here’s how elected Republicans and conservative media can begin the healing and unifying process: Accurately state that Joe Biden was duly elected president in a free and fair election,”

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To hell w "healing and unifying". We are at eternal political and cultural war w the far left (aka Democrats). No compromise.

xxxxxxxxxxx

sean davis:

It's long past time for GOP lawmakers in every state in the country to accept that Big Tech is at war with them, and to respond by making it impossible for Big Tech to do business in their states.

Right after she stands up and admits she lost to Trump in a free and fair election....yeah, thought so bitch

Maybe the “conservative” media FOX, could explain why they excepted the results of a clearly fraudulent election without investigative journalism.

Perhaps they can ask the FBI about Ruby Freeman and others caught on film.

Maybe FOX can explain the fractional votes.

Maybe FOX can explain the transfer of votes from Trump to Biden.

Maybe FOX can explain the subtraction of votes from Trump.

Maybe FOX can explain the statistical improbability, bell weather counties and the like.

Maybe, Maybe, Maybe, so much evidence presented in hearings, but blocked from being presented in court.

Somebody had better address the evidence of fraud, don’t tell me it was fair without evidence.

Donald J. Trump stated he would drain the swamp if elected.

He has drained it. And all the vile creatures that live and thrive therein, are exposed.

Some still are covered in slime, but as they writhe, they shall, clearly, show themselves.

My head hurts. Who said what? Nope, maybe he didn't say it after all. Just what exactly can you believe? This is all turning into a real shit show.

My head hurts.

Karminator is still down, but here is the link to a good YouTube video:

'Agent Provocateur' Tactics Seen at Jan 6 US Capitol Protest—Interview With Michael Yon | Crossroads

Big tech has now taken down the oathkeepers website.

quote:

Originally posted Hillary Clinton:
“Here’s how elected Republicans and conservative media can begin the healing and unifying process: Accurately state that Joe Biden was duly elected president in a free and fair election,”

Oh it's on us, is it? GMAFB, lady. What you want is for us to roll over, and the what seems to be the last thing you want is for us to unify. Unbelievable.

quote:

Originally posted by techguy:
Big tech has now taken down the oathkeepers website.

This is insane.

Fantastic! Screw you Dorsey!

‘Gab’ CEO Pulls Off The Impossible For Trump...Completely Backed Up President Trump’s Twitter Account Before Deleted And Recreated Him On ‘Gab’

https://100percentfedup.com/ga...ecreated-him-on-gab/

Although I'm not likely to use Gab (I don't tweet), I think it's awesome that some actions to circumvent Twitter's censorship of Conservatives is under way. Go Gab!

flashguy

I can't see how this could hold up in court. A fair court that is. These leftists are beyond nasty and vindictive.

NYC terminating contracts with Trump Organization after Capitol riot

City Hall will yank the Trump Organization’s multimillion-dollar contracts to operate four popular attractions in the Big Apple’s public parks, Mayor Bill de Blasio announced Wednesday.

“The contracts make very clear that if the company and the leadership of that company is engaged in illegal activity, we have a right to severe the contract,” de Blasio said on MSNBC’s ‘Morning Joe’ on Wednesday morning. “Inciting an insurrection against the United States government clearly constitutes criminal activity.”

https://nypost.com/2021/01/13/...-capitol-hill-riots/

Pelosi Names Eric Swalwell As House Impeachment Manager

https://www.zerohedge.com/poli...-impeachment-manager

Speaker Nancy Pelosi shocked many in Washington by appointing Eric Swalwell as a house managers in the impeachment of President Donald Trump as he continues to face calls for his removal from the House Intelligence Committee due to his alleged intimate relationship with a Chinese spy.

Swalwell has been hunkered down to avoid questions from the media and the public, but he will now be one of those prosecuting the case against the President.

He allegedly first met the spy, Fang Fang or Christine Fang, in 2011. She not only raised money for Swalwell but reportedly had a personal relationship with him. She also pushed successfully for his office to accept an intern. He cut ties with her in 2015 after the FBI contacted him. Pelosi made no mention of the scandal in heralding Swalwell’s credentials:

“Congressman Swalwell serves on House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where he chairs the Intelligence Modernization and Readiness Subcommittee, and on the Judiciary Committee,” Pelosi’s office said in a statement. “He is a former prosecutor and is the son and brother of law enforcement officers. He is serving his fifth term in Congress.”

Usually a speaker selects House managers to reinforce the credibility and integrity of the case against a president. Even before the current scandal, Swalwell was viewed as a member who was a raw partisan. Last year, it was revealed that (despite long denials) the FBI did send an agent to report on his observations within the Trump campaign. As I discussed in a column, Democratic members spent years mocking allegations that there was any spying or surveillance of Trump or his campaign by the FBI. That was just a conspiracy theory. Now however there is proof that the FBI used a briefing in August 2016 of then candidate Trump to gather information for “Crossfire Hurricane,” the Russia investigation. It turns out that it did not really matter after all and Rep. Eric Swalwell did not miss a step. Swalwell declared that such targeting of the opposing party and its leading presidential candidate was “the right thing to do.” That’s it. A conspiracy theory suddenly becomes a commendable act.

quote:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi shocked many in Washington by appointing Eric Swalwell as a house managers in the impeachment of President Donald Trump as he continues to face calls for his removal from the House Intelligence Committee due to his alleged intimate relationship with a Chinese spy.

The Babylon Bee couldn't make this up.

The plan is to attack Trump and his family nonstop after he is out of office. Regardless of evidence or proof. The swamp on both sides of the aisle want he and his family gone.

Rush to judgement? Three crucial questions remain unanswered about Capitol siege

What did Nancy Pelosi know? A prior plot or spontaneous riot? Were there inside facilitators?

https://justthenews.com/govern..._campaign=newsletter

One thing recent history has taught America is the first storyline of major tragedies or controversies is never the most accurate.

Americans were told by the Bush administration that they were sucker-punched by a surprise attack on 9/11 by terrorists, only to learn the CIA and FBI had significant advance evidence of the plot and its players and failed to connect the dots.

Susan Rice originally told the nation that the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was carried out spontaneously by a mob angered by an anti-Muslim video. The attack, it turned out, was pre-planned and carried out by an al-Qaeda-aligned terror group in Libya.

The country was assured Christopher Steele's dossier provided credible evidence of Donald Trump colluding with Russia, when in fact the CIA and FBI knew almost immediately it was uncorroborated and based in part on Russian disinformation.

And now just a week after the heinous and deadly siege of the U.S. Capitol, the final narrative of what actually happened is still being written, revised and unmasked.

Since the weekend, major bombshell revelations already have substantially revised the initial story of a spontaneous mob overrunning an unsuspecting Capitol police force.

The FBI admitted Tuesday it received information ahead of the Jan. 6 tragedy suggesting some participants were planning a "war" on the Capitol, including killing officers and distributing maps of the complex. It alerted Washington D.C. law enforcement through the joint terrorism task force alert system. It also "disrupted" the travel plans of some of the suspected trouble-makers.

"We developed some intelligence that a number of individuals were planning to travel to the D.C. area with intentions to cause violence," Assistant Director Steven M. D'Antuono said. "We immediately shared that information, and action was taken."

The New York Police Department is reported to have given the Capitol Police similar intelligence warnings of impending violence.

The chief federal prosecutor in Washington declared Tuesday he is pursuing conspiracy charges, signaling the attacks on the Capitol involved multiple acts and multiple conspirators working in concert with each other. The prosecutor talked about the planting of carefully constructed IEDs as one such act. In other words, there was pre-planning for some elements of last Wednesday's chaos.

And the official timeline of events constructed by the New York Times through videos shows protesters began breaching the perimeter of the Capitol a full 20 minutes before Trump finished his speech.

This new evidence raises the first compelling question that remains unanswered. How could Trump incite an attack that had already been pre-planned and was in motion before his speech ended?

A senior intelligence official told Just the News he has found no evidence that the president, the White House or the National Security Council was alerted in formal intelligence briefings to the pre-warnings or suspicions of violence the FBI and NYPD have admitted they had.

D'Antuono explained that one of the concerns the FBI had was trying to distinguish whether those writing "despicable things on the internet are just practicing keyboard bravado or they actually have the intent to do harm."

Former NYPD Commissioner Bernard Kerik told Just the News on Tuesday it appeared the FBI and NYPD did their job in alerting the Capitol Police, but the evidence of a pre-planned attack would undercut the current narrative that Trump had incited a spontaneous insurrection.

"By all accounts, the FBI, NYPD and other authorities did exactly what they should have done by conducting interviews and making notifications to the Washington D.C. authorities," Kerik said. "If these reports are true, you cannot incite a group that already pre-planned acts of violence by days or weeks, and it raises serious questions as to what security precautions were taken at the Capitol as a result."

Getting the facts to resolve this question is essential for congressional and federal investigators, both for the legacy of Trump and for learning how to avoid a repeat of the deadly tragedy that struck last Wednesday.

The second major question that remains unanswered is: What did House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the other leaders in Congress know — and when did they know it — about the possibility for violence and the Pentagon's pre-attack offer to send National Guardsmen to reinforce the Capitol Police?

The U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, who resigned after the attack, told The Washington Post that security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early request to call in the National Guard ahead of a protest.

Sund alleged that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence. He says Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger recommended that he informally request the Guard to be ready in case it was needed to maintain security.

Irving and Stenger have not talked publicly. But their account will be essential to the final effort to assign accountability for the glaring security lapses exposed last Wednesday. The key questions for both men is whether they warned Pelosi or Senate Leaders Mitch McConnell and Chuck Schumer about the violence concerns or consulted with the leaders about the idea of activating the Guard.

Democrats for weeks were concerned by the pro-Trump rally and previously had criticized Trump for using National Guard to quell Black Lives Matter riots in the summer. The leadership's discussions with their security chiefs now becomes an essential investigative focus.

Finally, there is this troubling third question: Were there facilitators inside the Capitol and outside it who instigated or enabled the attack to be carried out?

Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) one of the House's longest serving and most respected members, first raised this question a few days ago. He aptly noted that protesters were able to locate and penetrate his unlisted, unmarked office within minutes, raising the possibility they had inside help.

And video taken contemporaneously shows officers and other people opening doors to rushing rioters and some people — purported by the filming cameramen to be leftist anarchists —smashing windows and urging protesters to jump into the Capitol.

Identifying any insider help and the motives will be the final and perhaps most delicate task investigators face.

It appears that I am in an abusive relationship with the Democrat Party / mass media.



https://www.thewmhi.com/wp-con...ship-Infographic.pdf