I dont

Let the socialist side of the dim party eat the other side. Its already begun.

But populists like Trump are the only thing the globalists are afraid of (like Boris Johnson, Orban in Hungary and Duda in Poland)

quote:

Originally posted by skyline009:
Have anyone ever wonder why the fuck the republican party are so worthless, may be they know regardless how bad they are we will still hold the nose to vote for them because we don't want democrats in power. I believe is time to change the strategy don't have to agree with me.

Well, thank God the "high court" has its priorities in order.

High court agrees to hear NCAA athlete compensation case

https://sports.yahoo.com/high-...-ncaa-145039314.html

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
[ slow clap ]

So heroic.

Not trying to be heroic. I'm utterly fed up with the GOP--particularly the GOP in my state.

quote:

Originally posted by 12131:
^^^ I wouldn't worry about the House. Several patriots there. For sure more than in the Senate.

This! I’m thinking Gaetz also. Our area is largely TRUMP country!

Rand Paul signaled he may vote no on certification of the electors.

Saw it on Citizen Free Press late last night.

Here it is:Rand Paul

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
Well, thank God the "high court" has its priorities in order.

High court agrees to hear NCAA athlete compensation case

https://sports.yahoo.com/high-...-ncaa-145039314.html

Unfuckingreal. Those people (SCOTUS)are an absolute disgrace. Here I was thinking the three nominees Trump put there were going to actually do their job and defend the Constitution...recent events have clearly shown they couldn’t give a shit.

quote:

Originally posted by ensigmatic:

Not trying to be heroic. I'm utterly fed up with the GOP--particularly the GOP in my state.

Well, I can't say I blame you. I'm fed up as well. Just watched a bit of the Senate hearing on "election irregularities" on Newsmax, and some of these Republicans...ugh, nevermind. I had to switch it off.

My guess is that this 'leak' was planned/staged...around the 5min mark Ol' Sleepy is talking about how the Constitution is our only hope and he doesn't have the Executive Authority to ban [so called] 'assault weapons'...




Link to original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lEGCH9_gvE

Is Friday December 18th the 45th day mentioned in the 2018 executive order where the DNI needs to act?

quote:

Originally posted by Dzozer:
Is Friday December 18th the 45th day mentioned in the 2018 executive order where the DNI needs to act?

By my counting, it is.

maybe wishful thinking, but would be epic...


@MajorPatriot


Weiner Laptop
Jeffrey Epstein
Hunter Biden Laptop
Durham Report
DECLAS
Hillary's Server
Julian Assange & Seth Rich

What if these things, and more, that embody secrets so devastating they could take down entire governments were to culminate in a near simultaneous release date?

https://twitter.com/MajorPatri.../1339214799431999492

Cruz will stand up. I have no doubt.

So all they need are two in each chamber?

Then the House votes by state? We have it then.

The problem is Harris will be VP then though because the Senate trash like Romney will vote for her.

quote:

Originally posted by Boss1:
My guess is that this 'leak' was planned/staged...around the 5min mark Ol' Sleepy is talking about how the Constitution is our only hope and he doesn't have the Executive Authority to ban [so called] 'assault weapons'...




Link to original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lEGCH9_gvE

You’re correct. It has to be nothing but political posturing. I imagine it’s for two reasons. One being January 6th...try to minimize the chance of objections. And two, January 5th...Georgia run off election.

In both cases, the chances of them winning go up if we think there isn’t anything to worry about. Don’t trust that for one single second. For instance...he campaigned on the premise that he was specifically going after assault weapons.

These people have no mandate...far from it. Biden will be a cuckold, but the left prefers that to Trump. These folks don't even care if you know they staged a coup...they just desperately want Trump gone.

quote:

Originally posted by Ackks:
Cruz will stand up. I have no doubt.

So all they need are two in each chamber?

Then the House votes by state? We have it then.

The problem is Harris will be VP then though because the Senate trash like Romney will vote for her.

There are ways to deal with a VP... Permanent assignment as Ambassador to Antarctica!

quote:

Originally posted by Ackks:
Cruz will stand up. I have no doubt.

So all they need are two in each chamber?

Then the House votes by state? We have it then.

The problem is Harris will be VP then though because the Senate trash like Romney will vote for her.

That's not quite right. In that scenario, the Electoral Count Act of 1887 will come into play. It states that “Objections to individual state returns must be made in writing by at least one Member each of the Senate and House of Representatives. If an objection meets these requirements, the joint session recesses and the two houses separate and debate the question in their respective chambers for a maximum of two hours. The two houses then vote separately to accept or reject the objection. They then reassemble in joint session, and announce the results of their respective votes. An objection to a state’s electoral vote must be approved by both houses in order for any contested votes to be excluded.”

The Republicans can do this for each contested state's electors. You can count on at least 4 Republican senators voting against us (you can guess who they are). With a tie, 48-48, the tie is broken by the state's governor who would certify the results.

Everything here is a huge longshot at this point. If nothing else, the ECA can be used as a delaying tactic. But can they delay it enough where it finally would go to the House delegates and the Senate? Not likely.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

That's not quite right. In that scenario, the Electoral Count Act of 1887 will come into play. It states that “Objections to individual state returns must be made in writing by at least one Member each of the Senate and House of Representatives. If an objection meets these requirements, the joint session recesses and the two houses separate and debate the question in their respective chambers for a maximum of two hours. The two houses then vote separately to accept or reject the objection. They then reassemble in joint session, and announce the results of their respective votes. An objection to a state’s electoral vote must be approved by both houses in order for any contested votes to be excluded.”

The Republicans can do this for each contested state's electors. You can count on at least 4 Republican senators voting against us (you can guess who they are). With a tie, 48-48, the tie is broken by the state's governor who would certify the results.

Everything here is a huge longshot at this point. If nothing else, the ECA can be used as a delaying tactic. But can they delay it enough where it finally would go to the House delegates and the Senate? Not likely.

Thanks. So that putz in the video makes it sound like we have a chance that way, but we don't. There is no way Romney will ever help us along with the other two idiots. If just the House votes by state then that will help us.

Otherwise, the Insurrection Act is the only path. That's if the guy in the video was correct about that. If the military is sent into each state to do a full and forensic recount we probably pull that out.

Money From Facebook’s Zuckerberg Used to Undermine Election, Violate Law: Report
By Zachary Stieber
December 16, 2020 Updated: December 16, 2020

Hundreds of millions of dollars from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg was used to violate election laws, according to a new report.

The Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society, a national constitutional litigation organization, released the 39-page report, alleging that Zuckerberg’s $500 million given to election officials was used to treat voters unequally and improperly influence the election for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.

The bulk of the funds went to the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), a nonprofit started by former managers and staff at the New Organizing Institute, a progressive nonprofit.

According to the report, the nonprofit earlier this year “began sending agents into states to recruit certain Democrat strongholds to prepare grants requesting monies from” it.

For example, the center gave $100,000 to Cory Mason, the mayor of Racine, Wisconsin, to recruit four other cities to develop a plan and request a larger grant from it. Those five cities submitted such a plan in June and received $6.3 million to implement it.

That kind of privatization of elections “undermines the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), which requires state election plans to be submitted to federal officials and approved and requires respect for equal protection by making all resources available equally to all voters,” the report states.

“The provision of Zuckerberg-CTCL funds allowed these Democrat strongholds to spend roughly $47 per voter, compared to $4 to $7 per voter in traditionally Republican areas of the state. Moreover, this recruiting of targeted jurisdictions for specific government action and funding runs contrary to legislative election plans and invites government to play favorites in the election process.”


Mason’s spokesperson didn’t respond to a request for comment, nor did a Facebook spokesperson nor CTCL’s media office.

“This effectively is a shadow government running our elections,” Phill Kline, director of the Amistad Project, said at a press conference in Virginia.

“Government has the core responsibility of managing elections. We don’t put out elections for bid. We don’t have elections brought to you by Coca Cola. It is government’s job to manage elections, and it must do so without a thumb on the scale,” he added.

The project said the main foundations funding the efforts include The Democracy Fund, New Venture Fund, Skoll Foundation, and Knight Foundation

Other nonprofits deemed key to distributing the money besides CTCL were named as the Center for Electronic Innovation Research, the Center for Civic Design, the National Vote at Home Institute, the Center for Secure and Modern Elections, and Rock the Vote.

None immediately responded to requests for comment.

LINK

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
Well, thank God the "high court" has its priorities in order.

High court agrees to hear NCAA athlete compensation case

https://sports.yahoo.com/high-...-ncaa-145039314.html

Well they are a busy bunch!!

quote:

The Supreme Court on Monday turned down a request to salvage a Kansas law that required residents to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote, despite pleas from Kansas lawyers and almost 20 red states.

Link

Trump Lawyer: Campaign Wasn’t ‘Allowed a Forensic Audit’ of Nevada Voting Machines
By Jack Phillips
December 16, 2020 Updated: December 16, 2020
biggersmaller Print

One of President Donald Trump’s election lawyers told Senators that their team’s efforts in Nevada to obtain evidence to file lawsuits were met with denials from relevant election officials.

“Paper [ballot] backups that were supposed to provide such transparency” were not given to the team, said lawyer Jesse Binnall on Wednesday in front of the Senate Homeland Security committee. Binnall said that across the “entire state of Nevada,” there was “zero transparency” from election officials.

What’s more, he said, Trump’s lawyers were “denied any meaningful discovery in the case to examine the full extent of the voter fraud” that allegedly occurred in the state, including their investigations into whether 4,000 non-U.S. citizens voted. The suit also alleged that more than 60,000 people voted twice or were not residents of Nevada.

On Dec. 4, Judge James Russell denied the campaign’s lawsuit.

Russell wrote in his order that the Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that any illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, for any other improper or illegal reason, nor in an amount equal to or greater than 33,596, or otherwise in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election.”

State election officials declared they saw no evidence of voter fraud or irregularities in Nevada that would overturn the result of the election in the state, which has six Electoral College votes.

But in the hearing, Binnall said that Trump’s campaign didn’t have enough time to obtain evidence, as per the judge’s ruling.

“We couldn’t put that into evidence because the court ruled that it was too late,” the lawyer noted on Wednesday, saying they only had about “three days” to procure evidence of irregularities or fraud.

As they probed the alleged irregularities, Binnall said they were also refused access by state election officials to the code of voting machines for a forensic review or whether “they were hooked up to the internet,” while accusing the state of “denying transparency.” He stated: “We weren’t allowed near them … we weren’t allowed a forensic audit.”

The state election officials, he argued, told Trump’s team that the voting machine software code “is proprietary,” meaning it’s not open source due to intellectual property rights. Binnall, however, flagged this explanation as problematic as these machines aided in vote-counting.

“We were denied [transparency] at every single turn” in Nevada, he said, adding that one Nevada official “locked himself in his office” and wouldn’t open the door when Trump’s lawyers tried to serve him a subpoena.

According to a sworn affidavit citing Nevada DMV records, some 3,987 non-American citizens voted in the state on Nov. 3. In Nevada, both illegal and legal non-citizens can obtain drivers’ licenses or ID cards. It’s illegal for non-citizens to vote in U.S. elections.

The Epoch Times has reached out for a comment from the Nevada Secretary of State’s office following Binnall’s remarks.

LINK