Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Tequila with lime |
If you live in a state that used Dominion voting machines, even if it isn't a swing state, call your rep and demand an audit. The machines likely stole a lot more than the presidency. Also, every bit of evidence accumulated that shows these machines are used for fraud further undermines any legitimacy Biden has. Thank you President Trump. | |||
|
Member |
I just sent an email to Lauren Underwood to ask for a complete audit of the election results. I highly doubt it’ll do any good but I still sent it anyway. I can’t see how anyone can be happy with a 68% error rate. This simply cannot be ignored. | |||
|
Lawyers, Guns and Money |
See-Nothing, Do-Nothing Judiciary Unleashes Dred Scott 2020 Bob Maistros ‘Republicans have lost more than 50 court cases” relating to election fraud and illegalities, parrots the traditional media ad infinitum and gleefully. CNN crows of “desperate appeals and baseless conspiracy theories.” But the burgeoning legal body count is no indicator of legal incompetence, flight of fancy nor quixotic stubbornness. Rather, it’s a measure of the American judiciary’s historic failure at all levels to protect the integrity of the electoral process, defend the Constitution, and ultimately, perhaps, preserve the union. “Do you think we’re stupid?” Trump legal team leader Rudy Giuliani queried plaintively as the vote heist unfolded. No, Mr. Mayor. Your well-organized opposition doesn’t think you’re not stupid. But does think – nay, knows – you’rehelpless. Helpless on short notice to expose and counter the near-perfect crime Democrats orchestrated over months of war-gaming and legal positioning. Helpless against traditional media ranks closing around Joe Biden and outright taunting the president. (One national anchorman recently tossed off that The Donald “refuses to admit he has lost.” “Refuses” connoting pigheadedness, “admit” a deprecatory form of the more traditional “concede,” and “has lost” a conclusion the blow-dried Ron Burgundy-type was not yet in position to draw.) Helpless against rules rigged outside legal and constitutional frameworks amid pandemic panic, some with acquiescence of spineless, brain-dead Republican officials. But most of all, helpless in the face of the high legal mountain to climb. That mountain consists, first of all, of the need for “clear evidence” of irregularities sufficient to overturn the result. In fact, the Trump team is hamstrung by mindless repetition of the talking point alleging “no evidence” at all of election fraud. Oh. You mean “no evidence” like thousands of pages of election worker affidavits? Like refusing bipartisan access to vote counting? Like tossed absentee envelopes? Like constitutionally impermissible variances in intrastate review standards? Like the statistical impossibility and suspicious timing of near-simultaneous vote dumps across four states almost unanimously in favor of one candidate? Like video evidence appearing to show officials pulling out hidden ballots after dismissing observers? Or even like the executive branch amendments of election laws, constitutionally required to be established only by state legislatures, and passed expressly to prevent the exact frauds that may have eventuated? You mean that kind of non-existent “evidence?” Meanwhile, in the words of one prominent legal blog, there’s judicial “reluctance to wade into post-election litigation” on the part of the Supreme Court in particular – still institutionally burned by fierce leftist reaction to appropriate intervention in Bush v. Gore. Yeah? Where, pray tell, was the Supremes’ “reluctance,” for example, to disenfranchise majorities affirming traditional marriage in 31 sovereign states? “Reluctance” to baldly rewrite federal law creating a cause of action for transgender funeral home employees cross-dressing in the presence of grieving families? Or “reluctance” to step in and recast a penalty as a “tax” to preserve an otherwise unconstitutional enactment? Suddenly “reluctant” courts hide behind procedural dodges to avert their duty to ensure a credible and lawful electoral process. As if “laches” – mere delay in bringing a suit – overrides basic questions of constitutionality. And a state has no standing – “judicially cognizable interest” – in challenging unconstitutional actions, including potential violations of federal law, that negate the actual national presidential results to which their citizens’ votes contributed. Not to mention another outrageous Catch 22: wrongdoings – no matter how egregious – that cannot be shown without further investigation to be large enough to change outcomes must be ignored. But if they are massive in extent, then relief shouldn’t be granted that “disenfranchises” so many voters – even if their “votes” are illegal or non-existent. BTW, since when is a theft’s size a reason to excuse it? “Bernie Madoff stole $65 billion? That’s so much money it would be unfair to take it away from him.” C’mon, man. Here, we’re only talking about purloining the entire presidency. It would have been little skin off various courts’ backs to allow suits to advance, facilitating discovery and deposition of officials involved in suspicious activity and potentially, even disproving charges of fraud, thereby instilling greater confidence in the result one way or another. Instead, the Supreme Court’s two punts this week unleash Dred Scott 2020 (without the racial overtones). Like the original, they will inflame tensions and potentially, create further momentum toward America’s sundering. And make no mistake, that momentum is growing. More commentators, even legends like Rush Limbaugh and Pat Buchanan, bring it up daily. One anonymous pundit actually proffers an intriguing scenario, a red county-led separation, that would leave this correspondent on the wrong side of the divide – in a Republican state but one of America’s bluest local jurisdictions. More important, Texas’ now-spurned lawsuit provides a potential stepping stone: 18 states are now on record alleging a stolen presidency. From there, it’s only a hop, skip and a jump to the Declaration of Dissolution previously suggested in this space. The judiciary, most notably the high court, could have helped avert that outcome. Instead, in the words of a previous president, the justices could join scorned Roger Taney not just on the wrong side of the coming split, but on the wrong side of history. https://issuesinsights.com/202...hes-dred-scott-2020/ "Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." -- Justice Janice Rogers Brown "The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth." -rduckwor | |||
|
Member |
We didn’t get a lot for our money or the grief caused to President Trump. Barr & Sessions, two peas in a pod. Do nothing scalawags. | |||
|
I have a very particular set of skills |
^^Chelllim1 - good article, pretty much sums it up. Short version - we're being steam-rolled by a massive system that was allowed to stack the deck, the dealer, and the entire casino against us. Quite possibly the most appalling example of outright fraud ever perpetrated on democracy. Wait until Jan. 21 when they quit even trying to pretend with this unity BS they're shoveling... Embrace the serfdom folks. $.02 worth, Boss A real life Sisyphus... "It's not the critic who counts..." TR Exodus 23.2: Do not follow the crowd in doing wrong... Despite some people's claims to the contrary, 5 lbs. is actually different than 12 lbs. It's never simple/easy. | |||
|
Member |
This shit won’t stop until we make it stop and I’m not talking about the just us system. | |||
|
Member |
An article posted over at Treehouse, from a website called ‘readsludge.com’, published 6/10/19 - As He Blocks Election Security Bills, McConnell Takes Checks from Voting Machine Lobbyists. The swamp is very deep and extremely dangerous. __________ "I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal labotomy." | |||
|
Lighten up and laugh |
Welcome to another day of gaslighting. Nothing happened, we are delusional, just give up and accept it. Meanwhile, globalists, communists, and socialists just conspired together to steal the election in broad daylight. The future of our republic will be determined in the next few weeks. | |||
|
Member |
Half the folks in the country just whimpered & shrugged their shoulders and go on as if nothing has happened. Totally oblivious or flat ass don’t care. Regular Americans love our country and will stand with President Trump. | |||
|
Irksome Whirling Dervish |
My take is slightly different on the swamp and voting results. Dems, by and large it's the Dems, do the cheating, ballot harvesting, and everything else in the drunken quest for power. I accept and expect that in nearly every election since their track record for honest elections seems to be fleeting. Since there are iffy things going on in these elections, I want to see some evidence of the plans, plots, execution methodology, other communication or other markers of it happening. Not theory, not possibilities but actual evidence of the plan and how it was going to be put in place and who did it. This vast nationwide election made it obvious that many people hated Trump and didn't want him no matter what but where is the evidence of a concerted effort to rig the election? With all the resources available to the government, Trump and operatives who do shady things, there has to be an electronic trail or breadcrumb. There's nothing. Even if there was a vast plan with brainiacs figuring out the logistics, there's always an idiot in the group who makes a mistake or tips his hand but here there isn't a thing that says this is the plan, Joe needs XXXX number of ballots in this location, we need to stage them and all that. Evidence of a conspiracy and plan seems to be sorely missing. | |||
|
Member |
^^^^ Oh good, he's back. Anyway, Limbaugh is suggesting that without Trump, the old media criminal bastards will have nothing to talk about. Rush isn't alone saying that. I'll suggest there will be a flurry of executive orders, proposals and initiatives that will inflame the right. So rather than pump up Would-Be-President Biden's administration, the old media can get right back to work mocking and hating the right. Set the controls for the heart of the Sun. | |||
|
Member |
Well how in the hell do you expect anyone on the right side of this to get any evidence when everyone, every entity, is blocking the ability for discovery to happen? The only way is to put together a case with "real evidence" is to have a judge allow discovery. We know now from one of those brave judges in MI that the machines, tabulators and methods used for counting ballots do not meet rejection rate guidelines. We know that states violated election laws in their states and against the US constitution. There are sworn affidavits and whistleblowers detailing what they witnessed. Yet no one is allowing any significant discovery based on the evidence that is available. Why do you think that is? I am sick and tired of hearing there is nothing there. I don't believe it and millions of Americans do not believe it. I am amazed at how some of you IN A FREAKING GUN FORUM cannot admit this or are too damn obtuse to see it. My ignore list is getting long... The "Boz" | |||
|
I kneel for my God, and I stand for my flag |
Answer one simple question. Why did five "swing" states quit counting at the exact same time on election night? | |||
|
Member |
The media will be to busy singing corrupt joe's praises, then do the same over harris when it's her time. The right will be a distant memory. | |||
|
Lighten up and laugh |
Nobody here cares what you think. | |||
|
Member |
Same question I've been asking Democrats since that night, when Trump was clearly ahead in numbers in each of those five swing states. ********* "Some people are alive today because it's against the law to kill them". | |||
|
Nullus Anxietas |
In a word: Bullshit. There's plenty of evidence. Some of it even credible. What's missing is proof. And why is the proof missing? Well, could be there is no proof. Problem is: Since neither our law enforcement system or our court system stood up and demanded thorough investigations: We don't know. We'll never know. Thus Creepy Uncle Joe is and will remain of questionable legitimacy in the minds of somewhere approaching half the country. "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher | |||
|
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie |
Because a toilet overflowed in Atlanta. Apparently. ~Alan Acta Non Verba NRA Life Member (Patron) God, Family, Guns, Country Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan | |||
|
I have a very particular set of skills |
Anyone who reads this ^^ (on top of everything else) and still spews the 'no evidence' BS should return home to their villages immediately. Embrace the serfdom. $.02 worth Boss A real life Sisyphus... "It's not the critic who counts..." TR Exodus 23.2: Do not follow the crowd in doing wrong... Despite some people's claims to the contrary, 5 lbs. is actually different than 12 lbs. It's never simple/easy. | |||
|
Member |
Boy what a fairy tale story that was! (The toilet BS) Everything is a lie with these people. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 ... 1267 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |