If you did not hear the Coffee county gent testify last week, you should. It should be queued up to start at 4:57:40, if not, that is where you should start it.

quote:

Originally posted by sjp:

quote:

Originally posted by feersum dreadnaught:
The fat lady has not yet performed. She's warming up though. But what shall she sing? Stay steadfast. As Cromwell said: "Put your trust in God, my boys, and keep your powder dry."


BREAKING: Wisconsin Supreme Court says election officials were wrong; ballots may not be counted

The opinion, which was released this morning, says local elections officials were wrong to suggest that voters could claim the status of "indefinitely confined" based on COVID-19. The majority decision also held that if voters falsely claimed they were indefinitely confined "their ballots would not count."

https://electionwiz.com/2020/1...-not-be-counted/amp/

I just thought this needed to be repeated.

That isn't what I've read.

quote:

https://www.jsonline.com/story...dens-win/6529642002/
Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds Biden's win, rejects Trump lawsuit
MADISON - The Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld Democrat Joe Biden's Wisconsin win Monday, handing President Donald Trump a defeat less than an hour before the Electoral College was to meet.

The 4-3 ruling was the latest in a string of dozens of losses for the president across the country as Republicans pursue last-gasp efforts to give Trump a second term.

In the majority, conservative Justice Brian Hagedorn joined the court's three liberals to confirm Biden's win. They found one of Trump's arguments was without merit and the others were brought far too late.

Trump's challenges to Wisconsin's voting laws "come long after the last play or even the last game; the (Trump) Campaign is challenging the rulebook adopted before the season began," Hagedorn wrote.

Justice Brian Hagedorn
The three other conservatives on the court dissented, writing they believed clerks violated the law with some election practices.

"The majority does not bother addressing what the boards of canvassers did or should have done, and instead, four members of this court throw the cloak of (timing) over numerous problems that will be repeated again and again, until this court has the courage to correct them," Chief Justice Patience Roggensack wrote for the dissenters.

Alongside Hagedorn in the majority were Justices Ann Walsh Bradley, Rebecca Dallet and Jill Karofsky. In dissent were Roggensack and Justices Rebecca Bradley and Annette Ziegler. (The Bradleys are not related.)

quote:

Wisconsin Supreme Court rejects Trump’s call to disqualify ballots

https://www.channel3000.com/wi...o-disqualify-ballot/

So they tossed Trump's and Mark Jefferson and the Republican Party of Wisconsin won? Why can't I find any other stories about our win if they are tossing ballots? Confusing as heck. So what does this mean?

So 6 of the 7 justices on the Wisconsin supreme Court are women?

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
where is it cited that Barr said "it's the deposed king ranting"

Thanks for that, sdy. Clearly the news source I used insinuated that those were Barr's actual words. In fact, Mark Steyn may have been bamboozled too as that's who I first heard it from, and then I "verified" it separately. As careful and cynical as I have become with all news sources, I was still possibly mislead.

I first heard it reading you're post and then heard Steyn reporting it. Quite frankly it does not change my view of him. I see little difference between him and Sessions in terms of getting anything done and he has had ample opportunity.

quote:

Originally posted by Ackks:

quote:

Originally posted by sjp:

quote:

Originally posted by feersum dreadnaught:
The fat lady has not yet performed. She's warming up though. But what shall she sing? Stay steadfast. As Cromwell said: "Put your trust in God, my boys, and keep your powder dry."


BREAKING: Wisconsin Supreme Court says election officials were wrong; ballots may not be counted

The opinion, which was released this morning, says local elections officials were wrong to suggest that voters could claim the status of "indefinitely confined" based on COVID-19. The majority decision also held that if voters falsely claimed they were indefinitely confined "their ballots would not count."

https://electionwiz.com/2020/1...-not-be-counted/amp/

I just thought this needed to be repeated.

That isn't what I've read.

quote:

https://www.jsonline.com/story...dens-win/6529642002/
Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds Biden's win, rejects Trump lawsuit
MADISON - The Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld Democrat Joe Biden's Wisconsin win Monday, handing President Donald Trump a defeat less than an hour before the Electoral College was to meet.

The 4-3 ruling was the latest in a string of dozens of losses for the president across the country as Republicans pursue last-gasp efforts to give Trump a second term.

In the majority, conservative Justice Brian Hagedorn joined the court's three liberals to confirm Biden's win. They found one of Trump's arguments was without merit and the others were brought far too late.

Trump's challenges to Wisconsin's voting laws "come long after the last play or even the last game; the (Trump) Campaign is challenging the rulebook adopted before the season began," Hagedorn wrote.

Justice Brian Hagedorn
The three other conservatives on the court dissented, writing they believed clerks violated the law with some election practices.

"The majority does not bother addressing what the boards of canvassers did or should have done, and instead, four members of this court throw the cloak of (timing) over numerous problems that will be repeated again and again, until this court has the courage to correct them," Chief Justice Patience Roggensack wrote for the dissenters.

Alongside Hagedorn in the majority were Justices Ann Walsh Bradley, Rebecca Dallet and Jill Karofsky. In dissent were Roggensack and Justices Rebecca Bradley and Annette Ziegler. (The Bradleys are not related.)

quote:

Wisconsin Supreme Court rejects Trump’s call to disqualify ballots

https://www.channel3000.com/wi...o-disqualify-ballot/

So they tossed Trump's and Mark Jefferson and the Republican Party of Wisconsin won? Why can't I find any other stories about our win if they are tossing ballots? Confusing as heck. So what does this mean?

There were 2 cases, they went against Trump on one and for him on the other. At least that's how I understood it.

^Thanks. Funny how nothing can be found online abut the win. That would be huge though if WI flips. Still need two more states, but it's a good start.

from May 2020

quote:

Originally posted by feersum dreadnaught:
The fat lady has not yet performed. She's warming up though. But what shall she sing? Stay steadfast. As Cromwell said: "Put your trust in God, my boys, and keep your powder dry."


BREAKING: Wisconsin Supreme Court says election officials were wrong; ballots may not be counted

The opinion, which was released this morning, says local elections officials were wrong to suggest that voters could claim the status of "indefinitely confined" based on COVID-19. The majority decision also held that if voters falsely claimed they were indefinitely confined "their ballots would not count."

https://electionwiz.com/2020/1...-not-be-counted/amp/

It's a start!!! It is a move in the right direction.

Is it true some Electors are voting Trump in Nevada?

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
from May 2020

They 'fact checked' Trump's assertion in the debate that the vaccine would likely be available by the end of the year. Basically called the POTUS a liar and suggested 'experts' believed the vaccine would begin shipping in the second quarter of 2021. The 'media' in this country literally campaigned for slow Joe.

quote:

Originally posted by lastmanstanding:

My disdain for Barr has been no secret for sometime now. But in deference to others here who just a short time ago had a much more positive opinion of him I stopped negative posting about Barr. He needs to be relegated to obscurity in the same place Hillary is. Just another swamp rat who did not have the moral compass or courage to be in the position he held. Another feckless self serving bastard who when history called him he lacked the courage and fortitude to answer the call.

When Barr was first appointed, I was quite thrilled as I assumed he would do his job. Everyone here knows what happens when you "assume", and I should have taken that into consideration, as I was dead wrong about his performance! Low-life scum-sucking worthless POS is all he turned out to be!!!

quote:

Originally posted by sigalert:
Is it true some Electors are voting Trump in Nevada?

Just saw it on YouTube
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=...KhM&feature=youtu.be

Crucial Logs Missing From Antrim County Dominion Voting Machines: Forensics Report

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...reaking-2020-12-14-4

Crucial security and adjudication logs are missing from Dominion Voting Systems machines from Michigan’s Antrim County, according to a forensics report (pdf) released on Dec. 14 in compliance with a court order.

https://beta.documentcloud.org...nty-forensics-report

“Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years; but all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing. The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes. The lack of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the same software,” the report, authored by Russell Ramsland, states.

“We must conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.”

The absence of the adjudication logs is particularly alarming because the forensic exam found that the voting machines rejected an extraordinary number of ballots for adjudication, a manual process in which election workers determine the ultimate outcome for each ballot.

“The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots,” Ramsland said. “We observed an error rate of 68.05 percent. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.”

“These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws,” he added. “Because the intentional high error rate generates large numbers of ballots to be adjudicated by election personnel, we must deduce that bulk adjudication occurred. However, because files and adjudication logs are missing, we have not yet determined where the bulk adjudication occurred or who was responsible for it. Our research continues.”

Ramsland manages the Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG), which includes former Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and Central Intelligence Agency officials. The group focuses on cybersecurity and open-source network penetration testing.

ASOG examined Dominion products in Antrim County earlier this month as part of an ongoing case. The team inspected and performed forensic duplication on the county’s election management server, which was running Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5.3-002, compact flash cards used by local precincts in their Dominion ImageCast system, USB memory sticks used by Dominion Voter Assist Terminals, and USB memory sticks used for the poll book.

In addition to missing adjudication logs, the examination found that the systems are also missing security logs prior to 11 p.m. on Nov. 4.

“This means that all security logs for the day after the election, on Election Day, and prior to Election Day are gone. Security logs are very important to an audit trail, forensics, and for detecting advanced persistent threats and outside attacks, especially on systems with outdated system files,” Ramsland said.

“These logs would contain domain controls, authentication failures, error codes, times users logged on and off, network connections to file servers between file accesses, internet connections, times, and data transfers,” he added. “Other server logs before November 4, 2020 are present; therefore, there is no reasonable explanation for the security logs to be missing.”

13th Circuit Judge Kevin Elsenheimer approved the forensic examination in Bailey v. Antrim County, which alleges the infamous vote flip county officials reported last month may have not been the result of human error, as officials had alleged.

Elsenheimer earlier Monday agreed to let the report on the examination be published.

The office of Michigan’s Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Dominion, and a spokesman for Antrim County didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Erik Grill, an assistant attorney general, told the judge on Monday morning that Ramsland’s preliminary report was “inaccurate, incomplete, and misleading.” Haider Kazim, an attorney for the county, said it contained several errors the county believes were based on “faulty assumptions and incorrect assumptions.”

So is NV for show or was that the official 6 votes?

quote:

Originally posted by skyline009:

quote:

Originally posted by sigalert:
Is it true some Electors are voting Trump in Nevada?

Just saw it on YouTube
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=...KhM&feature=youtu.be

yes !!!!!

The governor of Michigan used state police to block GOP electors from the state capital. She literally interfered with the Electorate and violated the constitution. Literally on those grounds alone MI can be tossed out.

^^^^^^

Do the non-voting electors usually have a role in the process? I really don't know.

quote:

Originally posted by Ackks:
^Thanks. Funny how nothing can be found online abut the win. That would be huge though if WI flips. Still need two more states, but it's a good start.

We only need enough flips or disqualifications to bring Biden's count below 270. Even if Trump's numbers don't get to 270, that would throw the decision into the State legislatures.

flashguy

What court would throw out Michigan’s votes? That’s the problem, nothing matters, not the evidence, violating laws, the constitution, nothing. The governor of Michigan could have beheaded the GOP electors but no court is going to nullify any votes. If there is any way for Trump to get back into office it won’t be through the courts.