Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
Lin Wood, from Newsmax on Saturday night While the Supreme Court has rejected taking up Texas v. Pennsylvania, attorney Lin Wood on Newsmax TV said he is hopeful his case will be heard on merit and standing; otherwise, President Donald Trump and Martial law might be in order. "The premise of my case is simple: I take the position the Nov. 3 election was unlawful and unconstitutional, because the election was held using procedures for mail absentee ballots that were developed by the secretary of state in a backroom deal over the Democratic Party of March of 2020," Wood told Saturday's "The Count" with co-hosts Tom Basile and Heather Childers. "They changed the procedures and you cannot change the procedures in a federal election unless it is done by the state legislature. So, for that reason, the election is unlawful, the recount that followed was unlawful, and the Jan. 5 runoff is unlawful." Wood's case is filed with the Supreme Court against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. "I believe my case has merit," Wood told Basile. "I hope the Supreme Court will agree to hear it." On standing, Wood said he is filing his lawsuit as a voter in Georgia, which makes him the "property party to file the lawsuit." Wood noted Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's Texas v. Pennsylvania case was rejected Friday night not on merit, but standing. He added his calls for a special Georgia legislative session has been ignored by GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, GOP Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan, GOP Secretary of State Raffensperger, and GOP Attorney General Chris Carr. "They're not very responsive," Wood lamented. "I think that's because they've been corrupted by Chinese money, and they've got something to hide." If the U.S. Supreme Court continues to deny to hear election lawsuits, Wood suggested, Trump should declare "some extent of Martial law." "If the Supreme Court does not act, someone who cares about the rule of law in this country has to act: That would be President Donald Trump," Wood concluded. "If the Supreme Court does not act, I think the president should declare some extent of Martial law, and he should hold off an stay the electoral college. "Because we cannot have in this country, an election of our leader, where you have massive evidence of fraud and illegality. This country has to have a vote that has integrity. And the electoral college does not need to meet and vote until we have resolved these issues." | |||
|
Lawyers, Guns and Money |
Wisconsin judge, appointed by Trump, dismisses election lawsuit… A federal judge in Wisconsin on Saturday dismissed a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump against the state elections commission. The judge in the case, Brett Ludwig, who was appointed by Trump to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, held a hearing where the president’s lawyers made their arguments to set aside the result of the state’s popular election. “This is an extraordinary case,” wrote Ludwig in his decision Saturday. “A sitting president who did not prevail in his bid for reelection has asked for federal court help in setting aside the popular vote based on disputed issues of election administration, issues he plainly could have raised before the vote occurred.” “This Court has allowed plaintiff the chance to make his case and he has lost on the merits,” the judge wrote. In his reply brief, plaintiff ‘asks that the Rule of Law be followed’ …. It has been,” the judge continued. Ludwig dismissed the lawsuit “with prejudice. Trump’s lawyers had argued that guidance issued by the Wisconsin Elections Commission related to absentee ballots, “along with election officials’ conduct in reliance on that guidance,” deviated so much from state election law “that the election was itself a ‘failure,’ ” Ludwig wrote. But Ludwig wrote that Trump “has not proved that defendants violated his rights under the Electors Clause. To the contrary, the record shows Wisconsin’s Presidential Electors are being determined in the very manner directed by the Legislature, as required by Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution,” the judge said. **** Problem is, to have standing someone needs to have been harmed by the laws not being followed. Had Trump sued BEFORE the election he would not have been harmed at that point and the judge would have thrown it out for that reason. The judge knows this, I’m sure. Twisted logic: Trump wasn’t harmed because the electors are being determined by state law, ignoring the fact that their apportionment is being skewed by dramatic violations of the very same laws. If not for the violations of state law, the electors would be Trump electors, so Trump IS HARMED. It's becoming obvious that the Courts are not going to rise to the occasion. The judges in these cases are mostly dismissing on procedural grounds, such as lack of standing OR they are saying the remedy sought is too big and this is a question for the legislature, not the courts. "Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." -- Justice Janice Rogers Brown "The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth." -rduckwor | |||
|
Lawyers, Guns and Money |
Regarding the Supreme Court, Dick Morris says an unsayable truth. By Andrea Widburg Friday night, the Supreme Court’s rejected Texas’s case against the disputed states for “lack of standing.” There are a lot of theories for this decision, but Dick Morris said the unsayable: The Supreme Court was intimidated by the Democrats’ promised court-packing scheme. The Texas lawsuit went directly to the Supreme Court because it is the only court that can litigate a dispute between two states, and therefore has original jurisdiction for such disputes. Texas’s claim was that the defendant states, by violating constitutional mandates for conducting their elections, injured Texas – which used legal means to vote for Trump – by fraudulently handing the election to Biden. The Supreme Court, by a 7-2 margin, swiftly rejected the case: The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. That facile statement is an insult to Trump supporters. “Standing” is not a complicated concept. In Whitmore v. Arkansas (1990) 495 U.S. 149, 155, the Supreme Court explained, To establish an Art. III case or controversy, a litigant first must clearly demonstrate that he has suffered an “injury in fact.” That injury, we have emphasized repeatedly, must be concrete in both a qualitative and temporal sense. The complainant must allege an injury to himself that is “distinct and palpable,” . . . as opposed to merely “[a]bstract,” . . . and the alleged harm must be actual or imminent, not “conjectural” or “hypothetical.” *** Further, the litigant must satisfy the “causation” and “redressability” prongs of the Art. III minima by showing that the injury “fairly can be traced to the challenged action” and “is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision.” Texas met those requirements, showing an “injury in fact” that is “distinct and palpable,” that “can be traced to the challenged action” and that can be “redressed by a favorable decision.” Texas was not just whining how “another State conducts its elections.” This was not a case of “they ought to have used pink paper, not blue paper,” or “the polls should have been open an extra two hours.” Such inconsequential statements would have been claims of the type the Court’s statement described. What Texas alleged was more profound: The defendant states engaged in unconstitutional conduct to create the circumstances by which Democrat activists (and, possibly, foreign agents) could commit fraud in order to hand the election to Biden. Understood the proper way, not only does Texas, in which Trump won, have a say in what those states did, so does every Trump voter in America. It’s indisputable that the defendant states unconstitutionally changed their election laws through court action or settlement agreements. Additionally, in each defendant state, there is voluminous (and mostly uncontested) evidence that these rule changes allowed Democrats to engage in massive fraud to shift their citizens’ votes from Trump to Biden. Had this unconstitutionally enabled fraud not happened, the disputed states would have elected Trump and Trump would have won the national election. That Biden “won” the national election through this fraud is a real harm to every Trump voter and can be remedied through the Court’s intervention. There’s your standing. That being the case, why did the Supreme Court punt? One theory is that it wants “clean” cases that come up through the state court systems. Another theory is that the Court believes that this is an issue that legislatures, not the Court, should address. Marco Rubio has the right answer to that one: And then there’s Dick Morris’s take: “The Supreme Court is after justice, of course, but primarily they are after making sure the Supreme Court survives – that’s their institution and that’s their duty,” Morris told Saturday’s “The Count.” “I believe the Supreme Court was sent a message by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party during the election. “And the message was: ‘If you overturn this election, we will pack you, and make your Court basically meaningless.’” [snip] “And just ask yourself: Who raised the issue of Court packing? We didn’t. Why would the Democrats raise an issue that was hurting them? We would never bring it up; we never thought of packing the Court. They did.” Morris concluded, “it was a systemic effort, that succeeded, to intimidate the U.S. Supreme Court.” Unless the Supreme Court surprises me this coming week (and I really hope it does and that I am being wrong and unfair here), there’s every to believe reason that the justices are more concerned with status and safety than they are with election integrity and constitutional principles. Read more: https://www.americanthinker.co...h.html#ixzz6gW9mXqVl "Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." -- Justice Janice Rogers Brown "The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth." -rduckwor | |||
|
Lighten up and laugh |
Either we are delusional or the judges in our country have all been corrupted. No middle ground. I don't have faith in any of them choosing to do the right thing at this point. Sad knowing our country as we know it is gone. | |||
|
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie |
It doesn't sound like Trump's lawyers are arguing fraud in front of the court or bringing any evidence whatsoever regarding fraud. They are simply arguing about legalities in regards to state election laws and the Constitution, and federal judges and the Supreme Court don't seem to have any interest at all in weighing in on that. Freak me. It's the fraud damn it that is the issue here. But sadly it seems that it will be maybe years before the full extent of that is revealed. So damned frustrating. ~Alan Acta Non Verba NRA Life Member (Patron) God, Family, Guns, Country Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan | |||
|
Member |
Good video: Pennsylvania Sen. Doug Mastriano: We’re Standing Firm With Trump https://www.theepochtimes.com/...reaking-2020-12-13-1 _________________________ "Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." Mark Twain | |||
|
I have a very particular set of skills |
^^And the USSC decision has 'green lighted' every other court to turn a blind eye to all the corruption and fraud. They've effectively 'approved/legitimized' the steal across the board 'Well, SCOTUS says it's okay...'. There probably isn't a court in the US that will now do anything, which effectively kills any further investigations (pointless if courts will do nothing)... We'd have to find several voting machines with clear irrefutable admissable forensic evidence they flipped hundreds of thousands if not millions of votes at this point to stop the steal through legal remedy. We're a banana republic... they'll never 'loose' a meaningful election again, Embrace the serfdom. $.02 worth... Boss A real life Sisyphus... "It's not the critic who counts..." TR Exodus 23.2: Do not follow the crowd in doing wrong... Despite some people's claims to the contrary, 5 lbs. is actually different than 12 lbs. It's never simple/easy. | |||
|
Political Cynic |
The USSC has seriously underestimated the consequences from its decision. It’s desire for self preservation first and the country second is not going to stand well with a lot of people. They have in fact become political puppets and the people should now rightly take justice into their own hands since the court has absolved itself of any semblance of responsibility. | |||
|
Be not wise in thine own eyes |
A simple way to validate absentee ballots. This guy describes an easy method to verify ballots as fraudulent. Only problem is or politicians stand between us and the native ballot images that we the public own. “It’s a Real Simple Fact to Prove that There Was Massive Fraud in This Election” – Inventor of QR Code Can Prove It Jovan Hutton Pulitzer was mentioned in Michigan hearings. Parler Link to Michigan Hearing “We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,” Pres. Select, Joe Biden “Let’s go, Brandon” Kelli Stavast, 2 Oct. 2021 | |||
|
Lawyers, Guns and Money |
Still, I would not use that as an excuse not to vote. The Georgia Senate run-off elections are meaningful elections and all eyes will be on them. Don't stay home and just hand it to them. If they are to be stolen, make them work so hard for it that it's obvious and we may have a chance to stop it. "Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." -- Justice Janice Rogers Brown "The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth." -rduckwor | |||
|
Member |
Not only have the people lost faith in our elections, they've now lost faith in our judicial system. Civil war is coming whether people like it or not. | |||
|
Conveniently located directly above the center of the Earth |
Disagree. What we have 'lost faith in' is the fraudulent traitors in the positions of responsibility, who have distorted the legal process by their own partisan performance OUTSIDE the laws of that system. **************~~~~~~~~~~ "I've been on this rock too long to bother with these liars any more." ~SIGforum advisor~ "When the pain of staying the same outweighs the pain of change, then change will come."~~sigmonkey | |||
|
Lighten up and laugh |
Name a judge outside of the one brave woman in PA who has sided with the Constitution? Sure, some judges will give show "hearings" like the one in NV, but then throw the case out. Unless we are completely delusional truth and the Constitution no longer matter in our country. The media, tech, and judges all the way up to SCOTUS are backing the stealing of an election in broad daylight. We are in trouble. | |||
|
Oriental Redneck |
The damn system is broken, yes, because of traitors and cowards. And, yes, we have lost faith in the system. Arguing semantics is not going to change anything. Q | |||
|
Firearms Enthusiast |
WOW!!! | |||
|
Member |
Georgia Supreme Court Declines to Hear Trump Lawsuit Ahead of Electoral College Vote https://www.theepochtimes.com/...ge-vote_3616501.html The Supreme Court of Georgia declined to hear an election challenge filed by President Donald Trump’s team before the Dec. 14 Electoral College vote. The court said that it “lacks the jurisdiction to consider the petition and rejects it,” reported Fox News. The appeal from Trump’s team asked the Georgia Supreme Court to consider the merits of the case before Monday, Dec. 14. It was not clear why the Georgia Supreme Court made its decision to reject the case. The team filed the lawsuit in the Fulton County Superior Court before appealing to the Georgia Supreme Court, as reported by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Trump had filed the suit on Dec. 4 but was rejected by the Fulton County Superior Court clerk’s office rejected it due to his attorneys not filling out paperwork correctly before it was corrected shortly afterward. Trump’s lawsuit in Georgia alleged tens of thousands of people voted illegally in the state. Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has said there is no evidence of voter fraud that would overturn the result of the election. Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuit against Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan—which drew support from about 20 other states. Paxton argued that last-minute changes to ballot-integrity measures in the four states weakened the integrity of the overall general election. Despite the legal setbacks, Trump told Fox News in an interview released Sunday that “no, it’s not over.” “We keep going and we’re going to continue to go forward. We have numerous local cases,” Trump said. “We’re going to speed it up as much as we can, but you can only go so fast,” Trump told Fox News. “They give us very little time. But we caught them, as you know, as fraudulent, dropping ballots, doing so many things, nobody can even believe it,” he said. _________________________ "Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." Mark Twain | |||
|
Be not wise in thine own eyes |
I would add politicians to that list. “We” is a bit debatable at this point. It may be “They” but that would be their choice. I have faith that those in power and with influence will start to see that it is best we keep this a Constitutional Republic which encompasses the qualities of Law & Order along with Free and Fair Elections. “We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,” Pres. Select, Joe Biden “Let’s go, Brandon” Kelli Stavast, 2 Oct. 2021 | |||
|
Member |
When judges won't even hear a case that clearly has merit, the system failed. When judges won't uphold and protect the Constitution, the system failed. When judges reject the will of the people, the system failed. I know how to use a gun a lot better than I know how to navigate the court system and I know when I'm getting fucked. Do the math. | |||
|
I kneel for my God, and I stand for my flag |
Interesting video. I hope it goes somewhere. | |||
|
Member |
What would Para say about the negativity here in the recent days? It's not over! There is no "president elect". We are not a socialist country. We still have a President who is fighting everyday for this country. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 ... 1317 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |