SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The Trump Presidency : Year IV
Page 1 ... 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 ... 1307
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
The Trump Presidency : Year IV Login/Join 
Lighten up and laugh
Picture of Ackks
posted Hide Post
He says "IF" WI throws out the illegal ballots that didn't have a signature request we could win it by 100k votes on Sunday and then the dominoes will start to fall. He says if one falls the rest will follow. I agree.

 
Posts: 7934 | Registered: September 29, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Be not wise in
thine own eyes
Picture of kimber1911
posted Hide Post
CNN reporting on Smartmatic Voter Fraud.



Why do we not believe Joe, when he seemingly was being truthful?
This leads me to think Obama may not have won the 2008 and 2012 elections without Smartmatic help.

“We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,”

This message has been edited. Last edited by: kimber1911,



“We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,”
Pres. Select, Joe Biden

“Let’s go, Brandon” Kelli Stavast, 2 Oct. 2021
 
Posts: 5294 | Location: USA | Registered: December 05, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
always with a hat or sunscreen
Picture of bald1
posted Hide Post
LOL This is gonna be great!



Headline at https://thelibertydaily.com/ which links to:

https://twitchy.com/greg-3534/...isa-page-and-others/

Another damn good lawyer queues up against the asshat libtard deepstate corrupt cretins. Hope he burns them good!



Certifiable member of the gun toting, septuagenarian, bucket list workin', crazed retiree, bald is beautiful club!
USN (RET), COTEP #192
 
Posts: 16611 | Location: Black Hills of South Dakota | Registered: June 20, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
Let's put this one to rest.

If you listen, you can here ol' Mumbles, state:

"Folk's we gotta a lotta work to do. I don't only need you to get me elected..... I need you once I'm elected." (Or it is exactly him letting the truth out, because his brain is leaking what is in there. Which I tend to accept is "revelation".

He slurs like Foster Brooks, but that is what he said.

The slur comes across as slurring "don't only" into a single muddled word "doe'only".

And the "fraud-ian" slip, may be nothing more than ol' Joe "McGaffagain", being himself and talking in wordsalad.


There is much actual proof of fraud, dirty deals "ala, peanut butter biden laptop" and much more, that should be focused and presented, than a few sound bites.




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא שוב!
 
Posts: 44711 | Location: ...... I am thrice divorced, and I live in a van DOWN BY THE RIVER!!! (in Arkansas) | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Carter Page Sues DOJ, FBI, James Comey, And Others Behind Crossfire Hurricane FISA Abuse

In an eight-count complaint filed Friday in the D.C. District Court, Carter Page seeks damages of no less than $75 million from the U.S. government, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigations, and individuals responsible for obtaining four illegal Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders against Page.

Page’s 59-page complaint lists as defendants a veritable “Who’s Who” of the SpyGate scandal, including former FBI Director James Comey, Assistant Director Andrew McCabe, and the disgraced team of Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. Also singled out were Kevin Clinessmith, who earlier this year pleaded guilty to falsifying an email to hide Page’s past service as a source to the CIA, and FBI Agents Joe Pientka, Stephen Somma, and Brian Auten, with additional defendants identified merely as John Doe 1 – 10 and Jane Doe 1 – 10.

The first four counts of his complaint allege claims under FISA, with one count seeking damages for each of the four FISA court orders the defendants obtained against Page. FISA provides a private right of action to allow “an aggrieved person. . . who has been subjected to an electronic surveillance or about whom information obtained by electronic surveillance of such person has been disclosed,” to sue those responsible.

In addition to stating a civil claim for damages under FISA, Page’s attorneys note in the complaint that FISA makes it a criminal offense to illegally “engage in electronic surveillance under color of law.” While only the government can prosecute a criminal violation of FISA, the allegation is a stark reminder that other than Clinesmith, no criminal cases have resulted from the illegal targeting of Page and the Trump campaign—at least not yet.

Page’s fifth cause of action alleges a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act which provides that the United States is liable for civil wrongs “in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances.” In other words, Page can sue the government and its agents for wrongful conduct, just as he could a private person.

This count seeks damages for the individual defendants who “committed an abuse of process because they acted with an ulterior motive in using the FISA warrant process to accomplish an end unintended and not permitted by law, to wit, to spy on the Trump presidential campaign by unlawfully invading the privacy of Dr. Page without probable cause.” And yes, contrary to the corporate media’s continued denial, the Obama-Biden Administration intended to, and did, spy on the Trump campaign, including by obtaining the illegal FISA orders to surveil Page.

In his sixth cause of action, Page alleged what is called a Bivens claim, after the Supreme Court case of the same name. In Bivens, the Supreme Court held that a plaintiff is entitled to damages from the individual government actors responsible for violating the plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures, when the defendants act willfully, knowingly, or with a reckless disregard for the truth—which describes precisely what the Crossfire Hurricane team did in submitting the four false and misleading FISA applications to the FISA court.

The final two claims seek a remedy for Page under the federal Privacy Act. The first Privacy Act complaint seeks to force the Department of Justice to update Carter Page’s “individual records” and states that the Department of Justice rejected Page’s request to correct Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report, or even conduct a review as required under the Privacy Act, and accordingly Page seeks an injunction to compel the government to do so. His final claim, also under the Privacy Act, seeks damages for the harm he suffered when “he was falsely portrayed as a traitor to his country,” as well as court costs and attorney fees.

Page’s D.C.-based attorney Leslie McAdoo Gordon, a principle with McAdoo Gordon & Associates told me, “Carter’s life has been seriously damaged by the false accusation that he was a Russian spy. It is high time that he receives compensation for the gross and deliberate violations of his civil liberties by government officials.”

In addition to McAdoo Gordon’s counsel, Page is represented by John Pierce of Pierce Bainbridge P.C. from Los Angeles, California, K. Lawson Pedigo from the Dallas, Texas firm of Miller Keffer & Pedigo, and Timothy Parlatore, from the Parlatore Law Group in New York.

The next step will be for the defendants to be served with the complaint, for their attorneys to file their appearances, and respond. Then the fun will begin—discovery!

LINK
 
Posts: 2277 | Location: San Francisco, CA | Registered: February 16, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Be not wise in
thine own eyes
Picture of kimber1911
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigmonkey:
Let's put this one to rest.

And the "fraud-ian" slip, may be nothing more than ol' Joe "McGaffagain", being himself and talking in wordsalad.
I see your point on the first video and have deleted it.

This statement however is clear as a bell, no stuttering word salad.

“We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,”

The video cuts off quick however.
Has there been any argument beyond it’s just ol’ Joe “McGaffagain”?

Seems like it put’s the voter fraud as calculated and pre-planned.
Not just everyday Democrats cheating, but an organized effort.



“We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,”
Pres. Select, Joe Biden

“Let’s go, Brandon” Kelli Stavast, 2 Oct. 2021
 
Posts: 5294 | Location: USA | Registered: December 05, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Pennsylvania State Legislature Files Resolution to Dispute Statewide 2020 Election Results…

With mounting evidence of election fraud now visible, members of the Pennsylvania legislature have drafted a joint resolution to overturn election results, reverse the previous state certification, and the sponsors promise they will take it to the Supreme Court if necessary.

A RESOLUTION Declaring the results of statewide electoral contests in the 2020 General Election to be in dispute. WHEREAS, Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to prescribe the “Times, Places, and Manner” of conducting elections; and WHEREAS, Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to direct the manner of appointing electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has exercised its authority to establish election administration procedures for the Commonwealth, known as the Pennsylvania Election Code; and WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires all mail-in ballots to be received by eight o’clock P.M. on the day of the election; and WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires election officials at polling places to authenticate the signatures of in-person voters; and WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires that county boards of elections shall not meet to conduct a pre-canvass of all absentee and mail-in ballots until seven o’clock A.M. on Election Day, during which time defects on mail-in ballots would be identified; and WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code prohibits the counting of defective absentee or mail-in ballots; and WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code authorizes “watchers,” selected by candidates and political parties, to observe the process of canvassing absentee and mail-in ballots; and WHEREAS, the Commonwealth conducted an election on November 3, 2020 for federal offices, including selecting electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and WHEREAS, officials in the Executive and Judicial Branches of the Commonwealth infringed upon the General Assembly’s authority under the United States Constitution by unlawfully changing the rules governing the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, on September 17, 2020, less than seven weeks before the November 3, 2020 election, the partisan majority on the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania unlawfully and unilaterally extended the deadline for mail-in ballots to be received, mandated that ballots mailed without a postmark would be presumed to be received timely, and could be accepted without a verified voter signature; and WHEREAS, on October 23, 2020, less than two weeks before the November 3, 2020 election and upon a petition from the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ruled that mail-in ballots need not authenticate signatures for mail-in ballots, thereby treating in-person and mail-in voters dissimilarly and eliminating a critical safeguard against potential election crime; and WHEREAS, on November 2, 2020, the night before the November 3, 2020 election and prior to the prescribed time for pre-canvassing mail-in ballots, the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth encouraged certain counties to notify party and candidate representatives of mail-in voters whose ballots contained defects; and WHEREAS, heavily Democrat counties permitted mail-in voters to cure ballot defects while heavily Republican counties followed the law and invalidated defective ballots; and WHEREAS, in certain counties in the Commonwealth, watchers were not allowed to meaningfully observe the pre-canvassing and canvassing activities relating to absentee and mail-in ballots; and WHEREAS, in other parts of the Commonwealth, watchers observed irregularities concerning the pre-canvassing and canvassing of absentee and mail-in ballots; and WHEREAS, postal employees in Pennsylvania have reported anomalies relating to mail-in ballots, including multiple ballots delivered to a single address with unfamiliar addressees, ballots mailed to vacant homes, empty lots, and addresses that did not exist; and WHEREAS, witnesses testifying before the Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee on November 25, 2020 have provided additional compelling information regarding the questionable nature of the administration of the 2020 General Election; and WHEREAS, there remains ongoing litigation concerning the administration of the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, in 2016, Pennsylvania’s general election results were certified on December 12, 2016, and on November 24, 2020, the Secretary of the Commonwealth unilaterally and prematurely certified results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors despite ongoing litigation; and WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives has the duty to ensure that no citizen of this Commonwealth is disenfranchised, to insist that all elections are conducted according to the law, and to satisfy the general public that every legal vote is counted accurately; THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Pennsylvania House of Representatives— 1. Recognizes substantial irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, pre-canvassing, and canvassing during the November 3, 2020 election; and 2. Disapproves of the infringement on the General Assembly’s authority pursuant to the United States Constitution to regulate elections; and 3. Disapproves of and disagrees with the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s premature certification of the results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors; and 4. Declares that the selection of presidential electors and other statewide electoral contest results in this Commonwealth is in dispute; and 5. Urges the Secretary of the Commonwealth and the Governor to withdraw or vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on at the 2020 General Election; and 6. Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.

Better formatting at this link.

It is no longer an issue of whether election fraud took place, the issue is now whether the U.S. election system can withstand truthful sunlight and correct the fraud that is well known. Joe Biden will never be a legitimate U.S. President… everyone knows that.

The scale of victory by President Donald Trump is the problem for those who want to deny what took place. The efforts to overturn the election results were centered in approximately 10 municipal regions, and Pennsylvania holds two of them in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.

LINK
 
Posts: 2277 | Location: San Francisco, CA | Registered: February 16, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get Off My Lawn
Picture of oddball
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
^^^^ Good. The quicker the better.


I agree. In regards to PA, it is fuckin game on, the 4th quarter.



"I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965
 
Posts: 17568 | Location: Texas | Registered: May 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Data Scientist: ‘Weird’ Spike in Incomplete Nevada Voter Registrations, Use of ‘Casinos’ as Home Addresses

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...reaking-2020-11-27-4

An affidavit filed by Republicans in Nevada, citing a data scientist, shows an allegedly inexplicable jump in voter registrations in the state.

The scientist, Dorothy Morgan, referenced in their affidavit, said she spotted a “historically strange” increase in voter registrations missing the sex and age of the voter, as well as registrations where casinos and RV parks are provided as “their home or mailing addresses” in the Third Congressional District, which covers much of Clark County and Las Vegas.

Citing the other presidential elections as a reference point, Morgan said there were 68 voter registrations missing the critical data in 2016. But in 2020, there were 13,372 voters missing that data, she said.

About 74 percent of the allegedly incomplete registrations occurred between July 2020 and September 2020, Morgan found, according to the affidavit.

“This investigation found over 13,000 voters whose voter registration information revealed no sex or date of birth. Not only does this mean we cannot verify whether these voters are old enough to vote, it is also historically strange: While one does not expect voter registration information to be perfect, it is very strange that there were very, very few of these kinds of imperfect records with missing or invalid information until this year—when there are 13,372 of them,” the data scientist said, according to an affidavit obtained by the Washington Examiner.

Morgan noted the unusual address, saying that casinos and RV parks were listed.

“I have also identified dozens of voters who listed as their home or mailing addresses a temporary RV park and casino,” she wrote.

In an interview with the newspaper, Morgan said on Thanksgiving Day that she found the data “weird.” There were “just a lot of people who have zero birthdays, zero birth month, and then, unknown sex,” she continued.

“I saw is that you have a handful of people and then all of a sudden you have 13,000 people making that error in 2020, and that’s just, that’s not right,” Morgan added.

The scientist said that her findings are merely scratching the surface.

“Based on the results I have found in the limited time I have had to analyze this dataset, I expect to find additional oddities in the election data as I conduct further analysis,” she wrote.

Nevada’s Secretary of State’s office has not responded to a request for comment on Friday.

Nevada’s election data shows Democrat Joe Biden with a more than 30,000-vote lead over President Donald Trump. Earlier this week, the state’s Supreme Court certified Biden’s win.

Jesse Binnall, an attorney for the Trump campaign in Nevada, said on Nov. 24 that he will prove that many fraudulent votes were cast in the Silver State, asserting that Trump is the rightful winner of Nevada’s six Electoral College votes.


_________________________
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it."
Mark Twain
 
Posts: 13478 | Registered: January 17, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
Fixed it for you.

quote:
Originally posted by EZ_B:
Pennsylvania State Legislature Files Resolution to Dispute Statewide 2020 Election Results…

With mounting evidence of election fraud now visible, members of the Pennsylvania legislature have drafted a joint resolution to overturn election results, reverse the previous state certification, and the sponsors promise they will take it to the Supreme Court if necessary.

A RESOLUTION

Declaring the results of statewide electoral contests in the 2020 General Election to be in dispute.

WHEREAS, Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to prescribe the “Times, Places, and Manner” of conducting elections; and

WHEREAS, Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to direct the manner of appointing electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and

WHEREAS, the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has exercised its authority to establish election administration procedures for the Commonwealth, known as the Pennsylvania Election Code; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires all mail-in ballots to be received by eight o’clock P.M. on the day of the election; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires election officials at polling places to authenticate the signatures of in-person voters; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires that county boards of elections shall not meet to conduct a pre-canvass of all absentee and mail-in ballots until seven o’clock A.M. on Election Day, during which time defects on mail-in ballots would be identified; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code prohibits the counting of defective absentee or mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code authorizes “watchers,” selected by candidates and political parties, to observe the process of canvassing absentee and mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, the Commonwealth conducted an election on November 3, 2020 for federal offices, including selecting electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and

WHEREAS, officials in the Executive and Judicial Branches of the Commonwealth infringed upon the General Assembly’s authority under the United States Constitution by unlawfully changing the rules governing the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and

WHEREAS, on September 17, 2020, less than seven weeks before the November 3, 2020 election, the partisan majority on the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania unlawfully and unilaterally extended the deadline for mail-in ballots to be received, mandated that ballots mailed without a postmark would be presumed to be received timely, and could be accepted without a verified voter signature; and

WHEREAS, on October 23, 2020, less than two weeks before the November 3, 2020 election and upon a petition from the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ruled that mail-in ballots need not authenticate signatures for mail-in ballots, thereby treating in-person and mail-in voters dissimilarly and eliminating a critical safeguard against potential election crime; and

WHEREAS, on November 2, 2020, the night before the November 3, 2020 election and prior to the prescribed time for pre-canvassing mail-in ballots, the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth encouraged certain counties to notify party and candidate representatives of mail-in voters whose ballots contained defects; and

WHEREAS, heavily Democrat counties permitted mail-in voters to cure ballot defects while heavily Republican counties followed the law and invalidated defective ballots; and

WHEREAS, in certain counties in the Commonwealth, watchers were not allowed to meaningfully observe the pre-canvassing and canvassing activities relating to absentee and mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, in other parts of the Commonwealth, watchers observed irregularities concerning the pre-canvassing and canvassing of absentee and mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, postal employees in Pennsylvania have reported anomalies relating to mail-in ballots, including multiple ballots delivered to a single address with unfamiliar addressees, ballots mailed to vacant homes, empty lots, and addresses that did not exist; and

WHEREAS, witnesses testifying before the Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee on November 25, 2020 have provided additional compelling information regarding the questionable nature of the administration of the 2020 General Election; and

WHEREAS, there remains ongoing litigation concerning the administration of the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and

WHEREAS, in 2016, Pennsylvania’s general election results were certified on December 12, 2016, and on November 24, 2020, the Secretary of the Commonwealth unilaterally and prematurely certified results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors despite ongoing litigation; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives has the duty to ensure that no citizen of this Commonwealth is disenfranchised, to insist that all elections are conducted according to the law, and to satisfy the general public that every legal vote is counted accurately;

THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Pennsylvania House of Representatives—

1. Recognizes substantial irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, pre-canvassing, and canvassing during the November 3, 2020 election; and

2. Disapproves of the infringement on the General Assembly’s authority pursuant to the United States Constitution to regulate elections; and

3. Disapproves of and disagrees with the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s premature certification of the results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors; and

4. Declares that the selection of presidential electors and other statewide electoral contest results in this Commonwealth is in dispute; and

5. Urges the Secretary of the Commonwealth and the Governor to withdraw or vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on at the 2020 General Election; and

6. Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.
Better formatting at this link.

It is no longer an issue of whether election fraud took place, the issue is now whether the U.S. election system can withstand truthful sunlight and correct the fraud that is well known. Joe Biden will never be a legitimate U.S. President… everyone knows that.

The scale of victory by President Donald Trump is the problem for those who want to deny what took place. The efforts to overturn the election results were centered in approximately 10 municipal regions, and Pennsylvania holds two of them in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.

LINK


Q






 
Posts: 28216 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
Fixed it for you.


You are a patient man.

Thanks.
 
Posts: 2277 | Location: San Francisco, CA | Registered: February 16, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Nullus Anxietas
Picture of ensigmatic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kimber1911:
This statement however is clear as a bell, no stuttering word salad.

“We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,”

The video cuts off quick however.
Has there been any argument beyond it’s just ol’ Joe “McGaffagain”?

Yeah: I've read the comment is taken out of context. The way the snippet cuts off so abruptly suggests that's probably true. Ol' Sleepy's pretty demented, but not that demented--I think.



"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe
"If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher
 
Posts: 26032 | Location: S.E. Michigan | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I have a very particular
set of skills
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ackks:
He says "IF" WI throws out the illegal ballots that didn't have a signature request we could win it by 100k votes on Sunday and then the dominoes will start to fall. He says if one falls the rest will follow. I agree.

[FLASH_VIDEO]<iframe frameborder="0" height="408" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2ltqtrJf0Ew" width="725"></iframe>[/FLASH_VIDEO]


Should be an interesting weekend. WI - that would SEEM (should be) very cut and dry...no ballot request? Gone. Next...

As he indicated...this is WELL beyond just DJT...should they be successful with this 'steal,' it'll be the end of the filibuster, court packing, DC statehood, etc. They will rig it so D's are in power forever...

GOP will voice their minority opinion...D's say 'U-huh...thank you for your comments...now let's vote...oh, surprise, we win.' And so it will go...

Not only that, but it'll also be a HUGE green lights to all the blue states to go into even more overdrive on their liberal agendas as well...

$.02 worth,
Boss


A real life Sisyphus...
"It's not the critic who counts..." TR
Exodus 23.2: Do not follow the crowd in doing wrong...
Despite some people's claims to the contrary, 5 lbs. is actually different than 12 lbs.
It's never simple/easy.
 
Posts: 4992 | Location: In the arena... | Registered: December 18, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lighten up and laugh
Picture of Ackks
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Boss1:


Should be an interesting weekend. WI - that would SEEM (should be) very cut and dry...no ballot request? Gone. Next...

As he indicated...this is WELL beyond just DJT...should they be successful with this 'steal,' it'll be the end of the filibuster, court packing, DC statehood, etc. They will rig it so D's are in power forever...

GOP will voice their minority opinion...D's say 'U-huh...thank you for your comments...now let's vote...oh, surprise, we win.' And so it will go...

Not only that, but it'll also be a HUGE green lights to all the blue states to go into even more overdrive on their liberal agendas as well...

$.02 worth,
Boss

Agree, but we haven't heard anything coming out of there. If they were tossing ballots wouldn't we have heard by now? The liberals would be freaking out. The silence makes me think it's going to be another game like in GA where they sweep it all under the rug. We'll still win in court, but I'd much prefer to do it the easy way because it should be cut and dry like you said. If anyone has heard something please let me know.

Also, I hope President Trump starts having huge rallies in WI, GA, PA, MI, and AZ this week where he tells the people to call their state reps non stop until this is over. They need some encouragement to grow a spine and do what is right.
 
Posts: 7934 | Registered: September 29, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Be not wise in
thine own eyes
Picture of kimber1911
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
quote:
Originally posted by kimber1911:
This statement however is clear as a bell, no stuttering word salad.

“We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,”

The video cuts off quick however.
Has there been any argument beyond it’s just ol’ Joe “McGaffagain”?

Yeah: I've read the comment is taken out of context. The way the snippet cuts off so abruptly suggests that's probably true. Ol' Sleepy's pretty demented, but not that demented--I think.

American Thinker, article with Joe’s statement in full context.



“We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,”
Pres. Select, Joe Biden

“Let’s go, Brandon” Kelli Stavast, 2 Oct. 2021
 
Posts: 5294 | Location: USA | Registered: December 05, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
The scale of victory by President Donald Trump is the problem for those who want to deny what took place. The efforts to overturn the election results were centered in approximately 10 municipal regions, and Pennsylvania holds two of them in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.

This stands out. Did the 10 key municipal regions spontaneously decide to throw the election? How did 100's or 1,000's of people in the 10 key regions know how to and be able to execute this?

Seems like it would take organization, planning and resources. It wasn't a couple of people doing it on their own.


____________________________________________________

The butcher with the sharpest knife has the warmest heart.
 
Posts: 13523 | Location: Bottom of Lake Washington | Registered: March 06, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
Not sure why, at this stage of the game, we keep talking about what Biden said or meant. I will have zero bearing on what will happen in any courts.


Q






 
Posts: 28216 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I have a very particular
set of skills
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ackks:

Agree, but we haven't heard anything coming out of there. If they were tossing ballots wouldn't we have heard by now? The liberals would be freaking out. The silence makes me think it's going to be another game like in GA where they sweep it all under the rug. We'll still win in court, but I'd much prefer to do it the easy way because it should be cut and dry like you said. If anyone has heard something please let me know.

Also, I hope President Trump starts having huge rallies in WI, GA, PA, MI, and AZ this week where he tells the people to call their state reps non stop until this is over. They need some encouragement to grow a spine and do what is right.


You can bet the indefensible items (no ballot request = no vote) are going to be buried as deeply as possible. If true, and there's no way to argue it, they will do everything they can to make sure it never sees the light of day. Too easy for way to many people to be able to comprehend.

Much like avoiding asking any of the painfully obvious questions to their chosen candidate...which should have not only been asked, but pressed when given a BS answer... 'Don't even go there' as an answer to a very legitimate concern should not be acceptable...

There is such a thing as 'lie by omission' and being complicit.

The first state that has the spine to 'flip' may very well be the straw that breaks the camels back in this charade...

$.02 worth.

Boss


A real life Sisyphus...
"It's not the critic who counts..." TR
Exodus 23.2: Do not follow the crowd in doing wrong...
Despite some people's claims to the contrary, 5 lbs. is actually different than 12 lbs.
It's never simple/easy.
 
Posts: 4992 | Location: In the arena... | Registered: December 18, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Muzzle flash
aficionado
Picture of flashguy
posted Hide Post
My real concern is that too much has happened illegally to the ballots that ineligible ones can no longer be distinguised from eligible ones, based on signatures and postmarks, because once the ballots have been removed from their envelopes there is no way to identify them.

And I think that Georgia needs to immediately change its rules to stop any new voter registration until after the runoff elections. Runoff elections are not "new" elections--they are the finishing of an "old" election, and only the voters eligible to vote initially should be allowed to vote in the runoffs. Once the runoffs are done, new registrations could be accepted. No new residents would be disenfranchised from new elections, because none are likely to be scheduled for another 2 years.

flashguy




Texan by choice, not accident of birth
 
Posts: 27911 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: May 08, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get Off My Lawn
Picture of oddball
posted Hide Post
^^^^^^^^^^^
Yes, we have to consider the near future of U.S. elections. But I emphatically agree wth Jenna Ellis, that first priority is to un-fuck THIS election to give us a better chance at election reform.



"I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965
 
Posts: 17568 | Location: Texas | Registered: May 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 ... 1307 
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The Trump Presidency : Year IV

© SIGforum 2024