quote:

Originally posted by oddball:

quote:

Originally posted by sigspecops:
I would like every one of these lower courts and election officials that can't seem to find an ounce of fraud to tell us what is evidence of fraud? Let's see...it's not dead people voting, statistically impossible massive vote dumps and totals, every voter and ballot law and regulation broken and violated, thousands of non resident voters, more votes than people, found votes, lost votes, it goes on and on. So if none of these things are considered fraud what is?

I heard on Rush this morning there were cases where the judges did not even take a single glance at the evidence presented, just dismissed the cases outright.

But, as it has been stated, that is not only expected, but necessary.

quote:

Originally posted by 83v45magna:

quote:

Originally posted by Jimineer:

quote:

Originally posted by 83v45magna:
Adjudicated


Like many here, I will accept a legitimate outcome.

Not me. No to turning the keys over to a bunch of commie, America hating assholes. No way.

Notice I said legitimate. Do you see a legitimate outcome of this election with Sleepy and Sleazy in office? Don't be an ass.

You used legitimate to describe a possible outcome. So I could only assume you intended to say it’s possible. Sorry if I misunderstood.

But no, there is no possibility of a legitimate outcome. Either way, I don’t care if 200M people voted for the commies, I’m not going along with it.

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:

I heard on Rush this morning there were cases where the judges did not even take a single glance at the evidence presented, just dismissed the cases outright.

I know this sounds bad on its face, but it's not necessarily a bad thing. Either the judge wanted it to get kicked up to the SCOTUS as soon as possible, or he didn't, but his egregious behavior will have the same effect. Ruling for Trump would get things bogged down in state politics, when this needs to get fast-tracked to the SCOTUS.

Looks like use of PO Boxes and UPS stores as the “address” for absentee voting was one major pathway of fraud. Happily, should be easily proven...


Matt Braynard

Update:

- Prep for findings and conclusions complete. Video will go up tonight.

- In GA, nearly 100% of the voters who disguised a postal facility as their residential address voted absentee, with nearly zero voting on Election Day. REMARKABLE.


https://twitter.com/MattBrayna.../1331299873556086787

quote:

Originally posted by Jimineer:
But no, there is no possibility of a legitimate outcome. Either way, I don’t care if 200M people voted for the commies, I’m not going along with it.

I couldn't agree more.

Not sure how this goes if it goes bad.

I don't even own a pitchfork.

Link to original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpT2Rz4rTWM

quote:

Originally posted by jljones:

But, as it has been stated, that is not only expected, but necessary.

Oh, I agree. The faster these cases get to the upper courts, the better. And so far, it seems to be working

quote:

Originally posted by tgtshuter:
Time magazine has a "Joe Biden, the 46th President" commemorative issue on the news stands.

There was an 'American Collector Special Issue' back in August with Ol' Sleepy on the cover 'The Next President...'

Boss

My favorite part is that you think a private playground is protected by first amendment.

quote:

Originally posted by ensigmatic:

quote:

Originally posted by Ackks:
In other news YouTube suspended OAN and demonized them.

"Demonetized," maybe? (Though both could be true.)

At this rate the 1st Amendment won't need to be infringed by the government. The tech. industry will do it for them.

feersum dreadnaught mentioned Matt Braynard

Here is Braynard's video




He discusses voter data from Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin

His conclusion is that given his team's findings, he has no confidence that Biden is the deserved winner of the election.

NCOA National Change of Address

"In GA, nearly 100% of the voters who disguised a postal facility as their residential address voted absentee, with nearly zero voting on Election Day."

quote:

Originally posted by daikyu:

quote:

Originally posted by ensigmatic:

quote:

Originally posted by Ackks:
In other news YouTube suspended OAN and demonized them.

"Demonetized," maybe? (Though both could be true.)

At this rate the 1st Amendment won't need to be infringed by the government. The tech. industry will do it for them.

My favorite part is that you think a private playground is protected by first amendment.

How precious. My favorite parts are where you claim to know what I think and utterly fail to get the point, wiseass.

Mark Meadows:

a Judge has allowed NV Republicans to present findings of widespread voter fraud in a Dec. 3rd hearing. Americans will now hear evidence from those who saw firsthand what happened—a critical step for transparency and remedying illegal ballots.

I am not the one who claimed FB was infringing on my first amendment rights. Keep swinging.

quote:

Originally posted by daikyu:
I am not the one who claimed FB was infringing on my first amendment rights. Keep swinging.

Point out where I said YouTube (you didn't even get the company right) was infringing on my 1A rights. Point out where I suggested, or even implied, YouTube didn't have the right to determine what content their service will carry.

ETA: In retrospect: I phrased my original comment poorly. By "will do it for them" I meant "will accomplish the same end for them." Fine. You "got" me. Happy now?

All I want to know, will any evidence presented be provable?

quote:

Originally posted by LS1 GTO:
All I want to know, will any evidence presented be provable?

Yes. The Constitution is very clear about state legislators being the only ones who can make state election law.

All I want to know is will SCOTUS uphold the Constitution or make it up as they go like everyone else right now. The fate of the republic is literally going to be in the hands of one or two justices.

Friends,

Tomorrow, the first legal presentation will probably occur. This will be lengthy and expensive, and will continue through multiple litigation efforts.

My understanding is that she is not funded by any official sources, since her litigation is separate from the President's Team and "for the people".

For anyone interested in contributing to the funding of Sidney Powell's Legal Action to ensure election integrity, click on the home page below.



Home Page for Sidney Powell's Legal Defense Fund : Defending the Republic >> https://defendingtherepublic.org/


Sidney Powell’s Defending the Republic. The Legal Defense Fund is a 501c4. Contributions are not tax deductible.. Due to high traffic, the site may be temporarily unavailable.
defendingtherepublic.org

Thanks for your consideration, and please forward this to anyone who may be interested.

Trump campaign adviser: DOJ 'asleep at the wheel' amid systemic election fraud allegations

https://justthenews.com/politi..._campaign=newsletter



Steve Cortes, a senior Trump 2020 campaign adviser, said Tuesday that the Justice Department is "asleep at the wheel" amid the election fraud allegations from the Trump legal team.

Cortes told "Just the News AM" that he wishes the FBI was "involved and engaged" in the current election issues, saying the Trump legal team doesn't have the luxury of time and it also don't have the resources of the federal government.

"I wish the federal law enforcement were involved, the way it certainly was deeply engaged in trying to concoct the case against President Trump," he told host Carrie Sheffield. "I believe the DOJ in general – the Department of Justice – is asleep at the wheel here while there may be really systemic fraud taking place that is truly undermining our republic."

Cortes says he has no idea why the FBI is not involved when there may be such significant fraud occurring, some of which they can prove.

"We do have significant amounts of fraud that we can right now prove in court through affidavits and through eyewitnesses, and then we also have perhaps even more importantly, the constitutional issues, and these are critical constitutional issues," Cortes also said.

I hold out no hope forFederal Law Enforcement intervention in this farce.

Hell, those bastards at FBI had Hunter Bidens laptop last December. They might have prevented the impeachment charade with what was on it. But they did nothing. Crooked sumbitches. Regards 18DAI

quote:

Trump campaign adviser: DOJ 'asleep at the wheel' amid systemic election fraud allegations

I don’t think they were asleep, it was deliberate. Recall Chuckie Schumer’s getting back ‘6 ways from Sunday’ threat. This was all a coordinated effort on the Dems part.

It has me spitting nails and I pray all this horse shit gets turned around and cleaned out. I can’t think of anything more teal than this election for a Constitutional crisis.