quote:

Originally posted by Fly-Sig:

quote:

Originally posted by LS1 GTO:
Well judging by the mutiple takes by people reporting on a Trump interview today, Trump clashing about his stance supporting the Black community and manner of clashing - as it is being reported - is unlikely to help his position.

After seeing a couple of the headlines on this I went to the original video transcript.

As usual, the media is intentionally misrepresenting what he said. The interviewer set him up with inflammatory statements which are of course being reported, which also intentionally misrepresent Trump's history on race.

The media are evil.

As noted in my previous posts, I recognized the articles were biased and do not have the ability to listen to the interview at this time.

I have confidence Trump knows what he's doing yet am also in a place right now where I am reading the second hand words of what occurred and how those secondhand words impact the reader(s).

Hopefully, time permitting, I will have time to actually listen to the interview this weekend.

Can anyone comment on nhtagmembers post above?

quote:

Originally posted by LS1 GTO:
...yet am also in a place right now where I am reading the second hand words of what occurred and how those secondhand words impact the reader(s).

Who gives a fuck? What in the world are you talking about? This is beyond silly. You can't turn around on the internet without running into leftist websites running countless biased articles, day in, day out. Every freaking day. You're coming in here telling us you're concerned about how such articles affect their readers? They affect their readers the same way they always affect their readers. You think anyone is being swayed by this shit?

quote:

Hopefully, time permitting, I will have time to actually listen to the interview this weekend.

You are very confused. You're linking us to all sorts of leftist websites running leftist articles for their leftist readers and expressing your concern about what leftists might think and now you tell us you haven't even seen what you're commenting on!!!

You are seriously trying my patience. Fair warning

Conspiracy theorist's unite! LOL

quote:

Originally posted by Timdogg6:
So what is it with the comms on the SS??? In the video posted by the long haired hippy guy Stix somthing, he says they now use SMS not radio. Sure as hell go look back at the photos and count the agents with radios in their ears. I count 2 people of the 8 that got to trump had radios in their ears. WTH is that all about?

He’s basing his comments on the testimony of the USSS acting director. The excerpts below were taken from the acting director’s opening statement or letter, Link or what ever it’s called to the Senate:

“At 5:45 p.m., a local Butler County Emergency Services Unit counter sniper team member texted the Secret Service counter sniper team leader about a suspicious person and sent two photos of the individual, later identified to be the assailant.

At 5:53 p.m., the Secret Service counter sniper team leader emailed the Secret Service counter sniper teams that local law enforcement was looking for a suspicious individual outside of the perimeter, "lurking around the AGR building".”

Rowe said the local guys were texting each other and then emailed the SS CS team leader. The local guy said he called it into the command center, presumably by radio. None of that precludes the SS/DHS people from having ear pieces and wireless comms.

Reading and listening to what the USSS and local guys are saying, the word “assumed” comes up a lot. As the lead agency, that’s on the USSS.

Anyone who thought that the media would be shamed at having been caught in a fraud of historic proportions does not know who these people are. The mainstream press, as well as Democrat politicians-- and many Republican politicians-- are utterly without integrity. Not a shred. They have no interest in truth. Nothing they say is guided by, or even influenced by, truth.

Only what advances their career matters to them. That's it.
So for years, they were silent about Biden's zombie walk. Or his dead-eye stare. His babble. As silent as the Italian mafia's omerta.

Democrat politicians said "He's fine!" "He's never been better!" And so they reported what they knew to be false.

Their absence of conscience is clear in their Kamala propaganda. They know that under her control the border's floodgates opened. They know that she let in countless gangbangers, psychopaths, rapists and terrorists.

Now she claims she was not in charge of the border. Never happened. And dutifully they report "never happened" without challenge-- even though they themselves wrote with some glee about Biden's having appointed her "border czarina."

All in all, they are taking a hack politician who worked her way up the dirty ladder of California politics and transforming her into a brilliant black leader dedicated to serving the people. Somewhere old Pravda writers are marveling.

This is why Trump must debate her as soon and as often as possible. Otherwise, he will be running against an idealized fabrication who will be very hard to beat.

quote:

This is why Trump must debate her as soon and as often as possible. Otherwise, he will be running against an idealized fabrication who will be very hard to beat.

Naaa.... I disagree.
He will debate her, but not as soon and as often as possible.
I would bet on twice.

Naaa... I disagree.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
Naaa.... I disagree.
He will debate her, but not as soon and as often as possible.
I would bet on twice.

It would be nice to get both of those 2 debates you're predicting out of the way before early voting starts in mid-September in PA, VA, and MN. Or even late September early October in AZ, CA, IN, IL, MT, NE, NM, OH, VT, and WY. There may be a couple swing states in there.

Sure, lets debate in Mid-October, that's 3 weeks before the "election".

quote:

Originally posted by LS1 GTO:

As noted in my previous posts, I recognized the articles were biased and do not have the ability to listen to the interview at this time.

I have confidence Trump knows what he's doing yet am also in a place right now where I am reading the second hand words of what occurred and how those secondhand words impact the reader(s).

Hopefully, time permitting, I will have time to actually listen to the interview this weekend.

I had my confidence shaken a few times since DJT became President in 2016. Some of the articles or tv news stories are quite convincing. But every time it has happened I have gone to the original video or original tweet from DJT and found he did not say or do what the reports said he did.

We all know he can be a bit unsophisticated in his presentation sometimes, which allows that little niggling uncertainty when one of those news stories hits.

I have also learned that once these stories get out into the leftist media, their audience takes it as Gospel. They never see the entire original in context. It can be maddening to have someone say "I've seen it and he really did say that awful thing" when in fact they only saw the snippet the TDS media showed them!

^^^ That is a very logical and correct assessment, in my opinion.

quote:

Originally posted by justjoe:
Their absence of conscience is clear in their Kamala propaganda. They know that under her control the border's floodgates opened. They know that she let in countless gangbangers, psychopaths, rapists and terrorists.

Now she claims she was not in charge of the border. Never happened. And dutifully they report "never happened" without challenge-- even though they themselves wrote with some glee about Biden's having appointed her "border czarina."

It's clear from the stats that illegal border crossings were at a minimum with Trump and are at a maximum under recent years with the Biden admin.

That someone in the Biden admin is responsible is clear. The buck stops with Biden himself; he can delegate execution to someone else but the responsibility remains with him. He perhaps shifted the responsible to Kamala. That's fine.

In any case, either Biden or Kamala are responsible regardless of any delegation of execution. So, who is it? Will Biden accept responsibility for the border disaster? Or will he point to Kamala? If he points to Kamala, what can she say - will she point fingers back at her boss and the leader apparent of the party?

I hope the two are fucked and are skewered by a new congress with Trump at the helm.

^^^ I too hope they are skewered, but they will never admit what damage they've done. It was intentional and planned. And I believe much higher players dictated the game.

The entire lamestream media doing the same anti-Trump thing in unison is just beyond obvious. Fox does the montage of every leftist news hack saying the same damn thing. I can only assume the instructions come from the democrat party.

quote:

Originally posted by Lefty Sig:
I can only assume the instructions come from the democrat party.

They always do.


.

The Regime media and the DNC are coordinating their efforts. It's been pretty obvious since 2016.

quote:

Originally posted by Fly-Sig:
We all know he can be a bit unsophisticated in his presentation sometimes, which allows that little niggling uncertainty when one of those news stories hits.

Not sure who is this "we all", because I sure am not part of it. I find his in-your-face bare knuckle no-holds-barred telling the truth like it is in the politics world quite refreshing. For far too long, the Uniparty swamp creatures have given us smoke and mirror with their sophisticated lies, cheats, steals and even murders. I'll take "unsophisticated" any days.

Great response. Vance is showing to have good political instincts.

https://x.com/TheCalvinCooli1/.../1819153728353849656

Every talk and interview I've seen with JD since he was chosen by President Trump shows him to be extremely good at giving as good--and usually better--than he got. He shares that with some other strong leaders like Tom Cotton (who would have made a fantastic VP).
He is great at responding off the cuff (legal training maybe?), clear and articulate. Accurate transcripts probably show well-constructed sentences, but clarity that makes him relatable to the common person.