quote:

Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:
Rodgers is full of it. He straight up lied. He knew the policy of the league. He probably scored higher on the Wonderlic than 99 percent of his teammates. He is now blaming it on the Woke crowd. Sounds just like a high school boy who got caught. His stock plummeted on this falsehood.

How exactly did he lie? I'm sure he has MMR vaccines. Since the jab DOES NOTHING to add immunization to anything. What did he lie about?
If someone construes "I'm am immunized" to equal "I risked my life for no benefit so I got a covid jab". That would be the listeners problem.

Why should he wear a mask but Jabbed people who have the exact same chance of catching and spreading Covid don't.
In what world does that make any sense.

quote:

Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:
Yeah he lied when he could have just said he did not take the vaccine. Carefully read what I said. This is about telling the truth, not the vaccine. It is about integrity. It has nothing to do with the Woke crowd. It is gonna piss off a lot of his teammates who told the truth. I bet he wont be hosting Jeopardy anytime soon.

"It is a double pleasure to deceive the deceiver."

Jean de La Fontaine

The problem is clear, and that's the color of his skin.

Let's get real

quote:

Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:
Yeah he lied when he could have just said he did not take the vaccine. Carefully read what I said. This is about telling the truth, not the vaccine. It is about integrity. It has nothing to do with the Woke crowd. It is gonna piss off a lot of his teammates who told the truth. I bet he wont be hosting Jeopardy anytime soon.

I am not sure if you listened to his full interview on Pat McAfee’s show but he does a better job explaining his position. This article can’t and doesn’t cover it.

Aaron Rodgers is standing on the side of science, bodily autonomy, and informed consent! I stand with him!

We need more like him, publicly resisting this tyrannical insanity....A Lot More!

Family member just got the jab mandate at work.
Despite having a chronic medical condition and taking RXs that *should* be an exemption and having absolutely NO desire to get the bullshit notavax, here we are.

If something goes wrong, homicidal RAGE won’t accurately describe my feelings about this.

Did you know the Clinical Trial end date for Pfizer is predicted to be May 2023? Moderna’s trial date predicted end is Oct 2022, J&J 2023.
IT’S EXPERIMENTAL BULLSHIT NO MATTER HOW IT IS PRESENTED!!

I was in the truck yesterday and happened to listen to an interview with Peter Navarro on Clay and Buck. One of the best interviews I have ever heard. He is promoting his new book “Trump Time” but he talks a lot about Fauci. The “Fauci baby in the crib” line had me rolling. I might have to buy his book.

Excerpt:

“I didn’t know he walked on water, didn’t know he was god. I took the measure of that guy, and it’s like, he thinks he’s smarter than he is. He’s gonna hurt this country. And what I didn’t know then is that he had actually funded that frigging lab in Wuhan. He had authorized those gain-of-function research experiments — behind the back of the Trump administration, I might add, all documented in the In Trump Time book.

Again, if he had just told us. But I don’t blame the Boss for not taking my advice. The villain in that piece is you had all four of the big four health guys — you had Hahn at the FDA, Redfield CDC, Azar at HHS — saying, “He’s god. Keep him.” But most import I blame Mulvaney, the acting chief of staff, ’cause he didn’t have the stones to take the blowback.

To me, it was like a one- or two-day story. But his press team were like little lamb sheeps. Mulvaney was a scared little lamb sheeps. It’s like, “Oh, don’t fire Fauci! He’s god. Too much blowback.” No, no, no. I was like Churchill on Hitler: “Strangle that Fauci baby in the crib.” How do you fire him now?"

Clay and Buck Peter Navarro Interview

quote:

Originally posted by KMitch200:
Family member just got the jab mandate at work.
Despite having a chronic medical condition and taking RXs that *should* be an exemption and having absolutely NO desire to get the bullshit notavax, here we are.

If something goes wrong, homicidal RAGE won’t accurately describe my feelings about this.

Did you know the Clinical Trial end date for Pfizer is predicted to be May 2023? Moderna’s trial date predicted end is Oct 2022, J&J 2023.
IT’S EXPERIMENTAL BULLSHIT NO MATTER HOW IT IS PRESENTED!!

This is Moderna's 3rd time around with these trials (the previous 2 failing miserably). The only difference now is that humans are the lab rats.

Well it starts for me. We opened a website a few weeks ago to voluntarily up load our vaccine statues. Now an email saying they are trying to determine how to react to Jan. 4 deadline, I guess we are classified as government contractors for some reason.

The only positive was it said they were reviewing the regulations and would be providing guidance in the future. Company was based in San Francisco before moving HQ. I'm surprised they didn't say they supported it and would be immediately implementing it.

I'm vaccinated, but I don't plan on providing them the paperwork. I've already told my boss he might be down an employee. My former boss came up to me yesterday, shut the door, and asked if I got the email. He thinks we are going to lose a lot of employees. I'm not sure of his status, he's ex military and black, so I'm guessing unvaccinated based on stats. Unsure if he's not vaccinated, if he'll do it or lose job, I can say he's panicked we will be short staffed. My job is not one you can hire someone off the street and plug them in there.

quote:

I'm vaccinated, but I don't plan on providing them the paperwork. I've already told my boss he might be down an employee. My former boss came up to me yesterday, shut the door, and asked if I got the email. He thinks we are going to lose a lot of employees.

Very brave of you, Jesse.
That's the only way we get out of this:
I will NOT comply.
Every act of compliance is an act of surrender to tyranny.

My 66yr old mother in law tested positive a few weeks ago. She started feeling a little sick so my wife loaded her up with every vitamin that could possibly help and got her the monoclonal infusion. She never got terribly sick and was completely well after 8 days.
Oh, and she was unvaccinated, which caused the doctor and nurses to nearly wet their pants when she went in for the infusion.
Who knows how many lives could've been saved if people had been given therapeutics at the onset of illness instead of hospitals having them wait until they had pneumonia then put on a ventilator, only to die a few days later.

quote:

Very brave of you, Jesse.
That's the only way we get out of this:
I will NOT comply.
Every act of compliance is an act of surrender to tyranny.

I agree with all of this 100%. Those who stand up will be the real heroes when we finally get to the end of this nonsense.

I was at a meeting the other day with one of our local Sheriffs. We got to talking about Covid and he pointed out some stats. The percentage of inmates housed in his jail and the percentage of his employees who have volunteered for these shots reflects the same percentage of the general public in our area. He also said that he would never mandate his department get it, because he says that he knows that those who have already received it would walk out along side those who haven't.

Shut. It. Down.

Maybe society has softened up some, but they need us more than we need them. Let companies close their doors. Let those tax dollars stop flowing. Let society stew for a bit so that they realize what their masters are doing to them. Only then can these problems be rectified.

Noam Chomsky Goes Off The Deep End – Proving That All Socialism Leads To Tyranny
by Brandon Smith | Alt-Market.us

If the vaccines work, then how are unvaccinated people a threat to vaccinated people? If the vaccines don’t work, then why take them in the first place and why mandate them?

I was recently watching a new interview with 92-year-old Noam Chomsky, a figure of general worship among leftist academics, and I began reminiscing about the first time I read the book ‘Manufacturing Consent’.

Though I have never agreed with Chomsky’s politics I have always appreciated his analysis on the methods the establishment uses to control mass psychology and silence popular discourse. I have long felt that this was an area where the political left and conservatives might intersect in our views and find common ground.

This is why I felt an extra dose of disappointment when I witnessed Chomsky go off the deep end this week and suggest that people who refuse to comply with vaccine mandates need to be ostracized from society.

Chomsky compared people who don’t comply with the vaccines to people who don’t comply with traffic lights, suggesting we pose an imminent danger to others and that we should be removed. When asked how unvaxxed people forced out of the economy could be fed (how would they survive), he asserted “that is their problem.” Chomsky does not explicitly say that force should be used to eliminate the unvaxxed from social participation, he merely insinuates that “actions” might be required to get the desired effect.

I was around 20 years of age back in 2001 when I first read Manufacturing Consent. I was young and not fully aware at the time of a basic function of the political left and socialism that is vital to understand: Many people claim there is a “spectrum” of political beliefs on the left and that there are those that support socialism or centralization while also supporting freedom, but this is simply not so. At the core of their ideology freedom has no home, and when pressed on where they truly stand every socialist WILL eventually support tyranny as a means to achieve their Utopian vision of society.

Chomsky has long claimed himself to be a “libertarian socialist.” In the past I have found that a classic misdirection of covertly authoritarian people is to tack the “libertarian” label onto whatever they believe in. Con-men like Chomsky figure that most normies don’t actually know what libertarianism is, but they’ll assume it means that you “support liberty.” It’s a calculated abuse of the ideology designed to mask the collectivist’s true intentions.

I don’t even know that I personally fit into the libertarian framework, but I do hold some of its basic tenets as fundamental.

A key pillar of libertarianism is the Non-Aggression Principle – A foundational rule for society that says the use of force or coercion to impose one’s beliefs or ideology on others is wrong, and the use of force in general is wrong unless it is in defense of yourself or the lives of others. The problem with socialists and collectivists is that they ALWAYS find a way to claim that their brand of force is somehow in defense of the lives of others. That is to say, the “greater good” is the go-to excuse for all modern totalitarians.

Chomsky will claim that his hard-line stance against unvaccinated people is predicated on saving lives, and that’s the great swindle. When science and logic is applied, we see that the vax mandates have nothing to do with protecting the lives or safety of the public. That said, those same mandates are very effective in elevating the socialist goal of total centralization. How convenient…

Chomsky’s bias is evident in the lack of rational thought he puts forward. In fact, Chomsky never addresses the basic contradictions inherent in his claim that traffic laws and vaccine mandates are the same.

Firstly, covid mandates are NOT laws; they are dictates that have never been voted on by a single legislature nor the American people. This means mandates are meaningless in a legal sense. At least with new traffic laws the voters or legislators get some say in potential changes. The vaccine mandates are purely totalitarian in nature and completely circumvent all constitutional checks and balances.

Imagine if one day Biden assumed defacto control over all traffic rules, and then claimed the authority to deny all people who run red lights access to the majority of jobs and the overall economy? That would be absurd, right? Well, that’s exactly what Biden and his globalist handlers are doing with the covid mandates.

Secondly, obeying a traffic light is not the same as allowing yourself to be injected with a barely tested experimental mRNA cocktail – a “vaccine” which numerous health and virology professionals have warned could have potentially damaging side effects including autoimmune disorders, blood clots and infertility. Traffic lights have been in existence for decades; we know a red light is not going to harm our health. The covid vaccines have been in existence for about a year and have no long term testing (that has ever been released to the public) to back their safety.

All vaccines in common usage today were tested for at least 10 to 15 years before being released for use on the wider population. The covid vaccines were slapped together at “warp speed”, at least according the official story. Who are the guinea pigs for these mRNA jabs? The entire human population. Every person in the country is now considered a guinea pig.

We have no idea what the implications of this unprecedented experiment will be in the next few years.

Chomsky’s comparisons are obviously ridiculous and it’s frustrating that I’m required to point this out. One would think that the co-author of ‘Manufacturing Consent’ would be able to easily discern the massive differences in terms of violating public freedom. But, for some reason he can’t seem to grasp the foolishness at the heart of his debate. Or, he is being deliberately ignorant because he thinks, like many globalists, that there is something to be gained in going along with the farce…

The “greater good” theory is meant to either appeal-to or silence conservatives and libertarians that oppose the vaccines on the grounds of the non-aggression principle. Covid mandates rely on the claim that the unvaccinated are an integral danger to society as a whole, and thus force is justified. Now, I have been asking this question over and over again for the past year to any vax fanatic I run across, and not a single person has come up with a valid counter-argument:

If the vaccines work, then how are unvaccinated people a threat to vaccinated people? If the vaccines don’t work, then why take them in the first place and why mandate them?

What does Chomsky think the average death rate of covid actually is? Is he aware that according to dozens of peer reviewed studies the median Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of covid is only 0.27%? Who exactly are the unvaxxed a threat to? Less than 1% of the population? And if we are actually a threat to these people, then maybe THEY should take the vaccines, if they think the vaccines truly work.

What about the fact that vaccinated people still transmit the disease to others, according the the CDC narrative?

Furthermore, new studies from countries with very high rates of vaccination have shown that natural immunity formed by people who have already had covid (like I have) is superior in protection against future contraction or transmission of the covid virus. Natural immunity is up to 27 times more effective than the vaccines. It trumps the jab to an epic degree.

And what about all those breakthrough cases and deaths of fully vaccinated people? Chomsky must be ignoring those as well. Nearly 60% of all people hospitalized in Israel are fully vaccinated; 56% of all covid deaths from April to October in Ireland were people who received at least one vaccination. Who caused that? Unvaxxed people most of whom have superior natural immunity? Or, vaccinated people with low comparative immunity and the ability to transmit the disease?

Maybe Chomsky just isn’t educated on the science, or maybe he doesn’t care. Either way, his mentality is destructive and typical of socialists and leftists.

I am reminded of a radio show I did many years ago out of the UK which presented itself as a kind of liberty forum. As it turned out, the host was a socialist with some tourism into libertarianism and he was anxious for a debate. I was a little annoyed with the ambush on the merits of socialism but my position on it is simple enough that anyone should be able to understand it:

If a group of people want to form a community or collective based on socialist values then they should be allowed to do so in peace, as long as all participation is voluntary and they don’t try to harm anyone in the process.

At first the show host appeared to agree with this idea, but his support of personal freedom proved superficial as the debate went on. His argument was “What about all the people in society that need our help, such as those that are in poverty or are disabled? Don’t we need a centralized system in place to manage these kinds of problems?”

My response: “By all means, go and help those people if you want to help them. Just don’t try to force me to do it. I might want to help them too, but I will do it in my way, not yours.”

And here is where every single socialist shows their true authoritarian colors – The host then argued that while I might be a good and charitable person the majority of people, in his mind, are not. And so, we must all be forced by government to contribute to society in the manner “society” has deemed appropriate.

There you have it. Like Chomsky, this socialist was appealing to the greater good as a tool to impose HIS ideological vision onto everyone else; not to protect the lives and freedoms of individuals, which is the ONLY purview of government, but to make people participate in the way HE thinks they should participate. People must be forced to uphold social standards, and the social standards are coincidentally defined by the very people that benefit most from collectivism.

At no point do socialists and leftists ever suggest that more individual freedom might be the best option for elevating the greater good. Their solutions always involve progressively less freedom for the individual and more power for the government, the same government which they expect to control.

To be clear, I’m not talking about silly notions of anarchy, just constitutional protections for inherent freedoms. The political left only seeks to erode the liberties codified in the Bill of Rights, and no matter where they are on the leftist spectrum they all end up at the same terrible draconian place given the right circumstances.

This is evident as the vax mandates spread around the world, with nations and states run by leftists now mired in oppression. The facts are undeniable – Blue states are enslaved, red states are free. Leftists support tyranny, conservatives support freedom. Millions of people are trying to escape blue states; almost no one wants to relocate to one.

Even Noam Chomsky, a supposed anti-establishment champion, reverts to little more than a decrepit dictator rationalizing mass starvation when the opportunity to enforce vaccine mandates arises. Maybe he is feeling his mortality along with his age and fear of covid has overwhelmed his senses. I doubt it. I suspect the promise of collective power is so intoxicating to all socialists that their masks and costumes fall away and their true character emerges whether they want it to or not.

There is not a single shred of scientific evidence to support the forced vaccination argument. There is not a single shred of proof to support the claim that an unvaxxed person is a threat to the safety of anyone else. I’ll say it again – Mandates are not laws, and even if they were they would be unconstitutional laws. There is nothing legal, rational, scientific or moral compelling me to submit to an experimental vaccine. Chomsky and his ilk have no leg to stand on.

So, we are at an impasse. They want power over us, and we will not give it to them. Therefore, the law of the jungle takes over. The bottom line is this:

I will not comply with your illegitimate mandates. IT-WILL-NEVER-HAPPEN. And if you think you can use leverage to force me to comply, threatening me with poverty and death through economic discrimination, then I will view your actions for what they are – An attack on my freedoms and my life. I will therefore respond in kind and eliminate the threat by any means necessary, and, I will be justified in doing so, constitutionally, rationally, scientifically and morally.

Covid cultists like Chomsky, most of them leftists and socialists, should keep this in mind as they continue down this path. They think that the greater good is on their side but this is a fantasy driven by their own hunger for dominance. The question you need to ask yourselves is this: Do you really think your desire to force the mandates and your political ideology on me is greater than my will to stop you and remain free? Are you ready to risk death to impose the vax mandates? Because I am ready to risk death to end them.

https://www.infowars.com/posts...sm-leads-to-tyranny/

Well, if three shots (stage 1 + stage 2 + booster) still haven’t stopped it, then why should #4 be any more effective? What’s that definition of “insanity” again; something about doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results?


https://www.lewrockwell.com/20...by-any-more-obvious/

The 4th Covid Shot: Could Vaccine Failure by Any More Obvious?
Vasko KohlmayerNovember 6, 2021

“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in updated guidelines Tuesday that some immunocompromised people who have received either Pfizer or Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines will be able to get a fourth shot,” we read in a recent Axios report.

This bit of information is all that one needs to see what the complete failure and fraud these vaccines have been.

Just ask yourself this: Why is there a need for the fourth shot?

The obvious reason for this is that the previous three shots have failed to do their job. In other words, they have failed to provide sufficient protection against Covid-19 for those who received them.

Just think about it: less than a year into the massive vaccination drive, the US government had to recommend a fourth shot, because they know that the first three do not work.

That makes three failed shots in less than a year.

If you still remember, at the beginning of this year they told us that if we all took our two shots, we would be safe and the pandemic would soon end.

Many people believed this. Some were so eager to receive their injections that they even jumped the vaccination line ahead of their more vulnerable fellow citizens.

It turned out, however, that what the vaccinators had said was not true. The original shots did not provide adequate protection, and so we were subsequently told that a third shot – which they called a “booster” – would be required.

And now the third shot apparently needs to be followed by a fourth one, because the third has obviously not lived up to its promise either.

We have thus been served three injection flops in less than twelve months.

The glaring vaccine failure stares us straight in the face and yet many people are still unable to recognize it. They cannot perceive it, because they have been frightened and brainwashed into intellectual stupor by the Covid establishment, and now they blindly follow the “guidance” of the very people responsible for this travesty.

What more evidence does one need to recognize the utter vaccine failure than the recent authorization by the CDC of a fourth Covid injection in the span of 323 days?

It is unforgivable that the architects of this debacle have not only refused to put a stop to it but instead they continue injecting the population with their failed and dangerous products all the while making off with record profits. And now they are going after your children aged five to eleven even though children in this demographic are at almost no risk of serious Covid.

The Covid vaccination scam may well be the greatest racket in the history of man.

When will the population at large wake up to it and chase these shameless profiteers out of town?

N.B.

There is absolutely no reason to believe that the fourth shot will be any more effective than its three failed predecessors. In fact, judging by these vaccines’ track record so far, the failure of the fourth injection seems very likely.

Gov. Newsom remains out of public sight to deal with family obligations

Gov. Gavin Newsom's last public appearance was Oct. 27, when he received a coronavirus booster shot.

https://abc7.com/gavin-newsom-...ions-today/11202905/

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- A week after abruptly canceling plans to attend the United Nations climate summit in Scotland, California Gov. Gavin Newsom has receded from public view to deal with unspecific family obligations.

When the surprising announcement was made Oct. 29, a spokesperson said Newsom planned to participate virtually in the conference this week. But the California delegation's schedule at the meeting this week, released by the governor's office, did not include Newsom.

Instead, the schedule included in-person appearances by Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, who Newsom tapped to lead the state delegation in his absence; Sam Aseffa, director of the Governor's Office of Planning and Research; David Hochschild, chair of the California Energy Commission and California Natural Resources Agency Secretary Wade Crowfoot.

After the federal government late Tuesday authorized Pfzier's coronavirus vaccine for emergency use for kids 5 to 11, California implemented what state officials deemed a "robust vaccination program." It's the kind of announcement that Newsom typically makes in-person in front of TV cameras.

But the governor's office announced the plan with an emailed news release. His last public appearance was Oct. 27, when he received a coronavirus booster shot.

Newsom's office did not respond to questions Friday about what the governor has been doing this week.

Newsom spokesperson Erin Mellon said the governor will appear virtually at the U.N. conference next week.

"The Governor will participate in a couple events next week focused on global efforts to advance zero emission vehicles and to move beyond oil," she said Thursday.

Newsom submitted some prerecorded remarks to a transit conference earlier this week and his office announced some appointments to state agencies and boards. He also posted a photo on his Instagram account with his wife and four children, aged 5 to 12, dressed as pirates on Halloween.

His Twitter account went dark from Oct. 28 until Tuesday, when he tweeted Election Day support to fellow Democratic Govs. Phil Murphy of New Jersey and Terry McAuliffe of Virginia, who were seeking reelection. As the week went on, Newsom's Twitter account was more active.

It's rare, but not unprecedented, for Newsom to go a whole week without some type of appearance. Such absences are usually explained, including when Newsom leaves the state for vacation.

In this case, the only statement from Newsom's office came Oct. 29 and referred to unspecified family obligations. No additional information about the family's circumstances has been released.

It's a relatively slow time in Sacramento as the state Legislature is not in session and won't meet again until January. Recent storms mean no major wildfires are burning out of control, as has been the case in recent years.

Kounalakis returned from Scotland on Thursday. Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon will lead a second delegation of state lawmakers to Scotland next week for a series of meetings with world leaders and a tour of off-shore wind energy in Aberdeen, Scotland.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^
We can only hope that his absence is permanent. Has the press checked the French Laundry?

November 4TH. Fauci is a slime bag.

This is not typical of me but pray to god that newscum has succumbed to the adverse effects of the experiment. I can't tell you how much joy this would bring. There are few people more deserving than him.

Nice. Now let's make it permanent.

Court halts Biden vaccine, testing mandate for businesses -

SALT LAKE CITY — A federal appeals court temporarily halted the Biden administration's occupational safety rule that required businesses with over 100 employees to mandate the COVID-19 vaccine or regular testing.

In a ruling on Saturday, a three judge panel at the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay sought by Texas, Utah, Mississippi and South Carolina, as well as businesses who claimed they would be negatively impacted.

"Because the petitions give cause to believe there are grave statutory and constitutional issues with the Mandate, the Mandate is hereby STAYED pending further action by this court," the judges wrote, ordering lawyers for the states and the federal government to submit further briefing by next month.

The rule was not going into effect until January.

Utah political leaders have argued the government using OSHA rules to mandate vaccinations is unconstitutional. Governor Spencer Cox told FOX 13 earlier this week Utah would sue over it.

"I am grateful our courts recognize the egregious overreach from the Biden administration into the personal health decisions of citizens and that businesses won’t be forced to enforce this unconstitutional rule," House Speaker Brad Wilson, R-Kaysville, said to FOX 13 in a text message.
https://www.fox13now.com/news/...ndate-for-businesses

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
In a ruling on Saturday, a three judge panel at the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay sought by Texas, Utah, Mississippi and South Carolina, as well as businesses who claimed they would be negatively impacted.

I wonder if that will have any bearing on our case? But we are in an industry governed and regulated by the FAA, DOT, and Railway Labor Act. Curious...