Countdown To The Next Lockdown: Biden Says "In All Probability" US Will See More Restrictions

By now the narrative has gotten so absurdly grotesque and stupid, it's as if a platoon of monkeys or, worse, woke SNL writers put it on the back of a shampoo bottle.

https://www.zerohedge.com/mark...ee-more-restrictions

Man, the most deadly virus in the history of man is sure apparent in Kentucky. Well, ok nobody is wearing a mask or paying any attention but it’s obvious we have a crisis on our hands.

If it wasn’t for the media blaring it 24/7, you’d be hard pressed to know that the Community spread is as high as 50 per 100,000 here.

50 per 100,000. For god sakes, think of the children. We have got to flatten the curve. We don’t want to run out of ventilators. Anyone not not wanting to give up their liberty or asks questions of the professionals that saved us the last time, just doesn’t care about saving grandpa.

I dont know about the rest of you, but I try my damnedest to be at my immunological best. All the time. Every day.

At this point I almost wish covid would turn into Capt. Trips.

quote:

Originally posted by OcCurt:
At this point I almost wish covid would turn into Capt. Trips.

How many people do you think actually read that book?

quote:

Originally posted by OcCurt:
At this point I almost wish covid would turn into Capt. Trips.

The way some of these loons are acting, you'd think it had already

"Captain Wu?"

quote:

Originally posted by jljones:
Man, the most deadly virus in the history of man is sure apparent in Kentucky. Well, ok nobody is wearing a mask or paying any attention but it’s obvious we have a crisis on our hands.

If it wasn’t for the media blaring it 24/7, you’d be hard pressed to know that the Community spread is as high as 50 per 100,000 here.

50 per 100,000. For god sakes, think of the children. We have got to flatten the curve. We don’t want to run out of ventilators. Anyone not not wanting to give up their liberty or asks questions of the professionals that saved us the last time, just doesn’t care about saving grandpa.

Watching Baby Randy Andy Beshear yesterday on the Let’s Make a Deal Lotto Olympics give-away, it was almost as if Monty Hall was back.

Went out shopping to several stores this morning.

Sigh…it’s depressing to see all the scared sheep masking right back up again, at least 50% of people were today where until now it was virtually nil.

My wife and kids and her mother were at the zoo yesterday and told me this young double-masked up couple were constantly moving away from everyone and when my MIL happened to sneeze, they literally ran away.

Just when I thought all this bullshit was over, it starts up again in earnest.

quote:

Originally posted by Skins2881:

quote:

Originally posted by OcCurt:
At this point I almost wish covid would turn into Capt. Trips.

How many people do you think actually read that book?

M-O-O-N, that spells "a lot"!

Six month safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 vaccine.(Pfizer). This was a double blind study.

Under adverse events: 15 vaccinated participants died. 14 placebo participants died.

Cause of death not stated. See for yourself.

https://www.scribd.com/documen...59v1-full#from_embed

“you comply because you want it to end, but it never ends because you comply.”

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:

I think I laughed for a full minute at this. Then I laughed again when I went back to it. The look on that emoji as a non-verbal response was just...hilarious.

We all know by now that the MRNA vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission according to the CDC and the various vaccine makers, they only state that they may prevent serious disease.

Well here is an article that talks about how vaccines that still allow infection, may lead to mutations that cause more virulent and deadly mutations to occur. Here is one excerpt from the article. View entire article at link: https://www.quantamagazine.org...-to-evolve-20180510/



Tipping the Scales

Just as pathogens have different ways of infecting and affecting us, the vaccines that scientists develop employ different immunological strategies. Most of the vaccines we get in childhood prevent pathogens from replicating inside us and thereby also prevent us from transmitting the infections to others. But scientists have so far been unable to make these kinds of sterilizing vaccines for complicated pathogens like HIV, anthrax and malaria. To conquer these diseases, some researchers have been developing immunizations that prevent disease without actually preventing infections — what are called “leaky” vaccines. And these new vaccines may incite a different, and potentially scarier, kind of microbial evolution.

I think the scientific community is becoming increasingly aware that vaccine resistance is a real risk.

David Kennedy

Virulence, as a trait, is directly related to replication: The more pathogens that a person’s body houses, the sicker that person generally becomes. A high replication rate has evolutionary advantages — more microbes in the body lead to more microbes in snot or blood or stool, which gives the microbes more chances to infect others — but it also has costs, as it can kill hosts before they have the chance to pass on their infection. The problem with leaky vaccines, Read says, is that they enable pathogens to replicate unchecked while also protecting hosts from illness and death, thereby removing the costs associated with increased virulence. Over time, then, in a world of leaky vaccinations, a pathogen might evolve to become deadlier to unvaccinated hosts because it can reap the benefits of virulence without the costs — much as Marek’s disease has slowly become more lethal to unvaccinated chickens. This virulence can also cause the vaccine to start failing by causing illness in vaccinated hosts.

In addition to Marek’s disease, Read has been studying malaria, which is the target of several leaky vaccines currently in development. In a 2012 paper published in PLOS Biology, Read and Vicki Barclay, his postdoc at the time, inoculated mice with a component of several leaky malaria vaccines currently being tested in clinical trials. They then used these infected-but-not-sick mice to infect other vaccinated mice. After the parasites circulated through 21 rounds of vaccinated mice, Barclay and Read studied them and compared them to malaria parasites that had circulated through 21 rounds of unvaccinated mice. The strains from the vaccinated mice, they found, had grown far more virulent, in that they replicated faster and killed more red blood cells. At the end of 21 rounds of infection, these more quickly growing, deadly parasites were the only ones left.

I just found out that my sister, who is going back to her career in the Medical School, will be forced to take the jab. In order to be employed again.

I pray she will not suffer any of the side effects. Ironic that the same crowd who screams "Your body your choice!" when it comes to killing unborn babies is pushing NO CHOICE when it comes to the jab. Regards 18DAI

^^^^^^^^
If the dems didn’t have double-standards they would not have any standards at all -

Kamala Harris says she will be 'first in line' for a coronavirus vaccine if health experts approve it, but 'if Donald Trump tells us we should take it, then I'm not taking it'.

And from murdering gov. cuomo -

WaPo

“I’m not that confident,” Cuomo said, adding: “You’re going to say to the American people now, ‘Here’s a vaccine, it was new, it was done quickly, but trust this federal administration and their health administration that it’s safe? And we’re not 100 percent sure of the consequences.’ I think it’s going to be a very skeptical American public about taking the vaccine, and they should be.”

“Frankly, I’m not going to trust the federal government’s opinion, and I wouldn’t recommend [it] to New Yorkers, based on the federal government’s opinion.”

Imagine that - Cuomo actually said something that is true and makes sense.

Be careful. Excessive exposure to leftist "logic" will soften your brain, and that's even when they seem to be agreeing with you, because as sure as I'm sitting here, they always have some hidden motive.

https://www.scribd.com/documen...59v1-full#from_embed


From the clinical trials I mentioned earlier here are some more statistics.

There were 44165 participants.

29 people died 15 vaccinated 14 unvaccinated (cause of death not stated)

31 people had severe covid symptoms 1 vaccinated
30 unvaccinated.

So this means if you were unvaccinated your chance of getting severe covid is .0013

If you are vaccinated your chance of getting severe covid is .00004

Is this worth forcing people to take an experimental therapy that has never been used before?

It is not worth it to me. Even if the Pfizer shot is 96.7% effective in preventing severe disease, the chance of getting severe disease is extremely low to begin with. I know if you are older or have health problems you are at greater risk, but to force this on healthy young people and children is extremely unwarranted.

I've noticed recently, when out in stores, that alot elementary aged kids are wearing masks, even though their parents aren't.

Either their parents are afraid the kids will contract covid because they're not vaxxed, or more likely, they've been brainwashed by teachers, watching news, etc.

More ‘inconvenient truths’ from We ‘heart’ Trump -

Highly Vaccinated Iceland & Gibraltar DESTROY COVID-19 Vaccine Passport Narrative

Gibraltar -

“By June 1st, over 99% of Gibraltar's population was fully vaccinated. Since that time, new COVID cases per day have increased more than 2500%”

Iceland -

“Social distanciation and masks are back in one the most vaccinated nations of the world: Iceland.

Yesterday, 82% of the new cases were fully vaccinated.”

And the notorious CDC will not release its scientific findings on the ‘evolving and new science’ of the oh so horrible Delta variant (sarc).

Even the WaPo is reporting this absurdity -

CDC reversal on indoor masking prompts experts to ask, ‘Where’s the data?’