^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The source is Fauci himself. It was posted here on page 726.

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
Fauci Admits Only Around Half Of His Agency's Staff Are Vaccinated

https://www.zerohedge.com/covi...staff-are-vaccinated

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), said that about 40 percent of his agency’s employees have not received the COVID-19 vaccine, while a deputy at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said the agency is reporting similar numbers.

Rep. Jim Jordan nails it.
Where did this thing (COVID) start?
Why don’t Democrats in Congress want to know.
Why doesn’t the Select Committee on Covid want to know.
Why doesn’t Pelosi want to know.
Why doesn’t Fauci want to know.



HHS Assistant Secretary Adm. Brett Giroir stated that he believes the Wuhan Institute of Virology is “the most likely origin” of the coronavirus, and that the circumstantial evidence in favor of that theory is “overwhelming and the lack of another explanation is equally overwhelming.”

Link to article

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The source is Fauci himself. It was posted here on page 726.

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
Fauci Admits Only Around Half Of His Agency's Staff Are Vaccinated

https://www.zerohedge.com/covi...staff-are-vaccinated

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), said that about 40 percent of his agency’s employees have not received the COVID-19 vaccine, while a deputy at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said the agency is reporting similar numbers.

That article doesn't mention anyone refusing to get vaccinated. It it's quite possible that 40% of the employees are in their 20's, 30's, or 40's or they don't have any preexisting conditions therefore there's no reason for them to get vaccinated.

quote:

Originally posted by Skins2881:

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The source is Fauci himself. It was posted here on page 726.

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
Fauci Admits Only Around Half Of His Agency's Staff Are Vaccinated

https://www.zerohedge.com/covi...staff-are-vaccinated

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), said that about 40 percent of his agency’s employees have not received the COVID-19 vaccine, while a deputy at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said the agency is reporting similar numbers.

That article doesn't mention anyone refusing to get vaccinated. It it's quite possible that 40% of the employees are in their 20's, 30's, or 40's or they don't have any preexisting conditions therefore there's no reason for them to get vaccinated.

Why are those people being pressured to be vaccinated if there’s no reason for them to be vaccinated? At this point in the USA, only those resisting C19 vaccination remain unvaccinated. Myself included.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: arabiancowboy,

This is anecdotal but still very suggestive to me.

I go in for some health care periodically. I'm friendly with the staff. On a recent visit, they were encouraging me to not get any wuflu vaccine. They've had a number of their patients have severe conditions that they are attributing to the vaccines. While no scientific causal relationship has been established, it seems beyond mere coincidence given the incident rates and medical histories. This clinic treats chronic conditions so the patients are regularly seen.

I have no idea what percentage of their patients got the vaccine and how many had reactions. But it's a small clinic and it's surprising to me if they had one patient w/ adverse effects, let alone the dozen or so they talked about.

Not just blood clots and strokes, but also something that causes severe pain (PMR?) - several patients with no prior history. Multiple instances of shingles - could be coincidental but seems weird. A cardiologist wrote up something and sent it to big pharma which was basically ignored. Medical practitioners, it seems, are largely keeping silent when they observe reactions that may be attributable to the vaccines; they are largely not getting the vaccine around here.

If I would to wildly guess on incident rate based on this clinic, I'd say perhaps 2-10%. This seems significant given the severity of the reactions.

The bad stuff we're speculating - I think it's only the tip of the iceberg.

Everyone is being pressured to be vaccinated. Science be dammed they want those that have already had Covid19, the healthy, children and infants to get vaccinated. Doesn’t look good when the people pushing the vaccine have not taken it themselves.

Good article from The American Journal of Therapeutics. Too much info to put it all in this post so go to the link for the rest of the information.

https://journals.lww.com/ameri...nstrating_the.4.aspx

Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19

Abstract

Background:

After COVID-19 emerged on U.S shores, providers began reviewing the emerging basic science, translational, and clinical data to identify potentially effective treatment options. In addition, a multitude of both novel and repurposed therapeutic agents were used empirically and studied within clinical trials.

Areas of Uncertainty:

The majority of trialed agents have failed to provide reproducible, definitive proof of efficacy in reducing the mortality of COVID-19 with the exception of corticosteroids in moderate to severe disease. Recently, evidence has emerged that the oral antiparasitic agent ivermectin exhibits numerous antiviral and anti-inflammatory mechanisms with trial results reporting significant outcome benefits. Given some have not passed peer review, several expert groups including Unitaid/World Health Organization have undertaken a systematic global effort to contact all active trial investigators to rapidly gather the data needed to grade and perform meta-analyses.

Data Sources:

Data were sourced from published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts posted to preprint servers, expert meta-analyses, and numerous epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution campaigns.

Therapeutic Advances:

A large majority of randomized and observational controlled trials of ivermectin are reporting repeated, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes. Numerous prophylaxis trials demonstrate that regular ivermectin use leads to large reductions in transmission. Multiple, large “natural experiments” occurred in regions that initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns.

Conclusions:

Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.

much more at link.

I have a good friend that is a retired infrastructure engineer/analyst. He spent 30 years working for the "government" and traveled to all varieties of 3rd world shit holes.

He never left home without Ivermectin.

Apparently it has a wide range of uses against nasty stuff.

quote:

Originally posted by Skins2881:

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The source is Fauci himself. It was posted here on page 726.

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
Fauci Admits Only Around Half Of His Agency's Staff Are Vaccinated

https://www.zerohedge.com/covi...staff-are-vaccinated

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), said that about 40 percent of his agency’s employees have not received the COVID-19 vaccine, while a deputy at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said the agency is reporting similar numbers.

That article doesn't mention anyone refusing to get vaccinated. It it's quite possible that 40% of the employees are in their 20's, 30's, or 40's or they don't have any preexisting conditions therefore there's no reason for them to get vaccinated.

Sorry, no can do. They work for an organization that's fanatical about everyone in the country getting vaccinated. My money says their refusal likely has little to do with the circumstances you noted.

quote:

Originally posted by bigdeal:
Sorry, no can do. They work for an organization that's fanatical about everyone in the country getting vaccinated. My money says their refusal likely has little to do with the circumstances you noted.

Yeah, I haven't heard anything from that organization about there not being any reason to get vaccinated if you're between 20-50. They've been pushing for EVERYONE to get the shot. I'll put my money down with yours.

NH police didn’t get the memo that cloth masks have zero efficacy?

People should call out these idiots. If they are going to pretend that masks are necessary, at least pretend well. I hope they get sued and lawyers call them out on everything they are doing wrong. Use the funds to completely replace the admin and board.

Caught Red-Handed: CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx'd

https://www.zerohedge.com/covi...ew-covid-cases-among

New policies will artificially deflate “breakthrough infections” in the vaccinated, while the old rules continue to inflate case numbers in the unvaccinated.

The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) is altering its practices of data logging and testing for “Covid19” in order to make it seem the experimental gene-therapy “vaccines” are effective at preventing the alleged disease.

They made no secret of this, announcing the policy changes on their website in late April/early May, (though naturally without admitting the fairly obvious motivation behind the change).

The trick is in their reporting of what they call “breakthrough infections” – that is people who are fully “vaccinated” against Sars-Cov-2 infection, but get infected anyway.

Essentially, Covid19 has long been shown – to those willing to pay attention – to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors:

False-positive tests. The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold (CT value)

Inflated Case-count. The incredibly broad definition of “Covid case”, used all over the world, lists anyone who receives a positive test as a “Covid19 case”, even if they never experienced any symptoms.

Without these two policies, there would never have been an appreciable pandemic at all, and now the CDC has enacted two policy changes which means they no longer apply to vaccinated people.

Firstly, they are lowering their CT value when testing samples from suspected “breakthrough infections”.

From the CDC’s instructions for state health authorities on handling “possible breakthrough infections” (uploaded to their website in late April):

For cases with a known RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value, submit only specimens with Ct value ≤28 to CDC for sequencing. (Sequencing is not feasible with higher Ct values.)

Throughout the pandemic, CT values in excess of 35 have been the norm, with labs around the world going into the 40s.

Essentially labs were running as many cycles as necessary to achieve a positive result, despite experts warning that this was pointless (even Fauci himself said anything over 35 cycles is meaningless).

But NOW, and only for fully vaccinated people, the CDC will only accept samples achieved from 28 cycles or fewer. That can only be a deliberate decision in order to decrease the number of “breakthrough infections” being officially recorded.

Secondly, asymptomatic or mild infections will no longer be recorded as “covid cases”.

That’s right. Even if a sample collected at the low CT value of 28 can be sequenced into the virus alleged to cause Covid19, the CDC will no longer be keeping records of breakthrough infections that don’t result in hospitalisation or death.

From their website:

As of May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause. This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance. Previous case counts, which were last updated on April 26, 2021, are available for reference only and will not be updated moving forward.

Just like that, being asymptomatic – or having only minor symptoms – will no longer count as a “Covid case” but only if you’ve been vaccinated.

The CDC has put new policies in place which effectively created a tiered system of diagnosis. Meaning, from now on, unvaccinated people will find it much easier to be diagnosed with Covid19 than vaccinated people.

Consider…

Person A has not been vaccinated. They test positive for Covid using a PCR test at 40 cycles and, despite having no symptoms, they are officially a “covid case”.

Person B has been vaccinated. They test positive at 28 cycles, and spend six weeks bedridden with a high fever. Because they never went into a hospital and didn’t die they are NOT a Covid case.

Person C, who was also vaccinated, did die. After weeks in hospital with a high fever and respiratory problems. Only their positive PCR test was 29 cycles, so they’re not officially a Covid case either.

The CDC is demonstrating the beauty of having a “disease” that can appear or disappear depending on how you measure it.

To be clear: If these new policies had been the global approach to “Covid” since December 2019, there would never have been a pandemic at all.

If you apply them only to the vaccinated, but keep the old rules for the unvaccinated, the only possible result can be that the official records show “Covid” is much more prevalent among the latter than the former.

This is a policy designed to continuously inflate one number, and systematically minimise the other.

What is that if not an obvious and deliberate act of deception?

quote:

Originally posted by P220 Smudge:

quote:

Originally posted by bigdeal:
Sorry, no can do. They work for an organization that's fanatical about everyone in the country getting vaccinated. My money says their refusal likely has little to do with the circumstances you noted.

Yeah, I haven't heard anything from that organization about there not being any reason to get vaccinated if you're between 20-50. They've been pushing for EVERYONE to get the shot. I'll put my money down with yours.

If that is the case and they do have insider information causing them to refuse the shots, I'm surprised there's no whistle blowers considering it's 40-50% of employees. You'd think one or two would take the payment from the media, or try to sell a book deal for the information.

IIRC they did the same things with AIDS data back when it was becoming an epidemic. Change parameters to get the desired results. Figures lie and liars figure.

These vaccines magnetize people. That's the rumor. Well, it's bullshit, but it's imaginative bullshit.

Also, I heard that the Pfizer vaccine makes your testicles and sack ever so slightly luminescent. It's very faint, but your nads will glow. You have to be in a really dark room to see it.

OK, I made that up. Sorry.

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
What is that if not an obvious and deliberate act of deception?

Just another step in the process of trying to push people to take a vaccine most don't need or want. But yes, it's pure deception and yet another reason why people in growing numbers don't trust the government, CDC, the medical community, or by extension, the media pushing this BS narrative.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
Also, I heard that the Pfizer vaccine makes your testicles and sack ever so slightly luminescent. It's very faint, but your nads will glow. You have to be in a really dark room to see it.

Cool! That means I wouldn't need a flashlight any more when I take the dogs for a walk at night.

^^^^^^
Not quite sure the neighbors are gonna appreciate you free-ballin’ it while you’re walking Fido for his poop run. Just be careful.......

There is a wide variety of glow in the dark paint available now. Just dip your nutz into the paint and rock on! Totally DIY and no inoculation needed.