quote:

The World Health Organization (WHO) has labeled unvaccinated people a “major killing force globally”

Yeah, see... it's those of us who just want to be left alone to not participate in their experimental gene therapy that are a “major killing force globally”.

The WHO and I have something in common- neither cares what the other thinks.

The crazy thing is that all the health care providers/ clinicians/ urgent care folks I have spoken to here in WV completely agree that vaccinated people carry and spread Covid. At the place I just had pre-surgery blood work done at, the technician told me her husband who just retired from the army knows 2 friends in their 40’s that died unexpectedly post vaccination. It was enough for her to say “no more”.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/s...rnzsn11nH7zrJmcVuWQg

Whoever laughs last, laughs best. However the shot people won’t be around to hear our laughter.

quote:

Originally posted by marksman41:
If a person has not received any of the Wuhan flu shots and gets a blood transfusion from someone who has, will the non-shot individual now be infected with Fauci's Death Juice, or doesn't it work like that?

There was a video posted here interviewing several morticians about the “white, stringy, calimari-like clots” in veins and arteries in the deceased. At one point in the video, it was mentioned that in something like 26 decedents with this clotting, 25 of them were “vaccinated” and the 26th was not, but had received a blood transfusion from someone who was. I know nothing about the veracity of the information, but just in case it is true, I would not want a transfusion from anyone who had been “vaccinated.” Heck, I’d like to avoid needing a transfusion, but sometimes life doesn’t go as planned.

quote:

Originally posted by konata88:
Whoever laughs last, laughs best. However the shot people won’t be around to hear our laughter.

I hope you’re wrong. Too many people I care about were fooled into taking the jab. For their sakes (and the sake of others) I hope that the jabs are not as deadly as some are claiming. I’m not taking one, and I’m delighted that my wife & kids chose not to, but I am not wishing ill on those who were bamboozled or threatened into taking the jab.

5.47 billion Covid vaccinations worldwide.

And they're still pushing!

quote:

Originally posted by Patriot:
5.47 billion Covid vaccinations worldwide.

I believe that many doses have been made, but I do NOT believe than many jabs in arms.

quote:

I believe that many doses have been made, but I do NOT believe than many jabs in arms.

I agree.
Here in the US:
330 million people x about 70% vaxxed = 231 million x 2 doses = around 462 million shots?

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

quote:

I believe that many doses have been made, but I do NOT believe than many jabs in arms.

I agree.
Here in the US:
330 million people x about 70% vaxxed = 231 million x 2 doses = around 462 million shots?

There are a lot of quad+ vaxxed people out there. Who knows?

Over 70% of the worlds population (7.84b), not just the US.

Good lord, half the damn store is out sick and almost every single one of them is vaccinated. Meanwhile, us purebloods are in here picking up the slack as usual.

If this has been talked about then I apologize. My search scale yielded no results.


What are the thoughts on paxlovid?

Paxlovid’s efficacy is spotty enough that even Pfizer stopped recommending it for general use due to viral rebound for all but older high risk patients. To me it seems like more snake oil.

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Hea...rs/story?id=92886159

quote:

Paxlovid’s efficacy is spotty enough that even Pfizer stopped recommending it for general use due to viral rebound for all but older high risk patients. To me it seems like more snake oil.

The Moderna version, which is called Molnupiravir, is no better:

More problems emerged last week with Moderna’s fancy covid drug in the form of two studies. The first study published in The Lancet, titled, “Molnupiravir plus usual care versus usual care alone as early treatment for adults with COVID-19 at increased risk of adverse outcomes (PANORAMIC): an open-label, platform-adaptive randomised controlled trial.”

These researchers studied outcomes of patients with and without Moderna’s covid treatment Molnupiravir (its version of Paxlovid), and found that Molupiravir doesn’t work:

Molnupiravir did not reduce the frequency of COVID-19-associated hospitalisations or death among high-risk vaccinated adults in the community.

That’s not good. But that’s not all.

Another pre-print study published on MedRxIV the same day, December 22nd, titled “Antiviral treatments lead to the rapid accrual of hundreds of SARS-CoV-2 mutations in immunocompromised patients.”

The researchers also studied Moderna’s covid treatment Molnupiravir, which is supposed to reduce viral replication by scrambling covid’s genome. Nothing could go wrong with that plan.

But here’s what the researchers said:

Within days of treatment, we detected a large number of low-frequency mutations in patients and that these new mutations could persist and, in some cases, were fixed in the virus population … This commonly used class of antivirals has the capability to supercharge SARS-CoV-2 evolution, and uncontrolled use may generate new variants with a transmission advantage that prolongs the pandemic and makes other therapeutics less effective.

So, not only doesn’t the drug work — it does NOT reduce serious covid infections or deaths — but it “supercharges” the evolution of new covid variants by DELIBERATELY randomly mutating the covid gene.

The FDA approved that drug. You really can’t make this stuff up.

We spent a TON on this safe and effective wonder drug. A seven day course of Molnupiravir costs around $700. The federal government has pre-purchased billions of dollars worth, making the drug another runaway success for Moderna.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email

This reminds me, didn't Merck put out an Ivermectin clone?

ETA a quick search got me this:

https://www.statnews.com/pharm...hra-hospitalization/

Merck’s Covid-19 pill was no better than placebo in lowering the risk of hospitalization

A Merck pill used to combat Covid-19 failed to demonstrate it can lower the risk of hospitalization compared with a placebo among adults at a higher risk from the disease, according to the results of a large study conducted in the U.K.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

quote:

I believe that many doses have been made, but I do NOT believe than many jabs in arms.

I agree.
Here in the US:
330 million people x about 70% vaxxed = 231 million x 2 doses = around 462 million shots?

Very sobering to realize how many people fell for the scam. I knew most folks out there were sheep but the scale and to see it first hand is aomething to behold.

quote:

Originally posted by marksman41:
If a person has not received any of the Wuhan flu shots and gets a blood transfusion from someone who has, will the non-shot individual now be infected with Fauci's Death Juice, or doesn't it work like that?

I believe the issue is the mRNA nano particles remain spread around the body for some time after injection. A transfusion could contain some of those, which then would alter some cells in the recipient's body.

After some amount of time post injection, the nano particles clear from the body. How long idk. So, in theory, after that it would be safe to receive a transfusion from them.

The mRNA acts by invading a cell and causing it to make spike protein. Then the immune system makes antibodies against spike, which was supposed to provide immunity in case of future exposure to the virus. They said the cell's genetics would not be altered, but that has been found false, so when that cell replicates it will pass on the altered genetics.

It is my understanding that blood cells received in a transfusion do not replicate, so they should not cause your body to become altered. When the donated cells die, any altered dna in them dies too.

So the threat seems to be receiving blood with the nano mRNA in it which could invade your own cells. The longer it has been since they were jabbed, the less mRNA would be in their blood and the lower the threat to the blood's recipient.