Over 70% of the worlds population (7.84b), not just the US.

Good lord, half the damn store is out sick and almost every single one of them is vaccinated. Meanwhile, us purebloods are in here picking up the slack as usual.

If this has been talked about then I apologize. My search scale yielded no results.


What are the thoughts on paxlovid?

Paxlovid’s efficacy is spotty enough that even Pfizer stopped recommending it for general use due to viral rebound for all but older high risk patients. To me it seems like more snake oil.

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Hea...rs/story?id=92886159

quote:

Paxlovid’s efficacy is spotty enough that even Pfizer stopped recommending it for general use due to viral rebound for all but older high risk patients. To me it seems like more snake oil.

The Moderna version, which is called Molnupiravir, is no better:

More problems emerged last week with Moderna’s fancy covid drug in the form of two studies. The first study published in The Lancet, titled, “Molnupiravir plus usual care versus usual care alone as early treatment for adults with COVID-19 at increased risk of adverse outcomes (PANORAMIC): an open-label, platform-adaptive randomised controlled trial.”

These researchers studied outcomes of patients with and without Moderna’s covid treatment Molnupiravir (its version of Paxlovid), and found that Molupiravir doesn’t work:

Molnupiravir did not reduce the frequency of COVID-19-associated hospitalisations or death among high-risk vaccinated adults in the community.

That’s not good. But that’s not all.

Another pre-print study published on MedRxIV the same day, December 22nd, titled “Antiviral treatments lead to the rapid accrual of hundreds of SARS-CoV-2 mutations in immunocompromised patients.”

The researchers also studied Moderna’s covid treatment Molnupiravir, which is supposed to reduce viral replication by scrambling covid’s genome. Nothing could go wrong with that plan.

But here’s what the researchers said:

Within days of treatment, we detected a large number of low-frequency mutations in patients and that these new mutations could persist and, in some cases, were fixed in the virus population … This commonly used class of antivirals has the capability to supercharge SARS-CoV-2 evolution, and uncontrolled use may generate new variants with a transmission advantage that prolongs the pandemic and makes other therapeutics less effective.

So, not only doesn’t the drug work — it does NOT reduce serious covid infections or deaths — but it “supercharges” the evolution of new covid variants by DELIBERATELY randomly mutating the covid gene.

The FDA approved that drug. You really can’t make this stuff up.

We spent a TON on this safe and effective wonder drug. A seven day course of Molnupiravir costs around $700. The federal government has pre-purchased billions of dollars worth, making the drug another runaway success for Moderna.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email

This reminds me, didn't Merck put out an Ivermectin clone?

ETA a quick search got me this:

https://www.statnews.com/pharm...hra-hospitalization/

Merck’s Covid-19 pill was no better than placebo in lowering the risk of hospitalization

A Merck pill used to combat Covid-19 failed to demonstrate it can lower the risk of hospitalization compared with a placebo among adults at a higher risk from the disease, according to the results of a large study conducted in the U.K.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

quote:

I believe that many doses have been made, but I do NOT believe than many jabs in arms.

I agree.
Here in the US:
330 million people x about 70% vaxxed = 231 million x 2 doses = around 462 million shots?

Very sobering to realize how many people fell for the scam. I knew most folks out there were sheep but the scale and to see it first hand is aomething to behold.

quote:

Originally posted by marksman41:
If a person has not received any of the Wuhan flu shots and gets a blood transfusion from someone who has, will the non-shot individual now be infected with Fauci's Death Juice, or doesn't it work like that?

I believe the issue is the mRNA nano particles remain spread around the body for some time after injection. A transfusion could contain some of those, which then would alter some cells in the recipient's body.

After some amount of time post injection, the nano particles clear from the body. How long idk. So, in theory, after that it would be safe to receive a transfusion from them.

The mRNA acts by invading a cell and causing it to make spike protein. Then the immune system makes antibodies against spike, which was supposed to provide immunity in case of future exposure to the virus. They said the cell's genetics would not be altered, but that has been found false, so when that cell replicates it will pass on the altered genetics.

It is my understanding that blood cells received in a transfusion do not replicate, so they should not cause your body to become altered. When the donated cells die, any altered dna in them dies too.

So the threat seems to be receiving blood with the nano mRNA in it which could invade your own cells. The longer it has been since they were jabbed, the less mRNA would be in their blood and the lower the threat to the blood's recipient.

No one wants the booster... not even in senior living centers:

The New York Times ran a hysteria-fueled story December 21st headlined, “As Covid Deaths Climb, Even Seniors Skip the Latest Booster.”
Uh-oh!

The article begins with the obligatory personal story, that of Barbara Rock, who’s considered the ‘health matriarch’ at her Northern California senior living center. Her walker even has a sticker that says, “El Jefe” (the boss). The Times said the other seniors do whatever Barbara tells them. Although she told her fellow seniors to get the shots, and the first booster, she hasn’t yet advised them to get the new and improved bivalent booster.

“I didn’t know about it,” she curtly replied when asked about her oversight.

The Times blames the Biden Administration for failing to push the new booster hard enough in the care homes. But the paper unintentionally gives away what might be the real reason, when it quoted Dr. Sabine von Preyss-Friedman, a geriatric specialist.

Dr. Sabine reported some seniors have apathy about the new jab, because they misunderstand the vaccine’s purpose. For some bizarre reason the New York Times cannot possibly explain, seniors somehow got the idea the jabs prevented covid infections. She explained, “People are thinking, ‘I got the shot, and I still got Covid, so what’s the point?’”

Furthermore, a new Kaiser Family Foundation survey showed about 33% of adults 65 and older who got the first two shots, but not the booster, shockingly said they didn’t think they needed it. Talk about a narrative failure. Yet another 33% of those surveyed appallingly said they didn’t think the booster’s benefits were worth the risk.

“I feel fine,” Fiana Gutkin insisted, pushing around the collard greens on her plate as she shared plans to go tango dancing. “Why do I need it? I’m still waiting for someone to tell me that.”

Me too, Fiana. Me too.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email

And why WOULD someone feel compelled to get boosters when “vaccines” that are supposed to target the virus clearly do not do what they are billed to do? The victim was vaccinated and boosted; the real question is was her injury a result of vaccine injury or from Covid itself? A moot point to me when she almost dies after getting Covid post-multiple snake oil injections…

Woman, 36, almost passed out while walking. She was in heart failure due to COVID-19

https://www.today.com/today/amp/rcna63476

A month after having COVID-19, Jamie Waddell felt weak after walking a short distance. She thought she hadn't recovered. She had no idea her heart was failing.

When Jamie Waddell tested positive for COVID-19 for the first time in August, she was much sicker than she expected. After 10 days, she felt better and returned to school and work. But a few weeks later, she noticed she struggled to walk down the street without feeling faint. Soon, she couldn’t talk without getting winded. By Labor Day, she was so sick that she visited the emergency room, where she learned she had sepsis, pneumonia and heart failure.

“Based on the fact that I kept feeling worse and worse, I’m guessing my heart function had probably been declining over that whole week, and by the time I got to the ER, I was septic,” Waddell, 36, a nurse from Springfield, Illinois, tells TODAY.com. “They did an echocardiogram. My heart function was really low. I was in heart failure.”

In early August, Waddell and her husband were preparing to go on vacation and tested positive for COVID-19. She was vaccinated and boosted and felt surprised by how sick she felt.

More in the article, a long read; it never really touches on the more salient facts- the woman nearly died from either Covid or the “vaccine” that was supposed to be able to either protect her, or not kill her as an adverse reaction.

quote:

Originally posted by TheNewbie:
If this has been talked about then I apologize. My search scale yielded no results.


What are the thoughts on paxlovid?

FWIW I spent the last few weeks in and out of a couple local hospital systems. During some down time, I asked a couple different nurses how they handle Covid these days. I got rather vague answers. I asked if they were using Paxlovid. I got a couple blank stares and got the impression they didn't know what I was talking about.

Interesting article on substack:

"This is a passage from General Kirillov’s briefing: We have previously presented materials confirming the involvement of Hunter Biden and his Rosemont Seneca Foundation, as well as other US Democratic Party-controlled entities, in funding the Pentagon's main contractors operating in Ukraine. It has been shown how deeply the son of the current US president, Hunter Biden, is involved in funding the US DOD-controlled company Metabiota. However, some participants in closed projects remain in the shadows, although they are key players in Ukraine's military-biological programme.

They include former DITRA director Kenneth Myers, executive vice president of the CIA-controlled In-Q-Tel venture capital fund Tara O'Toole, former head of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Thomas Frieden, former the National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins, former Battelle Memorial Institute executive director Jeffrey Wadsworth, chief scientist and president of international research, development and medicine at Pfizer and many others.

All of them, in one way or another, are beneficiaries of the Pentagon's biological projects and are linked to the US Democratic Party, whose leaders act as the masterminds of military- biological research and the creators of covert money-laundering schemes to benefit a narrow circle of US elites."

Source: russian-mil-begin-naming-names

First it was the Gateway Arch in St Louis, now it's Harper's Ferry in WV. The National Park Service is keeping us safe!

https://www.journal-news.net/j...1d-2ff9144ba803.html

Harpers Ferry Park requiring masks indoors

By Toni Milbourne
tmilbourne@journal-news.net
Dec 27, 2022

HARPERS FERRY—According to an update on the website of the Harpers Ferry National Historical Park, visitors to the town must once again don face masks to gain entrance to park buildings.

The update, posted Dec. 23, calls for all visitors entering park exhibits and buildings or riding park shuttle buses wear face masks. The reasoning, according to the park site, is that Jefferson County is reported as an area with high Covid-19 community levels, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The requirement for masks is for everyone, regardless of vaccination status.

According to the CDC website, the community levels are measured using a variety of metrics. Among those is if an area has had 20 or more new Covid-19 admissions per 100,000 people over the previous seven days; has 15 percent or more staffed inpatient beds occupied by Covid-19 patients over the previous seven days; has had 10 or more new Covid-19 admissions per 100,000 population over the last seven days; has 10 percent or more of staffed inpatient beds occupied by Covid-19 patients over the last seven days.

The CDC site explained that the higher of the new Covid-19 hospital admissions and percent of inpatient beds occupied is adjusted up by one level if the new Covid-19 cases indicator is 200 or more cases per 100,000 population in the last seven days.

According to the CDC, a rapid rise in new cases may forecast increases in new hospitalizations or inpatient beds occupied by COVID-19 patients. Monitoring this leading indicator can allow communities to plan appropriately.

The Park Service has chosen to plan as if the numbers are on the rise. West Virginia is also one of the few states who are still under a Covid-19 State of Emergency although Gov. Jim Justice has indicated the State of Emergency will be lifted on Jan. 1. It is not clear whether the National Park Service will lift their mask requirements when the State of Emergency is lifted.

According to their website, there are also a number of areas of the park that are closed due to Covid-19, including the Black Voices/African American History, A. Burton Fine Watch Repair/Burton Jewelry Store, Civil War Museum, Harper House and Officer’s Quarters exhibits.

The Schoolhouse Ridge South trail is also partially closed, although the website said the cause of this closure is due to sinkholes.

quote:

All of them, in one way or another, are beneficiaries of the Pentagon's biological projects and are linked to the US Democratic Party, whose leaders act as the masterminds of military- biological research and the creators of covert money-laundering schemes to benefit a narrow circle of US elites."

This is the HUGE under-reported story.
The DoD and DARPA had patents on this Covid mRNA shot long before "Operation Warp Speed".

The more you jab... the worse it gets...

Re: the record covid deaths in Japan this week — in spite of that country’s high vaccination rate (82%). During my research later in the day, I noticed another curious fact: Japan has the highest booster uptake. By a lot.



Covid vaccination has flatlined worldwide, everywhere but Japan. The U.S. comes in second, but is on a diving trajectory heading straight down. China is third place, but at very small numbers, especially relative to its population. The figures suggest those may just be the Chinese facing international jab mandates for travel and visiting foreign educational institutions. Everywhere else in the world the numbers are trivial.

The Tampa Bay Times recently ran a roundup of letters to the editor about the falling booster rates among Florida seniors. Most of the letters blamed Governor DeSantis, because he’s “anti science” or something, but the Times did run one letter describing a vaccine injury.

Six months ago, there’s NO WAY that lone anti-jab letter would have seen print. Progress.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email

Eye opener...

Article critical of Fauci actually published by Newsweek

^^^Might as well copy/paste it so we can read it here...

Fauci Leaves a Broken Agency for His Successor | Opinion

Marty Makary , Professor, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
On 12/30/22 at 6:00 AM EST

After 54 years at the NIH, tomorrow marks Dr. Anthony Fauci's last day in office as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). While many were angered by his changing and conflicting recommendations, I am not. They are mere symptoms of a much larger and deeper problem. Dr. Fauci's agency failed to promptly fund key research during the pandemic. That research would have abruptly ended many of the COVID controversies that divided our country.

In a study of NIH funding published in The BMJ, my Johns Hopkins colleagues and I found that in the first year of the pandemic, it took the NIH an average of five months to give money to researchers after they were awarded a COVID grant. This should be unacceptable during a health emergency.

Consider the question of how COVID spread—was it airborne or spread on surfaces? (Remember all those people wiping down their groceries?) It lingered as an open question without good research for months, as Fauci spent hundreds of hours on television opining on the matter. Finally, on August 17, 2021—a year and a half after COVID lockdowns began—Dr. Fauci's agency released results of a study showing the disease was airborne. Thanks for that. The announcement on the NIAID website, titled "NIH Hamster Study Evaluates Airborne and Fomite Transmission of SARS-CoV-2" came 18 months too late.

Imagine if, in February 2020, Dr. Fauci had marshaled his $6 billion budget, vast laboratory facilities, and teams of experts to conduct a definitive lab experiment to establish that COVID was airborne. On this question and many others throughout the pandemic, our problem was not that the science changed—it's that it wasn't done.

NIH funding for COVID research was also erratic. The NIH spent almost $1.2 billion on long COVID research, but virtually nothing on masks, natural immunity, COVID in children, or vaccine complications. Ironically, the NIH spent more than twice as much on aging research as it did on COVID research in the first year of the pandemic, according to my team's analysis. I'm all for aging research, but not when a novel virus is killing thousands of Americans per day.

A randomized controlled trial is the gold-standard method to establish a drug's effectiveness. Yet remarkably, for COVID, we still don't have randomized trials for so many drug recommendations, including the new bivalent vaccine, COVID vaccine boosters in young people, the optimal vaccine dosing interval, and even the antiviral drug Paxlovid in vaccinated people. More disturbing, our country has been deeply divided for years about whether to mask children. The partisan arguing and harm to children could have been avoided if a proper study settled the science early.

Because the NIH moved at glacial speed, most of our COVID knowledge came from overseas. The critical discovery that steroids reduce COVID mortality by one-third came only after European researchers did a randomized trial that Fauci's agency should have commissioned quickly. Similarly, a conclusive study showing that Vitamin D reduces COVID mortality, published last month, arrived two years too late.

The official government job description for Dr. Fauci's role states that the director must "respond rapidly to emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases." Dr. Fauci didn't do that during the coronavirus pandemic. In order for the U.S. to respond better to the next pandemic, we will need our nation's infectious diseases research agency, and its top doctor, to act with a sense of urgency.

The NIH's disheveled COVID response is a window into a bureaucracy that has underperformed for decades. With obvious biases and blind spots, our nation's top research institution has long hindered research progress in important topics, from food as medicine to the role of general body inflammation in disease. The "H" in "NIH" stands for health, and health means much more than laboratory medicine. That means it should fund proper studies on environmental exposures that cause cancer, not just chemotherapies to treat it. The NIH's legacy system of having the oldest scientists in the room determine what research is worthy of investigation crowds out the study of fresh new ideas.

The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), the most widely circulated medical journal, recently reported its most-discussed articles of 2022. The top three articles were on the discovery of mRNA vaccine particles in breast milk, myocarditis after COVID vaccination, and a study I led at Johns Hopkins on the durability of natural immunity. None of the three were funded by the NIH—all were topics downplayed by Dr. Fauci and other public health officials.

On a personal level, many infectious disease doctors and academic physicians have told me privately they were afraid to disagree with Dr. Fauci because their entire career is dependent on NIH funding. We are now learning—through the Twitter files—that U.S. health agencies pushed for the censorship of opposing opinions from top scientists at top institutions. Health officials could have spent that time and energy conducting much-needed scientifically sound research.

If Dr. Fauci wants to forever improve the agency he is now departing, he should speak out against medical censorship and publicly call for the immediate discontinuation of a White House internal policy that the thousands of doctors and scientists at the NIH, FDA, and CDC are not allowed to speak to the media. Medical discussion should not be a privilege hoarded by a select few agency leaders.

Dr. Fauci made helpful contributions during the pandemic, urging people to take COVID seriously and encouraging high-risk Americans to get vaccinated. But at a desperate time when the country needed the NIAID to work, it didn't. Fauci's agency failed to pivot its mammoth research infrastructure to give doctors and policymakers the medical evidence they needed at a critical time. In the absence of evidence, dogma ruled the day. The result has been the most politicized pandemic in history and a loss of public trust. Rebuilding that trust and a broken agency will be the charge of Dr. Fauci's successor.

Dr. Marty Makary is a professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and author of The Price We Pay.

https://www.newsweek.com/fauci...ssor-opinion-1770215

Dr. Fauci's agency failed to promptly fund key research during the pandemic. That research would have abruptly ended many of the COVID controversies that divided our country.
Perhaps. But he had no interest in ending the controversies. He wanted to keep the wuflu fire stoked, keep selling those shots, and keep the scrutiny of any culpability off him.

our problem was not that the science changed—it's that it wasn't done
Well, the science would have ended the personal wealth growth.

The top three articles were on the discovery of mRNA vaccine particles in breast milk, myocarditis after COVID vaccination, and a study I led at Johns Hopkins on the durability of natural immunity. None of the three were funded by the NIH—all were topics downplayed by Dr. Fauci and other public health officials.
ibid.

U.S. health agencies pushed for the censorship of opposing opinions from top scientists at top institutions.
Because why? And what about accountability? Not very scientific for science oriented people. And seems criminal in nature, especially if financial gain is involved.

If Dr. Fauci wants to forever improve the agency he is now departing
He should admit his criminality, forego his ill gotten wealth gains, decline his pension and benefits, serve his time (or execution if so warranted) and close down the NIH, FDA and CDC as they exist today. Build what is needed from scratch.

quote:

^^^Might as well copy/paste it so we can read it here...

I don't know how to do that without including all the graphics, ads, etc.

^^^
It’s a little tedious but doable. Just copy blocks of text at a time, skipping over ads, pics, vids, etc.