quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
The issue is not the believers who say the vaccines are safe and effective; and that the clots and sudden deaths are not from the vaccines. Let them take Big Pharma's vaccines until the vaccines harm or kill them. The issue is the believers wanting us to take the vaccines. That is what must be resisted.

Not only should we be allowed to openly resist the garbage vaccines, we should be able to demand accountability and answers for all the lies from the top down. ALL of them. The most prominent lie from the cucumber in chief was that the vaccines would prevent you from getting Covid. A known, blatant lie that piece of shit Biden was fed and regurgitated until it was clear that it was a false promise.

We all know the plandemic was about 2 things: obscene profits and control. Those that knowingly supported the false claims that were without validity or repercussions need to be hauled into the light and exposed. I would prefer hanged by the neck until dead, but I’d settle for exposed and stripped of all titles and financial gains they accrued from the lies they knew to be lies. They aren’t just traitors to the US population, they are traitors to humanity at large.
Now the vaccinated are dying at higher rates than the unvaccinated. The liars say “well of course they are; a majority of people in the US are at least a little vaccinated so it makes sense”. So in one breath they still tell everyone to get a vaccine to protect themselves, and in the next admit that it won’t save you in the long run.

We have had supposed intelligent people insist that these fraudulent injections were considered vaccines despite their collective failure to prevent immobilization and transmission of the disease they were supposed to address. They are, by definition, most certainly not vaccines. They were at best prophylactics for the vulnerable. At best. There’s a couple of reasons they’ve stopped talking about the newest “this, that, or the other” variant concoctions. They STILL don’t meet the requirements and definitions of a vaccine. Do a search for “Covid” and nearly all the news centers around China’s lockdown, Twitter dropping its”Covid disinformation policy”, and of course that retarded “let’s declare a pandemic amnesty” which is a month old. Not one story about vaccine efficacy or effectiveness. Zero. A bit more than ironic, wouldn’t you say?

I never miss a chance to drive this last point home to anyone that is still so brainwashed that they support putting this crap in their bodies- I got the wuflu one time a year ago. Once. Despite being in a job that puts me logarithmically in contact with tens of thousands of people. Even from same-room exposure to positive test confirmed illness of 2 co-workers, which actually means everyone that were also exposed to them so technically more than 2. I know many people that accepted the “vaccine” lies (incredibly, some still do) and have been infected multiple times.

Who’s following the science now?

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:


Only one MIT Professor has really been paying attention to what is going on. He’s not mincing words. The vaccines should be halted until we find out what is going on here.


https://www.theepochtimes.com/...gn=socialshare_email

Maybe it has something to do with the Quantum Dot Vaccine Technology the rest of the MIT Professors have been working on for Bill.

quote:

Now the vaccinated are dying at higher rates than the unvaccinated. The liars say “well of course they are; a majority of people in the US are at least a little vaccinated so it makes sense”. So in one breath they still tell everyone to get a vaccine to protect themselves, and in the next admit that it won’t save you in the long run.

'Negative Efficacy' Should Have Stopped COVID Vaccine Recommendations In Their Tracks

Authored by Dr. Sean Lin and Mingjia Jacky Guan via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Recently, various health agencies around the world have approved and are actively pushing for another COVID booster shot, meant to enhance the vaccine efficacy against a COVD-19 infection.

However, many studies have found that the boosters do not make a significant difference in protection, especially in terms of protection against reinfection. In fact, the latest data shows vaccine efficacy against the coronavirus tends to even drop into the negatives after just a few months.

What Does Negative Efficacy Mean?

It is a well known fact that COVID vaccine effectiveness wanes quickly as time goes on; this is confirmed by countless studies.

Although the official narrative for COVID-19 vaccines nowadays only emphasizes its efficacy on protection against ICU admission and death rates, it actually implies the indisputable fact that vaccines don’t protect, contrary to their design, against infection or even symptomatic infection, especially after the emergence of various Omicron variants.

Even the protection two shots offers against hospitalization drops to about 40 percent after less than a year. It’s actually looking worse for protection against severe symptoms, as efficacy rates seem to drop into the negatives about five months into full vaccination.

When a vaccine’s efficacy drops into the negatives, it means that vaccination actually elevates the risks of hospitalization and severe diseases rather than reducing the risks. In simple terms, it does more harm than good when the efficacy is negative.

During the time prior to the pandemic, any vaccine with an efficacy less than 50 percent would be regarded as a poor product. When a product shows negative efficacy, it should be banned. It seems that the pandemic isn’t only bad for our health, but also is tugging at our common sense.

COVID Vaccines’ Declining Usefulness

It has been around three years since the first COVID-19 case was discovered in Wuhan, China. Since then, more than 600 million cases of the virus have been recorded, translating into a little less than 1 in 10 people around the world already being infected with the virus. In many countries, “living with COVID” has become the norm, along with getting “fully vaccinated” and getting those booster shots.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), it is recommended that everyone 6 months and older should receive a full vaccination and everyone 5 years and older should receive a booster shot. Booster shots are recommended as they “are an important part of protecting yourself from getting seriously ill or dying from COVID-19” according to the CDC.

However, emerging data paints a different picture.

At its crux, the vaccines were developed with the earlier strains of the coronavirus, meaning developers primarily used the original Wuhan strain in their testing. The Delta strain that came along was particularly infamous as it was known to have a high death rate, but vaccines fared quite well against it. The results, however, went south as time went on and as the Omicron strain rolled out.

Trying to Outrun Nature

Making its debut in South Africa, the Omicron strain started to dominate the world by the beginning of 2022, which caused even more turmoil in terms of vaccine efficacy. The most shocking result is the extent it dragged down the vaccine’s efficacy against infection. Data shows that the vaccine used to be around 90 percent effective for weeks on end after vaccination.

After Omicron came along, infection prevention dropped to less than 50 percent after about a month after two shots and dived into the negatives four months later. It doesn’t seem to stop after that.

This clearly suggests that the COVID-19 vaccination campaigns should’ve been suspended as soon as the Omicron variant began to dominate over Delta.

In a study which analyzed COVID-19 cases from the beginning of this year in children that were previously infected, it was discovered that vaccine effectiveness wasn’t keeping up with pre-Omicron levels. The effects of a full vaccination against a second infection drops into the negatives within a few months, and it seems that the earlier one got the vaccination, the more likely it would lose its efficacy during the omicron waves.

The results from a September 2022 British Medical Journal study highlights again the fact that vaccine potency drops rapidly with time. It concluded that protection against severe symptoms drops well below half within a few weeks of administering the full two doses, or even after a third dose is administered. It also showed that in the immunocompromised, two doses never had an efficacy rate against hospitalization over 50 percent. Things do look a little better for three doses, but not by much.

Another study published data on the efficacy of the third dose relative to primary doses and found that the mean efficacy of three doses of the Moderna vaccine against the Omicron variants are, in fact, below 0.

It is interesting to note a logical assumption made by many, which is that the more you take the vaccine the better prepared you are against the virus, isn’t necessarily true.

Data published shows that neutralizing antibody count doesn’t necessarily correlate with the number of doses.

They found that people who took the fourth dose sometimes had higher, but mostly lower, antibody concentrations in the body compared with those who took the third dose.

Also, the hazard ratio calculated by researchers for the third and fourth vaccine doses provide us with mixed results. Sometimes, it seems like a good option to stick with the third dose, as the hazard ratio actually rises for taking the second booster compared with the first one.

One possible reason vaccine data is going downhill after Omicron appeared is that the new variant had a lot of changes in its spike protein composition.

This changes the way the virus enters the body and allows it to better “bypass” the security system set up by the old vaccines, which were developed from the very first SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan strain. One can understand it as if the variants have new toys to play with the old security guards.

Another potential mechanism that leads to the significant decline of vaccine efficacy is that repeated vaccination also damages people’s immunity via immune imprinting, a phenomenon in which an initial exposure to a virus–such as the original strain of SARS-CoV-2, by infection or vaccination–limits a person’s future immune response against variants.

Meanwhile, there are numerous underlying factors that would contribute to the disease’s progression from mild to severe, or even into fatal stages. Even if the vaccination groups during clinical trials were carefully chosen to have similar comorbid medical conditions as the control or unvaccinated group, there are still many other unknown factors that would dictate the outcome of the disease progression.

It is inconceivable and overtly overambitious that any pharmaceutical company would aim so high to design a vaccine which can protect against severe diseases from the onset of research, especially since the resulting vaccine can’t seem to keep up with preventing infection in the first place.

If a vaccine reaches negative efficacy, it means that people have higher chances to get infected than if you didn’t get the shot in the first place, meaning that not getting vaccinated might just reduce the chance of infection, unwanted symptoms, and severe disease. This is not just a vaccine failure or breakthrough infection issue, but a good time to halt COVID vaccines for good. Humans will never win in this cat-and-mouse game against nature.
Are Previous Infections Still Protective?

As time goes on, the likelihood of reinfection is quite high. Studies do show that in reinfected people the chances of death, hospitalization, and some form of sequela is much higher in those infected for the first time. It also seems like a logical conclusion for the CDC to recommend that everyone gets vaccinated.

However, the data we have is rather conflicting as the aforementioned study doesn’t show much of a difference between the unvaccinated, the half vaccinated, or the fully vaccinated. They all have just about the same values for cardiovascular, thrombotic, renal, or pulmonary sequelae post infection, or chances of getting a tough COVID-19 infection in the first place.

Data also shows that previously infected and unvaccinated children were better at preventing a second infection compared with children who were in the same age category but who were vaccinated. Generally speaking, vaccine induced immunity doesn’t seem to be quite as effective as that induced by a previous, natural infection.

What this essentially means is that the vaccines cannot keep up with the constantly emerging variants and that a waning efficacy was frankly inevitable. The only question left is, what is the driving force behind the Omicron variants, or SARS-CoV-2 variants on a broad scale? What accounts for variants emerging at the same time around the world?

Microevolution cannot explain everything.

Over the past 3 years, scientists have applied the theory of evolution to describe and explain the trajectory of SARS-CoV-2. Delta was the deadly variant and now Omicron is the road runner. In theory, the virus developed these strains to best adapt to the objective environment, yet scientists are still looking for more answers.

For example, when much of the world’s population was in different degrees of “lockdown” or restriction of movements, when international travel was severely impaired, how did the Alpha and Delta variants emerge and quickly spread widely, and even become dominant globally?

If the only factor that determines which variant to become dominant or not was its fitness, i.e., its transmissibility and replication efficiency, why were there not multiple variants with better fitness that emerged and all became dominant regionally, just like how divergent strains of flowers blossom at the same time in distinct locations? Why does it appear as if there is a coordinating force behind the virus such that one strain was able to uniformly retire the previous one?

In order to answer all these questions, I believe that there needs to be a more holistic evaluation of the current pandemic. At the same time, it’s important to note that viruses adapt to the vaccines, and not the other way around.

Read more here...

There were plenty of outbreaks in the past, such as measles and polio, but they all disappeared with time. Many times when pandemics traversed the earth, the pathogen was truly in an optimal state to essentially infect mankind. However, they all disappeared, and it was seldom because of some vaccine. Polio, for example, was already in its stark decline when the vaccine rolled out.

Quite similarly to today’s situation, the polio vaccine was hailed as a wunderkind, yet it played quite a small role during pandemic prevention. The findings we have today about the COVID-19 shots are similarly discouraging, perhaps because we are still in the middle of it. However, the virus is still evolving and a vaccine is not going to be the simple answer out. Omicron shows that SARS-CoV-2 is smart enough to evolve and dodge it.

The pattern is not simple and requires more deliberation to find a sophisticated answer, if human limitations even allow us to discover one in the first place. It is almost as if there were some factors at play behind the trajectory of the virus that microevolution fails to explain, because it is most likely more complex than that.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...er&src_cmp=ZeroHedge

Meanwhile... Your tax dollars at work:

December 1, 2022
HRSA Announces New $350 Million Initiative to Increase COVID-19 Vaccinations

HRSA will distribute funding to health centers to support community-based vaccination events and outreach focused on underserved populations

November 22 – HRSA announced a new $350 million initiative for HRSA-supported health centers to increase COVID-19 vaccines in their communities, with a specific focus on underserved populations. This funding will support health centers administering updated COVID-19 vaccines through mobile, drive-up, walk-up, or community-based vaccination events, including working with community-based organizations, and other efforts to increase the administration of COVID-19 vaccines.

"Our message is simple: Don’t wait. Get an updated COVID-19 vaccine this fall. It’s safe and effective.”

Read the press release.
https://www.hhs.gov/about/news...m_source=govdelivery

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
with a specific focus on underserved populations.

"Our message is simple: Don’t wait. Get an updated COVID-19 vaccine this fall. It’s safe and effective.”
[/url]

Quiet culling.

"Here, take these blankets, they are safe and effective."

quote:

Originally posted by Tuckerrnr1:

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
with a specific focus on underserved populations.

"Our message is simple: Don’t wait. Get an updated COVID-19 vaccine this fall. It’s safe and effective.”

Quiet culling.

"Here, take these blankets, they are safe and effective."

It is hard to see it any other way.

More like:

“Just get in the box car- it is safe and effective”.

Fauci can't seem to remember much... a lot like Hillary Clinton when under oath.

The Deposition of Anthony Fauci
Steve Kirsch

While most of the US population were enjoying Thanksgiving week, Anthony Fauci sat under oath to answer questions about the Biden Administration's unconstitutional and dangerous efforts to bypass our First Amendment.

In the case of Missouri v Biden, the Attorneys General of Missouri and Louisiana are suing the Biden Administration for colluding with Big Tech to censor social media users who questioned or criticized official Covid policies.

To work around the First Amendment, Biden Administration officials identified individuals, organizations, doctors, scientists, and scholars as dangerous (for voicing criticism of government Covid policy). The administration then coordinated with social media companies to deplatform those individuals. This work-around of the Constitution is not only illegal but also a danger to our democracy. The state cannot assign to private sector actors its own violation of our constitutional rights and then claim immunity from the law. 

Having fought for months in the Fifth Circuit, Fauci was finally deposed last week. In seven hours of testimony, Fauci couldn’t seem to recall any of the policies that he himself trumpeted on the Chris Cuomo Show, The View, and every other corporate broadcast in 2020 that covered Covid. 

Here’s a roundup of the most interesting takes from Fauci’s testimony:

From the Brownstone Institute:

"From our deposition of Fauci yesterday in the MO v. Biden case. Fauci confirmed that in Feb 2020, Fauci sent Clifford Lane, his deputy at the NIAID [National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease], as the U.S. representative for the WHO delegation to China. Lane convinced Fauci we should emulate China’s lockdowns."

From Attorney Jenin Younes of the New Civil Liberties Alliance in the Tablet Magazine: 

"The Missouri documents, along with some obtained through discovery in Berenson v. Twitter and a FOIA request by America First Legal, expose the extent of the administration’s appropriation of big tech to effect a vast and unprecedented regime of viewpoint-based censorship on the information that most Americans see, hear and otherwise consume. At least 11 federal agencies, and around 80 government officials, have been explicitly directing social media companies to take down posts and remove certain accounts that violate the government’s own preferences and guidelines for coverage on topics ranging from COVID restrictions to the 2020 election, to the Hunter Biden laptop scandal."

From Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, MD's Substack: 

"And then there are the consequent downstream adverse effects of this kind of censorship—not only on those who are directly censored but on other users of the platform who self-censor to avoid similar punishments. Most concerningly, readers are deprived of access to contrasting information or open debate from which to inform their viewpoints, leading to the false impression of a scientific “consensus” when no such consensus exists."

Anthony Fauci is one of the most successful bureaucrats in American history; for over 40 years this man has lied, schemed, and harmed the American public to maintain his position, influence, and power. One small but telling example of his fraud was revealed in his deposition testimony. He claimed he “didn’t have time to worry about the Great Barrington Declaration” (GBD), in which top medical experts in 2020 had proposed “focused protection” of the most vulnerable to Covid in lieu of harmful, society-wide lockdowns. Yet Fauci was emailing his subordinates about GBD to defame it, and went on broadcast news to attack it.

"So Fauci claimed under oath at his censorship deposition that he hasn't ‘time to worry about things like the Great Barrington Declaration.’ Did he lie under oath? Fauci email to Birx, 10-16-2020 'I have come out very strongly publicly against the Great Barrington Declaration'.”

https://stevekirsch.substack.c...ion-of-anthony-fauci

Fuckin' little weasel. I hope he falls down stairs and breaks his fucking neck.

I had some time earlier today and watched the “Died Suddenly” broadcast. Right after that I read the local and national news. I lost count of the stories about those individuals who reportedly died suddenly.

quote:

Originally posted by mcrimm:
I had some time earlier today and watched the “Died Suddenly” broadcast. Right after that I read the local and national news. I lost count of the stories about those individuals who reportedly died suddenly.

Yeah, the next five years or so are going to be real interesting. For a lie this big, there can never be a "sorry, we were wrong," can there? But people will continue to drop dead, their vascular systems clogged with proteins that the mRNA grew.

I didn't get any of the mystery shots, and neither did my son. My wife did because her company was threatening firing - a stance they've since dropped. No adverse affects for her so far, except getting sick as a dog for a week solid afterwards. She was a bit of a believer and continued wearing a mask in public long after I refused, maybe more than a year. She mentioned wanting to get our son vaccinated when they made them available for children and I told her "over my dead fucking body, and that's not a cute turn of phrase, you will have to kill me to get that stuff in him while I'm around and if you do it behind my back, we will have a goddamn fight on our hands like you can't imagine." To the best of my knowledge, she let it drop there. I asked him a few times about getting shots with mom and he said no. In the last year, her attitude has changed. She didn't get any boosters, she watched all her "vaxxxxxxed and boooooooosted" friends and family get sick with it. My son and I each had it almost exactly a year ago, then I lost my sense of smell in April.

Up until now, she's not gotten it. The last two days, my wife has stayed home sick. We're giving her a wide berth, but nobody is wearing masks and he and I both feel fine. I haven't even moved to the guest room. She refuses to get tested, I think because of the hassle that will follow with a positive test. It's whatever, as far as I'm concerned. We'll get it or we won't, it'll be really bad or it won't, we'll get over it with or without lasting effects. I'm not growing any mystery proteins in my blood that didn't come from the virus itself, as I don't mind being part of a control group.

Here is a perfect example of the kind of flawed mental gymnastics people are capable of in attempts to try and scare fools into sticking poisoned needles in their arms. In this article by the Guardian, the headline reads-

“WHO estimates 90% of world have some resistance to Covid”.

This insinuates that a full 6.5 BILLION people have had Covid, and/or been injected with poison touted to help against it. Later in the article another stat is listed; that 6.5 million have died of the disease (not a likelihood, given obvious lies about Covid death numbers but we’ll ignore common sense for a tick) out of 640 million registered cases. This yields a barely 1% mortality rate. Let that sink in. Out of approximately 10% of the global population. In other words, they base total deaths by percentage on REGISTERED cases. In other words, positive test cases.

So what are they implying? That only 1/10 of the world has gotten Covid? That’s what they base their patently false mortality numbers on? At this point, you would be hard pressed to speak to anyone that has not gotten the bug. Let’s say for the sake of argument that only half the global population has been infected at any time, registered or not. 3.5 billion or so. This yields a mortality rate of only .0018. Roughly that of seasonal flu.

Personally, I believe the number of infections to be far higher than 50% of global population; at this point, it would be nearly impossible not to. But even at that level, it should be clear to anyone with working grey matter that this was blown monumentally out of proportion. And perhaps it is sinking in; “vaccine” uptake is at an abysmal 11% uptake in the US for all age groups combined. Despite the constant fear mongering about new variants taking hold because “people aren’t getting boosters”. As we speak, the Biden administration is ramping up another “free vaccine” push at taxpayer expense since it’s clear nobody wants to pay for it.

https://amp.theguardian.com/wo...-resistance-to-covid

I went in for my annual check up the other day. Only the second time seeing this doctor.

Facility still requires masking, which I will not hold against him. Practice is owned by one of the big hospital systems, and that nonsense comes from them.

His little computer told him I was due for a covid shot, and he got the eye roll from me. He then proceeded to explain that small pox went away because everybody took the shot, and that I would feel horrible if I killed grandma because I wasn't "vaccinated".

Does he feel horrible when otherwise healthy people suddenly drop dead because of the shot? If not, shut the fuck up. Even if yes, shut the fuck up.

It makes me sick that doctors are still pushing this shit. Either 1., they're that stupid to think it works, or 2., they're bought and paid for.

I'll never fully trust our medical community again.

quote:

Originally posted by a1abdj:
Only the second time seeing this doctor.

And the last time I presume...

quote:

quote:
Originally posted by a1abdj:
Only the second time seeing this doctor.

And the last time I presume...

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There is a severe nationwide shortage of primary care doctors. Find another before you fire the guy. Make certain you are ok with the hospital he is associated with. He sounds young. I would get an older physician but younger than yourself so you can keep him. The important question is how HE reacted when you told him NO.

"Los Angeles County is set to reinstate indoor-mask mandates as local COVID-19 infections and related hospital admissions continue to surge.'

LA County Director of Public Health Barbara Ferrer announced a possible indoor-mask mandate if the surge continues.

Could you enlarge the photo a little more?