^^^ Criminal. FIFY

quote:

Originally posted by old rugged cross:
^^^ Criminal. FIFY

Lots of rope and lots of trees is the appropriate recourse.

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
National Institutes Of Health Adds Ivermectin To COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines

This is what it says at the end of the NIH section on Ivermectin:

"The Panel recommends against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in clinical trials."

Very early on, clinicians were finding similar success rates with ivermectin - 90%+. Imagine how many lives could have been saved, how many cases of long Covid prevented, how many lives not ruined by lockdowns. How many lives not ruined by mRNA transfection jabs.

The level of evil perpetrated in the last 32 months is staggering.

quote:

Originally posted by Oregon:
"The Panel recommends against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in clinical trials."

Forgive me, but what in the hell exactly does that mean? Ivermectin works in clinical trials but not out in the real world? I read that too but its got to be one of the dumbest statements I've ever read, but exactly what I expect from government 'experts'.

UK Govt Denies ‘Safe Use’ Recommendation for Pfizer Vaccine In Pregnant Women, Says Those Breastfeeding Should NOT Be Vaccinated.

https://thenationalpulse.com/2...-cannot-be-provided/

The British government has recommended against pregnant and breastfeeding women receiving the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, admitting that “sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine” for the demographic “cannot be provided at the present time.”

The findings were revealed in a comprehensive report from the country’s Department of Health and Social Care, “Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech,” last updated on August 16th. The report was published through the government’s Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.

The report’s “Toxicity Conclusions” section outlines why the department recommends against pregnant and breastfeeding women receiving the vaccine, noting:

“In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated.“

“The absence of reproductive toxicity data is a reflection of the speed of development to first identify and select COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 for clinical testing and its rapid development to meet the ongoing urgent health need. In principle, a decision on Licensing a vaccine could be taken in these circumstances without data from reproductive toxicity studies animals, but there are studies ongoing and these will be provided when available,” continued the report.

The admission follows controversy over several Western governments’ hasty approvals and, in some cases, mandates of COVID-19 vaccines.

In the U.S., following a massive lobbying campaign by pharmaceutical giants including Pfizer, many jobs, businesses, and schools required COVID-19 vaccination for entry. As a result, companies including Pfizer have enjoyed record-breaking profits throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

The British government’s report also follows U.S. health agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) appearing to slow roll the release of data relevant to the efficacy and long-term health implications of the COVID-19 vaccine.

quote:

Originally posted by bigdeal:

quote:

Originally posted by Oregon:
"The Panel recommends against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in clinical trials."

Forgive me, but what in the hell exactly does that mean? Ivermectin works in clinical trials but not out in the real world? I read that too but its got to be one of the dumbest statements I've ever read, but exactly what I expect from government 'experts'.

It means if they say it is ok then 1) the UEA for the jabs is void, and 2) they admit the govt screwed the pooch on the entire C19 debacle.

Biden’s Covid Czar: ‘The Goal Is to Build a Very Different New Normal’

https://slaynews.com/news/bide...ign=daily-newsletter

Democrat President Joe Biden’s Covid Czar Dr. Ashish Jha has stated that the “goal” for the federal government’s pandemic response is to “build a very different new normal.”

Jha, the Biden administration’s COVID-19 response coordinator, made the admission during a video conference with other top federal health officials.

According to Jha, wokeness is at the core of the “new normal” with a focus on “equity.”

“I’ve heard Secretary Cardona say this over and over again,” Jha said during the meeting that included Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky.

“You know, people do talk about going back to normal… and I’ve heard the secretary say, ‘well, you know, normal wasn’t working out so well every-for some people.’

“So the goal in my mind is not to go back to normal, the goal is to build a very different new normal that has equity much more at the heart of it,” Dr. Jha said.

WATCH:

https://twitter.com/greg_price...ferent-new-normal%2F

The comments have emerged as Biden requested an additional $22.4 billion for Covid relief on Friday.

Biden claims the funding is in anticipation of a “fall surge” in the run-up to the midterm elections.

The billions in taxpayer money will help build Dr. Jha’s vision of a “very different new normal.”

^FTS.

“Biden claims the funding is in anticipation of a “fall surge” in the run-up to the midterm elections.”

As many here predicted, the left is ramping up the voter fraud machine.

New study shows significant effect of COVID vaccination on menstrual cycles

66% of post-menopausal women experienced breakthrough bleeding following shots.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/359082

A new study published in Science Advances investigating the effects of COVID vaccines on menstrual cycles has revealed that many women are significantly affected by vaccination, which has now been acknowledged by Dr. Anthony Fauci during an interview on Fox News.

https://twitter.com/Breaking91....com%2Fnews%2F359082

The study set out to examine two main questions: What proportion of women are affected by menstrual irregularities after the COVID vaccine; and, what proportion of non-menstruating women experienced breakthrough bleeding following COVID vaccination.

The study found that 42 percent of women with regular cycles bled more heavily following vaccination; for women with pre-existing menstrual conditions, that percentage rose to 50 percent.

On the second main issue investigated, the study found that 66 percent of post-menopausal women experienced what is known as "breakthrough bleeding" after being vaccinated against COVID. For women who were on long-acting contraception, this figure rose to 71 percent. 39 percent of women on "gender-affirming care" hormones (i.e. women claiming to be trans-men) experienced breakthrough bleeding.

The study's authors noted that their findings "align with other recent studies that show significant menstrual cycle responsiveness to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination." They also mentioned that "menstrual function may be disrupted long-term, particularly in those with long COVID," citing one study which showed that, "Among the SARS-CoV-2 positive participants, 16% reported changes in their menstrual cycle."

Not a peep in thee mainstream media.


The effect of ivermectin on the viral load and culture viability in early treatment of nonhospitalized patients with mild COVID-19 – a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial

https://www.ijidonline.com/art...(22)00399-X/fulltext

Highlights
•
Drug repurposing is a desirable approach to combat a new pathogen.
•
The value of ivermectin as an anti-SARS-CoV-2 agent is debatable.
•
Our study shows that ivermectin treatment decreased viral load and culture viability.
•
These results may reflect the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of ivermectin.
•
Further studies are needed to explore its role in combating COVID-19.

Conclusion

There were lower viral loads and less viable cultures in the ivermectin group, which shows its anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity. It could reduce transmission in these patients and encourage further studies with this drug.

Does anyone know if the pandemic is over yet, or whether it's just going to go on forever...??!!

quote:

Originally posted by sse:
Does anyone know if the pandemic is over yet, or whether it's just going to go on forever...??!!

Forever and Ever, Amen - Randy Travis

Also:

White House wants simultaneous COVID, flu shots: ‘This is why God gave us two arms’

Link

I wonder if that's what the "science" says.

My entire household is recovering from Covid, all of us vaccinated. It was fairly mild compared to the strep we had preceding the Covid. I did lose taste and smell for a bit but it seems to be coming back. Gone all this time avoiding Covid and then bam, we all get it. Wasn’t the most fun I’ve ever had on sick days. Apparently this strain is very contagious. I’ve done my obligatory home jail time of 5 days.

quote:

Originally posted by mcrimm:
White House wants simultaneous COVID, flu shots: ‘This is why God gave us two arms’

Pushing an additional snake oil injection doesn't surprise me in the least. The question though, is will this criminal administration attempt to force people to take it again or risk the loss of jobs and other parts of life? The 'science' is clear on the lack of utility the shots provide, so I really am curious if Joey Bag of Stupid will go down the totalitarian path yet again with this BS.

Feds reeling from new vax study, lawsuits on social media censorship and COVID stat manipulation

New research estimates COVID vax causes at least 18 "serious adverse events" in young adults for every hospitalization prevented. NIH observational study finds "variety of neuropathic symptoms" post-vaccination.

https://justthenews.com/govern..._campaign=newsletter

Makary is a coauthor of a new preprint, not yet peer-reviewed, on the ethics of mandating COVID boosters for young adults that was funded by the pro-COVID vaccine Wellcome Trust charitable foundation.

Led by University of Washington applied medical anthropologist Kevin Bardosh, the study estimates that at least 22,000 "previously uninfected adults aged 18-29 must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one Covid-19 hospitalisation" while causing 18-98 "serious adverse events," based on CDC and "sponsor-reported" data.

These include 1.7 to 3 "booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities," to prevent one hospitalization, the study found. "Given the high prevalence of post-infection immunity, this risk-benefit profile is even less favourable."

https://twitter.com/KevinBardo...rship-and-covid-stat

The National Institutes of Health's own neurology researchers, along with colleagues at Harvard, Johns Hopkins and the Icahn School of Medicine, found "a variety of neuropathic symptoms" within a month of COVID vaccination in a small observational study.

Their May preprint found that all self-referred patients — 92% women, median age 40 — reported "sensory symptoms comprising severe face and/or limb paresthesias," while 61% had "orthostasis, heat intolerance and palpitations." More than half had "objective evidence of small-fiber peripheral neuropathy."

TrialSiteNews surfaced the study last week, noting that 39% of patients developed symptoms after their second mRNA dose and 17% "reported mild-transient symptoms after the first jab with full onset after the second dose, raising the possibility of immune priming to the spike protein." Only one was known to have prior infection.

U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty overruled government objections to Fauci and Jean-Pierre answering "interrogatories and document requests," in their White House capacities, for their "external communications" to social media platforms. Fauci must answer in his capacity as National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director as well. Jean-Pierre's response would encompass her predecessor, Jen Psaki, who acknowledged White House pressure to censor a year ago.


Public health agencies are facing perhaps the most serious threats to their control over information since the COVID-19 pandemic started, playing defense in lawsuits that have already exposed substantial federal involvement in censorship and could next uncloak alleged manipulation of data that has driven COVID policy from the start.

A federal judge ordered White House COVID adviser Anthony Fauci and Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre to respond to document requests in a First Amendment lawsuit alleging the feds coerced social media companies to stamp out dissenting COVID claims, some of which the feds now acknowledge have merit.

Because of an untimely sick dog, the Justice Department is behind the eight ball in resisting a "special grand jury" to investigate federal officials for decisions that "significantly compromise[d] the accuracy and integrity of COVID-related data."

Oregon state Sens. Kim Thatcher and Dennis Linthicum and naturopath Henry Ealy went to court in March to compel the impaneling, alleging that statistical manipulation caused "a significant hyperinflation of COVID-19 case, hospitalization, and death counts" and $3.5 trillion in resulting fraudulent taxpayer expenditures.

The CDC's universal promotion of new "bivalent" boosters, authorized by the FDA based in part on eight mice, and a White House plan to make the shots annual are also facing headwinds from increasingly high-profile research on vaccine risk versus benefit.

The White House plan is "is not data-driven and ignores nat[ural] imm[unity] & concerns of immune imprinting from a multi-dose vax strategy," Johns Hopkins University medical professor and National Academy of Medicine member Marty Makary tweeted.

https://twitter.com/MartyMakar...rship-and-covid-stat

More at link

https://justthenews.com/govern..._campaign=newsletter

How many 54 year olds drop dead of natural causes? Is it more than I realize?

*****************************

Comedian David A. Arnold, best known for headlining two Netflix comedy specials, died at the age of 54 on Wednesday.

The stand-up funnyman, who was the showrunner of Nickelodeon’s “That Girl Lay Lay” and served as a producer on the “Fuller House” reboot, died “from natural causes” at his home, his family announced.

“It is with great sadness that we confirm the untimely passing of our husband, father, brother and friend, David A. Arnold,” his family told the LA Times.

“David passed away peacefully today in his home and doctors have ruled the cause of death due to natural causes.”

https://nypost.com/2022/09/08/...campaign=android_nyp