quote:

Originally posted by nhracecraft:
^^^Mass Formation Psychosis...

I have posted this in the past.

Interesting. So, seems like the cycles leading to the mass psychosis has been going on for a long time.

Fear events like regular periods of war (WWII, cold war, cultural revolution, korean war, vietnam war, mideast war, ...) and health events (SARS, AIDs, ebola, cancer, Covid, ...), and fiscal events (IMF, recessions, oil shortages, housing mkt crashes, ...).

Sounds like the video is suggesting that we need a physical base for freedom and rational thought that is opposed to the masses. A beacon so to speak.

We need a 'red' region - unequivocally dominated by the red - dispersed islands will not be effective. If this is true, where will it be and when will it form? Until then, seems like it will be an endless battle....?

Physicians (not American, of course) find vaccine-generated coronavirus spike protein in skin lesions, months after vaccination

https://alexberenson.substack....-the-gift-that-keeps

Remember when the Centers for Disease Control told you the mRNA in Covid vaccines didn’t last long in your cells?

Remember when fact-checkers at Reuters told you the coronavirus spike protein the vaccines make you produce isn’t dangerous?



About that.

The CDC has now quietly removed its promise that your body “breaks down and gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished” with initially making spike protein.

(Original CDC language on the Wayback Machine here; current CDC position, as of July 15, here)

Meanwhile, scientists keep piling up evidence that the spike protein remains in the body for months, at least, and is far from benign.

The most recent finding comes from Japanese physicians reporting on a 64-year-old who developed persistent and painful skin lesions days after receiving the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine.

The doctors found the patient had varicella-zoster virus, which causes chickenpox. They treated him with 1 gram daily of valacyclovir, commonly used against herpes viruses, but found it only marginally effective. Raising the dosage to 3 grams a day ultimately defeated the lesions.

The physicians then decided that they should examine the lesions for evidence of spike protein, because the patient had become sick so soon after being vaccinated.

In taking this step, they deviated wildly from standard American medical procedure, which is to deny that mRNA shots can possibly cause any side effect.

And when the Japanese physicians looked for spike protein in the lesions… they found it:

Immunostaining with anti-coronavirus spike protein (SP) antibody revealed the SP expression in the intravesicular cells in the epidermis and endothelial cells of the inflamed vessels in the dermis… In addition, the SP was also found in the endothelial cells of venules in the subcutaneous fat tissue underlying the herpetic vasculitis lesion.



The physicians speculate - as other researchers have - that in chemically modifying the mRNA in their shots to make it harder for the immune system to destroy, Pfizer and Moderna may have produced a zombie vaccine that will not die.

No, that wasn’t exactly how they put it, but it’s what they meant:

A plausible hypothesis was that the stabilization of RNA by substituting methyl-pseudouridine for all the uridine nucleotides for BNT162b2 might result in long-time pro-duction of the encoded SP from any cells.

The potential persistence of vaccine mRNA and the spike protein it produces is particularly relevant as more and more jabbed patients report autoimmune crises such as unexpectedly developing Type 1 diabetes (generally diagnosed in childhood) shortly following vaccination.

But physicians cannot find what they won’t seek. Fortunately, international researchers appear to be willing to ask questions American physicians will not.



Link to study and more information:

Persistent varicella zoster virus infection following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was associated with the presence of encoded spike protein in the lesion

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.co...f/10.1002/cia2.12278

19-year-old Canadian hockey player dies after collapsing during game

Toronto Sun journalist Joe Warmington noted on social media that the hockey league in which the young man played had mandated the COVID-19 vaccine last year.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/n...ly-canada-2022-09-02

AYR, Ontario (LifeSiteNews) — Another tragic death occurred in Canada on Tuesday when a 19-year-old hockey captain collapsed and passed away mid-game, sparking many online to question whether the league’s vaccine mandate played a role.

According to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 19-year-old Eli Palfreyman, captain of the Ayr Centennials of the Greater Ontario Junior Hockey League, passed away suddenly during an intermission of a preseason game on Tuesday.

Centennials vice president Brian Shantz responded to the tragedy by relaying that the team is “devastated,” and asked “for your prayers and support for Eli’s family and each of our players.”

According to an account of the young player’s death, it was during the intermission between the second and third period of the game when Palfreyman collapsed in the locker room, prompting those around him to jump in and give immediate medical attention.

Sadly, even with the quick response, the young man passed away.

While a cause of death has not been released, Palfreyman being one of multiple sudden deaths among relatively young Canadians has led to speculation about whether the experimental COVID-19 vaccines played a role.

Prominent Toronto Sun journalist Joe Warmington noted on social media that the GOJHL, like many other sports leagues in Canada, required all players to be “fully vaccinated” against COVID last year, despite the fact that young men in particular are at minimal risk of serious outcomes due to the virus while being at heightened risk of severe adverse events such as myocarditis from the jabs.

FYI pic.twitter.com/v7X9FFlvWw

— Joe Warmington (@joe_warmington) August 31, 2022

Warmington also reminded his social media followers that this time last year a young University of Ottawa football player met a similar fate as Palfreyman, dying suddenly

LifeSiteNews has likewise produced reports of other relatively young Canadians dying during or following physical activity, including a 50-year-old doctor who died while running and a 27-year-old pediatrician who died after collapsing during a triathlon.

While mainstream media and health authorities have largely ignored such events, many other doctors have been sounding the alarm about the safety of the novel mRNA jabs since their rollout.

Dr. Michael Palmer, a certified medical doctor and microbiologist, told LifeSiteNews last year that his opposition to the COVID vaccines is “not in spite of [his] medical education, but BECAUSE of it.”

“There is just no way that any competent medical scientist who makes an honest effort to himself could not see that these vaccines – in particular the mRNA vaccines, which are touted as ‘the safe choice’ – will cause grave harm, and with a sufficient number of cumulative doses certain death,” the doctor explained.

It is also noteworthy that despite the shots having “approval” from the likes of Health Canada, all currently available COVID-19 vaccines are experimental, with clinical trials not set for completion until 2023.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2...368728&draw=2&rank=1

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
19-year-old Canadian hockey player dies after collapsing during game

Nothing to see here. All perfectly Normal.

Balzé Halzé,

I remember reading about Rab Wardell, 37-year-old champion cyclist. A real tragedy.
All any of us are asking for is an honest investigation into reports like this but the silence from the MSM/Doctors/etc. is deafening.

National Institutes Of Health Adds Ivermectin To COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines

https://www.publishedreporter....reatment-guidelines/

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has reportedly added the controversial antiparasitic drug Ivermectin to their COVID-19 treatment guidelines list; the drug had been adopted early in the pandemic as an alternative treatment to the virus, although its use by the greater medical community was greatly lambasted, who said that it had no real effect and, in some forms and doses, could be harmful to humans.

The NIH’s research into Ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment option was initially publicized by Josh Barnett, a Republican who ran for election to the U.S. House to represent Arizona’s 1st Congressional District; however, he lost the primary on August 2, 2022.

Barnett issued a tweet on August 31, revealing that Ivermectin was now listed on the NIH’s COVID website – under a section titled “Outpatient Repurposed Drugs” – where it is currently stated to be in “Phase 3” of trial tests.

https://www.covid19treatmentgu...s/antiviral-therapy/





And a new large observational study out of Brazil:


Ivermectin Lowers Chance of COVID Death by 92%, Study Shows

https://slaynews.com/news/iver...ign=daily-newsletter

A major new study on the use of ivermectin as prophylaxis for COVID-19 has found that the drug lowers the chance of death in patients by up to 92%.

The large study, led by renowned Brazilian research scientist Dr. Flavio A. Cadegiani, found that regular users of ivermectin experienced a huge reduction in mortality compared to those who did not.

In a post on Twitter, Cadegiani announced that his study shows a “dose-response effect,” meaning that “the more you used, the more protection you had.”

Cadegiani observed that people who use ivermectin regularly every 15 days for at least six to eight weeks had up to a 92% reduction in mortality.

Last fall, esteemed epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch of Yale Medical School was among scientists and physicians who said in Senate testimony that thousands of lives could have been saved if treatments such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine had not been suppressed.

Link to study:

https://www.cureus.com/article...expedited_modal=true

Regular Use of Ivermectin as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Led Up to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner: Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects

^^

Unbelievable.

^^^ Criminal. FIFY

quote:

Originally posted by old rugged cross:
^^^ Criminal. FIFY

Lots of rope and lots of trees is the appropriate recourse.

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
National Institutes Of Health Adds Ivermectin To COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines

This is what it says at the end of the NIH section on Ivermectin:

"The Panel recommends against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in clinical trials."

Very early on, clinicians were finding similar success rates with ivermectin - 90%+. Imagine how many lives could have been saved, how many cases of long Covid prevented, how many lives not ruined by lockdowns. How many lives not ruined by mRNA transfection jabs.

The level of evil perpetrated in the last 32 months is staggering.

quote:

Originally posted by Oregon:
"The Panel recommends against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in clinical trials."

Forgive me, but what in the hell exactly does that mean? Ivermectin works in clinical trials but not out in the real world? I read that too but its got to be one of the dumbest statements I've ever read, but exactly what I expect from government 'experts'.

UK Govt Denies ‘Safe Use’ Recommendation for Pfizer Vaccine In Pregnant Women, Says Those Breastfeeding Should NOT Be Vaccinated.

https://thenationalpulse.com/2...-cannot-be-provided/

The British government has recommended against pregnant and breastfeeding women receiving the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, admitting that “sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine” for the demographic “cannot be provided at the present time.”

The findings were revealed in a comprehensive report from the country’s Department of Health and Social Care, “Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech,” last updated on August 16th. The report was published through the government’s Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.

The report’s “Toxicity Conclusions” section outlines why the department recommends against pregnant and breastfeeding women receiving the vaccine, noting:

“In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated.“

“The absence of reproductive toxicity data is a reflection of the speed of development to first identify and select COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 for clinical testing and its rapid development to meet the ongoing urgent health need. In principle, a decision on Licensing a vaccine could be taken in these circumstances without data from reproductive toxicity studies animals, but there are studies ongoing and these will be provided when available,” continued the report.

The admission follows controversy over several Western governments’ hasty approvals and, in some cases, mandates of COVID-19 vaccines.

In the U.S., following a massive lobbying campaign by pharmaceutical giants including Pfizer, many jobs, businesses, and schools required COVID-19 vaccination for entry. As a result, companies including Pfizer have enjoyed record-breaking profits throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

The British government’s report also follows U.S. health agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) appearing to slow roll the release of data relevant to the efficacy and long-term health implications of the COVID-19 vaccine.

quote:

Originally posted by bigdeal:

quote:

Originally posted by Oregon:
"The Panel recommends against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in clinical trials."

Forgive me, but what in the hell exactly does that mean? Ivermectin works in clinical trials but not out in the real world? I read that too but its got to be one of the dumbest statements I've ever read, but exactly what I expect from government 'experts'.

It means if they say it is ok then 1) the UEA for the jabs is void, and 2) they admit the govt screwed the pooch on the entire C19 debacle.

Biden’s Covid Czar: ‘The Goal Is to Build a Very Different New Normal’

https://slaynews.com/news/bide...ign=daily-newsletter

Democrat President Joe Biden’s Covid Czar Dr. Ashish Jha has stated that the “goal” for the federal government’s pandemic response is to “build a very different new normal.”

Jha, the Biden administration’s COVID-19 response coordinator, made the admission during a video conference with other top federal health officials.

According to Jha, wokeness is at the core of the “new normal” with a focus on “equity.”

“I’ve heard Secretary Cardona say this over and over again,” Jha said during the meeting that included Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky.

“You know, people do talk about going back to normal… and I’ve heard the secretary say, ‘well, you know, normal wasn’t working out so well every-for some people.’

“So the goal in my mind is not to go back to normal, the goal is to build a very different new normal that has equity much more at the heart of it,” Dr. Jha said.

WATCH:

https://twitter.com/greg_price...ferent-new-normal%2F

The comments have emerged as Biden requested an additional $22.4 billion for Covid relief on Friday.

Biden claims the funding is in anticipation of a “fall surge” in the run-up to the midterm elections.

The billions in taxpayer money will help build Dr. Jha’s vision of a “very different new normal.”

^FTS.

“Biden claims the funding is in anticipation of a “fall surge” in the run-up to the midterm elections.”

As many here predicted, the left is ramping up the voter fraud machine.

New study shows significant effect of COVID vaccination on menstrual cycles

66% of post-menopausal women experienced breakthrough bleeding following shots.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/359082

A new study published in Science Advances investigating the effects of COVID vaccines on menstrual cycles has revealed that many women are significantly affected by vaccination, which has now been acknowledged by Dr. Anthony Fauci during an interview on Fox News.

https://twitter.com/Breaking91....com%2Fnews%2F359082

The study set out to examine two main questions: What proportion of women are affected by menstrual irregularities after the COVID vaccine; and, what proportion of non-menstruating women experienced breakthrough bleeding following COVID vaccination.

The study found that 42 percent of women with regular cycles bled more heavily following vaccination; for women with pre-existing menstrual conditions, that percentage rose to 50 percent.

On the second main issue investigated, the study found that 66 percent of post-menopausal women experienced what is known as "breakthrough bleeding" after being vaccinated against COVID. For women who were on long-acting contraception, this figure rose to 71 percent. 39 percent of women on "gender-affirming care" hormones (i.e. women claiming to be trans-men) experienced breakthrough bleeding.

The study's authors noted that their findings "align with other recent studies that show significant menstrual cycle responsiveness to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination." They also mentioned that "menstrual function may be disrupted long-term, particularly in those with long COVID," citing one study which showed that, "Among the SARS-CoV-2 positive participants, 16% reported changes in their menstrual cycle."

Not a peep in thee mainstream media.


The effect of ivermectin on the viral load and culture viability in early treatment of nonhospitalized patients with mild COVID-19 – a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial

https://www.ijidonline.com/art...(22)00399-X/fulltext

Highlights
•
Drug repurposing is a desirable approach to combat a new pathogen.
•
The value of ivermectin as an anti-SARS-CoV-2 agent is debatable.
•
Our study shows that ivermectin treatment decreased viral load and culture viability.
•
These results may reflect the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of ivermectin.
•
Further studies are needed to explore its role in combating COVID-19.

Conclusion

There were lower viral loads and less viable cultures in the ivermectin group, which shows its anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity. It could reduce transmission in these patients and encourage further studies with this drug.