quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
[FLASH_VIDEO]<iframe frameborder="0" id="twitter-widget-1" scrolling="no" src="https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&lang=en&theme=&id=1654553450326245379" style="position: static; visibility: visible; width: 550px; height: 624px; display: block; border: none; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-image: url('https://codejanitor.azurewebsites.net/embeds/bgmessage.png');" title="Twitter Tweet"></iframe>[/FLASH_VIDEO]

So what's the problem? Too much or not enough Graphene on the test swabs you cram up your nose?

No wait...that's a conspiracy theory.

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01444

https://www.medrxiv.org/conten...0.04.22280705v1.full

https://www.mewburn.com/news-i...d-covid-19-detection

Last month, BioRxIV published a headache-inducing pre-print study on the accumulation of covid spike protein in the brain. The researchers confirmed their results both in live mice as well as in cadavers of dead humans.

The researchers explained their troubling findings:

Our results revealed the accumulation of the spike protein in the skull marrow, brain meninges, and brain parenchyma. The injection of the spike protein alone caused cell death in the brain, highlighting a direct effect on brain tissue. Furthermore, we observed the presence of spike protein in the skull of deceased long after their COVID-19 infection, suggesting that the spike’s persistence may contribute to long-term neurological symptoms.

Notice how they said, “injection of the spike protein alone.” Meaning, without the virus. They didn’t come right out and say it, but they basically said it. The researchers explicitly reported they found the damaging brain injuries even in subjects that were not covid infected, leaving only one other potential source of spike, and you know what that is:

However, even without detectable virus RNA in the brain parenchyma, signs of widespread immune activation could be detected. The lack of evidence for the viral presence and especially viral replication in the brain led to the hypothesis that virus-shed proteins circulating in the bloodstream may promote an inflammatory response independent of direct viral infection of the affected organs, including the brain. Notably, the highly immunogenic spike protein, also used in COVID-19 vaccines, might be a candidate for triggering infection-independent effects.

Uh oh. Other studies have concluded that free spike, such as produced by the jabs, can cross the blood-brain barrier. But this study found another, different way for spike to get into the brain — through cerebral bone marrow.

As a sort of bonus, the researchers dyed the spike protein and found that it accumulates in lots of humanized mouse organs, including but not only the brain:

The researchers were diligent and careful. Their preprint is twenty-five pages long, and included 115 footnoted references and nine linked videos.

Spike-induced brain damage could explain a whole lot, don’t you think?

Here’s the link to the study.
https://www.biorxiv.org/conten...04.535604v1.full.pdf

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email

NIH Renews Controversial Grant to EcoHealth for Coronavirus Bat Study

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...t-study_5250107.html

National Institute of Health (NIH) officials have re-activated a previously terminated $576,290 federal grant to EcoHealth Alliance to study how outbreaks of deadly viruses like SARS, MERS, and now COVID-19 originate from wildlife and transfer to humans.

The move has prompted one Republican lawmaker to demand that NIH explain the decision he described as “absolutely reckless.”

“Most emerging human viruses come from wildlife, and coronaviruses in particular represent a significant threat to public health and biosecurity in the U.S. and globally, as was demonstrated by the SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 outbreaks,” is how the NIH describes the purpose of the renewed grant.

The renewed grant is to be administered through the NIH’s National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the research arm headed for several decades by the recently retired Dr. Anthony Fauci. The description was made public by Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-Va.), who is chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee.

“This project seeks to understand what factors allow bat-origin coronaviruses, including close relatives to SARS, to jump into the human population by studying their evolutionary diversity, the patterns of spillover in people that live in high-risk communities, and analyzing characteristics of bat coronaviruses that could allow them to emerge,” the grant description continues.

EcoHealth issued a celebratory statement declaring that the NIH decision “reflects a reversal of the previous termination and suspension of a [grant] awarded in 2019, but halted in April 2020 due to concerns about continuing collaborative laboratory research with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIH).”

“It’s absolutely reckless that the NIH has renewed a grant for EcoHealth Alliance given their negligence and the breach of their contract with the NIH on the coronavirus research done at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. It is now believed likely that COVID-19 was the result of a lab incident at the Wuhan Institute,” Griffith said in a May 8 statement.

“From my observations, EcoHealth Alliance has not been contrite about their failures. And even worse, they have refused to cooperate with Congress in our attempts to get information about the research they were doing at the Wuhan Institute,” Griffith said.
Several U.S. agencies and independent scientists have concluded that a leak from within the WIV lab is the most likely source of the COVID-19 pandemic that, to date, has killed more than 1.1 million Americans since January 2020 and in excess of six million people world-wide.

The WIH lab has been the scene of extensive gain-of-function research by Chinese scientists, much of it funded in whole or part prior to the pandemic by NIH grants through EcoHealth. The NIH has awarded seven grants totaling more than $4.1 million to EcoHealth to study various aspects of SARS, MERS, and other coronavirus diseases.

More at link

Visiting someone in the ICU and I heard something very interesting from two of the nurses and one doctor, none have seen one case of covid this year. Large hospital south of Atlanta. Does seem like it has completely vanished to me

quote:

Originally posted by fischtown7:
Visiting someone in the ICU and I heard something very interesting from two of the nurses and one doctor, none have seen one case of covid this year. Large hospital south of Atlanta. Does seem like it has completely vanished to me

Oh my goodness, we can't let misinformation like that be released to the general public.

The UK Mirror ran a completely un-self-aware article yesterday headlined, “‘Brits are dying in their tens of thousands - and we don’t really have any idea why’.” The sub-headline explained, “Tens of thousands more Brits died than usual from May to December 2022, excluding Covid as a cause of death, raising serious questions as to why so many died.”
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/...usands-dont-29955386

From May to December last year, there were +32,441 excess deaths in England and Wales, not counting covid deaths. That’s 32,000 MORE deaths than normal. The media’s usually-reliable experts are having a hard time figuring out what’s going on.

As the Mirror drily noted, “experts aren’t quite sure why that is.”

Professor of Demography David Coleman, Emeritus, Oxford University, informed the Mirror that no one knows for sure what killed so many British last year. He pointed out that, since covid claimed so many elderly and infirm people, there SHOULD HAVE been a post-covid bounce in improved mortality.

But there wasn’t.

“Once those poor [vulnerable to covid] people have been packed off, the remaining population should be healthier, there should be a period afterwards where deaths are lower than usual, but that hasn’t happened,” bewildered Professor Coleman explained.

The Mirror trotted out several possibilities: climate change-fueled hot weather, fatter people, aging populations, dementia, screen time, and so on. But in the end, the paper had to admit they just don’t know what is causing all these excess deaths. They pushed all the needles off their lab tables but found there was nothing left.

Not even a pointy theory.

Isn’t it weird how the experts absolutely knew everything there was to know about covid and the rapidly-approved vaccines with 100% confidence just a couple years ago. But now that tens of thousands of people who shouldn’t be dying are dying: the so-called “experts” are baffled and useless.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email

^^^ Let me guess....heart related issues? Cancer?

"People have been packed off".
Thats a great expression there, Professor!

“Federal officials gave more than $23 billion "COVID-19 aid to the nation’s top 20 nonprofit hospitals.The biggest jump among the top 20 was 92 percent by the Mayo Clinic, based in Rochester, Minnesota, whose assets went from $9.2 billion in 2018 to $17.7 billion in 2021.”

Full Article: bit.ly/3Bqpuyw

Okay, so that’s cuckoo with Cocoa Puffs — but it’s also very telling. If the jabs worked great and everyone knew it, there’d be no need for a tweet like this. This doctor is emotionally preparing herself for a titanic disappointment.

Did you notice what’s completely missing from her comment? The vaunted “science.”

She said, “I got vaccinated out of love.” Not, “I got vaccinated because I followed the conclusive data.” Maybe I’m reading too much into this, but this doctor’s post-hoc rationalization about why she made a poorly-considered, self-destructive decision seems more like an admission that, in hindsight, the data wasn’t actually quite as good as the government claimed.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email

^^Now, there is someone who is having trouble coming to terms with a serious mistake they now realize they made. Being sanctimonious and lashing out at people who made their own decision based upon evidence they had- about the vaccine itself and about the valid distrust of bureaucrats who have demonstrated time and again that they can never be trusted- shows clearly that this person is trying to find a way to explain and justify to herself and others the mistake she has made.

There was and is nothing hateful about the self-preservation instincts of human beings causing them to refuse an untested vaccine offered up to them by corrupt, dishonest, incompetent and self-serving bureaucrats.

You can knock on that door from now until the cows come home, lady, but you're not getting anywhere with that stupid shit.

While waving her stand with Ukraine FLAG.

Something telling in her tweet is how she assumes those who refused a jab did so out of some kind of hate. She did not say refusers did it out of selfishness, she said out of hate.

She is buying into the narrative that a particular and large portion of the population is hateful. Whether she is assuming this group is MAGA, or republican, or conservative, or just a conglomeration of different subgroups, she is being led down the path of demonizing an opposition.

She reveals her closed mind. But she'll probably be demanding forgiveness and amnesty for those who foisted the jabs and lockdowns onto us.

This is a doctor? A real one? And she has the nerve to spew this vitriol at people that made an informed decision?

What an absolute nutball. This is the mental illness of the left on full display. I don’t doubt for a second that she is ANGRY that she trusted in this insanity and was duped while more intelligent, actually scientific minded people waited for more data. She can shove all her happy horseshit talk of love in the usual spot for long term storage. She is filled with nothing but angst and hate.

As They Attempt to Deny Their Trespass, Let Us NEVER FORGET – “The Unvaccinated Are Scum”, Compilation Video

As the politicians and their pretorian guard media attempt desperately to rewrite COVID-19 history (more coming on this issue) it is worth remembering exactly what the situation was in the prior two years.

This excellent compilation video from Tom Elliot reminds us who they were, and how significant the hatred was.
WATCH:



https://theconservativetreehou...n-video/#more-246688

^ So much hate. I wonder sometimes how to tell my kids that evil exists in this world and have them understand.

It’s funny. The same people that attacked those of us that chose to follow actual scientific method aren’t saying much these days. I wonder why?

Actually I don’t. The political mouthpieces have all shut their traitorous gobs. The only ones left are the ignorant rubes that listened to said divisive political mouthpieces. And they are (hopefully not literally) a dying breed. The scary thing to me is that half the country has been both indoctrinated and weaponized against the half that knows better than to trust big pharma, leftist government, and treatment with hazardous flim flam that was never properly trialed for safety and efficacy.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:


Okay, so that’s cuckoo with Cocoa Puffs — but it’s also very telling. If the jabs worked great and everyone knew it, there’d be no need for a tweet like this. This doctor is emotionally preparing herself for a titanic disappointment.

Did you notice what’s completely missing from her comment? The vaunted “science.”

She said, “I got vaccinated out of love.” Not, “I got vaccinated because I followed the conclusive data.” Maybe I’m reading too much into this, but this doctor’s post-hoc rationalization about why she made a poorly-considered, self-destructive decision seems more like an admission that, in hindsight, the data wasn’t actually quite as good as the government claimed.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email

This reminds of Marianne Williamson's jab to DT in 2019:

"So, Mr. President — if you’re listening — I want you to hear me, please: You have harnessed fear for political purposes, and only love can cast that out. So I, sir, I have a feeling you know what you’re doing. I’m going to harness love for political purposes. I will meet you on that field, and sir, love will win."

That pair writes similar hippy dippy, wavy gravy, woke, fantasy prose. They must have gone to the same college, er indoctrination camp.

Better get your Marianne Williamson 2024 campaign trinkets soon, she drops out early. I missed them in 2020.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:


Okay, so that’s cuckoo with Cocoa Puffs — but it’s also very telling. If the jabs worked great and everyone knew it, there’d be no need for a tweet like this. This doctor is emotionally preparing herself for a titanic disappointment.

Did you notice what’s completely missing from her comment? The vaunted “science.”

She said, “I got vaccinated out of love.” Not, “I got vaccinated because I followed the conclusive data.” Maybe I’m reading too much into this, but this doctor’s post-hoc rationalization about why she made a poorly-considered, self-destructive decision seems more like an admission that, in hindsight, the data wasn’t actually quite as good as the government claimed.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email

They did it for Love ??? In my opinion more like because you were SHEEP and wanted to conform. WE on the other hand tried to warn you out of LOVE many times. God Bless

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:


Okay, so that’s cuckoo with Cocoa Puffs — but it’s also very telling. If the jabs worked great and everyone knew it, there’d be no need for a tweet like this. This doctor is emotionally preparing herself for a titanic disappointment.

Did you notice what’s completely missing from her comment? The vaunted “science.”

She said, “I got vaccinated out of love.” Not, “I got vaccinated because I followed the conclusive data.” Maybe I’m reading too much into this, but this doctor’s post-hoc rationalization about why she made a poorly-considered, self-destructive decision seems more like an admission that, in hindsight, the data wasn’t actually quite as good as the government claimed.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email

Is this tweet fake or not? It's really hard to tell these days.

"Joe Rogan apologises for podcast about fake Covid tweet after doctor relentlessly harassed"

https://www.news.com.au/entert...cfff0d3c20f214f8ea40