quote:

Originally posted by oldRoger:

quote:

One suspects that a spate of high-level resignations from the FBI would immediately result in statements from some of them that would be very damning for Hillary and the DOJ

Without doubt this would put more nails in the Clinton coffin.
Rock ribbed, yellow dog Democrats, who make up something more than 20% of the electorate overall, and probably more than 50% in some states, will pull that Democrat Party Lever, regardless.

However, Clinton cannot win without a good many people who will be disturbed by all of this and may just say 'no more Clintons".

Dem voters would not be bothered by this one diddly. Zero. They wouldn't care at all. The entire FBI can resign and it won't matter one iota in November.

I have a feeling it's coming. Soon.

The Energizer is all giddy.

I think the California primary is looming bigger than whatever Comey might do. Loretta Lynch will cover for Hillary if the FBI does recommend indictment. But if Hillary loses California, or "wins" it the way she "won" Kentucky, the already nervous Democrat Party bosses will hit the panic button.

Willfully or not, Comey dragged out the FBI investigation far too long. When something like this is expected and not delivered, for a while it builds tension and interest. But, then, past that point it begins to make itself irrelevant. And then past that point, it starts to become a joke. That's where we are now.

I respectfully disagree. I have a hunch that once the cover was lifted on this, they found something much, much bigger. The more they dig, the more they find. Now it might very well have become a question on either which road to travel, or travel several at once and see how they link.

I really think this is waay bigger than first guessed...

quote:

Originally posted by justjoe:
Willfully or not, Comey dragged out the FBI investigation far too long. When something like this is expected and not delivered, for a while it builds tension and interest. But, then, past that point it begins to make itself irrelevant. And then past that point, it starts to become a joke. That's where we are now.

Please tell us what's in the FBI report and what their recommendation will be.

I'm betting its forensic accounting that's taking so long. That shit is tedious and protracted.

The principal goal and purpose of this investigation is not dramatic effect, like some sort of TV serial, but identifying suspected criminal activity and assembling the evidence to prove it.

No joke!

The way this SHOULD WORK is that Hillary, her husband, their kid, and about a dozen high ranking dems...maybe some reps...will find themselves facing racketeering, money laundering, and quite possibly espionage charges.

SHOULD WORK.

If it doesnt, the rule of law, this great Nation, and everything it has been based upon means nothing.

Then let the chips fall where they may.

quote:

Originally posted by entropy:
I respectfully disagree. I have a hunch that once the cover was lifted on this, they found something much, much bigger. The more they dig, the more they find. Now it might very well have become a question on either which road to travel, or travel several at once and see how they link.

I really think this is waay bigger than first guessed...

The FBI has access to tens of thousands of Hillary's e-mails. All those communications undoubtedly reveal hundreds of other relationships and, knowing Hillary's record, hundreds of other crimes committed in conert with the Clinton's. The depth and scope of her corruption probably makes the mafia look like amateurs. I'm not surprised this is taking awhile. I just hope they wrap this up before the election.

quote:

entropy
Ball Haulin'

posted May 29, 2016 10:34 AM Hide Post
The way this SHOULD WORK is that Hillary, her husband, their kid, and about a dozen high ranking dems...maybe some reps...will find themselves facing racketeering, money laundering, and quite possibly espionage charges.

I so much hope you are right.

So do I buddy...so do I.

quote:

I have a hunch that once the cover was lifted on this, they found something much, much bigger. The more they dig, the more they find. Now it might very well have become a question on either which road to travel, or travel several at once and see how they link.

^^^^^Yes, it has been obvious to many that the Clinton Global Fund and it's many side slush funds are only shallow cover for a massive bribery scheme.

However, as enthropy said: " I have a hunch that once the cover was lifted on this, they found something much, much bigger. The more they dig, the more they find."
This is difficult exacting work because the proving a quid pro quo is very difficult without a document trail.
Now the FBI has a document trail but it is massive. I assume they have recovered part of the 30,000 emails the Witch of Chappaqua did not turn over. Plus they have others from her aides, I would speculate way north of 100,000. All of this has to be matched with records from the Clinton Slush Funds which are probably deliberately deceiving.

Rather than dragging this out I suggest they are trying to hurry it up. People involved must be under a lot of pressure.

The end product is not supposed to be an exposé but evidence which will convince a jury to convict.

quote:

Originally posted by justjoe:
Willfully or not, Comey dragged out the FBI investigation far too long. When something like this is expected and not delivered, for a while it builds tension and interest. But, then, past that point it begins to make itself irrelevant. And then past that point, it starts to become a joke. That's where we are now.

So how long is an FBI investigation suppose to take?

Here's a pretty good interchange on FOX News Sunday with Chris Wallace. Wallace does a very good job keeping the discussion on track and holding their feet to to fire. The diversionary tactics by Congressman Schiff are maddening and are so typical of his party. Gratefully he was cut off at the knees.


http://video.foxnews.com/v/491...hpvid1#sp=show-clips

Article removed from Huffington Post
Not sure how valid this is but according to this, recommendation for racketeering charges are coming soon.

quote:

Originally posted by saigonsmuggler:
Article removed from Huffington Post
Not sure how valid this is but according to this, recommendation for racketeering charges are coming soon.

Yeah, I think this story is more wishful thinking than fact. It would certainly be lovely if it were true, but color me skeptical.

quote:

Originally posted by Sigmanic:
Yeah, I think this story is more wishful thinking than fact. It would certainly be lovely if it were true, but color me skeptical.

Yeah, because that's just what this thread needs, huh? More skepticism.

Does anyone know how Huffington Post is structured? Are there not editors who review articles before publishing?

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:

quote:

Originally posted by Sigmanic:
Yeah, I think this story is more wishful thinking than fact. It would certainly be lovely if it were true, but color me skeptical.

Yeah, because that's just what this thread needs, huh? More skepticism.

Does anyone know how Huffington Post is structured? Are there not editors who review articles before publishing?

Patience is a really hard thing. I know that the Clintons will not be sentenced to be boiled in oil like they probably deserve, but I am hopefully and impatiently waiting for the wheels of justice to grind them very fine. I guess it is another opportunity to try to learn patience.

I'm quite confident that Mr. Comey will recommend indictment.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:

quote:

Originally posted by Sigmanic:
Yeah, I think this story is more wishful thinking than fact. It would certainly be lovely if it were true, but color me skeptical.

Yeah, because that's just what this thread needs, huh? More skepticism.

Does anyone know how Huffington Post is structured? Are there not editors who review articles before publishing?

Yes, there just isn't a verifiable, workable link to Huntington. There is this one, though, and the site looks rather sketchy:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/b...ring-charges/5527829

I can't tell where this story emanated.