Screw Flake. He is a leftist tool. He thought his election to the senate would secure his and his family's personal wealth on the backs of the American people. Trump punked him out and he is acting like the little bitch he is. He might actually have to go earn a living now.

If you can't look at what is happening with Moore, with Mueller, with the democratic party (and the republicans), and realize that these people are directly threatening the will of the American people to choose their government you are blind. The establishment thinks we are too ignorant to choose who we want to represent us. But instead of waiting for the next election and running a good campaign, they are trying to activly subvert the candidates we did choose, or may choose in the case of Moore. All because they are not part of the secret club.

Disgusting.

The Republican Party really has a lot of Democrat moles.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
McConnell will be a problem

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...rt-on-moore-n2418539

"There's been no change of heart," McConnell said. "I had hoped earlier he would withdraw as a candidate. That obviously is not going to happen."

If elected, Moore would "immediately" be subjected to an ethics committee investigation, McConnell pledged.

Look at the pot calling the kettle black!!!!

McConnell has no room to talk about ethics.

they worked 15 days in November, and plan on working only 10 in December! IIRC, they started out the session with some 330 bills for consideration. They still have more than 300 laying around waiting action.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
If the ethics committee recommends action against Moore, there is a process that leads to a Senate vote. Moore could be expelled by 2/3 of the members voting

You know every DEM would vote to expel, so it would take 19 REP senators to vote to expel.

Would be very very ugly.

So it would. And no sitting (or prospective) Senator would want to stare down the barrel of that precedent.

Imagine a Senate with a Democratic majority of one, two or three Senators, and a Democrat in the crosshairs of an ethics committee investigation. Every Republican would be expected to vote for not seating or for expelling that Democrat or to demand something for voting otherwise. Every other Democrat would be in a position to blackmail the hell out of that Democrat AND the Democratic leadership. Considering what kinds of weirdos, weasels and crooks can get elected to the Senate, that's a can of worms that the Democrats themselves would not want to open.

No, Ethics Committee investigations exist to stall until scandals blow over, or maybe slap someone on the wrist so that the Senate can claim to have 'done something about it', and that's about it. Besides, every member of the committee would have to worry about payback, and people in DC have memories that are as long as their egos are overinflated.

Got an email this AM from the Roy Moore campaign:

As you may have heard, soon to be 'ex-Senator' Jeff Flake is now bragging about donating to radical 'open borders' Democrat Doug Jones' senate campaign.

Talk about low... No wonder conservative Arizona voters have literally run Jeff Flake out of the Senate!

would you like to send a message to Jeff Flake and Mitch McConnell?

Here's how: CANCEL OUT Jeff Flake's donation with your own donation of $100.

**************

So I did just that.

Smooooth

$100 is a joke. Flake did it for publicity and to secure a future job as a "republican" commentor/contributor on CNN or MSLSD.

Pretty sure this isn't going to help jonesy

What the...? Are they for real? It's not even written very well. That's really pretty ridiculous if they're sending out that mailer to blacks.

Roy Moore accuser admits to partial forgery of yearbook.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...its-forged-yearbook/

quote:

Beverly Young Nelson has finally admitted that she forged a portion of the infamous high school yearbook that she and attorney Gloria Allred used as proof of her accusations against U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore.

Credibility : Gone

*poof*

If you see a woman on TV with Gloria Allred, you can be pretty much sure that she should start her remarks with "Once Upon A Time...."

Beverly Nelson, Leigh Corfman, and Tina Johnson all have serious issues of credibility in their claims.

Yet so many jump to assume them to be "credible"

Nelson in the interview says "it sickens me to wonder what may go on with him if he gets into office". Note all of the Moore accusers are from decades ago.

I posted earlier that the 1977 median age of women for first marriage was 20.5 yo

Back then half the women who married did so very shortly after high school. Very few women went to college.

Today the median age of women in first marriage is 27.

Please read the thread. Just look up the page a couple of posts, please.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
Please read the thread. Just look up the page a couple of posts, please.

Crap missed it....

quote:

Originally posted by rduckwor:

Felons should never have the vote again, and we gave it to them.

The good news is that most will reoffend and lose their status again.

Roy Moore has 7 point lead in latest poll.

http://www.al.com/news/index.s...ncart_river_home_pop

A new Alabama Senate poll released Friday has Republican Roy Moore holding a solid lead over Democrat Doug Jones.

Change Research has Moore with 51 percent support to Jones' 44 percent.

That's an improvement from Moore over late November when Change had him with a 49-44 advantage.

The poll was conducted Tuesday through Thursday, sampling 2,443 registered voters with a weighting based on "predicted likelihood of voting in this election." About 74 percent of the poll participants said they voted in either the Democratic or Republican primary. The margin of error was 2 percent.

Undecided voters appear to be breaking for Moore, according to the poll. Change Research said those who have decided who they will support in the past week, 61 percent said Moore. Another 7 percent of poll participants who said they have made up their minds said they still might change it before Tuesday's election.

Overall, the poll said 4.6 percent of participants are still undecided.

The allegations against Moore made by women who -- when they were teens and Moore was in his 30s, said he made unwanted romantic or sexual advances - appear to be having minimal damage, according to the poll. Change said that even if Moore announced the allegations were true, 54 percent of Moore's voters would "probably" or "definitely" still vote for him. Only 21 percent said they "definitely" would not vote for Moore in those circumstances.

Those surveyed were split on whether they believed the allegations to be true: 41.3 percent said they believed the allegations, 41.1 percent said they didn't and 17.6 said they were unsure.

Asked when they made up their minds who they would vote for, 83 percent said more than a month ago. The first allegations against Moore were made in a Washington Post story on Nov. 9.

Meanwhile, poll participants showed support for President Trump. Asked to rate Trump's performance so far on a scale of 1 to 10 - with 10 being the best - 48 percent gave Trump an 8, 9 or 10. Meanwhile, 41 percent gave Trump a 1, 2 or 3.

But Trump's endorsement on Monday of Moore apparently meant nothing to the poll participants - 94.8 percent said the president's support had "no effect."

This article sums it up for me pretty well.

quote:

I'm pretty much done with the sex scandals. They were fun, but they're just going to have to carry on without me. If someone broke the law and you can prove it, prosecute him. If someone violated the rules of his organization, eject him. Other than that, if women have forgotten the fine art of slapping a man in the face, there's not a whole hell of a lot society can do for them. You keep silent for forty years and then ruin a man's career with an unprovable allegation — and that makes you a hero? Not to me.

Link